Two WR 3d Mark 01/05 , Kyosen destroyed the scores !!!

really impressive!
Congrats

OMFG!

thats crazy

So impressive....and such low GPU clocks too! :slobber:

omg dude ur GPU clocks are so loww and ur cpu can prolly still further cant it ?


seriously those are some amazing scores right there

wow those scores are just amazing, though the GPUs need to be put on some dice and modded

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ahmad

There is crazy, there is insane, and then there is kyosen :cool:

---

Kyosen = crazyinsane :p:

Someone slap me.


Then buy me a Conroe.

argh... i was kinda trying to base my upgrade path on "if i'm getting 1/3rd of the world record in 3dmark2k1, i need to upgrade"

*sigh* very very soon that will happen.


:D good job kyosen!

conroe is godly fast, well done Kyosen

O M G

Many thanks to here all:)

Unfortunately, ORB refused publishing my 01 score:(

Another updates...

3DMark05: 23851
<img src="http://222.151.149.185/c-board/file/3DM05_23851_E6700_4308.87.png">

3DMark06: 13309
<img src="http://222.151.149.185/c-board/file/3DM06_13309_E6700_4340.19.png">

I may be able to touch k|ngp|n's 13358,
but yes I know that my rig...water-cooled GPU... is not Xtreme at all;)
These results are just milestones for Conroe Era, I think.

Nice scores ;) This cpu id great!

:eek2: Those scores are insane! i can see 80k falling by the end of the year.

Wow, congratulations, Kyosen :)

damn....

still improving - insane ;) :woot: :toast:
And he's saying "but yes I know that my rig...water-cooled GPU... is not Xtreme at all" - lol I love xtreme :D

:toast:

Such big numbers .. fantastic scoring.

Regards

Andy

@ kyosen :
Very very great scores :clap: :clap: :clap:

Try 14K 3DMark06, 24K 3DMark05, 80K 3DMark 2001SE.

Could you benchmark with 3DMark03 ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bakalu

Could you benchmark with 3DMark03 ?

---

Though it's not impressive with Radeon...GeForce is stronger for 03...but here: 44200
<img src="http://222.151.149.185/c-board/file/3DM03_44200_E6700_4308.88.png">

very nice scores
why no AM3 at 4300MHz?

Been looking at this thread for about fifteen minutes now, I just woke up and wasnt sure if the scores were for real or if I were dreaming, but im starting to realize it now, they are real, man you just doubled my 01 score :slobber: insane scores , keep it coming kyosen :toast: :toast: :toast:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by payne280

why no AM3 at 4300MHz?

---

Because I couldn't exceed 201k+ at 4.3G:(
You will notice that memory clock is different between 4.16G run and 4.3G run.
i.e. FSB/RAM divider is 4:5 in 4.16G run and 1:1 in 4.3G run.
I could run AquaMark3 at 4.16G with 4:5 divider, but can't 3DMark01.
So I lowerd FSB/RAM divider to 1:1...

Also I need FSB1333MHz setting in BIOS, sadly.
In my experience, FSB1333MHz mode is slower than 1066MHz mode,
but 1066MHz mode prevents higher FSB...so we need higher multiplier;)

Lovely, Is it B step your cpu?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kyosen

Because I couldn't exceed 201k+ at 4.3G:(
You will notice that memory clock is different between 4.16G run and 4.3G run.
i.e. FSB/RAM divider is 4:5 in 4.16G run and 1:1 in 4.3G run.
I could run AquaMark3 at 4.16G with 4:5 divider, but can't 3DMark01.
So I lowerd FSB/RAM divider to 1:1...

Also I need FSB1333MHz setting in BIOS, sadly.
In my experience, FSB1333MHz mode is slower than 1066MHz mode,
but 1066MHz mode prevents higher FSB...so we need higher multiplier;)

---

ok thanks for clearing that up for me

Total amazing!
No words to say!:eek: