Originally Posted by _damien_
How many times do I have to explain?
You're the one who's dodging the facts. I don't even know what to highlight, you're so lost. As I've said throughout this thread, in order to prove me wrong you have to follow my specific examples. I can't be held responsible for your failure to do so. Gautam actually said that most people actually use my "unideal settings". That's true, but it doesn't remotely prove me wrong - however it does invalidate your benchmark results in this context.
If anything I say is unclear, I'm usually willing to elaborate. But since you don't wanna listen, fine.
It's obvious that you don't understand much of what I've been explaining. Why did you even bother to say that I was right about the theory, when you obviously don't have the knowledge it would take to verify 20% of it?