X79 MEMORY OC GUIDE (4 Different IC) --- G.SkILL + ASUS Rampage IV Extreme

you welcome

Good luck with the new stuff :D

this kits really awesome run on Quad Chanel X79 on ASUS RIVE another Great memory from Gskill

2400 7 10 7 24 1T 1.8 Volt

stable all bench...seem like still can run more higher.


http://i1191.photobucket.com/albums/...3/IMG_4920.jpg


http://i1191.photobucket.com/albums/...3/IMG_4921.jpg


http://i1191.photobucket.com/albums/...n3/11121-1.jpg


http://i1191.photobucket.com/albums/...Untitled-3.jpg

Awesome BBSE kits there hazzan, good job

Hey again,

So I ended up with http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product...82E16820231503

It's the same kit we discussed before but I got a good deal on a 16gb version the made the price difference like $15 so I was like what the hell 8gb extra for $15 seems alright.

Anyway, I never OC ram usually. I just set it at its rated specs and let it run. I would like to get it running @ 2400mhz. My 3930k I have it running @ 5 ghtz.

Any recommendations on how to get it running at 2400? I tried just setting the xmp profile and then changing to 2400 instead of 2133 but it wouldn't boot. :C

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frootl00ps

Hey again,

So I ended up with http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product...82E16820231503

It's the same kit we discussed before but I got a good deal on a 16gb version the made the price difference like $15 so I was like what the hell 8gb extra for $15 seems alright.

Anyway, I never OC ram usually. I just set it at its rated specs and let it run. I would like to get it running @ 2400mhz. My 3930k I have it running @ 5 ghtz.

Any recommendations on how to get it running at 2400? I tried just setting the xmp profile and then changing to 2400 instead of 2133 but it wouldn't boot. :C

---

those will run at 2400 but you will have to loosen timings or raise volts or possibly both depending on what you plan to run.

I have a kit of those as well that I have not even taken out of the package yet but I picked them up for about $135 from the egg when they were on sale, great kit I am sure and Hynix BRF seems to be the way to go for high memory clocks and density.

What is safe max volts for 24/7?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hiwa

Awesome BBSE kits there hazzan, good job

---

Just bought this week one more set.:up:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frootl00ps

What is safe max volts for 24/7?

---

i think u can run them for benching at 2400 not easy for daily or u have to find the best options for ur system, and check the cpu IMC if can do 2400 stable, so changing a lot of things in the bios, back to first post in this thread, look for 16GB tight timing and set them like that but with 2T command rate.

Hello,

I have G.Skill RipJaws Z 4x2GB 2133 C9 (F3-17000CL9Q-8GBZH), Hynix ICs I believe,
stable (HyperPi 32M) at 2400Mhz 10-12-10-28-1T and 1.65v (everything else on AUTO)

For you, it can be stable at 2400 C9 and 1.65v?
It's better to use the profile Hynix with R4E?

And what do you think of Dominator GTX8 (CMGTX8), they have PSC ICs, but 2400MHz 10-12-10, it is not good chips, I think...

Thanks ;)

EDIT: I tested to 2400 9-12-10 and 1.65v, it's not boot :p:

Start with profile then change the timing as you like if you run easy with profile try tight them if not loose the timing, normaly Hynix like high trcd and trP.


Some 2133 c9 Hynix can't run 2400 c9 , did u tried 9-12-11-31-200-2t ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hiwa

Start with profile then change the timing as you like if you run easy with profile try tight them if not loose the timing, normaly Hynix like high trcd and trP.


Some 2133 c9 Hynix can't run 2400 c9 , did u tried 9-12-11-31-200-2t ?

---

Thanks for your answer

I will test
9-12-11-31-200-2t it'll be more perf than 10-12-10-28 1T?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

Thanks for your answer

I will test
9-12-11-31-200-2t it'll be more perf than 10-12-10-28 1T?

---

you welcome, hope i can help
i m not sure have to test what apps-games u are using, i use after effect a lot of times and they are same for me here, only higher freq helps a lot not cl or trcd or tras or command rate, tuning these options help in benchmarks not daily use guys.

to 2400 MHz, 10-12-10, it is not stable with "OCCT Large Data Set"

vdimm: 1.65v
vtt: 1.15V
vccsa: 1.05v

necessary to increase the VTT?

And what do you think of Dominator GTX8 (CMGTX8)?
They have PSC ICs, but 2400MHz 10-12-10, it is not good chips, I think...

