Runs fine at 1920x1200, High settings, no AA (E6850, 8800GTX, 2GB Ram, Vista):
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...md/crysis2.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...md/crysis1.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...md/crysis5.jpg
Printable View
Runs fine at 1920x1200, High settings, no AA (E6850, 8800GTX, 2GB Ram, Vista):
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...md/crysis2.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...md/crysis1.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...md/crysis5.jpg
hmmm im slightly dissapointed. Finished work, downloaded demo, installed, auto detect, 4 fps :( :eek: this would be very high settings with aa on 16q though. I thought my system would be able to play this, ahh well when water cooling comes looks like i need some oc'ing (btw QX6850 is at 3Ghz)
so been playing it on medium and 2 aa for 20+ fps. something seems very wrong here :shocked:
Which driver are you using? Also, what's your resolution?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost326267
Best Regards :toast:
I finally figured out hiow to get it to play on Vista64, you need to run the exe file from the bin32 folder, not 64. Anyways, it looks great but runs like cr@p on my card.
Surprisingly it runs alright on medium at 1680x1050 on the x1950Pro. Hovers around 25-30fps which is minimum playable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulburner
I guess I thought graphics would be better from looking at all the screen shots the producers posted over the last year or so. Specifically the facial screen shots with all the detail. Don't get me wrong some graphics like the lighting are the best I've ever seen, no doubt, and the water is truly amazing. Very realistic. Just expected more. Hype tends to build that factor.Quote:
Originally Posted by DTU_XaVier
I think a lot of people are unhappy about buying a 500$+ video card within the last month or so and expecting to be able to play the new games at their highest settings only to be disappointed, myself included. Think I would have been better off holding onto my 7900gtx a little longer because I could play all the current games at their highest settings already.
e6850 8800gts 4gb ram, and its unplayable in medium high and very high (of course), i dont know what is the problem, i reinstalled the windows and the problem persist, maybe a little increase of frame rate but stills unplayable, im using windows vista 64 with all update including the hotfix for 8xxx series, its unplayable with both executables 32 and 64 bits, the 64 bits is the hell 10 minuts falling on parachute :S, and using forceware beta for crysis, the rest of games run perfectly.
any recommendation?
sorry for my english.
I love the Sandbox editor ... you can drop in at any point in the demo, add weapons, fly around the map, etc, also try completing the demo in delta mode, the Koreans get a lot smarter, ... all in all it looks like being a great game
How do you get to the editor, I couldn't find it.Quote:
Originally Posted by WSX
my piece:
Athlon 64 3800+ 2.41+Ghz
2GB XMS Corsair
eVGA 7900 256RAM GT (BIOS 5.71.22.35.24)
nVidia 6.14.11 driver
BENCHMARK CPU
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 1500, Recorded Time: 44.62s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 74.32s, Average FPS: 20.18
Min FPS: 10.44 at frame 1095, Max FPS: 32.69 at frame 122
Average Tri/Sec: 13545029, Tri/Frame: 671154
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.07
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 69.27s, Average FPS: 21.65
Min FPS: 10.44 at frame 1095, Max FPS: 39.85 at frame 117
Average Tri/Sec: 14608617, Tri/Frame: 674612
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.07
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 65.75s, Average FPS: 22.81
Min FPS: 10.44 at frame 1095, Max FPS: 39.85 at frame 117
Average Tri/Sec: 15363209, Tri/Frame: 673384
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.07
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 69.50s, Average FPS: 21.58
Min FPS: 10.44 at frame 1095, Max FPS: 39.94 at frame 117
Average Tri/Sec: 14546101, Tri/Frame: 673941
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.07
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
BENCHMARK GPU:
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 73.18s, Average FPS: 27.33
Min FPS: 17.12 at frame 1939, Max FPS: 40.95 at frame 977
Average Tri/Sec: 19669272, Tri/Frame: 719652
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.27
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 67.04s, Average FPS: 29.83
Min FPS: 16.94 at frame 1955, Max FPS: 47.19 at frame 100
Average Tri/Sec: 21716492, Tri/Frame: 727983
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 67.72s, Average FPS: 29.53
Min FPS: 16.34 at frame 1943, Max FPS: 47.19 at frame 100
Average Tri/Sec: 21485970, Tri/Frame: 727475
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 67.68s, Average FPS: 29.55
Min FPS: 16.34 at frame 1943, Max FPS: 47.19 at frame 100
Average Tri/Sec: 21514250, Tri/Frame: 727998
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
...please translate in english don't understand what it means:shrug:
anyone with a quad core,2gb ram and 8800gtx fps???
cheers
anyone try this demo with similar setup on different OS's? Im curious to see Vista 64bit vs 32bit vs XP.
Well, I'm not impressed at all. Not a smooth running game & my specs are more than enough. Q6600 @ 3.6 w/6GB of RAM RAID0 8800GTS @ 1003/600 Vista64. I think the game to get this season is COD4:shocked:
Well, i managed about 20fps on average, sometimes a little more than that (upto 26fps in places) on the rig in my sig.
