what about 300MHz+ HTT on that oneQuote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Printable View
what about 300MHz+ HTT on that oneQuote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Almost the same...27C less:)Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/646...shot0128gq.jpg
im confused, thats still stock speeds?
Yeah, but look at the temps. It actually booted into windows at that temp. most wouldn't even post at those temps.Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
That chip will clock a lot higher he's just showing the temps it can withstand.
I think you're missing the point Kyle ;) The comparison is done to show if the cpu can do higher HTT's at lower temps. The lower the temp, the more difficult it is for MOST cpu's to raise HTT's....Quote:
Originally Posted by Coroner Kyle
But didn't he just post 200 HTT? I guess I missed something, sorry.
He did post 200HTT, but look above to my post - 250HTT @ -98C ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Coroner Kyle
Oh, I just ignore your posts now, because I'm tired of my eyes bugging out of my head. ;)
Is this good enough for you? Bench your 4600:)......Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Most, if not all FX60 XXX2E won't even post @ this temp.....4 leds on.
http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/3...shot0130yo.jpg
Like this....
http://img108.imageshack.us/img108/4...shot0113yd.jpg
Dumo I knew this thing was going to rock after you posted your SS at those temps in windows. Now I've got to ignore your posts too.
Damn you and stephen; now I've got to get something that's not bugged. Maybe one day I'll get lucky...;)
LOL...ok that's better :toast: As for the 4600, I won't have it until later on this week, but even when I do get it, I can't get as cold as you :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
FWIW, the 4600+ was PCMark stable on a stock Mach2 @ 1.536 Vcore @ 11x290 1:1
Nice 4600 there Stephen:toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
I'm just feel better that finally I can put some serious heat load to 'idle' cascade:) ...after tryin' so many cold bugged cpus that won't even post @ -90C and wasting a good amount of thermal paste:(
Hehehe...IIRC, you've got that big TUB of thermal paste :p: But I bet that 4800+ puts out enough heat that your cascade has to really work to keep it cold ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
Steven, have you, or anyone else had a chance to test Steppings with a BF mem controller under phase, I believe its a new revision, havn't seen it before till just recently....But with the b2's and b3's doing so poorly...I don't have my hopes too high...
I just got Opty 146 from retailer today. Seems like new chip.
OSA146DAA5BN
CACJE 0604CPAW
Has anyone tried out this chip.
How far is this stepping going?
Should be good on air/water, horrible on phase ;)
Osa144daa5bn
Cab2e 0546upmw
Hi,
With regard to K7 procs, I read ages ago that the first letter of the five digit code related to "How close the cpu was to the center of the Die". I'm not really sure what that means ,but I alway though that the best overclocking K7 chips' code started with "A" eg AYHJA and therefore "A" was the best produced chip from the production run.
I could be a million miles of topic here but HTH's
Hal2710
Very interesting, I cant wait to see where this research goes.
Logically that has to be an urban myth as if you think about it typically the first letter usually only has 2 variables and often just one. E.g Mobile bartons for a given voltage and frequency were either an "A" or an "I", standard palominos either an "A" or a "R". So its impossible for just the centre of the die cpus to be denoted an "A" (unless it is a very big centre!!! lol).Quote:
Originally Posted by hal2710
ok then. this is very intresting, and also depresing. ive killed 2 BH chips :( botched IHS removal.
ADA 3700 DAA5BN
KAB3E 0548 RPCW
this one got the cold bug at 3170mhz, and it was worse with lower multi's, but i managed to get a bench at 3310mhz by pulsing my water pump. this is with the cpu reading 6*c idle ( crappy chiller ) and with any voltage, it dident care what voltage it had, it just took it and went.
ADA 3800 DAA4BW
LBBWE 0532 CPAW
this was a crap clocker. max on air was 2.7ghz, max on chiller was 2.7ghz. it refused to go higher on any setting's. and it was unstable at any speed, including stock. kept comming up with memory errors.
CCBWE 0602 BPMW
this is my 165.
it got to 2.78 on stock air, stable, and 3160 on chiller. but wont go above this, it keeps comming up with memory controler problems. even with negative temps. (-8*c peltier on chiller)
now if i could unlock the multi id push it some more.:D
http://www.sspmustang.com/AMD64x24600OEM.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
They seem to exist eh? :) This one is an even later sample than yours.
