I'm not sure what problems xgman has been having, but the board runs very smooth and the locks work great. It may not be the quickest or the best overclocker, but its very stable
Printable View
I'm not sure what problems xgman has been having, but the board runs very smooth and the locks work great. It may not be the quickest or the best overclocker, but its very stable
It seems you've had pretty good luck with it. My K8N and K8NS both are solid as a rock. He may have just gotten a bad one or maybe he didn't clear the BIOS before he started. Failure to clear the BIOS can cause all kinds of wonderful issues.;)Quote:
Originally posted by pkrew
I'm not sure what problems xgman has been having, but the board runs very smooth and the locks work great. It may not be the quickest or the best overclocker, but its very stable
So is this your main rig now or are you just benching with it? Have you tried pushing it on air? I'd like to see how it compares to the 940 and 754 stuff.
I had an A8V ordered and then cancelled because of the Gigabyte. I may wait until ASUS comes out with their A8N 939 board. Having ASUS and NF3 250 on the same board would be sweet!:toast:
XGman do you try the GB without vmods ?
because corsair XL don't like much Voltage , and news k8 Too.
try with stock voltage, and purple dimms.
Its my main rig atm. Once I figured out the memory situation it has really started to do well. One thing that I noticed is if you're going to push high vdimm through bh-5, you have to boot with a reasonable fsb. Mine will not load windows at 200fsb. I start it with 240.Quote:
Originally posted by StormPC
It seems you've had pretty good luck with it. My K8N and K8NS both are solid as a rock. He may have just gotten a bad one or maybe he didn't clear the BIOS before he started. Failure to clear the BIOS can cause all kinds of wonderful issues.;)
So is this your main rig now or are you just benching with it? Have you tried pushing it on air? I'd like to see how it compares to the 940 and 754 stuff.
I had an A8V ordered and then cancelled because of the Gigabyte. I may wait until ASUS comes out with their A8N 939 board. Having ASUS and NF3 250 on the same board would be sweet!:toast:
My cpu is an OEM, so no hsf for running on air. The FX I have is starting to look like an average oc'er. The best spi I'v had is 2.94G, 10 mhz less than on the Asus. I may try another cpu or just remove the IHS and try for 3g and live with it. With the cooling I have I'm not going to set any records any way, lol
The S754 NF3 250 Gigabyte boards are the same way. I have to use clockgen to get a high FSB. Can't boot with it. May have something to do with the dual BIOS.
Well, with the bh-5 at 3.4v on this if I start at too low of fsb I get memory errors and it crashes. Starting at 240 is very smooth though.
Please don't tell me I have to use Clockgen, I hate that thing.
Yeah, well when we overclock these things all bets are off. Taking hardware beyond standard specs is what overclocking is all about, but funning things can happen when you do. Also, every system is different, even if the hardware configuration appears to be identical. It's a lot of luck really. For instance, the first two BBA X800XTs I received didn't overclock very well but the Sapphire and Visionteks are crazy fast!:DQuote:
Originally posted by pkrew
Well, with the bh-5 at 3.4v on this if I start at too low of fsb I get memory errors and it crashes. Starting at 240 is very smooth though.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/35sStock.JPG
me , i like my gigaboard ; it roxx :D
Edit: under Windows XP !!
I agree, just took out my highpoint raid and for some reason got some better oc. Ran 2001se at 2.95 and will probably be able to run it at 2.96. With enough vdimm I should be able to run that at a 11 multi 1/1. Hard to be unhappy.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/32sbest.JPG
does an a8v owner can do better ?? :D
Pkrew , try the top performance option , there is a gain ;)
Very nice, I'll give that a try :toast:
Maj superpi 1M 32s@2533
Looking good fellas looking good :D
Quote:
Originally posted by StormPC
I don't think the Newcastle 939's will ever break 35k on 2k1. The FX-939 will. I know it's early, but I have to say I'm surprised that the best S939 showing so far is this FX-53 939, which is currently #11 (see below).
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7915393
The 3800+ and 3500+ have not made the first page and probably won't. Dual channel looks cool in Sandra but it doesn't make up for the cache difference between the ClawHammer S754 and the Newcastle S939 in 2k1 and most apps.
