Congrats on the score man :D :toast:
I just got a 8rda+ and a 2700 same stepping as you :D
could you tell me what PSU and bios you are using ?
Printable View
Congrats on the score man :D :toast:
I just got a 8rda+ and a 2700 same stepping as you :D
could you tell me what PSU and bios you are using ?
OPP,
I mailed worm as well as MO's support. Let's see what they have to say... althought they've never replied to me in the past, they fixed ORB not long time after i let them know about those glitches.
Back after 5 hrs sleep and WWWOOOWWW!!!!! You DID it!!! :slobber: :slobber: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
Se Ya DJ , heh heh :D :banana:
Got ya with a little old AMD chip :D
Thanks DDTUNG ;)
OPP
Extreme congratulations. :toast: AMD back in the top 3!!! :D :D Hope it gets published soon, get your finger out FM. :mad:
keep on benchin, OPP. The whole AMD world prays for you now:) lol. how's going with your video ram?
Opp
I dont know if you are still using the epos 8rda
if you are and want to improve 200+ points send me a PM and ill tell you the trick (only works for 8rda/+) :)
being unable to publish those score must be a §§§§§
im looking at those chase and lobby numbers and they look amazing
Well Done OPP! as always.:thumbsup: :toast:
SKATAN, share the wealth buddy.. a few more of us would love to hear about your WPCREDIT tweaks.....Quote:
Originally posted by SKATAN
Opp
I dont know if you are still using the epos 8rda
if you are and want to improve 200+ points send me a PM and ill tell you the trick (only works for 8rda/+) :)...
:D
Yep, that's gotta be at least part of the problem. Every time I run 3DMark, it shows me usin' 2x, when it's clearly set to 8x in the BIOS, and SANDRA '03 confirms 8x. Worst of all, it always shows my 2400+ as a Duron. :rolleyes: I'd almost rather have it just say "unknown". :pQuote:
Originally posted by QuadDamage
I think it's not nForce itself messing up with ORB but AGP 8X on these mobos... well, just my opinion.
Hey OPP. Not sure if you've done this, but i had problems with stability/posting over 2.05v. Found out the Power MOSFETs were overheating.
If you havent already checked them out, give em a quick once over with the ol' Mark 1 finger.
Yeah. :D 'Specially now that this is definitely gonna be my next mobo...:)Quote:
Originally posted by AKRedneck
SKATAN, share the wealth buddy.. a few more of us would love to hear about your WPCREDIT tweaks.....
:D
Yea I was going to through a heat sink on them when I set up the mobo but the heat sink I had was to wide so I have to cut it down first to fit it in there.Quote:
Originally posted by Bravo
Hey OPP. Not sure if you've done this, but i had problems with stability/posting over 2.05v. Found out the Power MOSFETs were overheating.
If you havent already checked them out, give em a quick once over with the ol' Mark 1 finger.
OPP
Damn dude your score is insane, where can I find the rig specs of that. Also I have had the same prob with my 8rda+ not publishing scores. It pisses me off. ORB really needs to fix that.
I doubt that the 8x is the problem, I have been publishing all my other scores with it at 8x or 4x, didn't matter. the only time I have ever seen this can't publish message was from this mobo yesterday.Quote:
Originally posted by spaceman
Yep, that's gotta be at least part of the problem. Every time I run 3DMark, it shows me usin' 2x, when it's clearly set to 8x in the BIOS, and SANDRA '03 confirms 8x. Worst of all, it always shows my 2400+ as a Duron. :rolleyes: I'd almost rather have it just say "unknown". :p
OPP
Rig specs.
Prometeia cooled XP2700 13x119 @ 1.98V, 8RDA mobo, 2x IBM 120 GXPs Raid-0 on Promise FF Card, 2x 256Mb Kingston HyperX 3500 @ 2.86V, 9700 Radeon at 501/355
OPP
I have a TTGI PSU and I'm useing the C16 sofar.Quote:
Originally posted by Shroomer
Congrats on the score man :D :toast:
I just got a 8rda+ and a 2700 same stepping as you :D
could you tell me what PSU and bios you are using ?
http://xtreme.routehero.com/mricee/i...i_review_1.htm
OPP
hey opp in all honisty do you think you got a shot at hilo's 2nd place or do you think you have reached the limits?