Thanks :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

to 2400 MHz, 10-12-10, it is not stable with "OCCT Large Data Set"

vdimm: 1.65v
vtt: 1.15V
vccsa: 1.05v

necessary to increase the VTT?

And what do you think of Dominator GTX8 (CMGTX8)?
They have PSC ICs, but 2400MHz 10-12-10, it is not good chips, I think...

Thanks :)

---

i really never used GTX8 sorry but they should be same as all other PSC ICs, so if they no go i think they not optimized well with X79.

this is not the same PCS ICs that RipjawsZ 2400 C8 :(

don't go higher than 1.20 vtt if you are using Air. CPUs degraded fast when vtt is high.

using WC ;)

for the memory controller, is the vccsa which should be increased?
when it is not stable?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

And what do you think of Dominator GTX8 (CMGTX8)?
They have PSC ICs, but 2400MHz 10-12-10, it is not good chips, I think...

---

Corsair GTX8 are Hynix (v5.11)...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

using WC ;)

for the memory controller, is the vccsa which should be increased?
when it is not stable?

---

Both are important

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Don_Dan

Corsair GTX8 are Hynix (v5.11)...

---

if Hynix tistou77 can try 10.12.11.31

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Don_Dan

Corsair GTX8 are Hynix (v5.11)...

---

Corsair said it was the PSC ICs

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hiwa

if Hynix tistou77 can try 10.12.11.31

---

I have de G.Skill actualy, I inform myself for CMGTX8

what current gskill is the one to get for x79 im making the jump and probably will go with asus board as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Circaflex

what current gskill is the one to get for x79 im making the jump and probably will go with asus board as well.

---

None...

I had two sets of 16GB Ripjaws Z 2400 11-11-11 that couldn't boot at 9-11-10 even with 1.75v.

The good ones are the old ones, like G.Skill PIS 2200 7-10-10, this are LinX/ Super Pi 32M stable at 2400 9-11-9 1.65v.

Unfortunately they are out. :(

what is there currently as very good ram (available) to 2400 C8 or C9 in 2x2 or 4x2GB?

thanks :)

the ripjawsz 2400 cl9-11 or the tridentx 2600c10 or tridentx 2666cl11

and 4x2GB (or 2x2GB)?

thanks :)

they are all 4 x 2 or 4 x 4 , 4gb modules.

finding 2x2 is not easy anymore but best on x79 is psc like PIS series, some old trident stuff, some ripjaws 16000 and the latest is ripjawsz 2400 8-11 or ripjawsx 2200 7-11-7
if tRP is same as Cas so probabily they are good PSC , if tRP is higher they are hynix or bad psc.
you can go with some bbse kit too like 2133 8-9-8

I search 2gb module (4x2gb or 2x2gb) kit 8GB and not 16GB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hiwa

if tRP is same as Cas so probabily they are good PSC , if tRP is higher they are hynix or bad psc.
you can go with some bbse kit too like 2133 8-9-8

---

ok, if 8-9-8, probability PSC
if 8-9-9, probability hynix or bad PSC, right?

is 10-12-10 for Corsair CMGTX8, but it's Hynix ICs

Thanks ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hiwa

you can go with some bbse kit too like 2133 8-9-8

---

I'm curious as to why BBSE is good on X79 but not BASE Hyper. Is it just tRCD? Wouldn't loosening tRCD enable Hypers to clock just as well as BBSE?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shiranui Gen-An

I'm curious as to why BBSE is good on X79 but not BASE Hyper. Is it just tRCD? Wouldn't loosening tRCD enable Hypers to clock just as well as BBSE?

---

no caz hypers doesn't like high tRCD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hiwa

no caz hypers doesn't like high tRCD

---

Hmm, didn't know that.

This MB sets in Auto VTT 1,370 and VCCSA almost at 1,4V :confused: It's when I choose DDR2400 MHz (10-11-11-30-1T @ 1,65V). VCORE ~1.45(6), 4.9 GHz, BCLK 100. I've got Geil Evo Two GET316GB2400C10QC (4x4 GB).

Don't you think it's too much? I can only say, that with VTT 1,3V and VCCSA 1,35V system unstable during Prime95 (Blend). Only at Auto (so high voltages) I was able to run Prime95 Blend for more than 15 hs (after that I stopped the test). I have not tried intermediate voltages.

But in X.M.P. I see 2T and I like 1T so set it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

I search 2gb module (4x2gb or 2x2gb) kit 8GB and not 16GB
ok, if 8-9-8, probability PSC
if 8-9-9, probability hynix or bad PSC, right?

