Peaking at 69% increse over dualcore with full load.... not sure if these Kentsfields are going to be worth it for my use.
Peaking at 69% increse over dualcore with full load.... not sure if these Kentsfields are going to be worth it for my use.
:eek: een mede utrechter op xs :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Hooker
if you are spending that much on a new rig, i'd go with one of the 1k models (pp&c, ocz, others..?). with that you'll be having more then enough power for this and future rig's (for example, you can add an extra vid. card later for xfire/sli without having to worry about you're psu).
OT: Sick power consumption on the kentfield, close to 300w for a cpu..:shock: thanks for sharing this coolaler.
although i have to agree with hkpolice, both cpu's at the same vcore would make a better compare.
Yeah, but those others are nowhere near as silent ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinges
As for #2: that was not just the cpu, but the entire pc.
Also, I don't think the next generation flagships will use
that much power. 450Ws under load just for a graphics
card sound like an awful lot to me... not to mention, how
to cool that beast? :eek:
He's showing us power consumption at identical Mhz. Even if they are not valid in the strictest sense they are pretty useful either way you look at it. It's possible to infer approximate numbers anyway and this also shows us that Kentsfield needs more juice than C2D for stability at similar Mhz.Quote:
Originally Posted by HKPolice
Good test thanks coolaler, imo for 2x the amount of cores at a higher voltage 60-70% more power is not so much.
wow~! good power :woot:
Am I reading the temperatures right, 87 degrees celcius on the CPU. Thats roasting!! Whats the thermal specifications for the Kentsfields???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
another thing to consider is that it will be rare for us to use all 4 cores.
As with most Core2 temperature reports - it's bogus.Quote:
Originally Posted by computerman0416
Whats the real temp then because personally I think one day heatsinks will come with little copper frying pans on top :toast:
i dunno, its hot though! :p:
IMO as long as its stable it doesnt matter
That kind of kills the performance per watt now doesn't itQuote:
Originally Posted by uOpt
Very informative, thanks for the testing :)
Hey Coolaler, is it possible to keep both chips' Vcore the same in your set-up? That might be a better way to compare.
Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
It think it's pretty low. Keep in mind it is 8 cores. So it mprimes at 56 watts per core using the OCZ unit. And that is 56 watts out of the A/C. Since the OCZ has 80% efficiency pretty much everywhere that means each core takes 45 watts, mpriming, and that is with 1 GB of RAM per core.
Thanks for testing! :clap:
kentsfield 4200mhz(phase change)+ 8800GTX single(650/2100)
when ran 3D06,peak value 308 watts(all platform)
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/8800GTX/308W.JPG
3D06
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/88...ENTS4200_3.gif
nice coolaler.. what's the evap idle and load temps for QX6700 @4.2Ghz ? vcore ?
first of all, nice results coolaler! :)
AT released an article a couple of days ago that does a performance per watt analysis with the new quad core vs. the current dual core
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=2866
Where can I get one of those cool watt meters that coolaler has? Looks like I'm gona need one for my Kentsfield setup too. Can you buy them here in the states?
nice 14k in 06 single card!!!
Thanks coolaler!
Thank you so much for the wonderful testing...It confirms that Kentsfield is way too early to appear for the masses,as it consumes a lot of power,runs H O T,which means OC cant be as good as the E6400:fact: ,and,of course,the price is...:stick: