I have yet find a single useful piece of info from FUD that has not already been chewed to death. Ditto that with links to articles from that bastion of truth: The Inquirer.
Printable View
I have yet find a single useful piece of info from FUD that has not already been chewed to death. Ditto that with links to articles from that bastion of truth: The Inquirer.
you got a point here... i have been thinking the same thing for awhile now but don't know how to go about it... would love to see it happen and i know many of you would too... i'm sure there are enough people out there who would like to see this happen that they would put their names on a petition... the problem lies in that those using sli are us, the proformance chasers... if the best hardware on the market is Nvidia then we are gonna want to buy Nvidia... and therefore they will not take the petition seriously... i mean why would they? yeah lots of people want it but its not hurting sales so why bother? :shocked:
I have strongly been thinking the next card i buy will be ATI just for this reason also...
The point is: buy ATI, hurt Nvidia, sign the stinkin petition... now wheres it at so i can sign it!?:yepp:
well no its not the best motherboard and i'm sure it wouldn't get bought if not for SLI... but they do presently have the best gpu's and we as preformance hungry group want the best graphics... and SLI is the only way to obtain "THE BEST" graphics therefore the vicious circle of life dictates that we must buy their mediocre products or deal with "OK" or "DECENT" graphics paired with a beast of machine...:down: Damn it i want my beast to have "THE BEST" graphics! :up: Thats really the only way we have to show our friends and family that our machine is the best! show them numbers and they look dazed... show them crysis at very high settings and everyone oo's and ah's...
so i ask again... where's the petition?:yepp:
I already spoke with my money (or directing money). $180 for a 3850... so yeah, where's that petition?
Oh no, not again... :p:
Yes this Nvidia Intel Bull :banana::banana::banana::banana: sucks, i know im about to follow Movieman's move and go to ATI just on this bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: alone. I want dual cards but in not keen on nvidia chipset it is flaky and unreliable (for overclockers).
yes, it's call peer-to-peer writes, and it's the protocol or what-have-you that exists in the chipset which then SLI and CF use to work.. the mfgs disable p-to-pw at the driver level if they deem the chipset to not be authorized or whatever.. so hacked drivers can allow SLI and CF on any board with enough pci-e slots and enough bw between them to make it worth while..
You are correct...dual PCB cards such as the GX2 series do use SLI.
However, I'm sure quad SLI is not possible on an Intel Board.
How they differentiate is surely based on the driver detecting the card and chipset and determining what is and is not possible.
The bottom line is that the 9800GX2 is giving Intel SLI... if rumors are correct, the equivalent of dual 8800GTS 512MB cards. In fact, you get SLI with only one fan/cooler instead of having the noise of two fans... What more do you want?
If everyone with an Intel motherboard was serious about wanting SLI, they would buy a GX2 and NOT buy an nVidia POS motherboard... this would send a message to nVidia that there is a real market for SLI on Intel while you also benefit from having the most kick-arse graphics solution available. Whether they offer it in discrete cards or two high-end cards sandwiched together... do you really care?
Nvidia....... take note you greedy bastards! You will STILL MAKE MONEY if you allow SLI on intel chipsets. God damn the people in charge there must be borderline retarded.
I don't get it. What is nvidia known for? Video cards. How will they make more money? Allow SLI on intel chipsets. Seems like a no brainer to me. Who cares if you lose a percentage of sales on your motherboards!!?? The money you make selling more video cards should offset that. Stupid.
Mmmm...this depends on what you term as "crappy." 2 GT cards, or 2 GTS cards perform better than an Ultra hands down. If you shop wisely, you can pick up 2 of these cards cheaper than an ultra as well. Getting better performance for less money running SLI is a nice deal.
Yeah, I agree... A GT pretty much performs on par with an Ultra at typical resolutions... any 8800 is going to work well in SLI and provide good bang for the buck... which is why a 9800GX2 is probably a really good choice for Intel owners who wish they had SLI. But someone who wants to SLI an 8600 is fooling themselves if they think that's a good solution... they should just buy a GT instead.
You're not getting the point that i'm trying to make. Sure i know that it's pointless to do SLI unless you are running higher end cards. But your average consumer does not know this. Hence nvidia will be able to sell more cards and make more $$$ which is what it's all about anyway. Nvidia's bottom line will get bigger if they use their freakin heads and allow SLI for all. That's the point i'm trying to make here.
lol are you trying to sell 9800's you sound like a sales rep :rolleyes:
2 cards (8800's of course) used well could and would detroy a single 9800GX2. better for power supply to cores & mem, better for cooling (both gpu & mem), if you stuff up something and blow a card its not a 2 for 1 deal in that regard too, and 2 cards will always be more attractive than one because, well , its 2 cards :p:
the fact nvidia have not implemented SLi on intel chipsets is realy beginning to demonstrate their fear. nvidias chipsets used to be good performance wise, but now they suck badly, and it appears they are desperately clinging to SLi to keep their mobo market afloat. who in their right mind would buy a POS nvidia mobo now if it wasnt for SLi lol? They have castrated their potential total profits by this, its really poor marketing imo. I love nvidia cards, but they can do without my cash for keeping the full potential of the 8800's from me.