---

that's right?

the G.skill 2133 9-11-10 have hynix or bad PSC, right?

thanks ;)

Is what the Dominator GT 2000 8-9-8 (CMT) with PSC ICs normally, are stable at 2400 C8 and 1.65v on X79 (Asus RIVE)
I saw on another topic that was stable but on S1156, I believe

Thanks ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by avabaska

This MB sets in Auto VTT 1,370 and VCCSA almost at 1,4V :confused: It's when I choose DDR2400 MHz (10-11-11-30-1T @ 1,65V). VCORE ~1.45(6), 4.9 GHz, BCLK 100. I've got Geil Evo Two GET316GB2400C10QC (4x4 GB).

Don't you think it's too much? I can only say, that with VTT 1,3V and VCCSA 1,35V system unstable during Prime95 (Blend). Only at Auto (so high voltages) I was able to run Prime95 Blend for more than 15 hs (after that I stopped the test). I have not tried intermediate voltages.

But in X.M.P. I see 2T and I like 1T so set it.

---

you're probably on ln2 mode. use with caution. actually don't apply those voltages.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

that's right?

the G.skill 2133 9-11-10 have hynix or bad PSC, right?

thanks ;)

---

the 2133 8-9-8 are bbse and some hyper but not easy to find
9-11-10 shoud be hynix as they are 4gb sticks. i never saw any 4gb psc module.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hiwa

the 2133 8-9-8 are bbse and some hyper but not easy to find
9-11-10 shoud be hynix as they are 4gb sticks. i never saw any 4gb psc module.

---

it's 2gb modules (4x2gb)

thanks ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

Is what the Dominator GT 2000 8-9-8 (CMT) with PSC ICs normally, are stable at 2400 C8 and 1.65v on X79 (Asus RIVE)
I saw on another topic that was stable but on S1156, I believe

Thanks ;)

---

I don't think so.

I have this Dominator GT 2000 7-8-7 (CMG) Elpida Hypers that can run 3DMark Vantage at 2400 9-10-9-28 but only with 1,78v+. And they are not Pi 32M stable, actually the system turns off when the test begins.

Can you PM me the link of this topic you saw?

Dominator GT 2000 8-9-8 have PSC ICs, not Elpida

the link of topic

post #36

;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

Dominator GT 2000 8-9-8 have PSC ICs, not Elpida

the link of topic

post #36

;)

---

I didn't know about this 1.5v RAMs.

Anyway, with +0.15v I can almost do the same.... 2400 9-9-9 @ 1.80v

Hondacity
>you're probably on ln2 mode. use with caution. actually don't apply those voltages.
No, I'm not. But it's too late :D With this voltages and + 1,5V VCORE, I'v started LinX for 1 hr. Hottest core was 91C (and I saw a red LOG). I was a little drunk and just tested my new CPU :( It was few days ago, but yesterday it was a Prime95 Blend test (with normal for me (~1,46V) VCORE).

But now it's OK. VTT - 1,2V and VCCSA - 1,23V. Prime 95 Blend 15 hrs and LinX 1 hr. I don't know why I had a problems. Maybe 1,65V on RAM in BIOS it's not enough (MB sets a little higher, as me now, about 1,67V). Or maybe VTT and VCCSA was it that positions, that I had problems (not too low and not too high) or it was a bad delta, I just don't know :shakes:

Thx for your reply.

But guys from ROG says that "Secondary VTT does not, however try to maintain at most a 300mv delta for stability. 1.40v is fine on these CPUs" :D

The CMT4GX3M3A2000C8 ver. 7.1 (8-9-8-24) are also good in OC that CMT6GX3M3A2000C8 ver. 7.1A (8-9-8-24)?

Thanks :)

I tested the Dominator GT (CMT4GX3M2A2000C8) 2000 8-9-8-24, ver. 7.1 (PSC IC)

At 2400 9-11-10-28 1T is not stable with HyperPI 32M,
What is the best setting to be stable h24?

I tried with all sub-timings on AUTO, PSC profile but without success (the tRFC is 120 or 128)
I can test with 143 or 147?

Thank you

PS: I saw the same Dominator GT (but CMT6GX3M3A2000C8, ver 7.1A) stable h24 at 9-11-10-28

Hmmm... 2000 8-9-8 I would have thought to be BBSE. For 2400 with PSC, try 10-12-10 and work your way down. It's possible that 9-11-9 may take more than 1.65V since 2000 8-9-8 isn't a very high bin for PSC (2000 7-9-7 or 6-9-6 would be higher).

