:dj: that's very noisyQuote:
Originally Posted by Xevipiu
do you need ear protection :D
Printable View
:dj: that's very noisyQuote:
Originally Posted by Xevipiu
do you need ear protection :D
what? I can't hear you! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by OCPerformance
:D Nice result man - congrats !!!
Me always been an old school BH-5 fanboy and owned a lot of kits (must have been about 50 pairs....).
My experience was the Corsair 3200LL v1.1 always performed a bit better than 3500 C2 v1.1 or Mushkin or Kingston.
So maybe U can win some more MHz trying to get some............ ;)
:toast:
I love this thread...
Could you post all of the timings that you've used, and what precisely helped you get more stable? I wonder if I could use same timings on my 2x512 bh5, and then just play with cycle refresh to fit the needs of 1gig.
All the timings that i have changed can you see in ah64tweaker screen in post one.Quote:
Originally Posted by g0dM@n
Saw that, but in some cases people use BIOS and just open A64 tweaker to show timings, and in those cases some may be off... one thing I haven't pieced together yet is the row cycle bios setting and the a64 tweaker setting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lastviking
i.e. I know that 2064 = 166mhz 15.6, but I don't know em all...
So if you didn't mess with that field, I was curious what you used in bios.
Could anybody tell me what the "100mhz 1.95us" is in Bios?
http://www.dfi-street.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11397Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
3684 according to funkflix's link. I remember printing that thread out, but happened to lose it.Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
In any case, if A64 Tweaker can detect the translation of every Refresh Period(tREF) that was set manually in bios, then why isn't there a full list?!
WoW! Congrats for reaching a milestone ! :toast:
thnx the -16 outside I shoud say....
great ram....nice oldies..
testing my old BH : 0°C ambiant
Dual 3.94v :
http://wowgame.free.fr/RAM/testing/S...027.859s-2.jpg
Single 3.94v:
http://wowgame.free.fr/RAM/testing/S...%203.9v+-2.jpg
and max screen :
single 4v :
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=67572 Single Channel 303.8 MHz
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=67574 Single Channel 303.1 MHz
http://wowgame.free.fr/RAM/testing/S...20303.1Mhz.jpg
Dual 4v :
validated screen :
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=67571 Dual Channel 301.1 MHz
http://wowgame.free.fr/RAM/testing/D...20301.1Mhz.jpg
no screen :
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=67569 Dual Channel 301.8 MHz
Wow, really nice overcrash86. Now, burn them in and go for higher.
Amazing, Nice work dude. :toast:
thx :toast:
but i didn't think to burnthem will up more
Yeah man! nice mems u have there :slap: :toast:
Wow, overcrash... have you tried more than 3.94v? Not trying to have you kill your ram, but just curious. :)
*EDIT*
Just checked your sig... 3ghz opteron stock volts? 640/640 stock volt stock cooling GTO²? That is... just... NUTS! But how did you kill the GTO²... that was godlike. I'm getting my pots in this week btw to fully vmod mine (aiming for 650/650).
over 3.94v superPI can't run, it's just for screen :(Quote:
Originally Posted by g0dM@n
my opty can do 2906Mhz prime stable on cuivre cooler at 1.3v...
the GTO² is died without vmod i dont know how :slapass:
..and your VDIMM was what?Quote:
Originally Posted by overcrash86
1.296Vcore and 262FSB (3.55VDIMM??), aint that riskable:stick:
if i remember correctly, that 3.4v :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dani
You gonna kill your CPU with that Vcore/VDIMM:confused:
i'v already bench with more differance between the vcore and VTT for exemple : vcore at 1.376v vdimm 3.94v...Quote:
Originally Posted by Dani
the CPU haven't any problem :)
bus i try to didn't stay long time with this big differances ;)
this CPU didn't like the heigh vcore :(
Example:Quote:
Originally Posted by overcrash86
http://img54.imageshack.us/img54/870...i1mb1vi.th.jpghttp://img366.imageshack.us/img366/7...30009lm.th.jpghttp://img366.imageshack.us/img366/7748/ping34fa.th.jpg
http://img394.imageshack.us/img394/1...83378tw.th.jpghttp://img394.imageshack.us/img394/5...tats4pd.th.jpghttp://img394.imageshack.us/img394/5...08pt4qz.th.jpg
My Bh5´s KHX3500, KHX3000, Mushkin 3500LII, Corsair3500C2, OCZ3500PLE to 1.360vcore! :slapass: :slapass: :slapass:
Regards and kisses in the nipples! ;)
I remember seeing a chart with recommended vcore : vdimm combinations, but I guess it doesn't matter with A64??? I know it did with AXP and Intel (dunno if newer Intel sockets still matter).
