Really impresive times, great scores for that clocks :slobber: . Memory runs 1:1 or higher :D ?
Find better CPU and try hit under 4:30 at 16M and 9:30 at 32M ;)
Congratulations my Dear Friend :D
Really impresive times, great scores for that clocks :slobber: . Memory runs 1:1 or higher :D ?
Find better CPU and try hit under 4:30 at 16M and 9:30 at 32M ;)
Congratulations my Dear Friend :D
Nice WR and not an ES! gratz Omega! :toast:
Love seeing such an early retail pulling off a WR. :p: :toast:
おめでとうございます!
Congratulations, Omega-san. :toast:
Thanks a lot all !! :toast:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
Yeah,The clock doesn't suffice in 1M...need more.Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
No pictures, It is the same always.;)
Temp was about -135C,
This chip seems to be stronger in cold.
:toast:
awesome work, 1.9v on cpu is just awesome.
:toast:
I wonder what holds the cpu back more, the cpu itself, or the power delivery on the mobo.
Completely Rules!! Full respect to you Omega-san:)
Nicely done OMEGA :woot:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
QFT, nice work man
The limit of Highest clock is not tried.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gebba
0701 is still used. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by ojdr2001
bachus_anonym-sanQuote:
Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
Many thanks always!!
Your 32M result of E6600 with stock cooled is fine too!! :toast:
Why did you only disable a core for 1M and no other calculation btw?
Hi MaSell-san,Quote:
Originally Posted by MaSell
You are nice guy, at "extreme overclocking party in poland".:)
It was run with 1:1,
Micron small chip is seems like limit around here at CL3 tighter setting.
If the MEM clock is raised, it is necessary to loosen the setting.
Or using the fatbody at 4:5 with 4-3-2-4...But my fatbody's limit is about 502MHz.
Therefore, it might be severe...
Thanks Gautam-san
Yeah, It is also hard to find good Retail-chip.
This #2chip was bought from TAM-san(Many thanks TAM).
Still, it seems to be easy for 1core to raise the clock.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
At 1M, around the 5400MHz was limit when with dual-core.
When the number of digits grows up, dual-core seems to be faster when having compared it.
Incredible 32M time. Omedetou!
Cya O!
didnt coolaler reach 9.00 sec with 5.4GHz??
but u beat him in 32m, i think
Coolaler was a bit above 5.5 for that, OMEGA san's times are always among the fastest clock-for-clock.
Thanks very much for the input...very interesting to note and respect to you for telling us.Quote:
Originally Posted by OMEGA3
I've also found that the Team Group 5300 is happiest and best performing 1:1 3-3-3-x, which it can handle at quite frequencies. :p:
holy mother of god
OMG!! :slobber:
very nice result and retail X6800
Many thanks all!! :toast:
Yes, Micron small chips(D9G**) are better at CL3.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
BTW, OPB-san was run with 1core at All digits...It seems to have to try more.
Cheers!!
looks like you and OPB are currently on the run - awesome job here as well :toast:
give multepler X13
+more good memory
+ocz boster+mode on the boster i see in this site give 5 v to C3 and you give to the memory 4 volt to ddr 2
+ln2 in the chips and to cpu
+more modee the the nobo
+ to the cpu
+ask the hipro is know what to do
=
wr for you omega 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMEGA3
No Sir, I am running dual core on that.