This is the PSC, take some kit to 1.65v 2400 C9 (and C8 from one topic where I put the link above)

What kit PSC are 2000 7-9-7?

Thanks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

This is the PSC, take some kit to 1.65v 2400 C9 (and C8 from one topic where I put the link above)

What kit PSC are 2000 7-9-7?

Thanks

---

we have GSKILL Flare 2000 7-9-7 4 X 2GB

Not avalaible :(

Thanks

The PSC profile, Hynix, etc... adapts with the frequency, or it is the same for all frequency?

Thanks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

The PSC profile, Hynix, etc... adapts with the frequency, or it is the same for all frequency?
Thanks

---

Please :D

And I tested the kit Dominator GT CMT6GX3M3A2000C8 (8-9-8-24, PSC ICs) of a friend on a Rampage Extreme 4 (only 2x2GB)

For my friend, is stable at 2400 9-11-10-28 1T 1.65v (OCCT and LinX)
But for me it is not stable with Hyper PI 32M with the same timings/sub-timings (HyperPi is more violent than LinX?)

I do not use the airflow or fans, is what it is because of this?
Or what is the controller of my CPU is bad compared to his

Thanks ;)

I've been having a bit of fun with my RIVE, 3930k and some cheap Corsair Vengeance 1866 C9 Hynix CFR kits. It looks like tRCD 12 is the lowest they can go for DDR3-2400 but considering they're only rated for 933MHz 9-10-9, I'm not complaining. 1200MHz 11-12-11-30 seems stable enough with just 1.65v.

Attachment 128107

Pushing volts up to 1.72 I could pass HyperPi 32M at 1200MHz C10.

Attachment 128108

Hmm, just noticed I'm missing 4GB of my 16GB. Will investigate.

Hiwa

The G.Skill Flare 2000 7-9-7, are stable (HyperPI 32M, etc...) at 2400 9-11-9 and 1.65v?

You put the fans for ram for your tests?

Thanks ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

Hiwa

The G.Skill Flare 2000 7-9-7, are stable (HyperPI 32M, etc...) at 2400 9-11-9 and 1.65v?

You put the fans for ram for your tests?

Thanks ;)

---

Flares are PSC and they love tighter cas latency.

here is 7-11-7 testing with them

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5011788


all the times i have GSKILL STOCK fan on memories, it's enough for testing memories.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hiwa

Flares are PSC and they love tighter cas latency.

here is 7-11-7 testing with them

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5011788


all the times i have GSKILL STOCK fan on memories, it's enough for testing memories.

---

Ok thanks, and 1.65v is stable at 2400 9-11-9?

It's better to use the fans for these frequency/voltage

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

Ok thanks, and 1.65v is stable at 2400 9-11-9?

It's better to use the fans for these frequency/voltage

---

As i said psc is good with tight cas latecy they should be same at cas9

Use air all the times even at 1.6

Ok thanks hiwa ;)

And about the PSC ICs, is that the G.Skill PI 2000 6-9-6 1.65v will be stable at 2400 C8 or C9 and 1.65v?

It's better these G.Skill PI (F3-16000CL6T-6GBPID) or RipjawsX 2200 7-10-7 (F3-17600CL7D-4GBXHD)?

Thanks ;)

They are all psc and all same as flares depend on ur luck to find the good kit, 2200 7-10-7 are newer psc series can be better than the rest.

Ok thanks, I will test G.Skill RipjawsX 2200 C7

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

Ok thanks, I will test G.Skill RipjawsX 2200 C7

---

cool let us know how they are going, if u have problem with Cl9 try lower :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

Ok thanks, I will test G.Skill RipjawsX 2200 C7

---

Where did you find that kit???

Buy used ;)

Hiwa, which profile if any would you suggest for clocking the low voltage Micron D9PFJ-based kits?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shiranui Gen-An

Hiwa, which profile if any would you suggest for clocking the low voltage Micron D9PFJ-based kits?

---

oh god no idea about that

No problem, I'm trying the Elpida Hyper profile and adjusting the main timings. 2000 9-9-9 is too easy with these, I should try for 2200.

