Well, as we all know Vista is terrible with any video benches. I could run this same setup on XP and prolly get a much better score.. 3DMark is terrible on here as well:D
Printable View
Well, as we all know Vista is terrible with any video benches. I could run this same setup on XP and prolly get a much better score.. 3DMark is terrible on here as well:D
I wish I knew this 12 hours ago, I was running version 9.5 last night at 4.95Ghz.
What did you get on 9.5?Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Here is a lowly 6000+ @ 3.4
http://aycu33.webshots.com/image/237...1355614_rs.jpg
I like the cpu scaling, 1.94x is not bad...
Ply
here's my qx6700 at 3.6Ghz in 64bit under vista x64.
I just ran mine at 3.78ghz... Not to bad:D
http://www.njkidxs.org/cinebench-3780.jpg
Just tried 10x333..
can you say BLUESCREEN!:rofl:
vista 32Attachment 62976
Hey DengYong, what are your voltage settings?
i couldnt pass from 3.2 ghz yet, tried some voltage settings but didnt achieve succsess on reaching 3.4 or 3.6.
Vcore 1.39(reading 1.36 on everest)
1.45 on HT(reading 1.47 on everest)
Cpu VTT 1.45
Memories are @ 900 mhz, 4-4-3-6 and 2 T.
i wonder if theres something wrong with my setup, i dunno, i had to remove battery and start the system without it, to enter bios again, when tried to pass from 3.2 ghz sometimes...
Starting with battery on(and clearing cmos on all the ways) would just freeze me on the bios startup screen, but no response....
any tips on the oc setting?
see my sig for full spec:
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/3066/untitledyb5.jpg
here's mine again (qx6700 at 3.6Ghz) but this time under xp x32.
xp winsin opengl of course .
xp: 6261
vista x64: 4632
I see you remembered to close your :banana::banana::banana::banana: tabs before doing a screenshot ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by veilsidebr
Time for a VID mod MM!Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Maybe it's time to get your nicer config wet. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
I think its time to get a single kentsfield:D
PWN +1 :clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by safan80
I think its time i done a screeny too.. see what i can bring to this.! L)
I run that for another guy for WCG. I do a few benches on it but WCG is it's role in life. That one won't get wet unless it's something he wants to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
That's a possibilityQuote:
Originally Posted by [XC]Atomicpineapple
Why would I want to hinder myself so with only 1/2 the cores meeded to play on cinebench?:DQuote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by safan80
i like women, and you? ;)
This is what I get on my FXs.. Glad to see the AMD scales as good across 2 sockets as the Intel does across its single chip. (4 cores total)
I've got 6.5GB of non :banana::banana::banana::banana: pics of chicks and then if you add the :banana::banana::banana::banana: 30GB lol. of course the :banana::banana::banana::banana: is the first thing to go when I want more free space.Quote:
Originally Posted by veilsidebr
safan80: how nice now we know...
ontopic: Really nice results some of you got, I got like 3 minutes and something, shut it down due to anger of the long time =P
going for a Q6600 in a month :D
veilsidebr here's my volts for 3.4
cpu 1.49v actual, fsb 1.4v, spp 1.40v, mcp 1.50v, ht 1.2v
pci-e @ 130
3.5 takes about 1.55v actual
I don't do benchmarks very often I'm mainly a gamer.
QX6700 @ 3.7
Win Xp Pro 32bit. No tweaks.
I can barely read those numbers.Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] riptide
jeez Rip, do you use a magnified glass to see that?
Well they are...Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
1 CPU: 3747
x CPU: 13000
OpenGL: 6388
And yes, I used a magnifier to get those for you, lol.