Intel X3220 quad-core, amazing 4xP95 stable speed of 3.6Ghz

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-05-2006, 11:19 AM
irev210

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revv23

wow, so these will work in 775 bords?

might be like a opteron for intel.

lol, read above.

They are socket 775, they are no different from there QX6700 brother.
11-05-2006, 11:45 AM
sierra_bound

Kris, nice results. Run Cinebench, please.:)
11-05-2006, 11:50 AM
DarkSephiroth

Power Consuming is the same as Kentsfield?
11-05-2006, 01:01 PM
LuckyNV

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkSephiroth

Power Consuming is the same as Kentsfield?

should be a bit less at stock since they use slightly lower voltage
11-05-2006, 01:30 PM
DarkSephiroth

I see, thanks
11-06-2006, 02:52 PM
Revv23

Quote:

Originally Posted by irev210

lol, read above.

They are socket 775, they are no different from there QX6700 brother.

Yes i read it, thank you.
11-06-2006, 05:15 PM
Supertim0r

this is what I got today in my "surprise" box

http://simon.webideal.ca/Bench/ES%202.JPG

http://simon.webideal.ca/Bench/Q66001.JPG

http://simon.webideal.ca/Bench/3d06%20GTX%20Q661.JPG

sorry, resized
11-06-2006, 06:18 PM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supertim0r

this is what I got today in my "surprise" box

sorry, resized

wow nice.. should have my Q6600 by end of this week :)

sexy windows style you have .. what style is that ? :)
11-06-2006, 06:20 PM
erwinz

wow.. :D looking forward for more of your results.. :woot:
11-06-2006, 07:45 PM
Revv23

wow so looks like these will clock very well..

edit - a 617 and a 631.... the 617 is pretty old...thats not step 7 b3 is it?
11-06-2006, 07:47 PM
jtdigital

very nice! I must resist upgrading! :D once you go onto these forums, you go broke! :sofa:
11-06-2006, 08:17 PM
Supertim0r

617 = E6700es b1
633 = Q6600es b3
11-06-2006, 08:19 PM
Supertim0r

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

wow nice.. should have my Q6600 by end of this week :)

sexy windows style you have .. what style is that ? :)

can't wait to see your results :)

this is "greybase style" from "Windows XP Pro Coccinelle french
11-06-2006, 08:28 PM
Dutch Schultz

nice.
11-06-2006, 08:59 PM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supertim0r

can't wait to see your results :)

this is "greybase style" from "Windows XP Pro Coccinelle french

thanks.. prepping my badaxe r304 for Q6600.. badaxe has very little droop on vcore so hopefully it will be nice :)
11-06-2006, 09:01 PM
Supertim0r

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

thanks.. prepping my badaxe r304 for Q6600.. badaxe has very little droop on vcore so hopefully it will be nice :)

I'm waiting Bad Axe 2 for kentsfield. 304 is fsb limited :(
11-06-2006, 10:24 PM
DarkSephiroth

Nice surprise :p:
11-07-2006, 02:55 AM
damnnit

Damn that is a nice surprised. They need to send some my way.
11-07-2006, 03:13 PM
Turtle 1

Excellent
11-11-2006, 05:50 PM
Yoxxy

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=137503

Must say these chips are amazing. That is at 1.48v under load. 1.53 idle. Pretty amazing chip.
11-11-2006, 06:55 PM
Poodle

I've been :slapass: the Kenty for it's power consumption. Now I'm even tempted to buy one. :toast: :banana:
11-11-2006, 07:35 PM
Lestat

oh come on Revv... i know you read what he said about the 771 fitting into a 775
11-28-2006, 08:40 AM
RLM

I'm a 3d artist, and like alot of 3d artist out there, these quadcores are creating a lot of interest. So far I've seen mostly benching on applications that don't seem to be setup to fully utilise these processors.

I've also been lead to believe today that real world performance isn't much to write home about.

I would love to see some 3d application benchmarks/renders done on these, utilising all four cores. As sierra_bound requested, cinebench would be a good start. Specifically I would be interested in the render time for final part of the bench mark test.

A long shot, but there's also demo of Lightwave 9, if any of you are interested in some further benching.

http://www.newtek.com/lightwave/lwtrial/

Cheers

RLM
11-28-2006, 10:36 AM
NWEng

Quote:

Originally Posted by FragTek

I keep hearing rumors that the C2Quad's won't be able to run on the 965/975 boards only upcoming bearlake and newer , is this just a bogus rumor? I noticed that you're running the Xeon on a P965 which would debunk this rumor I've heard, or is the Xeon setup to run differently than the C2Quad?

Nope, should run just fine with the right bios. Look to upgrade to Bearlake with the upcoming 45nm procs, Penryn, Wolfdale, etc., which according to my "sources" will be later rather than sooner. Fabs 32 (Ocotillo) and 25 (Israel) are a little behind schedule, so D1D will be the sole producer of 45nm for a while.
01-08-2007, 12:48 PM
Smy

If my motherboard support a kentsfield a xeon will work too?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page