UnOfficial EVGA X58 Classified Owners Thread

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

05-21-2009, 04:08 PM
Anemone

I'm guessing these aren't coming with B3 stepping X58's eh?
05-21-2009, 04:47 PM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anemone

I'm guessing these aren't coming with B3 stepping X58's eh?

No, not yet. Try in two months or so.
05-21-2009, 06:18 PM
IversGarn

Quote:

Originally Posted by lior307

My Question is :

Are the E760 Better than the E761 for OC ?? are they use the same Design and Chipset revision ??
Anybody ??

If both are on the retail shelves right now, both will have the exact same motherboard in terms of design and revision. Then again as lots of the brothers here have pointed out, the E761 is no longer in retail. EVGA simply removed it.

edit: Ah so if you can still get the E761, please do. The ECP is pretty useful if you intend to mod it and mount it on your casing.
05-22-2009, 07:02 AM
nge769

The 759's are done, production stopped !! Well its either the RIIE , or the
P6T7 WS SuperComputer for me ,:yepp::clap:
05-22-2009, 07:28 AM
dejanh

Ok, so before everyone blows their top, the 759 Classfied was always intended to be a limited production run hence the introduction of the cheaper, "mainstream" 760 board which is priced basically the same as the R2E against which it is positioned anyway.

Yes, the 759 is EOL but not in that sense. It is not getting replaced by anything, it just simply will not be offered in that form any more but rather the cheaper stripped down version will for the mainstream market.

I personally think that this is the right move because at least now we know that we really did get a limited edition board. I did wonder from the start if this will be another one of those 100K "limited edition" runs like some stuff I've seen before. I think this is a good move on EVGA's part. If NF200 proves to be really useful with the new-gen cards that are coming this board will have some serious resale value while the X58 is around :up:

Those of us who got the 759 still have the top dog and it is now very exclusive :D
05-22-2009, 07:57 AM
roller11

Supposedly the 759 and 760 have different clock generators which is why S3 sleep mode works on the 759, doesn't work right on the 760. I have only the 760, so I can't look on the 759 and report the P/N for 759 clock gen. Can somebody do a visual on the 759 and tell us what CG chip is being used? If they are really different, I need to switch to the 759 pronto, the return window on this 760 closes May 28.
05-22-2009, 08:09 AM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by roller11

Supposedly the 759 and 760 have different clock generators which is why S3 sleep mode works on the 759, doesn't work right on the 760. I have only the 760, so I can't look on the 759 and report the P/N for 759 clock gen. Can somebody do a visual on the 759 and tell us what CG chip is being used? If they are really different, I need to switch to the 759 pronto, the return window on this 760 closes May 28.

There is a post earlier in this thread where SetFSB is being used to manipulate the BCLK. Anyway, the clock gen. is identified as ICS9LPRS139AKLF. I have not verified anything, just stating what I saw in that post.
05-22-2009, 10:39 AM
Waxking1

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

Question, is anybody having problems clocking Uncore independently on D0 chips only using the Classified? I'm trying to figure out if there is a problem with the boards or BIOS or something to do with the D0 chips. Basically, Uncore can only be clocked 2:1 to DRAM or just a bit above (say +1x multiplier). An example would be if DRAM was at 1600MHz Uncore is okay if it is at 3200MHz, or 3400Mhz, but 3600MHz will cause an infinite F3/68 loop at boot and the system will not post. However, if you increase the DRAM speed to say 1700MHz, then 3400MHz (16x Uncore) is okay and so is just over 3600MHz (17x Uncore) but 18x Uncore or higher is not. If you go to faster DRAM yet, say 2000MHz, then you can set the Uncore to 20x or 21x but not 22x.

I just tried this on my 759 Classified. With Ram at 1600 Uncore at 18 worked OK(3600). Moving Uncore up to 19(3800) still booted but frequency was moved back to 3600 as reported by Eleet. I boosted Uncore voltage from 1.4 to 1.5 and still got the same results.
05-22-2009, 11:16 AM
lior307

OK ,
Just Bought 2 Mobo's of the E761 (non NF200, With ECP) .
will update in a few days .

