Printable View
So we two are running virtually identical systems, apart from me missing 2gigs of RAM, and only having a dual-core 6600...Quote:
Originally Posted by ketchupwfries
Gives me hopes of running the game properly at 1680x1050 (I assumes you mean 1680? :p: )
Best Regards :toast:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTU_XaVier
Are you in beta? I can't disclose much (I dont want to get into trouble with NDA rules), but personally I think if your specs are like mine, you should be able to run at 1680x1050 all on high settings with 2x AA and DX10 with no problem.
Crysis is being optimized for dual and quad cores - I'm not sure how much of a performance difference there will be with dual vs quads though.
Can't wait for the SP demo! :up:
30fps average is very different then 60fps average which is much much much more playable.
it should be run at least like the newest console the xbox 360 which is 1080p and 60fps.
crysis as we see for sure will become the next game benchmark on the net.
in times of multicpu and multigpu a high end pc should run it above the average 60 fps and faster then the mightiest console!
this is FPS after all - the game that becomes benchmark for graphics. and one of the heaviest applications there are.
to have 60fps average and aa*4 and hdr, (or crysis won't support hdr?)which is much better .........i don't see that happens with today's hardware of any kind. :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillll
30FPS is excellent when outdoors in the MP beta. No one, no matter what system specs they have, is going beyond that average. Again, the game is far from optimized so performance in beta absolutely does not represent the final version.
60fps average with all settings on Ultra High? Probably not until the new nVidia G90 chips are out. Although I would think ppl would come close with 8800GTX SLI setup and an OC'ed quad.
I'm currently playing the beta will all on High (not Ultra) and 1680x1050 and it looks *@#$ amazing. I can only imagine on ultra... :shocked:
Man I'm running the beta at 1920*1080 and the performance is BRUTAL! I get about 15-35 FPS (sometimes higher indoors) maxed, and it doesn't seem to help to lower the settings...
I tried adding these lines to the system.cfg file. I read a repost of this in the gamespot forums.
Anyone know of a good Crysis forum with beta discussion?Quote:
g_useProfile = 1
r_ShadersAsyncCompiling = 1
r_driver = "DX9"
net_wmi_check_interval = 0
r_UseEdgeAA = 1 (Smooths edges without much cost)
r_sunshafts = 1
r_UsePom = 1 (Parralax Occlusion Mapping)
q_ShaderGlass = 4
sys_budget_videomem = 1024 (Set to your amount of video memory)
r_TexQuality = 4
r_PostProcessEffectsFilters = 3
sys_budget_sysmem = 3072
r_VegetationSpritesTexRes = 128
r_ShowNormals = 1
r_ShadersStaticBranching = 0
r_ShadersDynamicBranching = 1
r_TextureCompressor = 0 (Disables texture compression)
r_VegetationSpritesAlphaBlend = 1 (Good for plants)
r_OceanRendType = 1
Unfortunately no, but I'm dying to try out the game....Quote:
Originally Posted by ketchupwfries
The only problems for me I see are:
1. I need an extra 2gigs of RAM (they're dirt cheap these days anyway)
2. I need Vista... meh..
Other than that, I'm good :D
Also, I might need a DVD-drive (my old one went the way of the dodo two days ago :( ), but that's just a hunch :p:
Best Regards :up:
The only thing I need is a time machine! Just ordered a msi p35 platinum, 2gigs of ocz reapers and a intel c2d 6750!Quote:
Originally Posted by DTU_XaVier
Playing on a 1280x1024 screen with a single 8800gts 320.
hope frames will be fine...
its brutal on my 640mbGTS 640/1500/1950
i set my res to 1380x768 max detail and it is quite playable. once i go native res though its a slide show
they gotta alot of work ahead of them. quite a few bugs. but i have faith they will pull it off. they have too, or theres gonna be a boatload of angry gamers at their doorsteps
I play 1280x1024 at a gts but I don't have a key :D
my new hardware is comming! When te hardware is installed I'm going to look for someone who has a key for me for testing :D
emm.. sorry for offtopic and for asking the same stupid question for 3rd time - don't any1 here have an already unneeded beta key?
or is there any way to get the beta running w\o activation(i know about crack\warez policies on the forum, so please if u'll answer this part of question - do it via PM ;) )
So any of you fellas played the new beta version 3? It apparently has many performance tweaks and visual additions/tweaks.
