not even sub 30s 1m with 3GHZ? Well latency values are high but anyway shows that it is not worth the change for S939 users...
Thanks for the benches anyway, but even with tweaking I don't think we'll see anything really surprising us positivly.
Printable View
not even sub 30s 1m with 3GHZ? Well latency values are high but anyway shows that it is not worth the change for S939 users...
Thanks for the benches anyway, but even with tweaking I don't think we'll see anything really surprising us positivly.
See if lowering your HT helps you boot into windows.Quote:
Originally Posted by JuanFlaiter
OPP
Hi OPPAINTER:Quote:
Originally Posted by OPPAINTER
I tried HTT 3x255 and nothing :(
I´m going to work now, I´ll work on it again in 12 more hours. I have a 4000+ chip I will be benching too.
BTW guys, I´m not showing off any scores and I´m not keeping this CPU, I´m just trying to help with some results of what an X2 AM2 could be for any of you.
LOL WTF ?? 29s@3ghz ? ROFL. Conroe should be afraid of that ?? :p: It has to be a joke... a 939 cpu is high 27's... I didn't think that AM2 would be that bad...
that is a pretty bad super-pi for 3 GHz...if i can do a 29.531s 1M at 2.8 Ghz...something just has to be wrong. (282x10 1:1 2.5-3-3-7 timings)
bad windows install all of the scores seem way to low for what it is and DDR2 should be faster then ddr at those speeds.
Dragon
Give him a break guys, he just got the system. :stick: Keep us posted please JuanFlaiter, many are interested in your results.
I will reinstall windows, as I told it isn´t the best install...Quote:
Originally Posted by FireDragon
I should be benching at night, I´m at work right now.
No flaming please.... yet... :p:
Actually i was referring to the 3DMark06 CPU score (over 2200 points), not the overall 3DMark score :rolleyes: ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Cappie
AM2 looks very bad so far :(
What was wrong with that board?Quote:
Originally Posted by JuanFlaiter
Not that I doubt it after my A8N-SLI premium experiences...
I wasnt flamming i was trying to help him out...make sure that u defrag after the video drivers then after the chipset drivers that will help out also...then get all of ur benching stuff on the system and de-frag...it helps quit a lot in truth.
Dragon
It is a really great board, for a daily driver would be definitely good. But for "sport" overclocking is not a nice board, only +0.1vCore and those heatpipes (snow logo, how ironic).Quote:
Originally Posted by uOpt
I want to see Epox 590SLI and DFI boards... Just wait till Computex :)
i wasnt sure how these Pi runs stacked up against my current rig so i ran a few. Here is a 170 at the same speed with 2Gb DDR500 2.5-3-2-7.
http://thecowsaysmoo.org/budwise/pics/Personal/3000.JPG
Well, your chip has 1MB L2.
Doesn't make a diff. especially with new Am2 chips
I made a OS fresh install, nothing changed much...
Updated with the 4000+, really nice chip.
Nice overclock on the 4000+
Was that stable? X2 4000+ is what I will be getting.
-k0nsl
Havent tested full stability yet, but what I feel is 3000mhz is definitely stable. Anyways for a rock solid overclock I would look for a better heatsink.Quote:
Originally Posted by k0nsl
good luck juan.
I should get my setup today will only a 3800+ .
so are they cooler then S939 or not :poke:
Don´t know, I don´t trust the sensors on the motherboard, it reads lower than ambient on idle :stick:Quote:
Originally Posted by zerotol
so then use that as your offset i am sure those bios must allow u to do that...BTW great results there...
One question is it just me or is EVERYONE with these AM2 chips hitting the vcore INSANLEY hard?? and they r still on stock air?!? i am not complaining if these chips can take it then i am all for it but it is still 90nm the only diff is sckt and ddr2 mc...
Dragon
It must just be because of the DDR2 of maybe even the chipset...seems to me like it is the chipset the mc flies gives LL oc on it also...maybe the nb heat issue can be related to the poor performance of these chips?