Found the relevant thread now that the Futuremark forums are working again. The explanation from a staff member was that the cpu speed varied too much during testing, so it definitely must be something to do with the way 3dMark detects it on NF1/NF2 boards. :(
Quote:
Hello everybody...
I took a look at the projects that some of you in this
thread submitted to find out what is the problem. In all
disabled projects that I found the problem was that the cpu
speed varied during testing.
There are certain set limits to how much cpu speed can
change during testing (some variation is allowed because it
always happens in some extent) but in the projects that I
reviewed the variation was marked to be over the limits.
Too much variation in CPU speed may distort the score to
the point that it really does not reflect the actual
performance of the computer and this is why the frequency
is checked multiple times during testing.
There are many reasons why this happens (overclocking
being just one of them) and it does not nessesserily happen
constantly (you can have two runs in same settings where
one has this behaiviour and another does not) so basically
when this happens it is usually just different variables in the
testing combining in a "wrong" way that leads to
momenterily speed variation in the CPU.
::Risto C
Wow, interesting post. But the question becomes: will they accept the score, or does OPP just have to keep running the benckmark in the hope that the CPU speed straightens itself out on one of his runs? It didn't sound like from that post that the folks at FM were willing to allow scores in those situations. That would suck.Quote:
Originally posted by MrLavender
Found the relevant thread now that the Futuremark forums are working again. The explanation from a staff member was that the cpu speed varied too much during testing, so it definitely must be something to do with the way 3dMark detects it on NF1/NF2 boards. :(
EDIT: and hey, it seems strange in that OPPS first 21K+ score the CPU speed was misreported and he wasn't able to publish (which does make sense), but on the last higher one, his CPU speed was correctly reported as I recall (which does not make so much sense). If 3dMark checks CPU speed multiple times, I wonder how it determines what to report?
Hey guys,
I'm looking for a new board for a friend of me. First I was thinking off the asus NF2. But I heard the The Multiplier is locked with a 2400+. He won't unlock his chip so I need a board that unlocks the xp2400+ by default. What about the epox, can I change the MP of the 2400+ without core or pin mods???
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BrainStorm
[B]Wow, interesting post. But the question becomes: will they accept the score, or does OPP just have to keep running the benckmark in the hope that the CPU speed straightens itself out on one of his runs? It didn't sound like from that post that the folks at FM were willing to allow scores in those situations. That would suck.
i was thinking the same thing did any of the people in the original thred ever get posted
So, out of curiosity, anyone tried taking their heatsink off their P4 and seeing if it would still run?
I (and a few others here, im sure) would be interested in if the benchmark result could be published if a heatsink had been removed part way through the bench so as to invoke the P4's thermal protection... 8-)
I smell fish.
Opp, have you modded your XP2700+ by cutting the one L12 bridge?
I've got the 8RDA+ and the same CPU, but I cannot use multis >12.5. Had this "bug" occured before you changed to c16?
thx br@insc@n
Some ppl made exactly the same point in the original thread on the FM forum, and further claimed that there were many examples of published benchmarks with thermal throttling. The response....a deafening silence. :(Quote:
Originally posted by STEvil
So, out of curiosity, anyone tried taking their heatsink off their P4 and seeing if it would still run?
I (and a few others here, im sure) would be interested in if the benchmark result could be published if a heatsink had been removed part way through the bench so as to invoke the P4's thermal protection... 8-)
I smell fish.
The only way this could make sense is if the benchmark is sometimes getting a *wildly* inaccurate reading from NF boards.
There are many ways of measuring/estimating cpu speed in a program, and I suspect that to make cheating harder 3dMark probably uses a pretty non-standard method. I know that even on my KX7 the reported speed never agrees exactly with what either the bios or wcpuid says (especially when you fiddle with settings like Enhance For Benchmark which add an extra MHz or so to the fsb).
