OPB Does it again with new 32m WR!!! 625mhz ram 5425mhz CPU!!

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-19-2007, 05:39 AM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo

Question is can the 965 achieve the same MHz ?

why not? you mean because of the cold bugs on them or slightly more jittery voltage stability to 680i

vince has already benched the CPU higher i think..............he's not done yet i'm sure .............but this feat from OPB is certainly great considering it's nvidia chipset :)
03-19-2007, 05:43 AM
NiCKE^

Subtimings with NV is the key.
03-19-2007, 05:44 AM
DadoKantz

seeeeeeee..............

Very compliments, with 680 it's very hard to reach this score, probably impossible!! :)
03-19-2007, 05:53 AM
Norz

Wow....im totally impressed......:clap: ...those memtimings are awesome:eek:
03-19-2007, 05:56 AM
ruggero

very good boy,you are the wizzard of fake...but now,tell me,what is the trick?:D
03-19-2007, 06:02 AM
Langley

Master piece of Super Pi Art!!~Congrats!
03-19-2007, 06:14 AM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Subtimings with NV is the key.

:eek: noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo really common now?
03-19-2007, 06:42 AM
Johnny Bravo

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

why not? you mean because of the cold bugs on them or slightly more jittery voltage stability to 680i

vince has already benched the CPU higher i think..............he's not done yet i'm sure .............but this feat from OPB is certainly great considering it's nvidia chipset :)

I actually meant fro ma RAM MHz point of view - this is where the nvidia really has the upper hand
03-19-2007, 06:49 AM
itznfb

^^ exactly. what 965 board is going to take RAM that high WITH those subtimings. i know for me, as soon as i start really tightening subtimings on 965 i start getting unstable real fast.
03-19-2007, 06:49 AM
Vullf

Very nice there mate
03-19-2007, 06:53 AM
before

Quote:

Originally Posted by [XC] itznfb

^^ exactly. what 965 board is going to take RAM that high WITH those subtimings. i know for me, as soon as i start really tightening subtimings on 965 i start getting unstable real fast.

But tighter timings on nF6 don't mean faster times... :)

Nice time indeed. :)
03-19-2007, 06:56 AM
itznfb

Quote:

Originally Posted by before

But tighter timings on nF6 don't mean faster times... :)

Nice time indeed. :)

you mean on 965 it doesn't make as much of difference?
03-19-2007, 06:59 AM
before

no; AFAIK 965 doesn't need to have the nF6 very tight timings to be faster at the end.
03-19-2007, 07:13 AM
Johnny Bravo

Quote:

Originally Posted by before

no; AFAIK 965 doesn't need to have the nF6 very tight timings to be faster at the end.

Perhaps, though I think this can only be applied to a certain degree, at some point the 965 will simply run out of steam even at looser timings, and I believe this could be the opportunity that the nF6 chipset needs to take advantage of the situation - either way though this is going to be great fun, a bit like an AMD Intel battle, who will be the better chipset for Spi ? I look forward to people on both platforms pushing their systems to see who is the victor :toast:
03-19-2007, 07:31 AM
njkid32

I am sure I am not the only mod thats watching this thread so please keep it clean and no accusations/flaming/fighting or a ban will be handed out as fast as you post it. NO OCX vs. XS AT ALL!!!
03-19-2007, 08:18 AM
burton

Man nice scores keep up the good work
03-19-2007, 08:18 AM
NiCKE^

Appreciated njkid32.
03-19-2007, 08:55 AM
before

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo

Perhaps, though I think this can only be applied to a certain degree, at some point the 965 will simply run out of steam even at looser timings, and I believe this could be the opportunity that the nF6 chipset needs to take advantage of the situation

Yea; you may be right... :)

BTW I've tested both chipsets and never succeeded in getting faster times with NF6 clock-for-clock even with tighter timings.
03-19-2007, 09:00 AM
Zeus

This is the stuff that dreams are made of, a good CPU, some very good cooling, awesome ram and a freaking fast 32M run..

Congrats bro! :toast:
03-19-2007, 09:14 AM
Johnny Bravo

Quote:

Originally Posted by before

Yea; you may be right... :)

BTW I've tested both chipsets and never succeeded in getting faster times with NF6 clock-for-clock even with tighter timings.

Yeah this I could believe, in a straight apples for apples comparison the 965 will be faster than the nF6, and AFAIK the 975 is faster again in comparison to the 965 chipset. Then conversely the 975 will top out first in terms of FSB followed by the the 965 then finally the 680i. I would surmise though if someone were to get some serious cooling on the ol' 965 then it would give the nF6 a pretty hard time :)
03-19-2007, 09:43 AM
Misko

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo

and AFAIK the 975 is faster again in comparison to the 965 chipset.

In 32m it isn't even in 1:1 ratio, one other + for 965 is that ram can be set much higher then on 975X, and 32M test is all about what u do with your ram (of course well tweaked win and cpu that can make 5350 32M is must have for WR)
03-19-2007, 12:42 PM
filmbot

Quote:

Originally Posted by njkid32

I am sure I am not the only mod thats watching this thread so please keep it clean and no accusations/flaming/fighting or a ban will be handed out as fast as you post it. NO OCX vs. XS AT ALL!!!

I was very surprised none of that have came up yet, and Im impressed. Hopefully it stays that and its good to see that you also want to keep it clean :)

Back on topic, as Ive already said, great time OPB :toast:
I only dream of having a kit like that :slobber:
03-19-2007, 03:19 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo

I actually meant fro ma RAM MHz point of view - this is where the nvidia really has the upper hand

Johnny i don't know if you've tested 680i against intel chipset but i can tell you right now........for SuperPI P965 wins hands down with looser timings hence why i said what i said.....and people can bench with CAS4 past 650MHz so there's plenty of headroom it's just a matter of having the right CPU that can reach those MHz
03-19-2007, 03:22 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo

Perhaps, though I think this can only be applied to a certain degree, at some point the 965 will simply run out of steam even at looser timings, and I believe this could be the opportunity that the nF6 chipset needs to take advantage of the situation - either way though this is going to be great fun, a bit like an AMD Intel battle, who will be the better chipset for Spi ? I look forward to people on both platforms pushing their systems to see who is the victor :toast:

i've been on nvidia's case through my contact about SPI performance since they sent me the motherboard for testing and they have not addressed it at all that i can tell........guess isn't important enough for them..........
03-19-2007, 05:05 PM
Johnny Bravo

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

Johnny i don't know if you've tested 680i against intel chipset but i can tell you right now........for SuperPI P965 wins hands down with looser timings hence why i said what i said.....and people can bench with CAS4 past 650MHz so there's plenty of headroom it's just a matter of having the right CPU that can reach those MHz

Hardly hands down mate ;)

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=682

Though once I've had a go at the sub 4GHz 1M run on this platform I'll be moving to my QuadGT so then I'll be better able to answer your statement :toast:

Quote:

....and people can bench with CAS4 past 650MHz so there's plenty of headroom

Don't get me wrong here as I just simply want to see this but can you provide me a few screen shots of folk running at this still FSB/CAS on a 965 platform, I'm just curious to see the platform setup, cheers.

John

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page