there is my result
http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/3732/3573ui0.jpg
Printable View
there is my result
http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/3732/3573ui0.jpg
my benchruns with the new version (somewhat optimized):
http://s2.supload.com/thumbs/default..._399x8sync.jpg
(screen shot taken with superprime itself :D)
and new url for SuperPrime: http://www.techenclave.com/forums/superprime/
enjoy :D
Regards,
K
My best shot at this benchmark, on phase-change cooled Conroe setup...
ASUS P5B Deluxe / Conroe E6600 @ 552x8=4414Mhz, DDR2-1104 4-4-4-4.0 --> details
Quote:
SuperPrime 0.4beta @ www.techenclave.com
---------------------------------------------------
Working set size: 5E7
Number of threads: 2
Total calculation time: 0 h 0:27.217
Vadidation url: http://www.techenclave.com/forums/su...lidate.php?145
---------------------------------------------------
... then, this is my 24/7, AM2 system...Quote:
SuperPrime 0.4beta @ www.techenclave.com
---------------------------------------------------
Working set size: 1E8
Number of threads: 2
Total calculation time: 0 h 1:14.741
Vadidation url: http://www.techenclave.com/forums/su...lidate.php?385
---------------------------------------------------
ASUS M2N-SLI Deluxe / Orleans 3200+ @ 293x10=2930Mhz, DDR2-976 8-4-4-4.0 --> details
Quote:
SuperPrime 0.4beta @ www.techenclave.com
---------------------------------------------------
Working set size: 5E7
Number of threads: 1
Total calculation time: 0 h 2:54.127
Vadidation url: http://www.techenclave.com/forums/su...lidate.php?298
---------------------------------------------------
... and for comparison, Conroe @ 2.93GHz (single core bench), just as above AM2 single core setup...Quote:
SuperPrime 0.4beta @ www.techenclave.com
---------------------------------------------------
Working set size: 1E8
Number of threads: 1
Total calculation time: 0 h 7:49.5
Vadidation url: http://www.techenclave.com/forums/su...lidate.php?156
---------------------------------------------------
ASUS P5B Deluxe / Conroe E6600 @ 326x9=2934Mhz, DDR2-1086 8-4-4-4.0 --> details
Quote:
SuperPrime 0.4beta @ www.techenclave.com
---------------------------------------------------
Working set size: 5E7
Number of threads: 1
Total calculation time: 0 h 1:21.433
---------------------------------------------------
Clearly, Conroe is twice as fast as my AM2 setup, at the same CPU clocks :)Quote:
SuperPrime 0.4beta @ www.techenclave.com
---------------------------------------------------
Working set size: 1E8
Number of threads: 1
Total calculation time: 0 h 3:44.278
---------------------------------------------------
btw, nice benchmark, kidoman :up: Although, validation links don't seem to work properly.
Hello bachus_anonym,Quote:
Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
Thanks a lot for running these tests in this detailed a manner. Truely, these will help me a lot in finetuning the benchmarks.....
- You just took the WR in this Benchmark in 5E7. The next best result is 30.20 (Here)
- It is scaling nicely... I want someone with a nicely OCed quad core rig to show me how this is scaling beyond 2 cores. I dont have access to such L33T hardware hence I cannot really predict. But I have used my imagination to make the algorithm as parallel and scalable as possible. (FYI, yesterday I ran the benchmark in a octa core Xeom MP machine. It was scaling like a beauty there but the results were slower because of Netburst architechture :mad: )
- Yes the conroe ownes in the benchmark, particularly due to the number of ALUs.
- I dont see the cache of the Conroe (vs a Allendate) affecting the score much (atleast not as much as it affects SuperPi) I have seen a 0.3s advantage of Conroe over a Allendale at the same clock. Good for my
benchmark....
- I am working with the admins back at my forum (www.techenclave.com) to get all the validations etc working. After that we will create a hall of frame. Make sure to get to #1 as soon as it comes :)
Regards and Thanks,
Karan
Team Techenclave
Nice benchmark here Kidoman:toast:
Heres mine,,,
http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/837...shot042gp1.jpg
ahha thanks for the appreciation man.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
and btw, u snatched the WR from bachus in a big way (1 sec :P)
:toast: :toast:
ps: just waiting for some quad giants to get cracking on this baby :fact:
:D :woot: :DQuote:
ps: just waiting for some quad giants to get cracking on this baby
Major release :) This benchi has taken off... thanks to the ocers determination to tackle every new demanding benchmark out there.
No longer just a CPU benchmark.... more of a system benchmark now.
Much has changed, hence the old scores dont apply. I guess you all will appreciate the changes in this version.
Version 0.6
31-Oct-2006
- Adjusted the dynamic load balancing system to give weightage to threads which have been running longer.
- Made parts of the benchmark single threaded to bring in the CPU's performance w/ 1 thread into the score.
- Added Rabin Miller Test into the implementation. Now after a certain range, the new test is being used which clearly gives us a health spee boost.
- Brought in memory into the equation in a big way. If you have fast ram, you shall have fast results :) (hopefully)
- Added Team TechEnclave to the Program title.