All speculation, but what it comes down to is that it's going to be up to FM whether to allow it or not. And like was said, no-one else seems to have had any luck. :(
MrIcee says above that this situation applies to one out of 3 or 4 submissions with the NF7-S. Can you get any scores at all published with this board OPP?
OPP:)
There may be another problem in publishing the scores. If the board is not 100% stable at your present clocks(even tho it is is or appears to be physically in finishing the benches), 3DMark detects flucuation in speeds...be it CPU or videocard...and it embeds that info in the.3dp. When you submit...their filter won't let you publish upon detecting this flucuation.
I went thru that with my 18,864 score a couple months ago. (KX7)Perfect run.....straight thru....but it couldn't be published. I wrote RistoC and asked what was going on..and he explained this anomalie to me. I did have the board right at the edge..and my thoughts are possibly, tho all appears 100% stable and perfect, that maybe there is an idiosyncrasy(sp) with the 8RDA+ at top clocks that is causing a problem, showing flucuations in the .3dp. Food for thought my friend:)
Randi:D
Thanx for the reply big guy :DQuote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
I have a TTGI PSU and I'm useing the C16 sofar.
http://xtreme.routehero.com/mricee/i...i_review_1.htm
OPP
I have been reading that the 8rda is a PSU monster :eek:
and that the rails do need to be adjusted no matter what PSU you use and even more so if you have dual chanel in use and are heavy on the vdimm :(
Looks like I will have to pick one of these PSU's up later ;)
It's cut yes, but even before I flashed I couldn't use higher Multipliers, when I flashed to C16 I got all the multipliers.Quote:
Originally posted by br@insc@n
Opp, have you modded your XP2700+ by cutting the one L12 bridge?
I've got the 8RDA+ and the same CPU, but I cannot use multis >12.5. Had this "bug" occured before you changed to c16?
thx br@insc@n
OPP
I did one run at 115x13 stock card speed, and it went through, other then that one I can't get any published.
OPP
WOW!!! Thats a sick score!! Good job thats just damn amazing :D
So OPP, you kindda liked that EPoS board, eh?Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
I did one run at 115x13 stock card speed, and it went through, other then that one I can't get any published.
OPP
I knew you would ;)
Heey i have got my fsb @ 220 but my max sandra score was 3280. I was using the C10 bios. I have tested the C31 And it works fine. ist more stable here.But my mem scores dit not increes. :mad: I have got Twinmos Pc3200 5 Ns. Anyboy who knows the problem ? My cas settins are 2.5-2-2-7Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
Heres some more FSB:)
And Quad, I did both methods, nothing works.
OPP
what multiplier are you running? sandra is known to report low scores for multipliers below 10.Quote:
Originally posted by -=Astennu=-
Heey i have got my fsb @ 220 but my max sandra score was 3280. I was using the C10 bios. I have tested the C31 And it works fine. ist more stable here.But my mem scores dit not increes. :mad: I have got Twinmos Pc3200 5 Ns. Anyboy who knows the problem ? My cas settins are 2.5-2-2-7
The 7 and the CL2.5 doesn't help.Quote:
Originally posted by -=Astennu=-
Heey i have got my fsb @ 220 but my max sandra score was 3280. I was using the C10 bios. I have tested the C31 And it works fine. ist more stable here.But my mem scores dit not increes. :mad: I have got Twinmos Pc3200 5 Ns. Anyboy who knows the problem ? My cas settins are 2.5-2-2-7
OPP
OFF Topic:
Just installed a pelt graphics cooler (Swiftech) in the the VapoChill, check it out :D
OPP
Man. You are so lucky you have all of this cool stuff to tinker with!
vapo and prommie what else could you ask for ?
CPU Mhz and MBM.
I notice only wcpuid reads the corect Mhz on this mobo, even my MBM has a problem, I keep hiting update CPU and it changes the Mhz to many different numbers except for the correct one:D
Could be the same problem as 3D Mark.
OPP
Took a few good years of Hardcore Overclocking to be able to obtain all this stuff.Quote:
Originally posted by Emericana
Man. You are so lucky you have all of this cool stuff to tinker with!
vapo and prommie what else could you ask for ?
