325 :p:
Printable View
325 :p:
300 max bios? new bios higher fsb?
Hot CPU temps coolaler....82C in one of your pics! :eek:
Don't believe the temp,when vcore=1.28v:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Betroz
Deam "mini FSB"!:D
damn lovely vdimm..but how come low vcore?:(
more oc to come?:D
Is it dead yet? I know FUGGER killed one at 300fsb. And one at 265 maybe?
At 300fsb is all she wrote for this motherboard?
i hope not that would be a big disappointment, i guess its time to wait for a rd600 boardQuote:
Originally Posted by Nasgul
come on, higher than 300
*crossed fingers*
ya know guys he is testing it the way things should be tested little by little test it, see how it compares at different levels with the other chipsets.
raise it some more.. test it more...
now.. although i agree that DFI isnt known for crappy boards. they are also known to not have a good Intel line. they have historically had troubles internally with their relationship with intel. so for them to offer more intel i think is great.
but only time will tell..... and ill be, as we all are, keeping my eyes on these threads.
1300.....
Wow,
I am really underwhelmed. FSB isnt the only thing that matters but i can't imagine anyone serious about overclocking could hack that limit.
Hopefully the RD600 is as good as promised.
I)ickie
Hmm, guys.... did i not see something or what? I believe the "New Mem Speed" is limited to 400-> 1300 (DDR ofcourse)
If this board indeed supports indepenent memory overclocking.... then there is NO evidence that this board is limited to 325Mhz FSB. Its just limited to a max of 1300 Mhz DDR2 speeds. Which is plenty for a initial test.
Lets hope coolaler shows us a preety 500 x 8 :D
Bleah this mobo are good only for the layout nothing other in my opinion...
300 Max Fsb really sux... it's a funny limit....
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnMike
You got it....:woot:
example:
200x5=1000
200x4=800
etc...etc...1-5 is ldt multiplier
Looks like pretty good so far! Hopefully OC will look as good as board :)
The board looks so sweet, but damn what a major setback it doesn't clock good. Believe me, if it could do 500FSB, DFI would've had it in even its earliest BIOS release.
this board sucks.. dfi... you broke my heart
Seems as if the board sucks. INTC should work with Nvidia to make a good chipset now that AMDTI has been formed. They are going to need a good third party. Obviously Nvidia has not quite realized how to make a high clocking northbridge for fsb.
This: http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/DF...LIINTEL/19.JPGQuote:
Originally Posted by goldenfrag
"new FSB Speed (QDR) - 790-1300 => max fsb = 325.
I agree. If it would be stable at higher speeds, they wouldn't limit it so low.Quote:
Originally Posted by _Eduard_
IMO it's nvidia that broke your heart.Quote:
Originally Posted by celerity
This is just a revised nf4 chip. How long has nf4 been around? nvidia is getting lazy.
Yes, and i think that everybody is missing that... I think that the LDT Multiplier is our "missing door" to go higher on the CPU and RAM.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grinch
After reading TonyOCZ article about Intel's chipset and knowing that Conroe sets 1066 Strap, 267mhz is the nominal valor of FSB, let's see...
267x4=1068(1066)
267x3=801(800)
267x2=534(533)
.....
267x5=1335(1333) -> X6800EE
I have a E6600 that can reach 400 (400x4=1600mhz) FSB x9 = 3600mhz
Now if that LTD Multiplier is what i imagine... Let's see:
400 (400x3=1200mhz) FSB x9 = 3600mhz
or
400 (400x2=800mhz) FSB x9 = 3600mhz
Those anyone see what i see?!...
Coolaler...Show us the "Big Apple".. :toast:
Lets hope ur onto something there.
If it's only going to go to 300FSB .. it be an all show no go mobo . and coming from DFI that be sad...
If that LDT Multiplier is for the memory controler on the FSB, it means that you still can lower the multiplier and push the FSB above 300mhz...Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver Bullet
300x5=1500(wall on NF590?!)
300x3=900 (lower FSB) x9 = 2700mhz, means you can 500x3=1500 x9 = 4500mhz!! :woot:
Do i make any sense?!? :rolleyes: