yup yup really nice.. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
philips hope you try also the DFI RD600.. :woot: I'll be getting thi board son.. :D
thanks for sharing.. :rocker:
Printable View
yup yup really nice.. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
philips hope you try also the DFI RD600.. :woot: I'll be getting thi board son.. :D
thanks for sharing.. :rocker:
thx all .
i have Conroe-L for long time. but intel roadmap shows would be a new type which names E2xxx ......and Conroe-L maybe names Celeron
VictorW
my name is philip.not philips......................
DFI RD600 mobo .....i just want to say ....please delay no more....wait for a long time....
it doesnt seem to clock as well as the e6300 voltage wise. i would stay with the E6300 unless that was just a semi-dud. still good tho.
DFI infinity 975X/G:
e4300 voltage 1.32500V
heheh, i've had a 4300es sitting on my desk for about 3 weeks now... still havn't put in a proper pc for a wee test
Expected price for the E4300?
hehehe o man.. show us what it can do.. :) if you have a bugdet board lying around it will be a good test..:) for budget overclockers such as me.. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Origin_Unknown
hehehe.. but I'll try this to a DFI RD600 if i have the chance.. :)
:woot:
150-160Euro.
Now someone pls explain why Intel would even offers this CPU? And how did they neuter it exactly, cuz E6300 vs E4300 both having 1800MHz, still E4300 is a bit slower, how come?
What i do like is the idea of just gettin 2gigs value DDR2-667 memory for cheap. A E4300@3000MHz is all i need :)
I've heared that FSB-speed is related to memory bandwidth. doh!Quote:
Originally Posted by pengizzle
well, then i got another one for u: If this is just a matter of multi-fsb-ratio and a E4300 is basically a E6300 with different and (thus slightly) slower fsb/multi settings, why would Intel release this CPU anyways and give it an irritating number like E4xxx?
Because I am sure its price will drop below the price of the E6300. And then it will be a nice budget CPU, because you dont need high end motherboards to oc it to decent speeds, because of it high multi of 9.
Yes exactly
You can even clock this cpu on the latest Via Intel boards
800>1066=1,8 to 2,4 ghz
Not a great Oc but it is possible:p:
absolutely,but everyone wants E4300 can OC 100% by low Voltage....then 400MHzX9 ,sounds great.Quote:
Originally Posted by Teroedni
64/6300's are 4mb cache conroe that get 2mb of cache disabled due to binning/quota. E4XXX are native 2mb cache die with a lower stock FSB and some design loosening for increased yield most likely (allendale). Chop off the 2mb cache and you get a smaller die and more die per wafer. Conroe L are 1/2 die of the native 2mb cache version, so probably just a allendale with out all the interconnects between the cores.
Quote:
Originally Posted by expreview
this will be great.. :) I'm readying a SFF setup for this.. :)
i hope these things will hit 3.6ghz, if so they would be the ultimate cheap CPU for running in 975x.
I got one today
FSB wall at 349MHz,with DS3 F8I BIOS
Its not very good for oc :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by oijkue
why o why???
what stepping is it?? I have seen 95% OC.. :) could you use a 975x chipset board??
what were u expecting? 100% oc and more? :slapass:
Could be a bios bug or VCCA problem. Can you check how high VCCA is with core temp please? If it is below 1.15v that could be the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by oijkue
What exactly keeps you from going higher than 349mhz FSB? Does it just get unstable at that point?
thread moved
That's not too bad, 3.1ghz from a 1.8ghz cpu.Quote:
Originally Posted by oijkue
http://topic.expreview.com/2006-12-1...1666d1617.html
Posted yesterday morning with wrong title e6300
Looks like a great O/C to me . Thanks Expreview good review. Was the 3709.1 O/C with x7 multiplier 529FSB Stable??
That's a E6300...Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
http://www.expreview.com/img/topic/e...g/e63oc530.PNG