Compare the above FX-53 with my stock 3700+ non-vmod air with much less MHz on the CPU.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7911005
Yes, I have an XT, but my entire system is unmodded and 100% aircooled. These new cards are very limited by CPUs, so his FX-53 much higher clocks, along with his Mach II Prommie should do better I think. The XT doesn't make that big a difference in 2k1.
Since it's my rig that you reference here, I'll add that the comparison you make here is very poor. Trying to make my rig look like its extreme in any way is a complete mistatement.
On the contrary, the very fact that I had the #11 spot says everything about how well these 939 systems could do in the "right" hands. Most folks know that I don't even get "into" benching anymore. That 32k score was done in one evening of basic tweaking of a gaming (not benching) system. In fact, there is no doubt that I have a ton of headroom left in the system. I clock everything at least 5% to 10% to the safe side of unstable for a cushion of stability. My CPU, memory, and vid card are all clocked at less than my maximum stable mhz. I have no volt mods either. The system is plug n play and completely self contained. It can loop 3DMark overnight, and run non stop at LAN parties at the settings I used to post that score. Furthermore, no tweaks to the OS have been made and no attempt to run fewer services has been made. In the sys tray alone I'm running Norton AV, MBM, Pop-up Stopper, SPy Bot Resident, Creative Sound Manager, ATI control panel. All of this on top of my very modest VC clocks on a plain jane x800 pro.
LOL...aside from some decent cooling, my gaming system is pretty darn bland.
Storm, I know you are enjoying not seeing any 939 systems at the top of the ORB at the moment. I am happy that you are so pleased. BUT, please do not represent my system or my scores. You have no clue as to how I have my system configured aside from what you can see in the benches and my sig, and that is far from telling the story. If you knew that, than you would know that using my modestly clocked rig is a perfect example as what kind of performance potential this platform has and what it could do in the right hands.
i agree , i think there's about +1K 3Dmark2K1 between FX940 and 939.
Quote:
Originally posted by misteroadster
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/32sbest.JPG
does an a8v owner can do better ?? :D
Pkrew , try the top performance option , there is a gain ;)
very nice.. but whats that program to adjust timings you are using called?
that's a program based on wpcredit , made by codered :
A must :
http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/a64t...weaker_V02.zip
uhh crazy nice.. hell of a job there codered :)
I agree, but when the S939 matures I'm sure it will catch up with the S940 somewhat.:DQuote:
Originally posted by misteroadster
i agree , i think there's about +1K 3Dmark2K1 between FX940 and 939.
mdzcpa
Request denied.;)
if opp or macci had a good couple FX53 939 + good sticks they broke their records , for sure.
But they don't have this.
I think opp can beat his FX with his 3500+ already with about 500 pts more.
i had tested 3800+ 200X12 5/2/2/2 19450 3Dmark2K1 on NF3ultra
and FX53 940 200X12 5/2/2/2 19000 3Dmark2K1 on NF3 150
With 9700 pro stock.
Time will tell, I did get mine to run 2k1 at 2957. Almost had 2968 but it crapped out in CL, the last run. Not bad for a POS mb. Anyway, I'll mod up the A8V when I can get a 200 ohm vr and try to get some comparisons. The nVidia chiipset is a little slower than the Via, but it will be interesting to see if the higher memory clock of the GB makes up the difference
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7944403
Edit: BTW, the best I ever got with this card on a s754 was at 263 1/1 x 11. That score was right at 24k running win2k. By the time I'm done tweeking this I'll be 1400-1500 above that with this mb and cpu
i assume via is better at stock frequency than NF3 in 3D bench :
2K1 results :
NF3 : 19450 (top perf enabled)
VIA : 19550
2K3 results :
NF3 : 5346
VIA : 5450 !!
but for superpi :
NF3 : 35s
VIA : 36s
I have a A8V but I only have a 64 3500 so we can't really conpare scores
compare to my 9700 pro :toast:Quote:
Originally posted by pkrew
Time will tell, I did get mine to run 2k1 at 2957. Almost had 2968 but it crapped out in CL, the last run. Not bad for a POS mb. Anyway, I'll mod up the A8V when I can get a 200 ohm vr and try to get some comparisons. The nVidia chiipset is a little slower than the Via, but it will be interesting to see if the higher memory clock of the GB makes up the difference
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7944403
Edit: BTW, the best I ever got with this card on a s754 was at 263 1/1 x 11. That score was right at 24k running win2k. By the time I'm done tweeking this I'll be 1400-1500 above that with this mb and cpu
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7701636
Very nice. Your 9700pro is actually running faster than my 9800np. Mines at 460/320
it was an 9700np at 497/344 ;) she's dead now :(
I saw that, very nice oc.
