Score:40.690---gjwild ----------148
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b255/gjwild/Pi.gif
Printable View
Score:40.690---gjwild ----------148
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b255/gjwild/Pi.gif
Just incase it was missedQuote:
Originally Posted by T_M
42.2386 --- HybridHB ------------- Opteron 170
41.515 --- Jeager -------- 3000+ Venice
http://jeager59.free.fr/A64/0512/2785.jpg
I'm confused as to just what this score measures...
how would you even improve upon your score?
i think thats formule cant' work, just testing :
38.772 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144
http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144...038.860s-2.jpg
39.557 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144
http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144...032.547s-2.jpg
39.641 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144
http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144...031.453s-2.jpg
39.919 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144
http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144...029.562s-2.jpg
40.349 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144
http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144...026.843s-2.jpg
40.393 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144
http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144...025.953s-2.jpg
40.931 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144
http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144...024.985s-2.jpg
and to finisht, too strange score :
40.840 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144
http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144...%2024.391s.jpg
just to say if you would have the better score, take 9x266 and optimize...
Nice work there overcrash....:toast:
I'll get booted tonight and throw out some results......
thx :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
mine are not fully optimized, but just little :D
i think ~26.7 at 3Ghz is possible, i've just more tested at 3350Mhz :p:
interesting. seems like the lowest clockspeed was the best.
just as i stated a few pages ago....formula is biased to lower clocksQuote:
Originally Posted by shimmishim
40.2201 --- http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/3816/4022017ti.jpg ------------- Opteron 148
http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/3816/4022017ti.th.jpg
I've thought of this some time ago, a ratio, and could never come up with something that was true for actual time and mhz. I should have payed better attention in school. This is good though. Maddening however.
Score: 39.5484 -- corvus_corax -- Opteron 146
Another shot but this time on 2.4GHz. Just a few tweaks.
http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/711...62402406of.png
43.837 --- Flak Monkey ---------- 3500+ Claw
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/3106/xs1dw.th.jpg
I'm gonna have to get my gskill la's back from my bud to put ya bh-5 guys back in your place:) ddr 660 pi 1m here i come.
My score : 23.766 x (3532,13/2000) = 41.97230
http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/3...766sn1m4og.jpg
your score is actually 41.972 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozan Baseski
Ummm....lol.....you're dividing by the wrong number......23.766 x 3532.13/2000 = 41.9723 ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozan Baseski
rofl do people actually read the thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by shimmishim
(just :banana::banana::banana::banana: stirring :P )
Ooops sorry guys. At first I thought we are dividing by the cpu's default speed instead of an arbitrary number like 2000.:p:
just for fun, i've retested 3 run :
32.922*2400.6/2000 = 39,5162766
39.516 -- Overcrash -- Opteron 144
http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144...032.922s-2.jpg
that seems as the 24GP :D
Well done Over! :D
Great Over! :toast:
You're now the first! :banana:
Can you make more optimisations?
33.141 X 2403.6 / 2000 = 39.828
39.828---http://img359.imageshack.us/img359/7...best9dw.th.jpg----------148 Opteron
Nice overcrash86. :clap: I couldnt touch that time with this damn UTT-CH. Shouldnt have sold my BH-5 :(
This is with Ultra, will retry with Expert later.
33.094*2400.5/2000 = 39.721
39.721 -- Eldonko -- Opteron 148
http://members.shaw.ca/zryan/test-4.JPG
overcrash, thanks for the very long tests there, but as I and dinos have already agreed upon, the formula is biased to low clockspeeds.
There is no way around this without putting memory speed and memory timmmings into the formula, which really defeats the purpose of the test..
I will update the list later tonight.
^ That's true, and it will be hard to come up with a true ratio. Would be fun though. HOWEVER, props must be given to overcrash86 for a 32.922 @ 2400. esp with 2 - 256's. I don't know how you did it but it is a very quick time. Well done.
I thought mem timings and speed WAS the purpose of the test? :confused: It is a little different than intended but it is still fun to see who can get the highest @ 2400 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxxxRacer
Sorta been posted already ...but my first post as a member of xs
40.086 --- Griff_en ------------- Opteron 148
Finally got my rig back up and running now with a water loop....here's the first result. Time to try some slower speeds with my 2x512mb bh5's which can do 274 with TIGHT TIGHT timings.....
http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/5329/9x26039859bs.jpg
39.857 --- s7e9h3n ------------- FX55/56
you have to have minimum 2.4GHz for results to be validQuote:
Originally Posted by umbre_tombetoil
Same for s7e9h3n... and for me (but I've removed my screen... :D )Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Forgot this point ... sorry .... :slapass: :slapass:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
So here's my best with my old SD :
http://img155.echo.cx/my.php?image=spisd24gp7ns.jpg
39.79 --- umbre_tombetoil ------------- 4000+ SD
Try tonight to bit this score with my opty ... :toast:
Well done mate! :clap: I've to improve mine...