Kingston is taking this Vapo to Las Vegas for the CES show next week. Xtremesystems will get in some advertising out of the deal:D
OPP
cant Kingston aford a vapo for them selves
I can only imagine THAT will be fun to play with. :D Now all ya need is a modded Lian-Li ('s) like on the front page. :cool:Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
OFF Topic:
Just installed a pelt graphics cooler (Swiftech) in the the VapoChill, check it out :D
OPP
Congratulations OPP
You done it again.
Now take 1st spot away from JC
Jen
Have you tryed to mess with the cpu throttling option in the bios ?Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
CPU Mhz and MBM.
I notice only wcpuid reads the corect Mhz on this mobo, even my MBM has a problem, I keep hiting update CPU and it changes the Mhz to many different numbers except for the correct one:D
Could be the same problem as 3D Mark.
OPP
maybe thats the key to the problem
lol soo lucky, would be a dream to own everything you do. and Congrats again :)Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
Took a few good years of Hardcore Overclocking to be able to obtain all this stuff.
Kingston is taking this Vapo to Las Vegas for the CES show next week. Xtremesystems will get in some advertising out of the deal:D
OPP
i'm hoping to get a new mobo for my birthday so i can start ocing this 2100+ this a7n266-vm can't oc, but hey the first was right when i got it ( $0 ) :)
I think I dissabled it.Quote:
Originally posted by SKATAN
Have you tryed to mess with the cpu throttling option in the bios ?
maybe thats the key to the problem
OPP
Good question, SKATAN. I've never messed with that setting. I wonder what it would do at 100%? Might be smart to ease up the scale, like 60% then 70%, etc. (if default is 50%).
perhaps leaving it at the default setting (50% I think it is) would not give you these problems? Just an idea, would be nice if it worked ;)Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
I think I dissabled it.
OPP
Cpu throtteling SUCKS atleast in my board. keep it disabled. When running prime 95 with that enabled and at the same time listening to mp3/surfin net, i get my mouse stutterin all over the place!!!! the second i disabled it the prob went away!
I've got CPU throttling disabled and had 2 scores rejected for publication yesterday. Its something with the 3DMark software and the NForce2 boards....a mhz flucuation is being detected. Thats the reason it rejects publishing the score, according to the powers that be at FutureMark:)
Randi:D
thats pretty odd i can submit all of my stuff fine... here is my last one nothin special but still it proves stuff can be sent on 8rda
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5264197
oh yeah opp you prolly did this but just as a suggestion to get a few hundred more points, set your AGP bus at 100mhz if it can handle it... it works great on my ti4200
I wonder if we can reproduce these "CPU speed" errors..?
I suggest we get like 5 cpu hogging probrams (CPU burn, prim95, sandra burn-in, seti@home for example) and run them all simultaneously...
If this works correctly, it should make the cpu speed do what 3dmark is "experiencing" and we should be able to detect it by hitting refresh with CPU-Z or WCPUID repeatedly...?
Since MBM5 cant detect the cpu speed correctly, but WCPUID can, maybe its a software error?
I'm running 10.5 now and got 3315-3103 At 215 Mhz 2.5-2-2-7. But my cpu has problems. I can run it max @ 2260 mhz @ 200+ mhz fsb's. And @ A FSB of 1600 i can get a 2400 Mhz out of it :confused:. I'm using te C31 bios now Its working perfect. I'm Gonaag get a Weak 49 2400+ Cpu next week i whant 2,5+ Ghz :D My old Weak 41 had To mush problems @ high fsb'sQuote:
Originally posted by TheDong
what multiplier are you running? sandra is known to report low scores for multipliers below 10.
Congrats, OPP...awesome scores :)
Hope FM lets you publish these...I find it rather ridiculous that ya can't.....
OPP could you please run some pifast! :) I'm interested in seeing what you'd score @ 3ghz ;)
Thx.
236 IN DUAL DDR
VDD@2.v
VMEM@2.9v
2*Winbond 5ns
tearing because of vmem mod on the GC (TI 4200)
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/236dual.jpg
I'm certain it's a software error. Like I said before there are many different ways of detecting cpu speed programmatically. Seems that MBM is also using a method that doesn't work well with the NF2. (IDEA: perhaps the MBM author might be able to shed some light on the cause of the problem?)Quote:
Originally posted by STEvil
I wonder if we can reproduce these "CPU speed" errors..?
