amazing...
Printable View
amazing...
are the corsair DDR3 8500s all micron
Great bandwith BA :up:
You make my old Corsairs 6400C3 feelind a litle depressed
Can only obtain 12.524 MB/s at DDR900 3-3-3-3 1T :rolleyes:
http://pedrorocha.planetaclix.pt/DFI...60_Everest.jpg
;)
dont think so, there is no micron on the market yet it seems :(Quote:
Originally Posted by billdavis
Great job BA!
Quite impressed with DDR3 at this early in the game.
Since I was in AMD world when DDR2 came out, was early DDR2 this good as well? I know that the fatbodies were released relatively early.
I wonder if it's the same with DDR3. Ah, too much speculating for now I guess.
Anyway, thanks for showing us the potential of DDR3. :D
Now only if DDR3 would come down in price...
Why do most overclockers want to go back to the old DDR1 like stock voltage :rolleyes:
Nice Results :up:
Awesome results...
I wish I had some DDR3 to play with (too bad is soo expensive :( )
I think its very possible.... Send me 5x Dominator pc2 8888 and 5x Dominator pc2 6400 c3df and ill give it a try...... :D Ill return them ... promise hehe...Quote:
Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
Nice chip;)
hehehe.. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by luihed
no 3d benches? :(
I know you want to send me a kit :)
There's some nice DDR3 results :) Why would you think 13k read bandwidth is out of reach? I have some DDR2 with read bandwidth over 14000 MB/s.
Must be a bugged run.. try Everest Ultimate 4.0.1033 beta version instead
I have the full version, why would it be bugged, and why would the beta be better? (I would have thought full version would be better than the beta)Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
Anyway got a link to it i cant find it? Im more than happy to install & bench again. Alternatively send it to
timbosan@gmail.com
thanks
you should always compare with same software if you can particularly with synthetic benchmarks like this
EVEREST Ultimate Edition Beta Build 1076 seems to be the latest one :shrug:
Lavalys Discussion Forum > Lavalys EVEREST > Beta versions
try these 2 http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/...-Edition.shtml
edit thanks Pyr0 for the link :)
im at work so i cant check right now, but im using one of those latest versions, as it correctly detects my P965 chipset etc. its not a beta version though. its been consistent though, before i got my new ram i was still pulling over 12k read bandwidth.
Here's is my write, copy & latency Everest benches at same settings as the above read bench. Compared to others i have seen they look fine, if not low. I have seen other DDR2 pulling 14K+ read BW too.
EDIT: i removed pics didnt wanna hijack the thread.
Always need to use the same version, otherwise you may as well be comparring Aquamark to 3DMark2003.
14k with 1000 444?
you think you score the same as other people or less?
well show me some more of those 14k results :P
Here's a quote from an Asus Striker review:Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
"Everest measured a bit over 14,000 MB/s at Memory Read test, compare it to the 7764 MB/s it measured with default"
found here: http://it-review.net/index.php?optio...&limitstart=10
and this: Just read an artical at tomshardware and they oc"d an e6300 to 1940 fsb to get 3.4ghz and they"re Everest bench was over 14000.
found here: http://evga.com/forums/tm.asp?m=56159 (i cant find the Toms Hardware review atm)
Ive read others i will add them here if i find em again.
that striker review is 7 months old...
you are using everest ultimate 2006
still kinda weird that newer versions of everest score lower than this old one... weird... maybe it was a bug in the old version?
There is no way my ram would come close to the DDR3. Either the newer versions are scoring too low, or the older (2006) version is scoring too high.Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
well ddr2 CAN get close to these DDR3 scores but what you need is 1000+ 333 or 1300+ 444 i think :D