BTW: what should i buy ?? W3540 or 950 (for the 950 i have to wait Two weeks but don't mind)
Which one will be Better Ocer ???
05-22-2009, 11:38 AM
Splave

3540 seem to be flying, noone knows about the 950 but I would assume they clock around the same

ICS9LPRS139AKLF is the 759 clock gen confirmed :)
05-22-2009, 03:03 PM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waxking1

I just tried this on my 759 Classified. With Ram at 1600 Uncore at 18 worked OK(3600). Moving Uncore up to 19(3800) still booted but frequency was moved back to 3600 as reported by Eleet. I boosted Uncore voltage from 1.4 to 1.5 and still got the same results.

So this is with a 920 D0 chip? Also, did you Uncore actually clock down on its own? Am I reading that right?
05-23-2009, 11:09 AM
Waxking1

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

So this is with a 920 D0 chip? Also, did you Uncore actually clock down on its own? Am I reading that right?

Yes, 920 D0 and the uncore clocked itself down from what I had set in BIOS. I'm using the latest BIOS S21S.
05-24-2009, 09:00 AM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waxking1

Yes, 920 D0 and the uncore clocked itself down from what I had set in BIOS. I'm using the latest BIOS S21S.

That is messed up. I think that there may be some BIOS incompatibility still going on in respect to D0 stepping chips. I emailed Peter about it a few days ago. No response yet. Maybe I'll forward this note to him as well. Very strange.
05-24-2009, 12:43 PM
stephen23

Quote:

Originally Posted by gatecrasherlok

Hmm im not too sure here either. Judging by whats in the tubing it aint healthy either

it is healthy now!!
:p::p::p::p:
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l1...y/DSC00126.jpg
05-24-2009, 12:45 PM
stephen23

Quote:

Originally Posted by masska

stephen,resize your pics mate :up:
and whats in your res, are they pieces of plastic/glass ?

plastic

it is really a nice board, some action on it

http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l1...anity/244c.jpg

http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l1...anity/4776.jpg
05-24-2009, 03:57 PM
LardArse

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

That is messed up. I think that there may be some BIOS incompatibility still going on in respect to D0 stepping chips. I emailed Peter about it a few days ago. No response yet. Maybe I'll forward this note to him as well. Very strange.

I didnt see D0s drop uncore down automatically yet. Even with Xeon 3540, I didnt need to just run 2x memory but could run more. lemme find a pic - could you be running too high vtt or something?
05-24-2009, 04:52 PM
MulletBoy

So iv HAD a 4025.0 Mhz overclock, with HT and Turbo enabled. It passed the wPrime 1024M test in under 200 seconds (198.17 is my best)

And at the end of one of those the highest temp reached on any core was 86 degrees Celsius on the first core. Im idling at about 42 degrees

All voltages were at BIOS stock settings, which i was pretty pleased that i didnt need to increase them to get this clock.

The reason im using the past tense is that i have been running this build for weeks on my desk out of a case and naked, completly stable without a single BSOD.... however i have now put the computer in its Case (a coolermaster cosmos s black label) and it initially would BSOD with windows boot....

i dropped the frequency to 160*22, and voila, it works again.... as i started to overclock it again in an attempt to get back to 175*22, i had alot more difficulty, i had to increase the CPU VCORE to around 1.35 and the CPU VTT to +350 just to get it to boot to windows at 173*22, but then it would BSOD within seconds of starting prime...

i could probably keep working and increasing voltages and stuff to try and get it stable again at 175 or close to it, however i want to know why it suddenly doesnt overclock as well as it did, when all i have done it put it in a case.... where the temps would be lower than on my bench as there are all the case fans blowing air directly onto parts of the MB that were otherwise passively cooled on my desk

as far as i can tell the only things that have changed are

- its now in a case
- the PSU is upside down (due to the cosmos design)
- an extra modular molex cable is being used for case fans
- everything is now virticle instead of laying flat...

