five five fiveQuote:
Originally Posted by 2metre*
Is that right? my bro..
ha ha ha :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:
Printable View
five five fiveQuote:
Originally Posted by 2metre*
Is that right? my bro..
ha ha ha :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:
Nice CPU speeds, but I think theres something wrong between the CPU speed and the performance?? I get just slightly smaller scores with a Conroe at 3.6 and a 7800GTX512. My benches were tweaked though...
Great work.
I understand that 4 cores sucking the same cache would slow down overall performance... but doesn't this 32m look a tad drastic for the speed? 31mins @ 4.4ghz that takes the cake :slapass:Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyVirus
nonetheless, nice work :)
You need to set Affinity for Super Pi...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rol-Co
Clearly the attitude I was expecting from someone :nono:
I think something wrong from score between CPU speed but my tested score different ....... :fact: come with me a look at my result .Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyVirus
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/1.jpg
my system in use.
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/2.jpg
max speed with i can on Water cooling 's Corsair nortilus 500 , QX6700@3.7GHz with Vcore 1.6500 , Vmem 2.30 , other Voltage Max in bios . This cpuz Validate : http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=136385
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/3.jpg
Cinebench 9.5 use time 11 sec on 3.7GHz
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/4.jpg
Super PI 32M on Runing 4 Thread
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/5.jpg
Just finish @ around 23.xxx min but why on 4.4GHz use 31 min :confused:
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/6.jpg
3D06 Score on 3.7GHz
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/7.jpg
PCMark 05 Pass !!! the score more than 4.4GHz System , Why Why Why... :confused:
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/8.jpg
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/9.jpg
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/10.jpg
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/11.jpg
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/12.jpg
Sisoftware Sandra Score .
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/qx6700/13.jpg
Aquamark Score Fully all score ( CPU , GFX and Overall )
Nice ZoLKoRn
ดังแต่ท่อล้อไม่หมุน ( More Mhz But Low Score )
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3 CSL
Eng. Please ... :party3:
I have to admit that the 32m superpi scores are aweful for the speed.
Also - on my kentsfield step 4 6700 I was only ever able to overclock two cores using an adjustable multiplier - so cores 0&1 would be multiplier adjusted speeds (300*14 for example) and core 2+3 would be fixed at x10 (300x10).
Is it so that newer steppings allows all 4 cores to have adjustable multiplier?
yeah was wondering about that quad 32M time.. thought at 4.4ghz would be way faster than at 2.4ghz stock here with 266mhz 4-4-4-8 mem timingsQuote:
Originally Posted by maverik-sg1
Quad 32M untweaked
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975...2m_quad_tn.png
Yes.I'm agree with all comment that maybe something wrong with score on 4.4GHz speed. Especially in SuperPI32m that make me wondering too.
My assumption it could be something wrong in mainboard bios,cause when I check score with other program like Cinebench 9.5 , sisoft-Process Arithmetic ,3DMark06 - CPU Score All cpu score can acceptable with 4.4GHz.
and on my setup I use CPU:Ram 1:1 with 14x multiple make my FSB just 315MHz.Maybe with this setup will effect poor performance.
with my default test I expect more result from O/C like everybody here,but it don't for some program.:p:
thank for all suggest here. Especially ZoLKoRn our friend from neighbour website :D
I know what it is for superpi - you have not set the affiliation for each instance to a different core (ctrl-alt-del then set affintityto core 0,1,2,3) - or you are not running it from 4 separate folders of superpi :)
no need to set infinity for each core when i ran my quad 32M above... just make sure separate folders for each pi instance :)
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn...700/pi3211.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by CrazyVirus
OK... I testing Ratio 1:1 for FSB and Memory and the final PI32 4thread just fisnish is 25.xxx min. is highed than ratio 2:3 at 2 min. on CPU speed 3.7GHz :toast:
OMG:fact: :woot:
Thank for ur help.:p:Quote:
OK... I testing Ratio 1:1 for FSB and Memory and the final PI32 4thread just fisnish is 25.xxx min. is highed than ratio 2:3 at 2 min. on CPU speed 3.7GHz :toast:
Yesterday,I try to test with the same as ur config and I've found the same poor result in PI32.
or Use defult multiple higher FSB (10x400) CPU:Ram 1:1 in SuperPI32M alway give me poor result.
what do u think about this situation? and surely I'm run separate folders for each PI.:)
OK. I come back again with a binggo "ANSWER" Why I've poor result in PI32M (4 Thread) with QX6700 @ 4.4GHz?
Today I've try to change my HDD from PATA to SATA and test PI32M with the lower speed @3.3GHz CPU:Ram 1:1.And below is the result
http://www.unlimitpc.com/webboard_pic/Copypi32-3.jpg
Result of PI32M (4 Thread) @3.3GHz is better score than My 4.4GHz which I've test it before.
Just change the HDD and problem was gone....DO U Belive it or not? 2 HDD set up with the same winxp setup CD.
Thank ZoLKoRn our friend for ur observe.And now My 3.3GHz. slower than ur 3.7GHz. just about 1 or 2 minutes.
Good... i'll try laster . I will chang HDD same to you from PATA to SATA because on the my test i'm use HDD Western WD800 PATA do not SATA :toast: This now i'm not free, i'll congratulations in next week :)Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyVirus
What cooling are you using?
nice work :slobber:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Venom-Crusher
What happen with your FRIEND.
55555 :slapass:
Who is him ? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Venom-Crusher
I'm sure he is now among us.Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoLKoRn
^^