- Changed version number to 0.6
Available immd via auto update (download 0.5 version from http://www.techenclave.com/forums/superprime/ and press F5 or Help > Check for updates, 0.6 will be ready to use on next restart) :cool2:
BTW, the current world record is held by coolaler @ 15.6 sec with a 4g Core 2 Quad :) :cool2:
Crashes on me :(
EventType : clr20r3 P1 : superprime.exe P2 : 0.5.0.0 P3 : 45445ad3
P4 : mscorlib P5 : 2.0.0.0 P6 : 4333c8f6 P7 : 1c09 P8 : 78
P9 : system.badimageformatexception
more data
SuperPrime v0.6
- QX6700 @ 3.0ghz
- P5WDH (early MCH 1.65 version) BIOS: 1707
- screenshot Photoshoped to show CPU utilization and temperatures during test run, with completed screen showing "finished" time
P5WDH (early MCH 1.65 version) - BIOS 1801 (new, Dec 22 06)
QX6700 @ 3.0ghz
SuperPrime v0.6 test and new 1801 BIOS
- "Above Normal" and 1E8 setting
- test to see new 1801 BIOS effect, if any
- about .3 sec improvement @ 1E8, over BIOS 1707.....
- results panel pasted in after test completion
- main shot taken seconds before test completion, to show CPU load, temps, volts, etc.
bump...
Pretty cool bench. Not many people seem to be onboard though. Kind of painful to see how badly the conroes whup my lowly opteron 165 though.
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/3...rimedv0.th.jpg
Is this based on any actual experience, or just pure opinion? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ehwaz001
I write code against this framework everyday, and have used every version since the beta of 1.0. While no framework is perfect .NET makes my job much easier, and more enjoyable.
I would like to understand where you are coming from. Are you a professional developer, and end user, or a hobbyist?
Hello, thought I would muck around with my work computer to see what the multi-core scaling was like on an AMD CPU.
The setup:
AMD Athlon X2 3800+ (Windsor 2GHz)
2x 1GB Transcend DDR2-667 5-5-5-15 (128MB Video Shared!)
ASUS M2N8-VMX
The results:
1 Thread (AboveNormal)
1E1: 0.8s
1E6: 1.68s
5E6: 10.169s
1E7: 21.606s
5E7: 1:54.15s (114.15s)
1E8: 3:50.212s (230.212s)
2 Threads (AboveNormal)
1E1: 0.42s - 90% improvement
1E6: 0.623s - 169% imrovement?
5E6: 6.95s - 46% improvement
1E7: 12.326s - 75% improvement
5E7: 1:3.232s (63.232s) - 80% improvement
1E8: 2:6.740s (126.740s) - 81% improvement
Cheers,
Shaun.
Home computer. No O/C or anything.
The setup:
Intel Pentium D 2.66GHz (805)
2x 1GB Corsair DDR2-800 C4 (Running DDR2-533 @ 4-4-4-12)
ASUS P5W DH Deluxe
The results:
1 Thread (AboveNormal)
1E1: 0.4s
1E6: 0.841s
5E6: 8.188s
1E7: 21.947s
5E7: 3:37.866s (217.866s)
1E8: 9:51.103s (591.103s)
2 Threads (AboveNormal)
1E1: 0.4s - 0% faster
1E6: 0.447s - 88% faster
5E6: 4.359s - 87% faster
1E7: 11.165s - 96% faster
5E7: 1:49.706s (109.706s) - 98% faster
1E8: 4:54.956s (294.956s) - 100% faster
Office computer, no o/c;
(Unfortunately CPU-Z gives me some errors here and can't display all the memory info. It's a 1Gb Sycron DDR400 stick.)
Intel Pentium 4 524 Prescott 3066Mhz
1Gb Sycron DDR 400
Asus P5PE-VM
Results:
1 Thread (AboveNormal)
1E1: 00.11s
1E6: 01.41s
5E6: 11.215s
1E7: 23.947s
5E7: 2:7.564s (127.564s)
1E8: 4:21.716s (261.716s)
Will be back with some San Diego an Conroe results from my home computers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by [timko]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durzel
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evolutionQuote:
Originally Posted by Ehwaz001
You guys just get in from yelling at the kids to get off of your front lawn?
I also have a skt A Sempron (Thoroughbread) as my quiet web browsing machine, and I wanted to test SuperPrime on this one also. But I get this error and I can't run the benchmark...:(
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monstru
You will need the .NET 2.0 Framework installed.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
AHA! That solves my problem, I will install it and run the benchmark. Thx :)
I really like this benchmark, it really uses Dual Cores at their maximum. As you can see in the attached images, I ran the tests with 1 core and then I ran the tests with 2 cores, and the difference is double, as it should be in any aplication. I am really impresed. Any news with the development of the benchmark?
X6800 @ 3412Mhz
2Gb Mushkin XP6400 @ 465Mhz 4-4-4-10
Dfi Infinity P965-S
Results:
1 Thread (AboveNormal)
1E1: 00.3s
1E6: 00.248s
5E6: 2.185s
1E7: 5.646s
5E7: 1:8.982s (68.982s)
2 Thread (AboveNormal)
1E1: 00.1s
1E6: 00.165s
5E6: 1.163s
1E7: 2.889s
5E7: 34.652s
E6600 @ 3479Mhz
2Gb Mushkin XP6400 4-4-4-10
Dfi Infinity P965
1 Thread (Above normal)
1E1: 00.1s
1E6: 00.242s
5E6: 2.130s
1E7: 5.521s
5E7: 1:7.609s (67.609s)
2 Threads (Above normal)
1E1: 00.1s
1E6: 00.160s
5E6: 1.121s
1E7: 2.851s
5E7: 33.948s
Nice little bench proggie. Just had a quick play..
As promised, some San Diego action:
San Diego 3700+ @ 2750Mhz
2Gb Kingmax DDR400 2,5-3-3-7
Asus A8N-SLI
1 Thread (Above normal)
1E1: 00.8s
1E6: 00.668s
5E6: 6.425s
1E7: 17.103s
5E7: 2:49.363s (169.363s)