Printable View
GPU clock ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ORCBEAST
Stephen, is there a +2 LOD in there as well?? :D
EDIT:
ARGH, Aopen YDG still aint for sale in Denmark... - But at 3200mhz with my XTX, I got 148xx marks, so I bet I can compete with ya in the 3ghz series ;)
Here's the same card steph's running, these tests only show GPU power.
His cpu is 550mhz short of mine, and he still outscores me.
This was on a tweaked OS and gpu @ 770/1920.
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/8743/3156mq.jpg
Try with some good BH5 / UTT or other low lats on that.... - It'll def give you alot of marks... -Stephen's probaly running 260 2-2-2-5 and the rest very low as well :)Quote:
Originally Posted by eBoy0
Just 2.6 on the cpu....was testing for max card clocks. AMD doesn't have speedstep ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ORCBEAST
@ MBeier: Not sure what LOD I should run, but IIRC that was done with LOD +5 :p: Maybe that's a bit much though......
@ Eboy0: Should have the auto back 2morro :rolleyes: Get ready to see some 1k/1k runs as the Baker's starting to top off @ higher heat loads.......
Ahh Stephen, I dont know the first thing about nvidia clockin' but I've already told you what I think about nvidia :p:
With AIT 2 is best for 03/05, havnt used it though...
But guys, one thing I can tell ya, my CeleD 310 wont stand a chance :p: - Running the sucker 2.13@4ghz 24/7 stable on box cooler though :D (and yeah, doin' some mach II tests as soon as mach's modded)
Still not @ 3ghz :p:
http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/9320/139815wt.jpg
Sexy! :D how you liking the card? Fights like a trooper!
Btw, what kinda ram you got running in that rig?
I need better cooling ;). Team PC4000 UTT BH5. This mobo is totally borked too...for some reason I can't run 265+FSB and the first pcie-slot is broken (so yes, I'm running the card @ 8x in the lower slot :rolleyes: )Quote:
Originally Posted by eBoy0
That aint good, hope you got another SLI mobo ;)
Team PC huh...
It wouldn't be so close if the GPU clocks were closer to Victor's ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ORCBEAST
That Conroe is pretty damn powerful considering 3dmark is still mostly GPU bound, for the CPU to really affect the score it must be very powerful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Why not match VIctors GPU clocks to have a fair comparisson?
745/1030
Cuz conroe vs. x2 isn't exactly a "fair" comparison :p: Also, I can't get the Vddr clocked that high....yet ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by n91htmare
Oh well, running 01, 03 and AM would show better comparisonQuote:
Originally Posted by Absolute_0
huh ! how is Conroe V X2 not a fair comparison ?Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
get a X2 clocked at 2.6 or 2.8 or whatever you can manage and get Conroe on the same clocks then we will see.
Let me ask you....do you have a Conroe right now? Can you go out to the store and buy one? Or maybe even order it online? My guess is that your answer is "No". Why? BECAUSE CONROE IS A NEXT GENERATION CPU.......Quote:
Originally Posted by IluvIntel
X2 is current technology. For a comparison to be fair, one must compare next generation cpu's to each other and not technology which is on it's way out :rolleyes:
:DQuote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
look at these buddy :p:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1148126774
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1148126774
VictorWang: since the GPU tests in 3d mark are so much about the performance of the GPU, you really should run both CPU tests. That's why it's got separate CPU tests.
i can tell you that....Quote:
Originally Posted by Kjaks
in 3Dmark05, cputest = 13k , for just a 3.3G conroe :p:
and.... here for you to compare :
3641mhz Yonah T2600
http://vic.expreview.com/attachment/...05+3641mhz.jpg
3375mhz Conroe E6600
http://vic.expreview.com/attachment/1148134663.jpg
Alright steph, you gatta compete w/ that :)
GOOD GOD VICTOR! :eek: Nice work there.....I'm going to pick up my autocascade today so maybe I'll be able to do a little better, but no way in hell those scores are acheivable with the setup I have running now :(
Stephen, I said to match the Clock speeds of the GPU because you know that 3dmark is a GPU intensive benchmark and we're testing the power of CPUS, not GPUS... So actually it would be a fair comparisson to see how an equally clocked GPU compares with different CPUS...
Next Gen or not... It will be available in few months anyways.
2 months from now it will be Conroe vs. Am2... and AM2 is not even next gen.
Something's wrong with that score , with the same CPU clocks for my OPty170 and MUCH lower GPU clocks :Quote:
Originally Posted by eBoy0
Opteron 170 @ 3150MHz , 1.64V , 315x10.0
Water Chilled
DFI LP UT nF4 SLI-DR Xpert
2x512Mb , 262MHz @ 2.0-2-2-5-1T , 3.41V
7900GTX PNY @ 721/951MHz ;)
WinXP Pro SP2 , FW 84.21WHQL , LOD +3
3DMark05 : 12923
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1991640
Same GPU clocks again (721/951) but with Yonah @ 3.0GHz :
T2600ES @ 3.0GHz , 1.50V
Aoper BOX Cooler :)
Aopen i975Xa-YDG unmoded
2x512Mb , 385MHz @ 4.0-4-4-12 , 2.00V
GeForce 7900GTX , 721/951MHz , LOD +3
3DMark05 : 12822
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2004915
What's there to say? I'll be the first to admit that a Conroe should stomp on any x2 clocked @ the same speed :p: . It's like comparing apples to oranges - A Conroe is a 4mb L2 cache, 65nm chip on a DDR2 platform. An x2 is a 2mb L2 cache, 90nm chip on DDR1. By next generation I mean a more fair comparison would be a 65nm AMD cpu with the optimaztions necessary to compete with processors available @ the same time.....Quote:
Originally Posted by n91htmare
There is no such thing as "fair." If score 1 > score 2 then score 1 wins. :rolleyes:
Is that why 3dmark only allows results to be published for "approved" cpu's/systems? :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by freecableguy