AFIK, FCG had a 0519 ACBWE, and this is a little earlier than that.
Does anyone know all of the memory controller ID's as in B2, BN, and which ones don't have the cold bug and overclock best.
Your best bet is with a manchester with the mem controler revision of BH.Quote:
Originally Posted by @_dud
Thanks for the "decipher"
I might buy a FX-55 (die is 130nm, clawhammer) for less than $400. Stepping:
CAA2C 0505 DPMW
I have a mach 1, any experience under cold with this specific stepping?
I couldnt make my computer stable more than 275fsb with my opty 146 cabye 0540fpmw under mach1 (r507) (it is windows stable 9x322 or prime/games stable 10x290 on AIR).
Thanks...
THat should work quite well. I have no clue how they oc but 130nm chips love the cold, you could use a cascade with no problems on that chip.Quote:
Originally Posted by ooztuncer
Do somebody know how well a Opty 146 (CABYE 0540 FPBW) clocks? :banana:
I can see brain Iden will not find the second pair of numbers/letters. So is there another program out there that will tell you the second pair without having to take off the HSF?
What is the first line in the stepping for?
I understand the second line, and the third is for wafercharge-correct?
great thread...thanks for the info...
that's exactly what I have with my X2 3800+, CDBHE 0532XPMWQuote:
Originally Posted by Cpt Twitchy
:banana: :clap:
I saw an X2 4400+ available somewhere recently that had a mem controller of CCBWE...is that good?
I'm thinking about upgrading my X2 3800+ to a X2 4400+ and just want to make sure I get a stepping that is better then the one I currently have
first line is the OPN (Ordering Part #)...example, my X2 3800+ is ADA3800DAA5BVQuote:
Originally Posted by @_dud
second line is the stepping
third line is the serial number of your CPU
ccbwe is very average.. some do well, most do not.. the ccb1e's were the best to get, but now the ccbbe's are performing extremely well also.. if you see one of those jump on it. good luck!Quote:
Originally Posted by Titus
according to this overclocking database most of the top overclocks were achieved using the CCBWE memory controller...the CDBHE also made a decent showing as well...Quote:
Originally Posted by revenant
http://www.hwupgrade.it/forum/showthread.php?t=935362
Risultati AMD64 X2 (Dual-core)
Processore | Step/Week | Frequenza max | Voltaggio | Cooling | Link
- A64 4800+ | CCBWE 0528EPMW | 2860 mhz | 1.552V | Ad acqua | Link (3Prozac)
- A64 4800+ | CCBWE 0523VPMW | 2760 mhz | 1.408V | Ad aria | Link
- A64 4800+ | CCBWE 0536XPMW | 2700 mhz | 1.456V | Ad aria | Link (volcom)
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0524RPMW | 2913 mhz | 1.648V | Ad acqua | Link
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0524RPMW | 2860 mhz | 1.712V | Ad acqua | Link
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0524RPMW | 2806 mhz | 1.552V | Ad acqua | Link
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0531TPMW | 2805 mhz | 1.632V | Ad aria | Link (Mo3bius)
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0528BPMW | 2797 mhz | 1.648V | Ad acqua | Link
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0534MPM | 2755 mhz | 1.552V | Ad aria | Link (CapFTP)
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0529RPMW | 2722 mhz | 1.472V | Ad acqua | Link
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0531TPMW | 2706 mhz | 1.552V | Ad aria | Link (fax72)
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0525UPMW | 2706 mhz | 1.632V | Ad aria | Link (pamauro)
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0531TPMW | 2700 mhz | 1.520V | Ad aria | Link (magnifico)
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0532TPMW | 2700 mhz | 1.568V | Ad aria | Link