I suggest we get like 5 cpu hogging probrams (CPU burn, prim95, sandra burn-in, seti@home for example) and run them all simultaneously...
If this works correctly, it should make the cpu speed do what 3dmark is "experiencing" and we should be able to detect it by hitting refresh with CPU-Z or WCPUID repeatedly...?
Since MBM5 cant detect the cpu speed correctly, but WCPUID can, maybe its a software error?
This sucks. Unless somebody finds a bios setting or something that gets around the problem it seems that many good NF2 scores won't get published. :(
*EDIT* I've posted here on the MBM forum, let's see if we can get any more info.
cpulloverclock:)
Oustanding bandwidth my friend !! :thumbsup:
Also, Welcome to XtremeSystems !!
Randi:D
That is some monster bandwidth. Can you bench 3d with that? Yeesh.
I'm glad I ordered this board. Got the non-plus after newegg had the + and the 8K3A+ that I returned out of stock. Maybe I can get my xp1600 up to 2100mhz. I need to unlock it and push the memory up higher. All these high scores make me want to push the limit even more. :D
Man... that is great! :toast:
And that's at 2.9v? If so... have another :toast: on me. :D
the NF2 isnt the only board it doesnt detect the cpu speed properly on.
3dmark and MBM5 wont detect my cpu properly on a Shuttle AK11 rev 3.2...
Running an 1800+ at 11x150.89..
MBM detects it as: 1.6
3dmark detects as: 1.6
wcpuid detects as: 1659.78/79.
MBM always has detected cpu speed wrong for me as well as 3dmark. The only reliable program in the respect is WCPUID. Even on this kt333 board I run so I dont think it has anything to do with Nforce 2 its the programs.
Off topic here as well sorry
OPP
So which do you like the best as far as Vapo or Prom.
Which is the best for some fast swapping and least worries about condensation.
Well, back to on topic...:D
OPP, are you still trying to get a bench that will publish with this board...or are you waiting for some sort of response from FM...or what is the current status of things? Inquiring minds want to know!
word.Quote:
Originally posted by BrainStorm
Well, back to on topic...:D
OPP, are you still trying to get a bench that will publish with this board...or are you waiting for some sort of response from FM...or what is the current status of things? Inquiring minds want to know!
Quote:
Originally posted by cpulloverclock
236 IN DUAL DDR
VDD@2.v
VMEM@2.9v
2*Winbond 5ns
tearing because of vmem mod on the GC (TI 4200)
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/236dual.jpg
ouch
now that would run a killer AMD score :D
I agree. Same with my KX7-333.Quote:
Originally posted by STEvil
the NF2 isnt the only board it doesnt detect the cpu speed properly on.
3dmark and MBM5 wont detect my cpu properly on a Shuttle AK11 rev 3.2...
Running an 1800+ at 11x150.89..
MBM detects it as: 1.6
3dmark detects as: 1.6
wcpuid detects as: 1659.78/79.
But the problem with the NF2 seems to be that it detects it wrongly AND the detected speed seems to fluctuate wildly for some reason.
I was thinking that knowing the detection method being used might give some insight. There is one well known method that compares the cpu's internal cycle counter to an external timer (the PC's 8254 RTC timer) over a given delay period and calculates the speed from cpu cycles/time elapsed. But if the RTC goes wobbly (when the chipset is under stress?) ......
A much better idea is to read the multiplier/bus frequency directly from the cpu/chipset if at all possible, which I'm certain is what WCPUID, CPU-Z, etc are doing. Information on how to do this is almost impossible to find though (I've looked!).