I think you're stoned, but like pkrew said, time will tell.:toast:Quote:
Originally posted by misteroadster
if opp or macci had a good couple FX53 939 + good sticks they broke their records , for sure.
But they don't have this.
I think opp can beat his FX with his 3500+ already with about 500 pts more.
i had tested 3800+ 200X12 5/2/2/2 19450 on NF3
and FX53 940 200X12 5/2/2/2 19000 on NF3
With 9700 pro stock.
I don't understand why you think the S939 stuff (especially the Newcastles) would be faster than the S754 or S940. It's the same exact A64 technology. Same chipsets, everything but the number of pins. Those of you who really understand the A64 know that doubling the bandwidth of an A64 does not help in 3D gaming and 3D benching. The A64 can only utilize so much memory bandwidth. That's why the socket 754 stuff is competitive with the dual channel A64s. This has been proven time after time.
I am building an FX-53 socket 939 to test next week. I'll do a real comparison between the FX-53 and the 3700+, with identical hardware except for the CPU and motherboard. Then I'll know for sure what the true expectations of the S939 are. I expect the S939 to be faster (although there's been little evidence in support of this). We'll see if this is realistic.;)
OK, but then why do all those STOCK benchmarks show FX/939 is about 1000-1200 pts. faster than FX/940 at defult?Quote:
Originally posted by StormPC
I think you're stoned, but like pkrew said, time will tell.:toast:
I don't understand why you think the S939 stuff (especially the Newcastles) would be faster than the S754 or S940. It's the same exact A64 technology. Same chipsets, everything but the number of pins. Those of you who really understand the A64 know that doubling the bandwidth of an A64 does not help in 3D gaming and 3D benching. The A64 can only utilize so much memory bandwidth. That's why the socket 754 stuff is competitive with the dual channel A64s. This has been proven time after time.
I am building an FX-53 socket 939 to test next week. I'll do a real comparison between the FX-53 and the 3700+, with identical hardware except for the CPU and motherboard. Then I'll know for sure what the true expectations of the S939 are. I expect the S939 to be faster (although there's been little evidence in support of this). We'll see if this is realistic.;)
C
I don't know which stock benches you are looking at, but even if that's true it doesn't mean much. A stock X800XT will kill a stock X800 Pro, but push both to the limits on stock cooling and you're lucky if you see an 800 point difference on 2k1.
All (CPUs/GPUs etc...) have limits as to how much work they can do in a certain amount of time. Architecturally and process wise there is LITTLE difference among the three A64 platforms. For this reason I say there is no difference between them as far as extreme overclocking is concerned. They are ALL capable of doing about the same amount of work. I believe it all boils down to which CPU came from the better wafers and process. A good clocking A64 will always beat a $hit clocker no matter how many pins you have.:D
Quote:
Originally posted by StormPC
I think you're stoned, but like pkrew said, time will tell.:toast:
I am building an FX-53 socket 939 to test next week. I'll do a real comparison between the FX-53 and the 3700+, with identical hardware except for the CPU and motherboard. Then I'll know for sure what the true expectations of the S939 are. I expect the S939 to be faster (although there's been little evidence in support of this). We'll see if this is realistic.;)
Storm,
Please keep us posted on your results when you have that new box built. I'm VERY interested to see what you find out in relation to the performance of the two platforms.
John
Didn't Op just score 36,826 with his sk8v?Quote:
Originally posted by charlie
OK, but then why do all those STOCK benchmarks show FX/939 is about 1000-1200 pts. faster than FX/940 at defult?
C
Actually he had one higher than that. S940 though. I will be comparing S939 and S754.
I don't know WHY 939 is faster...maybe becasue of the reduced latency of non ecc mem. Remember 2-2-2-5 on a reg sk8v is the same as 3-3-3-5 with non reg DDR, IIRC
When is FX55 supposed to hit the streets?