Here is it ;) These BH5 are awesome!
39.820 -- before -- FX55 SD 0516WPMW
http://www.beforeoverclock.com/image...33s[2].png
Edit--- Disregard this post as it has no informational value..
just to compare :
http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144...028.484s-2.jpg
same optimisation as my 2.4...
Over, can you bench at 8.5*290 or more, it could be beter with a bigger RAM freq.?
that will be same, x.5 isn't an real coef...Quote:
Originally Posted by toto408
31.047 * 2800.7/2000 = 43.47666645
43.477 --- Reinvented ---------- X2 4400+ Toledo
29.735 * 2800.8 / 2000 = 41.640894
http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/346...allenge4gh.png
32.937 * 2403.4 / 2000 = 39.5803929
39.580 -- corvus_corax -- Opteron 144
http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/921...0ghs5jw.th.gif
This time in an unoptimized XP :p:
opty 175 DC system in sig
(3030.3 *28)/2k = 42.4242
ultra large pic
http://www.efegs.com/someguy/pics/va...rpi/28spi4.bmp
Why arent I on the list?Quote:
Originally Posted by Flak Monkey
I've managed to increase my score but unfortunately not enough to beat out overcrash... :rolleyes: I'll try to do so anyway :D
39.539 -- before -- FX55 SD 0516WPMW
http://www.beforeoverclock.com/image...PERPI1M32s.png
PS: Is there any chance to see the rankings updated?
Here is it :banana:
39.501 -- before -- FX55 SD 0516WPMW
http://www.beforeoverclock.com/image...32s%5b2%5d.png
P4 3.0 Woot
63.4913775
Please allow me to take the AMD A64 crown ... although a bit late ;)
Opteron 144 @ 2400 Mhz .
I have a 2 MB PCI card which cannot display 1280x1024 . I will try another runs to get detailed memory info.
39.5052
Congratulations! :toast:
But how the hell u can beat me with an idle timer of 16? :eek: A64Tweaker would be intresting!
39.411 --- SabinuS ------------- Opteron 144
Yes.. my best score:
32.843"
There is the A64 screen this time :)
My best winchester 3000+ score- 40,487
http://www.oc.pri.ee/screens/winch-s-pi1m-33,313.PNG
and with Opteron 146 not so good - 40,302 http://www.oc.pri.ee/screens/1M-30sec@2686MHz.PNG
Will there be any updates with the new results?
43.77087 --- SparkyJJO ---------- Athlon64 3700+ San Diego
http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...JO/superpi.jpg
i think maxxx stopped it a while back as ppl are moving on but really good results there for sure................Quote:
Originally Posted by sabinus
so what's the trick you're using :p:
Usual stuff: Win2003, copy-wazaa, process priority, defrag, NO ramdisk, almost NO services stopped, and a LOTS of patience ;)
...err and a personal innovation I call "pseudo-minimize™" that gives you the edge of ~0.1 sec @ 1MB.
I will post it on the SuperPI tweaks&tricks thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
i used to have patience with 1M and would make my hardware not-so-stable on purpose and repeat it 50xtimes to get the best score heheheh....but then i thought it's all just tricks and lots of bs for a benchmark that last 20-od seconds......and concentrated on 32M instead and starting getting some kick arse times.......once you get it sweet for 32M you'll really start enjoying that.....and you need a lot of patience for 32M runs hhahah....conroes are a different story though.....much much faster........i mean i squeezed the :banana::banana::banana::banana: out of my Opteron and got it up to 3.5Ghz.....and managed 20m runs but damn people are ripping up sub-15m easy on air lol with ConroeQuote:
Originally Posted by sabinus
interested in your "pseudo-minimize™" actually :D
Sorry for insane bump, but blame it on funkflix - he made me:D
Edit: 29.203*2704.4/2000
=
39.488
Holy Bumps!
Heres a result on DDR2, still the Athlon 64 core :shrug::
http://hwbot.org/community/submissio...x2_24sec_230ms
24.230x3462.7/2000 =
41.95