I have.Quote:
Originally Posted by binormalkilla
looks better but for some reason I get a big FPS hit when shaders are on high.
with shadders at low and shadows at low rest all high I get 40's -80s FPS
RES 1650x1080
Trying to download the new beta, but my network's borged...
So it's a tedious process of trying to make it comply to my will :( :p:
Best Regards :toast:
the 3rd beta version is free! fileplanet.com!
if you create an account on fileplanet you have free acces to the 3rd beta!
let me see some benchmarks guys!
The game better be well playable with the 8800GTS or it will not collect as many players as it should. There are a lot of people who have not yet even moved to DX10 cards and I don't think Crytek would want to lose all the potential buyers. I am not even touching the beta as I can't see it being a good judge of how the real thing will run. As far as I am concerned at the moment Crysis is building a lot of hope and it's not going to be as great as people are expecting and foaming at the mouth over. I hope that I am proved wrong but I just can't see it being as great a game as people think.
Well the graphics are tremendously better, especially in reference to the water, smoke, and explosions.
There is a new graphical bug regarding textures and shaders, where some textures appear as yellow geometry labeled 'shader' and 'compiler'.....lawl
Well all in all I'll have to say that this optimizations are very promising. I practically doubled my FPS from beta 2 to beta 3......so the retail will be insane. Everyone participating in the beta be sure to include feedback at this forum. The password for the sections is in you invite email.
http://www.forumplanet.com/crysisbeta/
Hmm can some help me with the config.
With file are it ?
I dont know with file you use and where it is located.
I want to test the extra high settings that now are grey out.
Here's a pack of 124 screenshots (.PNG) of Beta3 with almost playable settings played on a 3.6GHz Q6600 + 8800GTS 320MB (50% OC'ed):
http://www.helsinki.fi/~llounent/Cry...creenshots.rar (200MB)
edit:
http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/9...550918rwg7.jpg
http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/7...242561ret4.jpg
Playing at almost playable with everything high in-game and no adjustments in the driver, at 1680x1050, with the setup in my sig.. Seeing as they're touting large FPS-gains in the final release, I should be A-OK :D
Best Regards :toast:
Largon you call 28 fps and lower a playable framerate ?
My GTS @ 580/1800 give the same FPS and thats are with a D950 @ 4,0Ghz
So i see no difference between my CPU and yours.
You have overclocked the 8800GTS to ? whats your clock now ?
Edit:
Sorry i forgot you running on a higher resolution.
Thats is that you have that fps of course.
Can you take some screenshots with 1280x1024 resolution
With the same clocks as you have set with the screenshots above here..
Thans already.
Snake_Eyes,
Key words: "almost playable"
Are you on 2x AA and using these tweaks?
Cause I am.
The card is @ gpu:702 / shader:1836 / ram:2088.
I'm retarted, I can't download it. I signed up, but it always asks me to buy something instead of allowing me to DL the beta. :(
I was going to see how well it runs w/ good DX9 hardware and a quad.
EDIT: I have a 1920x1200 monitor, so I can see how crappy it looks in HD. XD
Snake Eyes,
1280x1024, 2x AA [edit: edge antialiasing, not really 2x AA] + the proverbial "hidden extra eye candy" ->
http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/6...180026rng5.jpg
http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/6...200146rep6.jpg
edit:
btw,
:confused:Quote:
(...)
My GTS @ 580/1800 give the same FPS and thats are with a D950 @ 4,0Ghz
So i see no difference between my CPU and yours.
(...)
In games a 3.6GHz Core 2 is 60-140% faster than a 4GHz P4.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=2802&p=9
Maybe you over-estimate P4 a bit?