Allendale @ 460FSB +

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-03-2006, 03:01 AM
Big_Sam

Quote:

Originally Posted by FUGGER

Ok, I give up. WTF is this??

Nice screen, FUGGER :D
But I will not have not enough imagination to assume what it is.
06-03-2006, 03:06 AM
cadaveca

Temps?
06-03-2006, 03:42 AM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by FUGGER

http://fugger.netfirms.com/460.jpg

Hmmm...interesting....While there's an obvious improvement in the architecture, I would have thought the difference between Core and Core 2 would have been much bigger......Yonah on air:

http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/9991/252x131m6hm.jpg
06-03-2006, 03:49 AM
farksy

Quote:

Originally Posted by FUGGER

Stock vcore I can boot @ 333FSB

1.4v I can boot to 30% over 333FSB = 433FSB

NB @ 1.6v
Memory @ 2.2v

http://fugger.netfirms.com/default.jpg

Ok, I give up. WTF is this??

http://fugger.netfirms.com/awaymode.jpg

Lol ! AMD hacked into Intel's chip !?!?
06-03-2006, 03:53 AM
Kjaks

Quote:

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

Hmmm...interesting....While there's an obvious improvement in the architecture, I would have thought the difference between Core and Core 2 would have been much bigger......Yonah on air:

http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/9991/252x131m6hm.jpg

Interesting, but how tweaked is that OS?
06-03-2006, 03:56 AM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjaks

Interesting, but how tweaked is that OS?

It's not tweaked at all ;)
06-03-2006, 04:03 AM
kiwi

SP maybe not so huge but in 3D I'd say there is a HUGE difference. I am getting like 7-8K more 2k1 at the same speed vs yonah.
06-03-2006, 04:05 AM
death metal

*lol* at the screenshot!
06-03-2006, 04:07 AM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiwi

SP maybe not so huge but in 3D I'd say there is a HUGE difference. I am getting like 7-8K more 2k1 at the same speed vs yonah.

It's cuz your conroe is 4mb l2 cache :stick: :p:
06-03-2006, 04:28 AM
RyderOCZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by FUGGER

Ok, I give up. WTF is this??

http://fugger.netfirms.com/awaymode.jpg

That is to keep the Fanboys out of your thread, and your PC.
I think it monitors and says "AMD............no CPU for you"
06-03-2006, 04:41 AM
Vric

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evilsizer

guys the only way to compare the 2 would be to have both the 2.4ghz 2mb vs 2.4ghz 4mb. I havent seen the 2.4ghz 2mb es yet, unless he has a ES and is not locked on upping the multi.

You can't higher the multi, but you can lower it.

So a E6600 with 7x multi would make a good comparison with that chip.
Compare both at 1.86. Then we will see if the 4MB cache worth it.
06-03-2006, 04:41 AM
Johnny Bravo

From Guru3D

Quote:

Microsoft's Away Mode is also a requirement for AMD Live! compliant systems. Away Mode will allow a system to shutdown all components that are unused by a user when they are "away" from the machine. Some of the components listed are: displays, keyboards, mice, remote controls, and other non essentials. The machine continues to operate normally, with the power LED on the system will indicate an off state -- although safety issues may arise from a user thinking that the machine is off when in fact, it's still operating. According to Away Mode specifications, the machine will continue to operate normally so that tasks such as file downloading and transferring can still take place without requiring much power. Away Mode is only supported in Microsoft's Windows XP Media Center Edition with Rollup 2 update. Apparently, the Away Mode feature is part of the Live! specification and is not a feature available to Intel Viiv systems.

Nothing to fear then Fugger...apart from the fact it shouldn't even be there! :D
06-03-2006, 04:52 AM
Gautam

Quote:

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

Hmmm...interesting....While there's an obvious improvement in the architecture, I would have thought the difference between Core and Core 2 would have been much bigger......Yonah on air:

There *is* a very large difference- this is just 3158MHz:

http://www.ocforums.com/attachment.p...1&d=1147922522
06-03-2006, 04:59 AM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

There *is* a very large difference- this is just 3158MHz:

Ummmm....please read post #34 :p:
06-03-2006, 05:42 AM
althes

keep up the good work fugger
06-03-2006, 05:56 AM
Gautam

Quote:

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

Ummmm....please read post #34 :p:

Quite a head scratcher...I still can't believe that this architecture relies so heavily on cache... :shrug: core 2 is quite different from core, sort of sad to think that the cache by itself is where most of the oopmh seems to be coming from. :-/
06-03-2006, 06:20 AM
Stelios

Away mode : http://download.microsoft.com/downlo...b/awaymode.doc
06-03-2006, 06:33 AM
kiwi

Quote:

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

It's cuz your conroe is 4mb l2 cache :stick: :p:

I think 2MB models will do similar, maybe 1K-2K less than 4MB models
06-03-2006, 06:36 AM
865pe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

There *is* a very large difference- this is just 3158MHz:

http://www.ocforums.com/attachment.p...1&d=1147922522

T7200 mobile?
06-03-2006, 06:46 AM
cupholder2.0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

Quite a head scratcher...I still can't believe that this architecture relies so heavily on cache... :shrug: core 2 is quite different from core, sort of sad to think that the cache by itself is where most of the oopmh seems to be coming from. :-/

There a lot more to core than just the cache :fact: . Like the 4 x86 decoders for example. But it does look somewhat cache dependent.
06-03-2006, 07:01 AM
[XC] moddolicous

I suppose your running the mem 1:1 right fugger?? These are some very good results. A good chip running 6x400 with mem running 1:1. That sounds like a good gaming rig.
06-03-2006, 07:11 AM
Gautam

Quote:

Originally Posted by cupholder2.0

There a lot more to core than just the cache :fact: . Like the 4 x86 decoders for example. But it does look somewhat cache dependent.

That's exactly what I'm saying. Which is why its so odd that a Yonah is able to keep up with it...I guess pi is just very cache-centric, in 3D it should be a different story.
06-03-2006, 07:32 AM
oijkue

Are conroe and Allendale have the same die size?
06-03-2006, 08:21 AM
Evilsizer

Quote:

Originally Posted by oijkue

Are conroe and Allendale have the same die size?

allendale is conroe it just doesnt have the extra 2mb L2 enabled. What do you think they would do with all the early dies that had some bad L2 cache on it.
06-03-2006, 08:58 AM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

That's exactly what I'm saying. Which is why its so odd that a Yonah is able to keep up with it...I guess pi is just very cache-centric, in 3D it should be a different story.

For the most part, the shorter PI runs seem to be most affected by the difference in L2 Cache, but run a 32m and the gap lessens even more. Just take a look at the performance of Core Solo vs. Core Duo and you'll see what I mean ;)

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page