Settings were at 1440x900 all at medium. I'm happy with that though, i only paid £117 for this card back in March, pleased its held up so well. Picking up an 8800GT and another 2gb OCZ DDR2-667 via my girlfriend this week, so i'll be even happier :)
169.01 my ass!!! It screwed up the game for me. Getting 7fps where I used to get 20+. Ridiculous!
Sandbox Editor how to ... http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...781142&page=37Quote:
Originally Posted by Deux
Why is everyone having problems with the beta drivers? I was getting unplayable framerates at medium, but as soon as i installed the new forceware drivers getting 60 fps on medium dropping to 40 in places but on average around 50fps?
I haven't had any problems with the beta drivers. I suggest you guys do a driver sweeper/cleaner removal and install 169.01 drivers and also install the Nov runtimes for Direct X. I've been playing in DX10 at 1680x1050 with all settings on high (not very high) and it is playable (15-45 fps) and I'm using q6600 @ 3.6ghz, 4gb ram, and 8800gtx stock. Additionally DX9 runs at 1920x1200 at these same settings and is playable. If you want over 60 fps I suggest you go to DX9 mode and bring down the resolution...
anyone know why I'm getting this when I try to open Sandbox editor?
25-30fps average framerate on both the CPU and GPU timedemo batch files.
E6850 @ 3.6Ghz (400x9)
2Gb DDR2 @ 1000 5-5-5-15
8800GTS 640Mb
163.76
Sad.
This is what I get with beta drivers!
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/473...8001947ef6.jpg
After some tweaking/restarting:
XP32
1920x1220
NoAA
Everything else Maxed
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/6...8002404co3.jpg
Same res, shadows low, water med, no post processing(gives me nausea anyways).
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/7...251850cfv8.jpg
Above settings=decent game even in high foliage/multiple AI areas. Occasionally dips to 20 though.
http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/5...325634cvo9.jpg
Yeah the framerate can be decent when tweaked.
Run the GPU timedemo though and you'll be surprised how inadequate your hardware really is.
169.01 gave me another 3-4fps over 163.76.
I'm not sure if this demo is multi-threaded or not, but I only manage 25-28fps average in the CPU timedemo with an E6850 @ 3.6Ghz :(
fixed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Budwise
me too :D!!
About performance on lower-end hardware.
First of all, i benched(via BAT files in the bin32 dir) my rig(sig) in 1280*1024 w\o AA on 163.71\XP SP2 and got these results:
GPU
lo - 31.25\45.58\68.61
med - 9.56\17.93\25.24
hi - 3.03\8.38\11.92
CPU
lo - 16.88\45.08\56.51
med - 7.59\16.33\21.65
hi - 2.99\7.95\11.52
BTW, it would be interesting for me to compare my bench results with someone either on 7900 GS\GT or GF 8600\R2600.
Next - i played alot with settings and GPU bench and found the best settings for me.(i did set textures to high, engine seem to have tuned this setting, but textures still look very nice)
http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/3...4412tx3.th.jpg
And i'm - generally - getting an average 30-45 fps, sometimes, especially when large amount of objects is being precached, such as in the first level start - it may drop to 20-25 for a few secs, but it does not disturb me so much. In some places, i can even get 50+.
Graphics - of course are not that good, especially light\shadowing on objects in world is poor compared even to that on "med" shadows, but... graphics are pretty nice and clean indeed, and water is something amazing :) And, as for me, the most beautiful thing in any 3d game is a high framerate. :)
In general - the "Shaders" are the most "heavy" setting gpu-wise, but that's giving the greatest visual candy for you as well. Try to compare how grass\trees look on low and high shaders setting - you'll understand me.
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/2...5239qp2.th.jpghttp://img141.imageshack.us/img141/5...5809tx1.th.jpghttp://img140.imageshack.us/img140/2...0368gg8.th.jpghttp://img139.imageshack.us/img139/7...0656tn5.th.jpg
http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/5...1221bw0.th.jpghttp://img134.imageshack.us/img134/4...1635ol0.th.jpghttp://img132.imageshack.us/img132/7...2281vy1.th.jpghttp://img147.imageshack.us/img147/9...3189zp7.th.jpg
And in conclusion, 'bout CPU and physics. I tried to bench "low" and "med" settings only.
Results in cpu bench were 22.41\38.92\52.53 and 14.70\27.78\52.72 respectively. So, if you've got a "weak" CPU - drop the physics first of all and see for performance. It can make your shooting experience a lot better in a very dynamic moments.
Have tried 163.69 and 163.75 beta drivers both with the same results :(Quote:
Originally Posted by DTU_XaVier
resolution is 1280x1024 native
Still looks ok ok medium but I would like to see the hardware list to get decent fps on max settings