Thanks

here is what my BIOS was at when it was on the Bench

Mother Board ( EVGA X58 Classified )
Drivers ( )
Bios ( latest non beta )
CPU ( 940 )
CPU Cooler ( Xigmatek Thors Hammer )
Memory ( Corsair Dominator 1600 8 8 8 24 )
PSU ( Corsair HX-1000 1000 )
GPU ( Palit 2GB 285GTX )
Drivers ( Latest )
Operating System ( Vista 64bit )

Frequency Control
CPU Clock Ratio ( 22X )
CPU Host Frequency (Mhz) ( 175 )
MCH Strap ( Auto )
CPU Uncore Frequency (Mhz) ( 2805Mhz (x16) )
Spread Spectrum ( Disabled )
PCIE Frequency (Mhz) ( 100 )

Memory Feature
Memory Control Setting (Enabled )
Memory Frequency ( 2:8 )
Channel Interleave Setting ( 6 Way )
Rank Interleave Setting ( 4 Way )
Memory Low Gap ( Auto )
tCL Setting ( 8 )
tRCD Setting ( 8 )
tRP Setting ( 8 )
tRAS Setting ( 24 )
tRFC Setting ( 74 )
Command Rate ( 1T )

Voltage Control
EVGA VDroop Control ( With VDroop )
CPU VCore ( Auto )
CPU VTT Voltage ( Auto )
CPU PLL VCore (Auto )
DIMM Voltage ( Auto )
DIMM DQ Vref ( +0 )
QPI PLL VCore ( Auto )
IOH VCore ( Auto )
IOH/ICH I/O Voltage ( Auto )
ICH VCore ( Auto )
PWM Frequency ( 800 )

CPU Feature
Intel SpeedStep ( Disabled )
Turbo Mode Function ( Enabled )
CxE Function ( Disabled )
Execute Disable Bit ( Disabled )
Virtualization Technology ( Disabled )
Intel HT Technology ( Enabled )
Active Processor Cores ( All )
QPI Control Settings ( Enabled )
QPI Link Fast Mode ( Enabled )
QPI Frequency Selection ( 4.800 GT/s)
05-25-2009, 12:48 AM
bluehaze

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waxking1

I just tried this on my 759 Classified. With Ram at 1600 Uncore at 18 worked OK(3600). Moving Uncore up to 19(3800) still booted but frequency was moved back to 3600 as reported by Eleet. I boosted Uncore voltage from 1.4 to 1.5 and still got the same results.

Are you sure your not confusing QPI Link with Uncore Frequency? If your running 200 bclk you'll have a 3600 QPI which shows on first page of Eleet. Your Uncore will be on the second page under memory "NB Frequency"
05-25-2009, 04:05 AM
hlonipha

got mine and was bad. During post it only showed 4 ghz of ram while 6 installed. It would not clock any higher than 190 bclk on with my DO 920. Sending back to newegg tomorrow.
05-25-2009, 07:12 AM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by LardArse

I didnt see D0s drop uncore down automatically yet. Even with Xeon 3540, I didnt need to just run 2x memory but could run more. lemme find a pic - could you be running too high vtt or something?

In my case Uncore is not dropping but I just cannot boot past a certain multiplier away from 2:1.

Basically, if I have DRAM running at 1600MHz (8x multiplier), I can do Uncore at 16x, 17x, and maybe, just maybe 18x will occasionally POST. Beyond that I cannot POST and loop F3/68 codes at POST. Same thing goes for 2000MHz DRAM as reported by other people using 10x multiplier. Uncore can be set at 20x, 21x, and maybe, just maybe at 22x. Beyond that is F3/68 loop and/or crashing. However, if I say clock the 1600MHz DRAM higher to maybe 1700MHz then I can do higher Uncore based on the higher DRAM clock, but again in the +1x or +2x Uncore multiplier from base 2:1 ratio of Uncore to DRAM. It is as though Uncore is only scaling with faster DRAM and you cannot clock it independently. The i7 940 I had that was a C0 chip would clock Uncore without any issues well past 2:1 ratio to the exact same 1600MHz DRAM (highest stable I tested was around 4.3GHz Uncore, bootable around 4.6GHz Uncore I believe). Again, this is using the exact same DRAM.

