K10 Scores starting to surface

Now you got me going..Going to crank down the other machine(64 bit) and see what happens..I got a feeling that there's going to be some surprised and maybe unhappy people here..back in a few..this takes a few minutes to do..server hardware..:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kl0012

http://images.people.overclockers.ru/120410.png

---

Core totally owns it in wPrime.

Let's wait for some Penryn scores.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nn_step

now to make sure that the OS isn't effecting it, 64bit may be required.

---

If anything, the score is going to be higher on x64 os .

oh boy....... I can see why AMD kept silent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Movieman

Now you got me going..Going to crank down the other machine(64 bit) and see what happens..I got a feeling that there's going to be some surprised and maybe unhappy people here..back in a few..this takes a few minutes to do..server hardware..:D

---

Yeah, I'm eager to see dual clover @2G cinebench R10 under 64bit windows

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by savantu

Core totally owns it in wPrime.

Let's wait for some Penryn scores.

---

Not realy.
It is 2.66GHz 2xXeon.
From the russian site.
http://forums.overclockers.ru/viewto...er=asc&start=0

Assuming 100% clock scaling
dual K10 @ 2.66G will yield 8.00 sec and 246.17 sec in wprime.

unless every revision posts the SAME info on CPU-Z this has to be a B0

= EVT sample which are supposed to have bad performance....

i wait for final benches with final revisions :rolleyes:

From the other clover: Win2K3 ent 64 bit at 2000mhz:
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/1...e102000eg0.jpg

SPI 1M
http://img.coolaler.com.tw/images/zm...mlwemyzmzk.jpg

PI1M @ 2G

Edit: Damn you, zaarath :P

Ouch!!!!

Bad News : So far it's down in Cinebench, wPrime and Superpi

Good News: All are synthetic and not real world benches

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by generics_user

unless every revision posts the SAME info on CPU-Z this has to be a B0

= EVT sample which are supposed to have bad performance....

i wait for final benches with final revisions :rolleyes:

---

Well, it's certainly a valid concern, but aren't all EVT samples clocked @ 1.6G?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Movieman

From the other clover: Win2K3 ent 64 bit at 2000mhz:
[IMG][/IMG]

---

Thank you

If it's of any matter my best on that 64 bit machine on SP1M is 15.562s at 3330mhz..
That's an untouched OS and stock volt chips with DDR2-667FBDimms

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by zaarath

Well, it's certainly a valid concern, but aren't all EVT samples clocked @ 1.6G?

---

vr-zone got one @ 1.8ghz

but is this one really an ES, if it is supposed to be one then i smell BS because amd ES never show processor numbers...

EDIT: second scrrenshot shows full information, well we'll see :)

I sure hope those are the sucky ones. If this is retail, run for your Q6600's while they are still below 300$!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nn_step

Thank you

---

My friend, are you sure you want to say that to me after seeing this?
I fully expected to be on the losing end of this not the other way around.
Then add in that Penryn is 9% faster than my Clovers at the same clock.
Honestly, I am sorry to see this and I think you know me well enough to know I'm dead serious.

I don't think this is an ES.......

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Movieman

My friend, are you sure you want to say that to me after seeing this?
I fully expected to be on the losing end of this not the other way around.
Then add in that Penryn is 9% faster than my Clovers at the same clock.
Honestly, I am sorry to see this and I think you know me well enough to know I'm dead serious.

---

If that came from anyone else, I would have called you a Fanboy but its not the case, it's the truth. I truly am disappointed at the initial results.
I know these are preliminary results and synthetic, but in your experience movie man, how have these synthetic results transfered over to real work performance?

Second scrrenshot shows single socket F system with 1 cpu :confused:

EDIT: ok i pass out, this is just as much validated as Theos 30k in 06, no info on the system, the RAM or anything else, i'll pass :shakes: , much smooke around no info, intel ES benches had mor system specs and better screens to back it up :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by generics_user

Second scrrenshot shows single socket F system with 1 cpu :confused:

---

It shows "Processor #8"...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Movieman

My friend, are you sure you want to say that to me after seeing this?
I fully expected to be on the losing end of this not the other way around.
Then add in that Penryn is 9% faster than my Clovers at the same clock.
Honestly, I am sorry to see this and I think you know me well enough to know I'm dead serious.

---

I too expected amd to take back the crown, but it seems it's not the case . Perhaps we're too quick to come to conclusions, afterall we don't know how k10 speed scales as the clock increases .

I don't think anybody expected anything great in SPI tbh, afterall 512kb vs 4096kb L2 says it all... what I'm eager to see now is 3d06 cpu scores . Maybe we're in for a surprise ? :shrug:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by n91htmare

If that came from anyone else, I would have called you a Fanboy but its not the case, it's the truth. I truly am disappointed at the initial results.
I know these are preliminary results and synthetic, but in your experience movie man, how have these synthetic results transfered over to real work performance?

---

I have been saying for the last 8 months that these clovers are the damnest things I've ever seen. I can load all 8 cores at 100% and it still doesn't slow down. nn_step can tell you, I run the 2 of these machines at 3157/8mb/1402 at 100% load 24/7 doing DC work..Thats nonstop 100% load except for a few benches and updates since last December..In March this machine had a 99.8% uptime, I remember that figure. I'd done 4 reboots for updates..Thats it..Yea, I could go to work selling these for Intel they are so good.