If there's no busted cores .:eek:
Since the debut they are busted ?Or it is because it was too much pushed .:D
Printable View
If there's no busted cores .:eek:
Since the debut they are busted ?Or it is because it was too much pushed .:D
Holy hell Gorod, it may not work as quad anymore but it sure does scream in single-core mode! :shocked:
Nice one :toast:
OMG, awesome chip! is this the first sub 9s with quadcore?
regards
That is, once again, some amazing TOP CLASS clocking my friend:toast: I am speechless...:)
this is amazing man :)
Awesome, Gorod !!
That chip is insane Gorod!!! So do I see a 2k1 run coming up at 5.5-5.6? :up:
Good freq,but i think you can do better about spi time ;)
:up: :up: :up:
Unfortunatelly it won't do well with ONE core enabled.....It NEEDS two cores to "shine".... :(Quote:
Originally Posted by harleybro
Thank you Hipro5 :toast: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
Oh no it was fine when i bought it , it worked great for 2 weeks for daily usage in my 24/7 comp with all 4 cores and overclocked great too (~ 4GHz with warercooling easy 3d bench stable ) . So no intel's fault here for sure :DQuote:
Originally Posted by redratamd
heh yeah ... it's my super pi toy now :DQuote:
Originally Posted by G H Z
not very sure about that :)Quote:
Originally Posted by PPInDaHouse
Thank you SIOUX :toast: I am very happy with results too :yepp: :)Quote:
Originally Posted by SIOUX
With 2 cores probably not , well not 5.6 for sure :) , but 5.45-5.5 possible (it did AM3 @ 5460MHz and it wasnt too hard ) , and it was under 1.90V so i guess with a little more volts bump and good temp controll 5.5GHz in dual core mode is possible for 3d01 with that chip :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by harleybro
You right m8 , very unefficient time for that freq. , i wasnt going for good pi times this time anyways so no big deal , just wanted to see how far can it go with 1 core :) But next time will use a tweaked OS and better ram :yepp: and maybe can get a better (faster) times :)Quote:
Originally Posted by c1rcu1tburn3r
Yeah i remember that to , back in FX57/Opteron170 times got a chance to play with them both and did some comparo benches to see how much faster dual core is :) , it's funny how old bench like 3d01 can use 2 cores so well :clap: .Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
Anyways i will try it with 3d soon , not making big hopes , but maybe just maybe it can do 5.5 with 2 cores , last time i remember AM3 was very easy with 5.46 and 2 cores enabled so maybe with a little more "push" it will ran 3d01 at speeds close to that :)
Congratz !!! Great clocking and really awesome chip you got here :eek: ! Time to see how high will go mine with only 1 core I think ;)
Bye
p€p|n0r@ng
Awesome job!
Is this the first 65nm chip to hit in the 8s SPI?
EDIT: I see that was already asked.
I think it is?
Poor 2 other cores.
Great work nonetheless!
Thanks for the input. :up: :D I haven't tried disabling down to one core and was thinking that's all it needed.Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
Again you are doing an amazign archivement ;).
Congrats, that is a really good qx6850.
Keep pushing it.
Gorod, 8.938s Congratulations!!
Nice chip you have! :toast:
There are a lot of chip that goes up when 1core.
There is chip also that doesn't go up at all either with 1core....
Kitchen paper used for the be dewy prevention is good.:up:
Gorod, one question. In the other topic, the temp over 140 degrees is positive or negative? And is it correct?
amazing cpu
:shocked:
Alot of temp sensors show 255c for -1c, 254c for -2c etc, so his temp was probably something like -116c:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Igorq
My old 170 reached 96c during a 64k spi run once. I wonder how hot it was when I booted... probably like 140 or something:D But it's still alive!