FX55 is expected to launch in the fourth quarter. It will likely use the current 130-nm fab process. FX57 is supposed to launch in the second quarter of next year and will use the 90-nm core. This is the chip that's code-named San Diego.
LOL...that's just what I expected you'd say. I figured you had nothing to refute the facts with.Quote:
Originally posted by StormPC
mdzcpa
Request denied.;)
But, hey, posting in total ignorance is your right to free speech. And you seem comfortable enough in doing so. So...carry on;)
Forgotten in this "discussion" is that with locks memory will be able to run at a higher fsb, which should add a few hundred points in itself.
very easy to know , remove one stick of an FX53 939 @260 and you'll see the difference immediately.Quote:
Originally posted by StormPC
I think you're stoned, but like pkrew said, time will tell.:toast:
I don't understand why you think the S939 stuff (especially the Newcastles) would be faster than the S754 or S940. It's the same exact A64 technology. Same chipsets, everything but the number of pins. Those of you who really understand the A64 know that doubling the bandwidth of an A64 does not help in 3D gaming and 3D benching. The A64 can only utilize so much memory bandwidth. That's why the socket 754 stuff is competitive with the dual channel A64s. This has been proven time after time.
I am building an FX-53 socket 939 to test next week. I'll do a real comparison between the FX-53 and the 3700+, with identical hardware except for the CPU and motherboard. Then I'll know for sure what the true expectations of the S939 are. I expect the S939 to be faster (although there's been little evidence in support of this). We'll see if this is realistic.;)
here's the difference between FX53 940 14X200 dual Ecc and 14X200 single ECC(By Me):
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/SingleVsdual.JPG
and here is 3200+ 10X260 1:1 Vs FX53 940 13X200
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/3200FX55.JPG
Ouch! Where is the love????:buddies: :shrug: :ROTF:Quote:
Originally posted by mdzcpa
LOL...that's just what I expected you'd say. I figured you had nothing to refute the facts with.
But, hey, posting in total ignorance is your right to free speech. And you seem comfortable enough in doing so. So...carry on;)
misteroadster:
Still think you're stoned.:banana4:
You see, ALL of the benches in your bargraphs are nearly identical with the exception of the Sandra Memory benches. Your evidence supports my theory that there isn't much difference between single channel and dual on an A64 in real world performance, which is why the S754s are hanging on the front page of the ORB quite well!:D
If Sandra memory benches are the center of your universe, by all means get the S939. If not it's really not worth it.
yes , but there is a gain when you increase FSB With a FX , and you forget the bad effect of ECC reg.
i don't have a stick of 3200 ECC reg but it run on 754 , if anybody can do this test ; i had done it , there was a serious lost of point at 3DM2K1 about 800 and about 1 sec superpi
i agree , i'm stoned , but not enough to say nothing .:banana:
i'm actually testing my 3800+ with 9700 325/315 :
2600mhz 216X12 : 20012
2604mhz 236X11 :20202
i assume little gain but gain.
The dual channel impact is important... it depends game/app. For example, in xbit-labs, look at FX-53 Vs. 3700+ in these three benches (same frecuency, same caché, but dual Vs. single channel):
http://www.xbitlabs.com/images/cpu/lga775/quake3.png
Quake, FX-53 12% faster than 3700+
http://www.xbitlabs.com/images/cpu/lga775/3dmark01.png
3dmark 2001, FX-53 6% faster than 3700+
http://www.xbitlabs.com/images/cpu/l...3dmark03-2.png
3dmark 2003 CPU, FX-53 8% faster than 3700+
Or look at Ace's Hardware, differences between dual and single channel:
http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=65000314
As we can see there are apps/games where dual channel has a nice impact (ScienceMark Primordia, 7.5%; Plasma, 24%; WinRAR, 5%; Medieval Total War, 6%; Ghost Recon, 15%; Halo, 6%; Wolfenstein, 8% & 6%; X2, 5%). There are anothers where hasn't (render 3D. Only in Maya with Mental Ray there is a noticiable 4,5%). Again, it depends game/app.
Summary, in general terms there are apps/games where dual channel has an important impact in perfomance. There are others where hasn't. And this general situation is reflected perfectly in A64.
Well you guys post all the bargraphs you want. What's at the top of the ORB? That's right, an ECC REG 940 and a single channel 3400+ (not even a 3700+). So tell me again about the effects of DC and REG mem?:ROTF:
Keep your bargraphs...I'll go with what is proven.
