man thats to bad... it thought it would do 570+ with that voltage....
can you read it with digital multitester??
Printable View
man thats to bad... it thought it would do 570+ with that voltage....
can you read it with digital multitester??
dint hav digital multitester:( if i get a meter, wic point should i test on itQuote:
Originally Posted by andre X_X
but i think it is because the chip not quite 'good':mad:
luckily the mem can reach 800 easily.....next time try 900
is it possible to reach 1000:D :banana:
1000?? not be able without mod....
anyway, can you write in all the numbers on the memory?? just wanna know what chip the GX2 have...
here is the reading point for Vgpu....
http://endeavorquest.net:8880/7900GT...65741899-O.jpg
*Source: endeavorquest.net
thx alot:toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by andre X_X
i dont know how to remove the HSF....:p:scary too
my DIYfreak fren told me it is 1.4ns ddr3 and chip is 79gt mobile ver (????:eh: )
The HSF covers the Memory too???
could you give me the link to your card??? i mean a little info bout ur card...
Updating 1st Post...
Adding up, Aquamark3 Score and 3DMark06 Score...
sorry it is a chinese hw bbs ...but u can juz lookat the pics;)Quote:
Originally Posted by andre X_X
http://bbs.ocfantasy.com/thread-1338-1-1.html
here is a hongkong website who reviewed my card:cool:
http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/quadsli-79gx2-1.htm
I dont realize its a dual core 7900GT.... I thought GX2 only a naming from Albatron.... Are u running it on quad SLi??? or only single GX2... Seems to me Quad SLi is not as better as 7900GTX on SLi especially in compatibility issue....
okay, you have good memory on that card since it was fabricated with 1.1ns chips....
since you have BC type of Chips, i believe its already factory overvolted since BC running on 1.8v and ALL 7900 Series already running on 2v... dont Vmod your Mem (2.1v is the max though)..
here is the specs i took from samsung website:
http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/2...52324qc7cf.jpg
btw, here's my card (GIgabyte 7900GT) with 1.25v on Coolbits optimal detect:
http://img343.imageshack.us/img343/6...oolbits0yt.jpg
okay, forget the reading point of Voltage since it might has DIfferent PCB.... i'll try to find an info bout GX later on...
thx of your infoQuote:
Originally Posted by andre X_X
haha im runnnig at single sli.....i m satisfied of it:D
“it was fabricated with 1.1ns chips....”-----wat mean?:confused: samsung lies?somebody told me lots of 7900 die because official overvolt?!:eek:
my coolbits work abnormally.....didnt hav auto oc and the vcore (i nvr know this:rolleyes: bf i m using a 6200,din see that)
it is a guru3d fixed 87.25 fw......not a good driver, sometime sys hang without reason but other cant recognize the catrds:mad:
maybe the Coolbits doesnt support GX2 on Auto OC????
and what do you mean with vcore???
have you try 91.28 driver??
im trying to say that 1.1-2.0ns chip were from the same waffel and usually it was tested (to what speed it can run). some bad chips cant run on 1.1ns and were labelled to lets say 1.4 or 1.6 (according the tests)... luckily most of them can run higher speed with overvoltage it... thats why most 7900GT (that has 1.4ns) can Bench on 900+ and some stable on 800+ (due to overvolt from nvidia to 2.0v).Quote:
Originally Posted by ~JIN~tanjt
Samsung doesnt lie... it was nvidias design to run the mem on overvoltage...
i mean i nvr know that coolbits can show us th vcore:p:Quote:
Originally Posted by andre X_X
unfortunately, i tried....>800, the ram start unstable, screen is raining:DQuote:
Originally Posted by andre X_X
seem it is not a 1.1.....1.2 maybe;)
Have a question, can be 125 :confused: any damage of system od card :confused: What about long running card on thisQuote:
Originally Posted by andre X_X
i dont suggest you running for long time with 125mhz... anyway different system might have different results... some system cant use more than 110mhz, due to stability issue... for sata users 120 is the safe bet, for pata 130+ is still reachable... im using 120+ only for Benching.. on daily 100 - 105 is the safe place...
We got pretty simular systems, but your ram clocks and cpu clocks are higher then mine. Still I score a lil higher then you on 06. Did you run with high/normal quality?Quote:
Originally Posted by andre X_X
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=314976 :toast:
venice@2.7
2x512 xms3200xl 225 2-3-3-6
asrock dual sata2
asus en7900gt top 1.57v 710/1800
well at SM3 test, the "VPU recover" kicks in, thats make my sm3 score lower than you... usually on Canyon Flight test it start to kick in, and run at oc again at deep freeze... dont know why.....
Well then you need to get better cooling :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by andre X_X
Edit: you're benching with 512mb ram and afaik it matters allot on 06 ;)