With Rampage IV Extreme and 3930K, do these G.Skill kit are stable with the original specifications (and OC to 2400) and 4 sticks (4x2Go) and 1.65v :p:

- Ripjaws X 2133 7-10-7 (F3-17000CL7D-4GBXHD)
- Ripjaws X 2200 7-10-10 (F3-17600CL7D-4GBXHD)

There are kit with the green pcb and other with black pcb, except the color, it's the same or green or black is best?

Thank you very much

And on the G.Skill, for PSC ICs, this is indicated on the ram xxxx1040xxxxx (in general)

This is a kit with 1040 and another with 104G, would compatible to work together?

Thanks ;)

I tested the Ripjaws X 2133 7-10-7, is stable at 2400 9-11-9-28 1T (the rest in Auto)
I tried with a "loose PSC profile", but it is not stable with HyperPI 32M

vdimm: 1.65v
vtt: 1.15v
vccsa: 1.05

http://nsa30.casimages.com/img/2012/...1706525814.png http://nsa29.casimages.com/img/2012/...1729674978.png

http://nsa29.casimages.com/img/2012/...1753324678.png

give them 1.70 or higher, no problem 1.70/1.75 daily use for PSC

do like i always doing: make 2 profiles in bios
one OC and one easy
when u want play games or other things like rendering etc set OC profile, when u won't so them use easy profile.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hiwa

give them 1.70 or higher, no problem 1.70/1.75 daily use for PSC

do like i always doing: make 2 profiles in bios
one OC and one easy
when u want play games or other things like rendering etc set OC profile, when u won't so them use easy profile.

---

Thanks ;)

1.70v for ram in h24 is not dangerous?
It is obligatory use the fans, I suppose

What can I expect with 1.70v in 2400, 8-11-8 (8-10-8)?

Otherwise, I do not use profile, I prefer to have an OC stable for the h24

Thanks

any ram is different you have try to know it.

Pk and 1.70v for ram in h24 is not dangerous?
At 2133 7-10-7, no boot with 1.65v, this is because of the RIVE or something?

Thanks ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

Pk and 1.70v for ram in h24 is not dangerous?
At 2133 7-10-7, no boot with 1.65v, this is because of the RIVE or something?

Thanks ;)

---

no It's not 1.70 is ok always with Gskill or good fan on memories, try 7-11-7 u are running QuadChannel you can't run like dual channel.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hiwa

no It's not 1.70 is ok always with Gskill or good fan on memories, try 7-11-7 u are running QuadChannel you can't run like dual channel.

---

I also tried 7-11-7 to 2133 and 1.65v and no boot (quand channel)

I tried 8-11-8 to 2400 and 1.68v and no boot (error CC)
I'll try to 1.70v

It's too easy with this board and G.Skill RipjawsZ 2133 C9, even the newer batches like mine that have Hynix CFR instead of BFR run great with the Hynix Tight Profile.

Attachment 128612Attachment 128613Attachment 128614

Team 4x4GB DDR3 2133 C9 at DDR3-2400 10-11-11-30-147-1T 1.65v BIOS set using the tight Hynix profile.

Attachment 128881Attachment 128882

Wowzers, this was totally unexpected. I never thought I could do 1300MHz and pass SuperPi 32M. The bandwidth sucks because of the loose timings but I was just trying to see if my IMC could handle the raw clocks.

Attachment 128921Attachment 128922Attachment 128923

I have no idea why but I can't get any of the settings I posted that passed HyperPi32M to do so now. At first I thought it was the BIOS as I updated to the 2xxx versions and was having extreme difficulty. I rolled back to 1404, no dice. I even went back to the version I was using for all the successful runs, 0018 and still HyperPi32M either errors out or more often than not, I get a BSOD. This isn't just with one kit either, NONE seem to want to do what the did before. I hate to think my CPU degraded somehow but that's the only explanation I can think of...

It's not looking good for the 3930k. I put my G.Skill RipjawsZ in my P9X79 with the 3820 and they passed 1200MHz 10-12-11-28-1T-147 like normal.

Attachment 129127

Hi there!

Anyone with Gskill RipjawsZ F3-17000CL9Q2-32GBZH (4GBx8)?
I´m trying to get the best compromise with speed/stability 24/7 for my RIG (signature), and as I am not an expert, I ask for help.

I set this settings:


http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/659...0807115248.jpg

http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/8...0807115304.jpg

http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/3...0807112301.jpg

and only boot when Ive reduced CPU Strap to 100!

Are not good values ​​for these mems, and what I ask is, the best correction for the settings.

Thanks in advanced!!


