QX6700 Owners, please post your OCs here.

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-26-2007, 06:17 AM
Drag

Asus P5b Deluxe
Core 2 Extreme 6700 (kentsfield) 1,33v
2gb Gskill pc6400 GA c3
Mach II cooling

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/127648.png
http://82.173.172.10/Rol-Co/1m4g.png
http://rol-co.nl/images/langer.jpg
02-26-2007, 07:00 AM
Speederlander

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drag

Asus P5b Deluxe
Core 2 Extreme 6700 (kentsfield) 1,33v
2gb Gskill pc6400 GA c3
Mach II cooling

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/127648.png
http://82.173.172.10/Rol-Co/1m4g.png
http://rol-co.nl/images/langer.jpg

I see. It's an engineering sample. Not really indicative of actual retail chips.

But impressive.
02-26-2007, 10:32 AM
Hassan

But can you hold that with sustained load, or just a quick superpi 1m?
02-26-2007, 02:45 PM
BarkerD

1 Attachment(s)

QX6700, Asus P5WDH, 2GB TeamXtreme D9GMH, Watercooled (PA120.3 rad, 1/2", Swiftec 655 pump)

3.5GHz - 48degC idle and 65degC load after 8 hours prime
02-26-2007, 10:21 PM
Speederlander

Currently now priming small 8K fft @ 2.66 GHz with 1.14 vcore under load.
02-27-2007, 12:13 AM
aspstein

This was a test i did i while ago.

Cooling was my overklokk singlestager which doesnt get very cold but holds load pretty well.
Temp in bios is about +10C lol

Max fsb and clock
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...anuar07002.jpg

100% stable speed
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...eng_QX6700.png

Didnt do any screens of loadtesting @ 4,14GHz, but I thought it wasnt to bad for an singlestager.
02-27-2007, 01:13 AM
okmijun

Quote:

Originally Posted by loafer87gt

Yeah, I am running an 8800GTX card and the even at idle the temps are fairly high at around 73C. Most of my BSOD are when running OpenGL with 3DSMax, as the screen will temporarily freeze, my sound will start looping, and eventually the system will halt with a BSOD error. The strange thing is the crashes seem much less frequent if I run my machine at the stock speeds as opposed to even a mild overclock. Very frustrating, as when I was running at 355x9 things were super snappy, but the random nv4displ.dll errors were really starting to frustrate me. I am kinda at a loss as to why I get so many nvidia related errors when running things even slightly out of spec.

I just can not believe, that f***n nv4disp.dll BSOD
is from ti4200 prehistorical eon!!!!!
try google>nv4disp.dll fix etc....
VIA used to have some fix for that problem, it did work on some nonVIA based mobos.
ti4200, 5900,6600...and even 8800 have same problem?
Check nV+VIA forums for that fix.
Advice, try ti use D3D instead OGL, it is even more faster in MAX7,8,9.
regards!
02-27-2007, 06:59 AM
PcCI2iminal

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/3...x4startnd3.jpg

P5B DLX
Scythe Infinity + SanAce 260CFM
Room Temp->10C
Bios set -> 1.63v
Windows idle-> 1.53v
load-> 1.45v
03-07-2007, 12:35 PM
pepinorang

Quote:

Originally Posted by nicepun

Hi guys, I would like to compare OCs so if you have a QX6700 please post your OCs and vcore. Thanks.

Some like:

320x12 = 3845GHz 1.55vcore (set in BIOS) FPO/BATCH#: L644B747

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=169838

Hi, What is the real vcore for this frequency ? and is it stable or not ?
03-07-2007, 01:17 PM
fhpchris

3350 mhz Quad prime @ 1.4v on a STORM.
3970 mhz on 1m/wprime 32m @ 1.55v on a STORM.
3910 mhz wprime 1024m
03-07-2007, 01:20 PM
nicepun

Quote:

Originally Posted by pepinorang

Hi, What is the real vcore for this frequency ? and is it stable or not ?

I will more testing but so far 1.55vcore for 320x11 (3.5Ghz) stable as hell. I will measure real vcore and let you know.
03-07-2007, 05:09 PM
TopherTony

http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=4300&thumb=false

vcore was 1.625v
03-07-2007, 08:16 PM
Slammin

1 Attachment(s)

I just got done building my rig a few hours ago and am still messing around, but so far, 3.6GHZ, 1.4 vcore. Temps from 30ish to 48ish so far but have not run anything heavy other than 4 instances of P95 for about 30 minutes, and 500% memtests. This is definitely foreign territory for me because that last intel board I had was the IC7-Max3. Also, when I went for 3.7, I don't know if it was ram, fsb, may both, but it would BSOD before Vista completed loading. PWM temps also shoot up pretty fast after 3.6/1.4vcore, so I think I'll hang around this OC with the CPU and concentrate on RAM now.

