MooWaHahaha! ROTMFFLMFAO!Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
Printable View
MooWaHahaha! ROTMFFLMFAO!Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
You sure, I thought E4xxx was 800MHz FSB?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vassili
http://www.techpowerup.com/img/06-07...K1IDDr76mr.jpg
Must be getting mixed up with Celerons...:)
That's pretty cool. Starting at an effective 200 fsb instead of a 266 fsb and having a multiplier of 12.
I'm excited to see people's results.
Yup.. Should do 3.2GHz "out of the box" with stock cooling and cheap-ass PC4300 DDR2..... :eek: :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Noob-ftw
I would have bought this instead of my week 25 E6300, but I need a dual core.Quote:
Originally Posted by mzs_biteme
It IS a dual core CPU....:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Noob-ftw
Just missing VT technology... No biggie...:rolleyes:
Its a few seconds faster then my old barton was when overclocked so I do hope its the cheap celeron of the future or theres not much point to it.
Is there a spec sheet for this. Personally having tried dual core I wouldnt go back to single core even if it overclocked 100%
^^
I have no idea where all you guys are geting the "E4300 is single core" crap out of...:rolleyes: It's a Conroe CPU with slower FSB and no Virtualization Tech. With the same multi as E6600, it should be a breeze to OC it past 3GHZ...:woot:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gam3Ra
:cool: it's $40 - $60!when old P4&celeon sold out.
1/3 cost of Conroe;) single core A64 killer
but it comes too late.i dont want single core CPU any more
The e4300 won't be out until the first quarter of 2007, but my guess is that CPU will be the best allendale for OCing. With DDR2 800 memory at stock speeds it could potentially pull a 100% OC.
How much does the Virtualization technology add to performance?
depends greatly on what you are doing. If it is say running VMware, it'll double your performance. If you are just gaming. It wouldn't matter at allQuote:
Originally Posted by Phosphate
I will keep my DOTHAN thank you... Specially now witht he X1950 PRO AGP coming....... The good thing about it is the OCing that is going to be great....
Alex
This might end up being the gamers CPU to get then.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
I was wondering the same thing but since you were doing such a great job of explaining it I stayed out.Quote:
Originally Posted by mzs_biteme
I think the Single Core Conroe-L E1000 series got mixed up with the Dual Core E4300. Conron as the other guy Called them might be a great name and pretty good description. It was a Conron tested and not a Conroe-L, why?
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060921-7801.html
So the Pentium 1000 and Celeron 400 series aren't dead yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by ARS
http://digitimes.com/mobos/a20060919PR207.html
So what he tested was in fact the New Celeron 4xx and NOT a true Conroe-L that "desperately" needs its cache.Quote:
Originally Posted by DT
That depends! There are plenty of Dual Core patches out there. I'd honestly be shocked if folks really do hit much more than 3GHz with these processors that are re-cycled from the failure bin! That's all Celeron and Durons have always been.Quote:
Originally Posted by Phosphate
They should be priced to sell and fill a void that Intel needs to fill.
Ya when I heard about the X1950 pro AGP . I got a large:) on my face . I will keep my dothan also . holidays around my house are going to very much fun with all the gaming computers . We can have a very merry LAN xmas.Quote:
Originally Posted by AgonxOC
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4252
no it's not!Quote:
Originally Posted by mzs_biteme
it's a single core. just look at the cpuz screen.
and yes cpuz is reading it correctly. those new single core "Core" based chips will be the new pentiums and celerons when intel runs out of netburst chips.
I think these chips will clock insane. the 800mhz bus, tiny L2 high multi and so cool.
combine these chips with mobo's natively capable of 1066mhz fsb and those chips will run an easy 1066 fsb with stock cooler and only very little extra vCore. and that price :slobber: it's clocking heaven
I know Conroe-L is single core but E4300 is dual.... It got mixed into the thread, when somebody tried comparing the two.... So, you're right, and..... I'm right...:toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by zert
Damn... :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Phosphate
don't be so rude with opty :stick:Quote:
Originally Posted by LagunaX
I did 33.6sec quite easily with a A64 3200+@2.5GHz and poor tccd @250 2.5-3-3-6
this new cpu performs like a good K8 with 1M of cache :)
edit : at least, stock frequency
but no cold bug so oc is going to by interesting on this cpu :D
A64 @2.7~2.8GHz should get you less than 30secs in 1M. And 3GHz somewhere north of 27secs.
Here's a review of the Conroe L with 1 mb cache runnning @ 2.8 GHz . Its a bit more powerful than a AMD 64 and should O/C to 3.6 easily
http://www.oc.com.tw/article/0611/re...le.asp?id=5555