FX-57 0516WPMW meets Kayl Black Frozen SS

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-05-2006, 09:41 AM
guess2098

@ eva2000

woot!!! the no cold bug FX-57 0516WPMW!!!
give her some DI :up:
06-05-2006, 10:02 AM
bachus_anonym

Great to see you finally subzero-cooling, George :up: Temps are somewhat high, though...
06-05-2006, 10:25 AM
before

They aren't too high for a 1/4HP compressor, are they?... ;)
06-05-2006, 10:31 AM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by before

They aren't too high for a 1/4HP compressor, aren't they?... ;)

... missed that part from George's thread is Phase change :wasntme: I take that back then :D
06-05-2006, 04:36 PM
eva2000

Thanks.. yeah not bad for 1/4HP heh :D

Very happy as i was stuck at 3109-3150Mhz on water for all my AMD64 cpus, Opteron 146, 148, FX-57, FX-60 hehe and 2950mhz on Opteron 170.... but now thanks to Kayl this will change :)

Good thing is compressor runs cool, no condensation = nice 24/7 cooling solution - already ran it for 16+ hr runs three times this week with no probs :)

Just plucked in my 2nd 256MB BFG 7800GTX for some SLI fun :D
06-05-2006, 04:51 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

Good thing is compressor runs cool, no condensation = nice 24/7 cooling solution - already ran it for 16+ hr runs three times this week with no probs :)

Hey, what are you trying to imply????:p: I could run my unit for 16+ hours straight too, but I'd end up with an iceberg the size of the one that sank the Titanic on my mobo :D
06-05-2006, 05:03 PM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

Hey, what are you trying to imply????:p: I could run my unit for 16+ hours straight too, but I'd end up with an iceberg the size of the one that sank the Titanic on my mobo :D

LOL you call that condensation ? more like motherboard artic glacial formation :D
06-05-2006, 07:32 PM
eva2000

how's this 3dmark05 score with single core AMD64 cpu and 2x 256MB BFG 7800GTX SLI @473(525)/1350

FX-57 @3501Mhz
= 15,338 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2054959

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...0_15338_tn.png

Compare this to dual core cpu

FX-60 @3001Mhz with 2x 256MB eVGA 7900GT CO SC @590(610)/1827
= 15,625 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1954967

FX-60 @3061Mhz with 2x 256MB BFG 7800GTX SLI @501(551)/1386
= 15,409 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1897498

But already managed to beat my FX-60 BFG 7800GTX SLI score of 15,409 with 11mhz less on GPU and 18mhz less on Vid memory

3dmark05 = 15,442
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2055087

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...0_15422_tn.png

:cool:
06-05-2006, 09:03 PM
brandinb

hmm wouldnt the fx60 be more productive under your ss in 3dmark 05?
06-05-2006, 09:09 PM
eva2000

maybe... will get around to my Opteron 170 and FX-60 on Kayl Black Frozen SS soon ;)

Just testing each of my cpus first hehe
06-05-2006, 11:07 PM
CapFTP

really nice clocking you're having....I really comprehend your enthusiasm...I'm living the same feeling with my 1st phase change..:D

ehm...soon you'll have a nice PM about pi32 times....:) have to offer you a beer ?
:D

regarding 3dmark scores....i had some test in the past on 1900xtx card and I was missing 300 pts with a 3700+@3 gigs vs. x2 4400@2800....so your dual cores setup should grant you some extrapoints...and if not coldbugged....also some more satisfactions..:D
06-06-2006, 12:55 AM
before

Very nice work George! Very clean screenies... :)
06-06-2006, 01:17 AM
eva2000

thanks guys... now to Opteron 170 or FX-60 next, if i do FX-60 first it probably dampen my experience with Opteron 170 though hehe... but Opteron 170 10x cpu multiplier will limit how far i can do on the board HTT wise which this board is around 334-344HTT AFAIK
06-06-2006, 09:06 AM
eva2000

Did a fresh winxp pro sp2 fully updated install and redid 14x251HTT = 3514Mhz 32M run to see if i could improve :)

WinXP's screensaver mode nearly cost me my new PB when i saw the screen black out at 23rd iteration! Lucky i moved the mouse before trying a manual reboot hehe...

Old PB
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...rpi-32m_tn.png

New PB
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...rpi-32m_tn.png

Improved by 0.703 seconds :D
06-06-2006, 12:33 PM
CapFTP

george you need to tweak something else or to increase freq to have better time....
06-07-2006, 02:44 AM
eva2000

Yeah, anyway forging ahead with 5.719 seconds faster 32M time :)

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...rpi-32m_tn.png

Problem is load temps are a tad too high at +6C to +8C heh
06-07-2006, 02:52 AM
Viss

Very nice 32M. Wil you run 2001 with the FX57?
06-07-2006, 02:58 AM
eva2000

yeah later though 7800GTX's don't show off well in 3d2k1 though... my X1800XT is back on air so no 810/963 clocks on water hehe
06-07-2006, 03:18 AM
CapFTP

good good good......I had to stop at 254x14 and 20min 34"....i'm still near zero or below...but too hot anyway
06-07-2006, 05:42 AM
eva2000

thanks yeah heat our #1 enemy hehe

Okay here's a Pcmark05 run seems low score but guess it's about right for single core AMD64 cpu :)

Pcmark05 = 6,313
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=385436

FX-57 @3501Mhz
DFI NF4 UT SLI-DR R.AB0 1114-3 bios
2x 256MB BFG 7800GTX stock hsf SLI @493(541)/1370
3x 80GB Hitachi 7K80 SATAII raid 0

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...13_5919_tn.png

Pcmark04 = 6,889
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=3237533

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...89_7406_tn.png

3dmark05 = 15,548
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2057420

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...7_15548_tn.png

3dmark2001 = 41,662
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8989854

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...0_41662_tn.jpg

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page