Anyway, if I do find out anything else I'll post it.
cpulloverclock, that bandwidth is incredible! :toast: Can you bench with that? :slobber:
237 IN DUAL DDR
2*WINBOND 5NS (ALWAYS)
VMEM 2.9v
VDD 2.22v
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/237.jpg
:slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber:
Isn't 2.22v VDD dangerously high on these boards? Don't blow it up! :D
RE OPP's publishing problem: Alex van Kaam, the MBM author, has pointed me to this FAQ which confirms that MBM uses the counter + timer method to measure cpu speed. So if it's consistently showing the wrong speed (only when overclocked I assume?) it indicates that something is going wrong with the timer when the chipset is stressed (Windows uses the 8254 timer for high resolution timing).
So presumably 3dMark is doing the same thing. That's about as far as I can take it though, I have no idea how you might go about fixing this. Perhaps some more cooling somewhere? Which bit of the chipset contains the timer?
Maybe someone would like to try this out on some mobo tech guy (although given that the Epox one doesn't even know if the PCI bus is locked or not, I don't hold out much hope there :D).
There's a guy whose board glew up at 2 V so be careful.
Interessting thing ...Quote:
Originally posted by MrLavender
:slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber:
RE OPP's publishing problem: Alex van Kaam, the MBM author, has pointed me to this FAQ which confirms that MBM uses the counter + timer method to measure cpu speed. So if it's consistently showing the wrong speed (only when overclocked I assume?) it indicates that something is going wrong with the timer when the chipset is stressed (Windows uses the 8254 timer for high resolution timing).
So presumably 3dMark is doing the same thing. That's about as far as I can take it though, I have no idea how you might go about fixing this. Perhaps some more cooling somewhere? Which bit of the chipset contains the timer?
What do mean with timer? Do you mean Clock Generator? This must be an ic in combi with a quartz I think (so on the kx7). I have had a look at all ic's on the 8rda, but all seems to have other functions.
The 8254 used to be a seperate IC in the original PC's, but nowadays it's part of the chipset since it's such a simple device. Some details here from Intel's site, or search Google for "8254 timer" or "8254 PIT".Quote:
Originally posted by br@insc@n
Interessting thing ...
What do mean with timer? Do you mean Clock Generator? This must be an ic in combi with a quartz I think (so on the kx7). I have had a look at all ic's on the 8rda, but all seems to have other functions.
I don't know enough about mobo hardware to say where it gets the clock signal from (I'm a programmer, not an engineer :D), I know that the input frequency is 1.19318MHz which gives a max timing accuracy of ~838 nanoseconds. This is why it's used for all high resolution timing by the OS, there is no other device in the PC with that sort of accuracy (sigh, the price of backward-compatability).
Ok, but on the KX7 I find an ic just behind the agp slot, it's a Realtek called RTM560. In SoftFSB you can choose this type of ic, so I thought it's the general clock gen
You gonna smoke something man, be aware.... :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by cpulloverclock
237 IN DUAL DDR
2*WINBOND 5NS (ALWAYS)
VMEM 2.9v
VDD 2.22v
:confused: :smileysexQuote:
Originally posted by TodB
You gonna smoke something man, be aware.... :rolleyes:
Quote:
Originally posted by SKATAN
ouch
now that would run a killer AMD score :D
SKatan how is your 8RDA working ?
You'll be looking :confused: sooner rather than later when that board decides to commit suicide. That is putting a lot of strain on the board as a whole and I sure as hell hope you don't plan to keep it there for much longer.
Maybe a bit of a vdimm mod is in order, with 3.0 - 3.2 you could go a little easier on the vdd. Maybe even get higher fsb ;)Quote:
Originally posted by cpulloverclock
237 IN DUAL DDR
2*WINBOND 5NS (ALWAYS)
VMEM 2.9v
VDD 2.22v
Heh, shall i write out an invitation to join my 'dead-8rda+' club? :DQuote:
Originally posted by cpulloverclock
237 IN DUAL DDR
2*WINBOND 5NS (ALWAYS)
VMEM 2.9v
VDD 2.22v
Be carefull dude, i blew mine at 2.0V
holy crap, you have killed just as much stuff as me.. though all the stuff I killed was processors 8-)
Maybe your voltage regulator was just weak. I think the chipset can handle it's the other components that are a problem.
