I don't have the movie, but it would be great if people could try to duplicate the process and post times. I would love to see how it stacks up against other systems.
Great work :toast:
Printable View
I don't have the movie, but it would be great if people could try to duplicate the process and post times. I would love to see how it stacks up against other systems.
Great work :toast:
Followed eva2000's lead and used DVD Decryter to rip the ISO. Then backed up using "deep analysis" to a folder....
eva2000 did it in 5min 32sec.:
Opty 170 @ 2.85 took twice as long:
nice work.. thanks for the info..
tnx eva for smtg different to compare to conroe..
deep analysis, 4200+ @ 2500mhz
pcdoc and napalm, drive speed plays an important factor too.. can you list the drive configuration used as well as which partition you had the ISO image and the dvdshrink output
i.e. napalm you're 4200+ @2500mhz is faster than pcdocs 170@2850mhz but you using same matrix dvd ?
:D))) damn! why u have to say dat outloud!?? keep it quite.. :D
oh well, yeh hdd performance is trashed by dvdshrink.. happy now?
yeh, matrix reloaded on the rig in sig.. transfering from 2x raid on areca 1210 to 4x raid on areca 1230.. :D
on Areca controller on PCI-E bus would be bloody fast i can imagine hehe - what was encoding speed in MB/s ?
Someone with kentsfield cpu and matrix reloaded dvd should do the same tests would be interesting :D
gimmie gimmie kent and ill test the fields out of it.. :D
i didnt look at the speed throughout.. but ive seen 25/26 MB/s don know the max.. i think encoding was done in 3 min. some sec.
btw, how do u reset dvdshrink? ive been using for long time but never reset.. me noob! :slap:
read 1st post again ;) so you're 9min 10s time with reset deep analysis or very 1st run ??? clear drive speed plays an important factor for you to do 9min 10s at 2500mhz vs my FX-60 @3010mhz only 9min 34s hehQuote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
Folks asked for some test runs on FX-60 as well so here they are :)
- FX-60 CCB2E 0536RPMW
- Kayl Black Frozen SS Phase change cooler for cpu
- DFI NF4 UT SLI-DR R.AB0 406BTA bios to allow 233 upclock mem divider
- 512MB Gecube X1900XTX stock hsf
- 2x 512MB OCZ PC3200 Gold UTT BH-5
- 4x80GB Hitachi 7K80 SATAII NCQ Raid 0 (nvraid)
- Pioneer DVD-RW + FDD
- 1KW PCP&C SLI power supply
- WinXP Pro SP2 fully updated
Notes:
- Due to phase change cooling, FX-60 max HTT is low - this may influence performance somewhat.
- All DVD Shrink settings and ISO are the same as for Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 tests.
- Seems DVD Shrink completion times are always highly influenced by hard drive speed, so differences between FX-60 and E6600 systems' drive configurations can influence the results. Faster drive speeds and drive configurations and controllers which handle NCQ well i suspect would give better times.
- FX-60 used single volume 4x80GB SATAII raid 0 array where OS partition and ISO images etc were on same raid volume as where the DVD Shrink output was being written to. FX-60 disks had NCQ enabled.
- E6600 used 3x320GB SATAII raid 0 split into 2x separate raid 0 arrays volumes where DVD Shrink ISO image was being read from a seperate raid 0 array from where the DVD Shrink output was being written to. E6600 disks had NCQ disabled as in bios drives were setup as RAID and not ACHI mode (which enables NCQ).
Test Configurations & Results:
- @14x215HTT = 3010Mhz with OCZ PC3200 Gold UTT BH-5@250mhz 2-2-2-5 = 9min 34s
- @15x220HTT = 3300Mhz with OCZ PC3200 Gold UTT BH-5@253mhz 2-2-2-5 = 8min 53s
- @16x206HTT = 3305Mhz with OCZ PC3200 Gold UTT BH-5@236mhz 2-2-2-5 = 8min 57s
- @16x213HTT = 3408Mhz with OCZ PC3200 Gold UTT BH-5@243mhz 2-2-2-5 = 8min 41s
As you can see for 3408Mhz test here's the screen capture at 99% mark notice difference in encoding speed. Whether the drive configuration played a factor who knows.
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...hrink_99pc.png
click image below for full screenshot
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...1s_cpuz_tn.png
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 vs AMD64 FX-60 DVD Shrink Comparison
Now putting the Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 and AMD64 FX-60 test results together we get the following:
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975...60_seconds.png
Remember to consider the following notes when looking at the above graph.
Notes:
- Due to phase change cooling, FX-60 max HTT is low - this may influence performance somewhat.
- All DVD Shrink settings and ISO are the same as for Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 tests.
- Seems DVD Shrink completion times are always highly influenced by hard drive speed, so differences between FX-60 and E6600 systems' drive configurations can influence the results. Faster drive speeds and drive configurations and controllers which handle NCQ well i suspect would give better times.
- FX-60 used single volume 4x80GB SATAII raid 0 array where OS partition and ISO images etc were on same raid volume as where the DVD Shrink output was being written to. FX-60 disks had NCQ enabled.
- E6600 used 3x320GB SATAII raid 0 split into 2x separate raid 0 arrays volumes where DVD Shrink ISO image was being read from a seperate raid 0 array from where the DVD Shrink output was being written to. E6600 disks had NCQ disabled as in bios drives were setup as RAID and not ACHI mode (which enables NCQ).
Conclusion:
Putting drive configuration and speed aside, the above test results clearly show the power of Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 as even at stock speeds of 2400Mhz it beat out FX-60 @3408Mhz by 9 seconds! :eek:
Your analysis are always really well documented eva, BIG thanks for the comparison :toast:
Guess I'll take a 6400 instead a 6600 as it's enough for me, at least until really good mobos are out (RD600 :D)
ohh duh!! :wierd: tnx! didnt read everything.. :) dat was the 1st deep analysis no resetQuote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
i retested.. last time i had a prog runing and was surfing the net at the same time..
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1153298374
analysing @ 19MB/s
encoding @ 26MB/s
just for fun,
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1153298574
encoding @ 168MB/s
later today ill test @ 2600mhz.. wanna see if can even ur FX-60 @ 3408.. :D
btw, do u have preview video enabled? takes quite a bite.. disable it..
preview is enabled.. stress the cpu more :D
WOW Great
Good stuff but I doubt you'll be able to do apples to apples comparisons with other members because of all the variables. In most Ripping - Reauthoring - Burning cylces the optical and hard drives will slightly muffle Conroe's advantage. Still very nice to see how Conroe performance scales with another benchmark. Thanks. :toast:
sloppy mem timings..
@ 2596mhz
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1153306695
@ 2618mhz
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1153306736
by 1s.. lol..
cant wait to get my hands on conroe.. :D
nice that's Areca power for ya :D
indeed :)
@ 2640mhz, dis is all the mem can muster..
vs
8min 32sec.
close but no cigar.. about 2700mhz and lots of areca/raptor power to pass the just the 2400mhz conroe.. sheesh
Using two Rapture 150's (no raid)... On the first test the iso and the output folder were on the same drive. This time I sent the output to the other drive, wow!Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
wow indeed.. clearly drive speed is an important factor!Quote:
Originally Posted by pcdoc1
This is what I was hoping to see, THX!!
Those are awsome times this cpu is pulling :woot:
________
Extreme Q Vaporizer
is dat analysing or encoding? did u reset?Quote:
Originally Posted by pcdoc1
how come its shows 2MB l2 in the screenshot?
crystalcpuid bug :)Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkyRider
nice stuff, i have a 150gb raptor waiting for my new conroe build, still sealed hard not to open it though