This bios on this IN9 is a little scary!

By the way, running 4 sticks of:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820227159

Think I'll get much more from it?
03-07-2007, 08:43 PM
Chosen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slammin

Think I'll get much more from it?

Propably, if you get rid of this Abit (and any Abit) board and buy something else, like Evga, Asus, Gigabyte, DFI, etc.
Have a look here ;)
03-07-2007, 10:05 PM
SLi_dog

Vapochill LS results.

Just the CPU dependant benchmarks.

Pifast - hwbot comparison

http://slidog.bigblog.com.au/data/2/...0220230901.png

PCMark05 - hwbot comparison

http://slidog.bigblog.com.au/data/2/...0220230930.png

wPrime 32M - hwbot comparison

wPrime 1024M - hwbot comparison

Also, 3DMark06

http://slidog.bigblog.com.au/data/2/...0227212121.png
03-08-2007, 02:20 AM
Slammin

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chosen.

Propably, if you get rid of this Abit (and any Abit) board and buy something else, like Evga, Asus, Gigabyte, DFI, etc.
Have a look here ;)

Hmm,

I gues the latest bios must have taken care of it because I am 100% certain, at least by every measure (Everest, benchmarks, etc.) I can make that all cores are clocking together.

I never even booted into an OS with the shipping bios, but I did save it to floppy. If I ever get bored, I may load it just to play, but I doubt I get that bored anytime soon!

Edit:

I just checked with RMClock and sure enough, two cores with multi 11, and two with multi 10! I stand corrected! I hope abit fixes this!
03-08-2007, 06:53 AM
irenic

qx6700 on xbx2 with latest bios..

266x11 = 3ghz, all voltages at default.. stable dual orthos, gaming, 3d benchies, without problem.

266x12 = 3.2ghz, all voltages at default.. unstable orthos for core 3 n 4, but stable gaming, 3d benchies..

will try higher when i got time to play with this new processor :)
03-08-2007, 11:42 AM
Chosen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slammin

Hmm,

I gues the latest bios must have taken care of it because I am 100% certain, at least by every measure (Everest, benchmarks, etc.) I can make that all cores are clocking together.

I never even booted into an OS with the shipping bios, but I did save it to floppy. If I ever get bored, I may load it just to play, but I doubt I get that bored anytime soon!

Download an older version of CPUz, adjust the multiplier upwards (try 11, 12 or 13 for example) and then run CPUz 1.33-1.35, which allows you to see each of the 4 cores separately and get ready for a surprise :)

http://img459.imageshack.us/img459/793/ourtkw4.th.jpg
03-08-2007, 12:08 PM
Rol-Co

easy'r way :D

run s-pi 1m and set affinity to core 1 only and look at the result

run s-pi 1m second time and set affinity to core 4 and look at the result.

you be shokked :eek:
03-08-2007, 12:35 PM
BigBen

1 Attachment(s)

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=160100 with 1.5V
03-08-2007, 01:39 PM
Chosen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rol-Co

easy'r way :D

run s-pi 1m and set affinity to core 1 only and look at the result

run s-pi 1m second time and set affinity to core 4 and look at the result.

you be shokked :eek:

er.. that's exactly what my screenshot is showing: one Spi1M @core1 and one @core3, 3 whole seconds difference, 12x300 from BIOS, 2 cores stuck at 10x300.
03-08-2007, 03:30 PM
JokerCPoC

See My Sig. I'm sure others can do better, But I'm stuck with slow ram, So I'll make do until I can replace It. :D
03-08-2007, 06:27 PM
sdumper

Vcore for the OC in my sig is 1.60 on Striker

Im sure i can go much higher but I I am waiting for a new phase unit before I go higher..

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=169633
03-08-2007, 07:51 PM
RLM

Quote:

er.. that's exactly what my screenshot is showing: one Spi1M @core1 and one @core3, 3 whole seconds difference, 12x300 from BIOS, 2 cores stuck at 10x300.

You can also use the -core parameter in the shortcuts for the latest cpu-z to see what individual cores are set at. RMClock is easier though.

A fix to this is use CrystalCPUID. Example I have my multiplier set to 12x275 right now. If I run CrystalCPUID, go through each core and from functions select 'Intel Enhanced Speedstep Control' one of them shows up with a multiplier of 6. If I then change that to 12, all cores are then overclocked evenly.

I tested this with cinebench and my rendertime dropped from 15 seconds down to 12 seconds, so it does work.

RLM
03-08-2007, 09:33 PM
irenic

i played with 3dmax this morning and yes, the nv driver problem appeared! :(

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page