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0532UPMW | 2700 mhz | 1.568V | Ad acqua | Link (Amd4ever)
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0532TPMW | 2650 mhz | 1.536V | Ad acqua | Link
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0544RPMW | 2607 mhz | 1.440V | Ad aria | Link (Dexther)
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0527RPMW | 2600 mhz | 1.472V | Ad acqua | Link (Rez)
- A64 4400+ | CCBWE 0527RPMW | 2600 mhz | 1.472V | Ad acqua | Link (Rez)
- A64 4200+ | CDBHE 0533RPEW | 2706 mhz | 1.520V | Ad aria | Link (PhoEniX-VooDoo)
- A64 4200+ | CDBHE 0532SPAW | 2705 mhz | 1.552V | Ad acqua | Link (Mikestore)
- A64 4200+ | CDBHE 0527TPBW | 2700 mhz | 1.536V | Ad acqua | Link (Cavidor)
- A64 4200+ | CDBHE 0530VPMW | 2661 mhz | 1.472V | Ad aria | Link (Airm4n)
- A64 3800+ | CCB2E 0541XPMW | 3000 mhz | 1.520V | Ad aria | Link (zerothehero)
- A64 3800+ | CHBHE 0526UPBW | 3000 mhz | 1.584V | Mach I | Link
- A64 3800+ | CDBHE 0527UPBW | 2900 mhz | 1.504V | Phase | Link
- A64 3800+ | CCBWE 0529RPMW | 2854 mhz | 1.552V | Ad acqua | Link
- A64 3800+ | CCBWE 0528MPMW | 2752 mhz | 1.632V | Ad aria | Link
- A64 3800+ | CDBHE 0535RPAW | 2750 mhz | 1.488V | Ad aria | Link (tzitzos)
- A64 3800+ | LDBHE 0537XPMW | 2700 mhz | 1.456V | Ad aria | Link (killer978)
- A64 3800+ | CCBWE 0544XPMW | 2700 mhz | 1.504V | Ad aria | Link (blackdem0n)
- A64 3800+ | CCB2E 0541XPMW | 2700 mhz | 1.520V | Ad aria | Link (glazio)
- A64 3800+ | CDBHE 0535RPAW | 2700 mhz | 1.552V | Ad aria | Link (CapFTP)
- A64 3800+ | CHBHE 0531TPAW | 2700 mhz | 1.616V | Ad aria | Link
- A64 3800+ | CCBWE 0529SPMW | 2650 mhz | 1.440V | Ad aria | Link
- A64 3800+ | CCBWE 0543TPMW | 2600 mhz | 1.408V | Ad aria | Link (Skatman)
- A64 3800+ | CCBWE 0544XPMW | 2600 mhz | 1.472V | Ad aria | Link (Thomas Budicin)
ok, well, for opterons ccbwe has been pretty average.. but there have been a few great OCers, and a decent few better than average chips with that stepping also.. I think ccbwe is a very common X2 toledo (non opty, and not manchester) stepping, so you're going to probably see more of those in the "best of the best" lists, simply because there are just a lot more of them.. I reckon. I should not pipe up too much about the X2's tho.. I know more about the opties.
Just got a Opteron 146, CACJE 0605 GPMW ... I've seen CACJE 0604's do well but haven't seen any 0605... ANd I couldnt decipher the MW (that doesnt make any sense). Any ideas what the MW means together and I think it should be good for air/water...
Hmm.. back to figuring out what the second to last 2 letters mean..
Since on AM2 I've now seen BY and BV, old "mem controllers" when we know for a fact they are brand new ddr2 supporting ones
I currently have a kab2e (i think, could've been cab2e) 3700+ but i just received this 3700+: http://kuvax.net/i/9801_Moddedtoledo.jpg
Shop tells it to be Toledo-singlecore!
Opteron DC with one core disabled...Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorro
Moddable? :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by ChkDsk
They're workin on it :eek:
They? Would be niiice if that could be modded to a dual core :D If it's made in the current amd-style, it'll be impossible to mod :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Repoman
Hmm. Just wondering. Is there any other way to check if there's another core inside that processor than rip the ihs off? I figured that if i'd put my own san diego 3700+ on a scale and compare it's weight to the one on the Toledo one, the dualcore should weigh more.
I have a Toledo 3700+ CCBWE 0542 VPMW that supposedly did 3.2Ghz under MachII and 2.9Ghz on air. I have not had a chance to test it at all because my RAM is bad. It would be great if they were able to be modded back to dual core! However, I reckon the chance of doing so is 0%