I'm taking Charlie an X800XT today. We'll see what S939 can do with it.
Nothing like living in denial:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by StormPC
Keep your bargraphs...I'll go with what is proven.
What's "proven" has been put in front of your face time and again. At this point it's apparent you're hell bent on pushing any credibility you may have had right into the toilet. By ignoring the obvious facts layed out right in front of you only puts your opinion on the lunatic fringe and in the zero value column.
Worshipping the ORB results doesn't help your position. Just because someone with the skills and desire have not yet pushed the 939 pin platform to the "top of the ORB" proves nothing at this point. The platform is young and no heavy hitters with all the right equipment have even tried yet.
Get over it, the old 940 system is second rate now
:lol:
Just got back from Charlie's. Benched S754 3700+ and S939 FX-53. Why don't you ask Charlie how it went? The S939 results were disappointing to say the least.:(
From what I saw I am now having second thoughts about testing the FX-53 and Gigabyte S939 I'll be getting next week. I see little point until the bugs are worked out.
Oh, and mdzcpa? Stick to accounting and I'll stick to building the fastest stock aircooled systems on earth!;)
Quote of the week: "Get over it, the old 940 system is second rate now"
Somebody should tell OPP and Macci.:ROTF:
hehe you guys are too much!!
wow....that's, ummmmm, impressive:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by StormPC
I'll stick to building the fastest stock aircooled systems on earth!
I sure hope to god that's not your full time job if this is the best you can do.
Oh, and BTW, no need to tell 'em, they already know. It's being work on at the moment:)Quote:
Originally posted by StormPC
Quote of the week: "Get over it, the old 940 system is second rate now"
Somebody should tell OPP and Macci.:ROTF:
Here comes yet another possible alternative board, and Anandtech is apparently very high on it.........also it is expected to be available this week:
http://www.anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.html?i=2100&p=2
John
anyone have it ordered yet?
John
Then we are pretty much SIAMESE TWIN then. Mine is 30012. :toast:Quote:
Originally posted by xgman
Mine's 30015, so we are practically twins. lol :D
NF3 ultra and CH5 is definitively a winning couple :
here is Corsair 3200 LLPT :
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/32s2515.JPG
32s at only 2.5ghz.. .. holy gwacomoly...
Here's a fun one. Just getting bored waiting for an x800xt at a decent price
pkrew,
WOW! That is SICK fast :D
C
Thanks charlie, yep these fx's a quick. This matches the spi time I got with a 3400+ at 2.87 and about the same memory clock
i'll try 28s today i think :D
use A64 tweaker man ;) , are you 5222 ?Quote:
Originally posted by pkrew
Here's a fun one. Just getting bored waiting for an x800xt at a decent price
I'm using it. Yes that's at 2225 and all the timmings tightQuote:
Originally posted by misteroadster
use A64 tweaker man ;) , are you 5222 ?
a64 tweaker?
what is that?
i think you can hit 32s at 2400mhz or 30s at 2600mhz under 2K3 server with best optimisationsQuote:
Originally posted by pkrew
I'm using it. Yes that's at 2225 and all the timmings tight
Probably true and I'll try that sometime. This is with plain vanilla XP
This is the quickest I can get to 30s under XP, unoptomized with a 10 multi.
:DQuote:
Originally posted by JNav89GT
a64 tweaker?
what is that?
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...threadid=37345
Very sweet, I'll definately have to load up my copy of win2003 and give it a try at some point
;)
Well, tried to get 32s on XP, but best I did was 9 X 272 which was 33s. Funny it wouldn't let me be as aggressive on the timmings with a multi of 9. I tried to get 29s with the 10 multi which allowed the top setting, but the memory crapped out at 273 at 3.7vdimm which was 30s, but another 1-2 fsb would have done it. I did manage 7900 in Sandra though. 270 X 11.
Extrem bandwith :D :toast: , always your KHX3500 ?
purple dimms ?
you can hit 27s gogogogo !!!! :banana:
Yep, hard not to like this mb. I do wish they would have staggered the dimm slots so I could use some ram sinks, but nothing wrong with 270 dual channel. I should have a gig of eb by friday.
