_Manny_ , something is seriously wrong there. I have no idea how a e6750 @ 3520 MHz and dual channel ram @ 1320 MHz gets 19.XXX sec in SPI 1M. My e6300 @ 3.43 GHz & ram @ 980 MHz (4-4-4-12) gets 16.5xx secs......i have 2mb less cache too......
Printable View
_Manny_ , something is seriously wrong there. I have no idea how a e6750 @ 3520 MHz and dual channel ram @ 1320 MHz gets 19.XXX sec in SPI 1M. My e6300 @ 3.43 GHz & ram @ 980 MHz (4-4-4-12) gets 16.5xx secs......i have 2mb less cache too......
Yep LNē (-150°C) and 3.25V real. P35 under LNē too (1.85V real)Quote:
Originally Posted by overcrash86
I did 650MHz CAS3 but one of my member (seb97133) did 657 or 658Mhz I don't remember.Quote:
Originally Posted by over@locker886
i hope this was a bug and not some "tweak" to get attention :eh:
Why are you using memset 3.0? Why do you insist on cheating? Someone ban this moron's ip from the forums. He's booting at Cas 5, clearly. You're about the 10th idiot to come here and try to scam a cas 3 record.
well now you've upset Hutch too :D:ROTF:
Is it just LN2 mist around -15c like your older benches or do you have 'ram-pots' now?Quote:
Originally Posted by jmax_oc
hutch
i've seen some really cool RAM pots actually ;)
Some people just don't listen.
LOL not use MemSet 3.0
:clap: very good in math... multiplier @ 6 ... ram 2:3Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
460 mhz x 6 = 2760 mhz
:shakes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Manny_
setfsb in the second and third sshot _you_ posted shows real freq, alas 4xx*8, while in the next few sshots clockgen picks the idle value that with EIST on will be 4xx*6 .Quote:
Originally Posted by _Manny_
give up while you're ahead pal . :rolleyes:
^^^actually CPUz is MUCH more reliable in reporting RAM frequency than SetFSB or memsetQuote:
Originally Posted by Slay0r
He's talking about CPU Frequency, not RAM frequency dinos ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
I used Home Ram ram pot ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Hutch
Congrats Manny, the record is all yours. Props to you on the hard work.
P.S Your record is not the Cas 3 WR, rather, the record for the most pathetic Cas 3 memset cheat attempt on XS! GOOD JOB LOSER!
_Manny_: Try another board if you can, and post the CPU-Z CPU screenshot along with the SPi times too or as you can see, many guys won't believe you and will jump to any other conclusion (usually name calling and abuse), even if you were genuine and uninformed about the bug.
Oh, and the guys saying 3400-3500Mhz need to check the link _Manny_ gave at the start: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=242375
How would RAM stay at 672.5MHz 2:3 divider if that 6x divider was speedstep? :yepp:
_Manny_, sorry bud, but until you post some CPUz screenies or try this on a different mobo, I'm calling shens.
what i wonder is how he managed to get cpu-z validation?
There are several bugs that can help you do that.Quote:
Originally Posted by naokaji
I wonder if those DDR3-2700+ numbers are still up there in the rankings of x86secret :D