You guys think it doesn't matter as much with A64's ondie?
that is awesome, good work
Man this is insane :O
But why only a 27sec run?
@ 3ghz with 2-2-2-5 300mhz memory i thought you'd be closer to 25sec :stick:
The only i have seen that take 24.9 amd is a 3.3ghz ,and 2x256 is slower than 2x512mb. Do any have 2x256mb tccd that can try 10x300 2.5-x-x-x for me (easyer to compare then)Quote:
Originally Posted by psy^
I've got one with 2x512mb TCCD if you want to see it.........Quote:
Originally Posted by Lastviking
k show it + what windows are you using?,2x512 will be faster but it beter than nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
FX55 + GSkill 2x512mb 4800FF
Unoptimized Win2k3
http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/5218/10x3001m8pz.jpg
Actually, if you like, I can run it again right now and just turn bank interleaving off in bios......
EDIT: I just went ahead and turned off BI so here's the result:
http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/18/lvnobi3dc.jpg
I'm happy to just hit DDR600 at any timings. I tried 6-3-3-2 and corrupted windows. it would just keep rebooting no matter what I did.
I can only dream of those timings at DDR600:(
@ S7e9h3n,
What is the WR for AMD SuperPi 1m on air ???
I'm not sure, but I think it's around 24-25 seconds......and that was done in sub-zero outside air temps....Quote:
Originally Posted by Moso
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Thx for info i think i will try win2k3 instead of WinXp easyer to compare then. But my time is already faster than 2x512 tccd with bank interleaving on so my time is not to bad but i can be faster.
@ S7e9h3n
I think it's 24.953 sec by Dani in this thread :
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...t=67058&page=7
Found something win2k3 give about 0.300+ faster time than WinXp Sp2 could not test @ 300mhz+ today but i compared 10x300(183 divider(273 on the sticks))
Now you understand why we run 2k3 ;) Wouldn't it be kinda hard to compare your 10x300 time to 11x273? First your timings would be very different @ 300 than @ 273. Secondly, it's pretty hard to estimate how much difference in the final time is due to the high FSB, Also, @ x11, you get a better bandwidth efficiency than @ x10......Could it be possible your faster time is due to the ability to run tighter timings? Or did you run the exact same timings on your memory @ 273 as you had @ 300?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lastviking
:) i did the both run with 10x300(183) in WinXp and Win2k3. Win2k3 give me about 27.000 with 10x300(183) 2x512mb (didnt test 2x256mb), the timings was fair so hard that you had used with your bh5 utt @ 275mhz(its more like my timings with my bh5 @ 300mhz). "I didnt change timings becuse its harder to compare then :)"Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Ok....thanks for clearing that up.....btw, this is the best I can do @ 11x273 -Quote:
Originally Posted by Lastviking
http://www.cryo-laboratory.com/uploa...n/11x2731m.JPG
In this momment (on my corsair voyager), i have one shot. This was in an unoptimized XP SP2 -without XP theme :p:- I know, my timings are not the best for TCCD :D (actually i have aother shot with better timings on my 144 )Quote:
Originally Posted by Lastviking
http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/9...p3009lf.th.gif
I hope could be useful :)
:confused: Mushkin 3500LevelIIQuote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/4...timming3au.jpg
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/3...o2te0pv.th.jpg
TCCD FF
Bye
Ummm...what's your point? :p: I was showing LV my fastest 1m time @ 3ghz since he was testing the same with his new install of windows2k3. Yes, your 2x256 sticks do 275 :woot: But these 2x512 sticks do 280+ (just haven't tested higher yet);) :Quote:
Originally Posted by Xevipiu
http://www.cryo-laboratory.com/uploa...5/13x2801m.jpg
My time on 3.0GHz with TCCD 300MHz 2.5-3-3 is very slow...i know. Actually i can almost beat my time with 3GHz but the mems on stock 200MHz :D (well is 2x512MB, shot here ). For example, my time in a not fully optimized XP SP2 (just with cache the OS Kernel to memory -systemcache=1 and DisableExecutivePaging)
http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/731...50tras31hs.png
Edit: Awesome memories there s7e9h3n! I need a pair :)
lol srry to dig up an old thread, but that is just INSANE TCCD eat your heart out!!!, 300 mhz on BH-5, just WOW (i was still using BH-5 well UTT bh-5, till about a month ago) when i grabbed these mushkin redlines in my sig
Dragon
wow will they live for another run ... Great job.