I can think of lots of things not to like.Quote:
Originally posted by pkrew
Yep, hard not to like this mb. I do wish they would have staggered the dimm slots so I could use some ram sinks, but nothing wrong with 270 dual channel. I should have a gig of eb by friday.
Ok, so when you get tired of running Sandra how about a little 3DMark2001 action? If these things are half as good as you guys seem to think you should be able to smash your 33730 A64 score easily! WTF are you waiting for? Start setting some records other than Super Pi for God's sake!:D
Aren't you tired of thread crapping storm. Seriously, you're obseseed. Take some meds and calm down. I'll run some 3d as soon as I get a card. If you know of where I can get an XT for less than $600 let me know. In the mean time, relax. I'll call you in some Xanax if you need it.
Yes, always on the KHX3500. My purple dimms don't clock well. I'm using the orange onesQuote:
Originally posted by misteroadster
Extrem bandwith :D :toast: , always your KHX3500 ?
purple dimms ?
you can hit 27s gogogogo !!!! :banana:
Since when is it thread crapping to ask to see some benching?:confused: Isn't benching what 99% of all this extreme hardware is all about???Quote:
Originally posted by pkrew
Aren't you tired of thread crapping storm. Seriously, you're obseseed. Take some meds and calm down. I'll run some 3d as soon as I get a card. If you know of where I can get an XT for less than $600 let me know. In the mean time, relax. I'll call you in some Xanax if you need it.
If you really want a good deal on an XT PM me. This is not the place for it. Certain individuals get really pissy when they think you might make money relating to a post on Xtremesystems.org. I'll sell pkrew an X800 XT at a loss if he promises to actually bench it! :toast:
thanks , my GB don't like orange's , i have to be at more than 240 1:1 when i use them. at 200-240 it's not stable very strange :mad:Quote:
Originally posted by pkrew
Yes, always on the KHX3500. My purple dimms don't clock well. I'm using the orange ones
My orange ones are the same. I boot at 12 x 240. I tried the purple, but they didn't seem to like the bh-5.
i tried mine BH5 and they aren't very stable at 200 mhz on all dimms , i'll retry them.
mine aren't stable at 200 with the vdimm mod, but they run great above 240
Is that with A8V or K8NSNXP-939???Quote:
Originally posted by pkrew
mine aren't stable at 200 with the vdimm mod, but they run great above 240
That's with the Gigabyte board. The vdimm is set for 3.5 24/7 and occationally higher. It runs fine at 200 without the high vdimm
If you turn the voltage down does it run at 200 ok?Quote:
Originally posted by pkrew
That's with the Gigabyte board. The vdimm is set for 3.5 24/7 and occationally higher. It runs fine at 200 without the high vdimm
With this particular volt mod you control it with the 3.3v rail. Once its modded it will equal what your rail is set at. There's another way to mod it that you can adjust lower, but this one you don't have to turn your voltage up as much to get the vdimm that you want.
Not much of a problem really, if you're running air, just boot at 240 x 10. It also depends on the memory. My lvl 2 doesn't clock as well on this board and I boot it at 230
pkrew i've finded the technic to adjust voltage of this mod.
when i used a floppy wire about 25 cm instead a big wire 220v i had 3,3v with 3,4 VIO.
i think a 1 or 2 ohm resistor should be good
That may work, I suppose you could probably put a vr in the line. For me, I like the voltages. I'm not too worrried about running 200.
my god those are fast... 30sec at only 2.64 big ones.. thats faster than a 940 fx...
nice run!
THX :toast:
finally hit 8000 in bandwidth, 274 x 11
Congrats, pkrew. :toast: You've got that board working nicely.
+1 :toast:
Very nice Pkrew!!, what ram are you using to hit that mark?
Thanks guys, I'm using khx pc3500.
Nice job!,
timings & voltage?
2225 and 3.7v
CH-5 ?
Its bh-5
That's why I was wondering whether I should keep my Mushkin 3500 level 2 or go with the OCZ 3700 EBs...
What did you do to get it to 3.7v? I didn't think it could take it?Quote:
Originally posted by pkrew
2225 and 3.7v
I just turned up the 3.3v rail to 3.7v. I only ran it for a few minutes, but I'm sure people have put more than that through A64's. I usually just leave it at 3.5v. The ram gets pretty warm without ramsinks. I'm just going to have to try and cut the ones I have.