alpha's Allendale E4300

Nice overclock. May get one of these cpus soon.
Thanks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Evilsizer

why is it some people here think these "Allendales" are conroe core? i dont get it the info is right in front of yall it is a L2 revision,not B2. Different cores and some seem to forget once the B2 conroe cored 63/64's filter out they will be L2 Allendale cores.

---

Yes thats what a lot of ppl are not thinking of so those who may think the present e6300/e6400 is the better core for high overclocks better buy one soon before they all become true Allendales :stick: :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by alpha0ne

Yes thats what a lot of ppl are not thinking of so those who may think the present e6300/e6400 is the better core for high overclocks better buy one soon before they all become true Allendales :stick: :D

---

Well I would wait until those E6300s and E6400s get 4 MB L2 caches....you can look at it that way too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by alpha0ne

I am reasonably sure that CoreTemp is NOT reading temps correctly as they do not correspond with Speedfan that I have adjusted to match coretemp when ...

---

Sorry, but you have no idea. Read what CoreTemp actually does! http://www.overclockers.com/articles1378/ Especially page 2: the T-Junction.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Unbornchild

Sorry, but you have no idea. Read what CoreTemp actually does! http://www.overclockers.com/articles1378/ Especially page 2: the T-Junction.

---

No I reckon alph is onto something, there is something different happening there

Here's the temps from mine:-
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q...emp-odd-wp.png


With my E6600 and this same board temps between Coretemp and TAT were always withing a degree or two of one another... as you can see in the screeny everything is way off, I wouldn't trust any of them.

It seems like TAT for whatever reason thinks that the E4300 has a Tjunction of 100C...
If you look at the temps, there's a 15C difference between the readings, correlating to the 100C vs 85C in Tjunction.

funny though tat also thinks the cpu is a P-M when it is not.

something else thats strange I found is ever since I installed vista TAT reads higher than coretemp lol

before they both read the same, now since vista core temp gives me my same old idle and load temps it and TAT did before and TAT is up to 10C hotter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Unbornchild

Sorry, but you have no idea. Read what CoreTemp actually does!

---

No need to be rude :slapass:

Since lowering Vcore CoreTemp has been performing as it should so maybe its just an anomaly ???

I have found the lowest possible Vcore set in bios @ 3.20GHz fully torture stable to be 1.4125V with my crappy Anus due to the usual Anus massive Vdroop™

With a board with better power reg the bios Vcore should be ~ 1.365V actual which is excellent for low heat tolerant rigs such as an HTPC :clap:

I will be installing this e43 into my ga 965P-DS3P soon for further testing :banana:

Heres a dual 32M @ 3.20GHz whilst browsing

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b2...e/32Mx2E43.jpg

I ran a few tests using the x8 multi this morning and found that I could run @ 3.20GHz torture stable using .0125 less Vcore than when using the x9 multi ?????? :confused:

Can anyone confirm ??/