Ram clocks better than 975,but i dislike 4-4-2-8!:mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
It's just a bit faster than 4-4-3.;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
Printable View
Ram clocks better than 975,but i dislike 4-4-2-8!:mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
It's just a bit faster than 4-4-3.;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
May I contribute?....:D
A friend brought me one for Moding it, so I "play" a bit with it......:D
RULE No1: DON'T use 1:1 devider on this mobo.....It's NOT 975 chipset....;)
Take a GOOD look at the screenies below AND the LATENCY.....;)
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C..._Latency_1.png
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C..._Latency_2.png
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C..._Latency_3.png
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C..._Latency_4.png
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C..._Latency_5.png
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C..._Latency_6.png
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C..._Latency_7.png
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C..._Latency_8.png
.....and AGAIN......
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C..._Latency_9.png
AS you can see, the BEST is at 4-4-4-x ......and with 4:5 OR 2:3......1:1 gives a very high latency 55 - 60ns......
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C...03s750ms_1.png
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C...03s750ms_2.png
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C...0_13.906_1.png
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C...0_13.906_2.png
http://www.thelab.gr/images/Hipro5/C...63_13.891s.png
.
Wow hipro thats a big help thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
What mods are you doing to it if i may ask?
edit - Also, a question, did you switch timings via memset or in bios? as bios timings seem to effect performance different then memset.
450 4:5 is nice. What settings/bios you used for that?
I booted at 400MHz SHARP so as to keep a better strap with Cas 5-4-4-8 -6-5-10-10-10-12-disable.....I then within Windows, uped the fsb at 450MHz and played with the Ram's timmings/subtimmings....Doing so, I had a 43.2ns latency on everest and 8ns latency on S-Sandra.....Also 2007 score on winrar 3.61 benchmark.....:)
Winrar benchmark shows you what you've got...;)
Mods - simple things - Only VMCH and VICH-VTT....:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
@ eva2000: Put the tRRD=5.....On this mobo, tighter is not better...... ;)
Thx for all the nice tests here! :toast:
Anyone have a tip for me, why i can't use the 4:5 divider? I can not boot into windows, doesn't matter which timings or bios i use.. :confused: 9x400 and my Fatbodies @ 500MHz and with 2,4V Vdimm = no go!
With my E6400 i already handled to bench with 505MHz, but it was 1:1 and with "strange" Timings. http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/6...28smalldr3.jpg
hipro is that a 6800 running 400x9 at 4:5 ddr1000? i have been trying forever to get that is that stable or only benchable?
Fatbodies and 4:5 = 5-4-4-12-6-10-10-10-12-disableQuote:
Originally Posted by funkflix
Yes it's an X6800 one....Vdimm = 2.70Volts via DDR Maximizer as for the Corsair 8000UL Fatbodies and 2.66Volts as for the Cell-Shock 1000C4 ones...It benchies everything ....:)Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaoSMinionX
P.S. Try PCI Latency=128 and PCI-E = 110 to 120MHz.....
Thx mate, but it have not worked(i forgot the 12 on the end to be honest, it was on 10). Are this the tightest timings possible with Fatbodies on 4:5 or just the timings to be sure, that it is working 100%?Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
Will give it a try again tomorrow, with a little bit more sleep and time.. ;)
You can pick 5-5-5-15 as well for boot....Quote:
Originally Posted by funkflix
Wow!...Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
Thanks for all the effort!..
Hmm.. the sub timings r very interesting...
I'm running my 6403 @ 3-4-3-4-3-20-5-9-6-9
gonna try out ur tests...
Thou my board is only a P5Bvanilla.. :(
Tested that all before, but can't get it working here, thanks anyway..Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
Very interesting thread guys! Thanks a lot!
I have two questions for you:
- is it true for all 965 mobos?
- what about mobos with 975 chipset? They perform in the same way?
Tanks in advance for your answers.
thanks for the tip mate :)Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
:rocker: YAY thank you!
I have this Memory:OCZ Platinum Revision, 2 2GB, (PC2 6400), Rated @ 4-4-4-15; and it seems to like that at 266 if EVER...
@333 1:1 my core temp is 62 / 58 since the motherboard switch with added fans. :(
I need to get that everest!
Hmm..i was playing with sandra and 4-4-2 gave me better results than 4-4-4.I tried everest and spi and i found out that Hipro is 100% right.Thanks for the tips dude..
for me out of all of them 3-4-4-x was the best for PI 1mb
the best timings for high frequency memory with a P5B with is 3-4-2-4-4-3-20-1 :)
the problem about 3-3-3 and 3-4-4-3 is known, it's why I didn't use them when I benched :o
just a P5B issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
Cool thanks again hipro, any chance you havea picture of that VICH-VTT mod, ive never seen it.
Results from a little testing i did:
For these quick benches, i ran:
7x401 (2807 MHz) 1:1 DDR2-802 (4-4-3-4)
or
7x401 (2807 MHz) 1:1 DDR2-802 (3-3-3-4)
or
7x401 (2807 MHz) 4:5 DDR2-1002.5 (4-4-4-4)
Results were averaged from a few runs
SuperPI 4M
1:1 (4-4-3-4) - 104.875s
1:1 (3-3-3-4) - 103.964s
4:5 (4-4-4-4) - 101.990s
3DMark01 SE game tests only
1:1 (4-4-3-4) - 37653
1:1 (3-3-3-4) - 38040
4:5 (4-4-4-4) - 38645.5
Q4 bench 800x600 high quality AA/AF off SMP enabled
1:1 (4-4-3-4) - 97.91 fps
1:1 (3-3-3-4) - 99.53 fps
4:5 (4-4-4-4) - 102.4 fps
WinRAR bench multithreaded
1:1 (4-4-3-4) - 1184 KB/s
1:1 (3-3-3-4) - 1225 KB/s
4:5 (4-4-4-4) - 1326 KB/s
FEAR 800x600 0x AA 2x AF everything maxed
Min - Ave. - Max fps
1:1 (4-4-3-4) - 55 / 111.67 / 231.67
1:1 (3-3-3-4) - 55 / 111 / 229.33
4:5 (4-4-4-4) - 55.33 / 112.67 / 233.33
UT2k4 Primeval 1024x768 no AA/AF
1:1 (4-4-3-4) - 91.965 fps
1:1 (3-3-3-4) - 92.975 fps
4:5 (4-4-4-4) - 94.635 fps
Those results indicate CAS 3 works just fine for me...:confused:
Thank you for all that testing although I am on 680i I'd still like to ensure I am not missing anything? running that 4:5 and looser timings but higher DDR2 speeds provided much better results in bench, gaming and everything you did. So why would I want to run 3-3-3 if I can loosen and run higher DDR2 speed and provide better overall system performance?
What about when you boot at 400mhzQuote:
Originally Posted by -n7-
Has anybody actually tried to hardcode tighter timings in the SPD? I think doing this and booting with SPD settings should fix the problem.
What do you guys think?