Heh, their is something about me and vidcards. The only one that got away alive, was a GF1 DDR, and it had to fake it's death! The vidcard worked again when I removed the 80W pelt. :)Quote:
Originally posted by STEvil
holy crap, you have killed just as much stuff as me.. though all the stuff I killed was processors 8-)
@wolf: jup, the chipset didn't die, but the chip next to the voltage regulator burned out.
Celeron 366 @ 595 2.6v (noooo)
Celeron 500 @ 585 2.1v (doh)
P3 650 @ 910 1.8v (argh)
Celeron 700 @ 1092 1.75v (argh!)
Duron 800 @ 1ghz 1.8v (nuts)
T-Bird 850 @ 1050 1.85v (drat)
T-Bird 1200 @ 1533 1.85v (@#%@#!#%)
And a few others I have forgotten..
/end off topicness 8-)
OPP,
Were you ever able to get the 8RDA To run with a higher Vcore...
What was the highest you could go?
Thanks,
RoydRage
Highest core I could get onto windows with was 2.07V.Quote:
Originally posted by RoydRage
OPP,
Were you ever able to get the 8RDA To run with a higher Vcore...
What was the highest you could go?
Thanks,
RoydRage
I broke the mobo, I'm onto the Asus now:D
OPP
How did ya break it? :eek:Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
Highest core I could get onto windows with was 2.07V.
I broke the mobo, I'm onto the Asus now:D
OPP
Quote:
Originally posted by RichBa5tard
Heh, shall i write out an invitation to join my 'dead-8rda+' club? :D
Be carefull dude, i blew mine at 2.0V
we cant be sure you blew it because of the 2v vdd
because when one looks at your sig one sees a pattern :D
I know of 8rda+ tha blew , out of the blue with 1.56v (default) non moded vdd
Epox challange OVER :D
Someone start a thread named ASUS challenge :p :p :p :p
You should take all the northbridges off your dead mobo's and get a chain to hold them... 8-)
a new screen
2400+@2639MHz in wc
vcore@2.15v
vdd@2.14v
vddr@2.9v
Windows 98
tearing is always here (vmem mod of my ti4200)
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/250.jpg
Nice MHz... and that's hella high on the Vdd. :D
Hey jeff what mobo do u got? With my 1800+ my multi dont work over 12.5 or under 10.5:confused: On a 8rda.. Thought these were alredy unlocked:mad:
Edit: 1800+ T-Bred of course
I don't think the Epox challenge is over..... just a little break is all.... ain't many boards that can run 3DMark at 230+ FSB.... of course some folks still believe in the dumbed down timings issue with this board........:D
@cpulloverclock - what stepping is that CPU? Thats awesome.
It's an AIUHB 047
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/252.JPG
WinXP French version
bad perf, it's strange :smileysex
don't understand what's happening
I'll retry at 221.93 7-2-2 cas2 in DUAL DDR
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/36m.JPG
Muzz, Heres the NF7 running 3d at 11.5 x 233 FSB with dual memory.Quote:
Originally posted by muzz
I don't think the Epox challenge is over..... just a little break is all.... ain't many boards that can run 3DMark at 230+ FSB.... of course some folks still believe in the dumbed down timings issue with this board........:D
I'll be getting a new Epox and doing the mem mod and chipset mod and hope to be able to do the same range.
OPP
I believe the scores will be pretty close myself OPP.
Be looking forward to it mang.:banana:
is that NF7 without mods? dont think so, but just checking.
That NF7 has XtremeTekwerkz(Vmem), OPP(Vcore) and ICEE(Vdd) volt mods:thumbsup:
Randi:D
I hate cheaters..
*note - I inverted the colors cause its much easier reading.. and looks cool 8-)
I love the geocities trick 8-)
http://www.geocities.com/scatha_v/futuremark.txt
ICEE as in MrIcee mods........:toast:
Good job Randi.
hi,
the v-ddr MOD work fine :D THX Jeff
timing: aggressive 7,2,2,2 3.1 v
http://membres.lycos.fr/ftpad/images/3702.png
Looking good Learn....... still running that board hot I see........:D
Epox makes it to #2 on the ORB:banana:
I did the v-mem and still I can't get this running dual past 218, bummer.
Whats the best bios?? I need a link.
OPP