Special Thanks to "Shiranui Gen-An" and "hokiealumnus" :up:

if BCLK between 100 and 108 (approximately), strap must be 100 (and ram to 2133MhZ)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

if BCLK between 100 and 108 (approximately), strap must be 100 (and ram to 2133MhZ)

---

I corrected it, thanks!

Can you run two different sizes of memory on X79? I already have 16 GB in 4x 4GB. Could I add 4x 8GB for the other channel if they are roughly the same speed memory? Or does all the memory have to be the same. Looking for over 32GB but 64 GB is much too much. 48GB would fit the bill.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Callsign_Vega

Can you run two different sizes of memory on X79? I already have 16 GB in 4x 4GB. Could I add 4x 8GB for the other channel if they are roughly the same speed memory? Or does all the memory have to be the same. Looking for over 32GB but 64 GB is much too much. 48GB would fit the bill.

---

I can't see why not as long as the sticks are running the same speed.

In other news, I did determine that my 3930k degraded and needs more vcore for the same CPU clocks as before. I lowered the GHz a little and managed to get my RipjawsZ to pass 12xHyperPi 32M at 1200MHz 10-12-11-28-147-1T like before.

Attachment 129262

Hynix at 2400mhz, 10-12-10 and 1.50v (Domintor GTX8), could be stable at 2400mhz, 9-11-9 (or 9-xx-9) and 1.65v?

Thanks

Good question. All you can do is try it and see. I'd go for 9-11-10 first.

Yes but I would not buy them if they are worse than my current Ripjaws X (2400 to 9-11-9 and 1.65v) :D

I don't think you're going to find any sticks better than those Ripjaws. That's some highly-binned BFR.

Hynix BFR are worse than the PCS? (in general, it is 9-11-10 I believe with good BFR)
Yet 2400 C10 to 1.5v, should be stable to 2400 C9 and 1.65v

But I'll wait a feedback of users that has these GTX8 :D

EDIT: What is the best performance Between 2400 C9 and 2600 C10?

I suppose that 2600 C10, it requires more voltage VCCSA and/or VTT?

Hello

Has anyone mounted the fan (G.Skill Turbulence II FAN) on a Rampage IV Extreme and a graphics card in the 1st slot pcie?
How did you do for the fan (fan support) does not touch the graphics card?

Thanks

Not easy going lower than 11 on tRCD and hynix and 2400
Keep ur ripjawsx till next year probabily you will need them.

Ok thanks ;)

A solution to the fans G.Skill on the RIVE (with CG on the first slot)?

What was there next year?

Thanks so much :up:

I managed to put fans G.Skill (I modified the fix)
So with the fans at 70%, it's stable with HyperPI 32M, at 60%, I get errors

This is a loss of voltage or need a good cooling?

Thanks

probably it's the voltage.

Vdimm or other?

Thanks

u have to test if ur cpu can do it first at 2400 with stok and higher vtt

1.test cpu with loose timing and 2400 with stock vtt and find the right vtt voltage for system.
2. start test memories at 2400 and go tight slowly

I tested with RipjawsZ (2133 9-11-10 at 2400 10-12-11) and it is good, so or RipjawsX do not like quad channel, or require more voltage (but what)

Thanks

So I tested with OCCT and it is OK with RipjawsZ (2133 9-11-10) at 2400 10-12-11
But I get errors with RipjawsX (2133 7-10-7) at 2400 10-12-10 (although it is OK with HyperPI 32M at 2400 9-11-9)

The settings

Vcore: 1.29v (4.5Ghz)
VCCSA: 1.05v
VTT: 1.15v
Vdimm: 1.65v
PLL: 1.80v

The ripjawsX do not like quad channel in h24 (stable OCCT, LinX, etc ...) it's just good for bench?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tistou77

So I tested with OCCT and it is OK with RipjawsZ (2133 9-11-10) at 2400 10-12-11
But I get errors with RipjawsX (2133 7-10-7) at 2400 10-12-10 (although it is OK with HyperPI 32M at 2400 9-11-9)

The settings

Vcore: 1.29v (4.5Ghz)
VCCSA: 1.05v
VTT: 1.15v
Vdimm: 1.65v
PLL: 1.80v

The ripjawsX do not like quad channel in h24 (stable OCCT, LinX, etc ...) it's just good for bench?

---

Whoa, that's a bit low for VCCSA at the parameters you're trying to run.
1.1-1.125v VCCSA and a slight bump on PLL(1.82ish) should help drastically.
Try that and report back.