VTT/DRAM/PLL/core, etc. voltages do nothing to change this situation. I can crank them as high up as possible or as low as possible with the exact same results.
05-25-2009, 07:46 AM
cstkl1

can anyone post a

4.4ghz -4.6ghz dram 2100mhz -2200mhz stable..C7 or C8 or C9 etc
aka linx 50 runs or prime 95 largefft custom 5.4gb 2 hours.
ty

taking some time on the new wc setup i am planning for this board.
before that would like to know whether is this possible or not on this board

like to see high cpu speed with high dram speeds.
05-25-2009, 08:29 AM
Olly_K

Some of my classified action :
http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedstandard.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedkoolancenb.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedkoolancenb2.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedkoolancevrm.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedbpbarbsjpg.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedbpbarbsjpg.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedmobotray2.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedwhiteredtubing2.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedwhiteredtubing3.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedwhiteredtubing4.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classified3tubes.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classified3tubes2.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classified3tubes3.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedcase1.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/cp/classifiedcase2.jpg

http://www.ollyk.com/vantage41k.jpg
05-25-2009, 08:43 AM
cstkl1

nice

prime95 large fft 5.4gb stable on the ram ?? say 2 hours

the dfi cant do more than 1 hour stable with linx also same not more than 1 hour
05-25-2009, 09:16 AM
Vega

Very nice!!! :up::clap:

edited by runmc - Vega there is no need to quote all those picture one post down from the original :shakes: Please use some forum smarts when posting. :up:
05-25-2009, 09:17 AM
Waxking1

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluehaze

Are you sure your not confusing QPI Link with Uncore Frequency? If your running 200 bclk you'll have a 3600 QPI which shows on first page of Eleet. Your Uncore will be on the second page under memory "NB Frequency"

Sorry, I was looking at the QPI link, I'll check again.

Since I checked before I've changed the memory from Mushkin at 2:8 to Corsair at 2:10. Now the computer won't boot past 2X plus 1. If I try 22 it just keeps trying to reboot. Could be that I need more VTT but I'm high enough already there.
05-25-2009, 09:50 AM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waxking1

Sorry, I was looking at the QPI link, I'll check again.

Since I checked before I've changed the memory from Mushkin at 2:8 to Corsair at 2:10. Now the computer won't boot past 2X plus 1. If I try 22 it just keeps trying to reboot. Could be that I need more VTT but I'm high enough already there.

Hey wax. Thanks for clearing that up. I found it very strange that Uncore would be down-clocking on its own. Anyway, now that we cleared up that issue we can get back to the now pretty clear Uncore problem. You are now another confirmation that Uncore with a D0 will only go 2x + 1 and no more in reference to DRAM speed.

What is going on here?
05-25-2009, 09:57 AM
stephen23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waxking1

Sorry, I was looking at the QPI link, I'll check again.

Since I checked before I've changed the memory from Mushkin at 2:8 to Corsair at 2:10. Now the computer won't boot past 2X plus 1. If I try 22 it just keeps trying to reboot. Could be that I need more VTT but I'm high enough already there.

have noticed that your CPU temp was up to 90 celcius?
isn't some parts is not installed well?
05-25-2009, 10:06 AM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by stephen23

have noticed that your CPU temp was up to 90 celcius?
isn't some parts is not installed well?

Uncore stuff that him, I, and a few others are talking about has nothing to do with cooling. My cooling is perfectly fine but I get the same problem. 3oh6 also runs only sub-zero with the same problems.
05-25-2009, 10:42 AM
Olly_K

I think he may be referring to my screenshot . .
05-25-2009, 10:56 AM
Vega

Any one else here with Kingston HyperX 2000MHz memorys? I have major problem so get them run well. I have atleast manage to get them running 9-9-9-24 1T, 1900MHz ATM but want more...
My E-leet monitoring 1.5V QPI VTT so I guess that enough, right? Maybe it is better to reduce speed to 1800MHz with 8-8-8-20 timings instead..?
05-25-2009, 11:51 AM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vega

Any one else here with Kingston HyperX 2000MHz memorys? I have major problem so get them run well. I have atleast manage to get them running 9-9-9-24 1T, 1900MHz ATM but want more...
My E-leet monitoring 1.5V QPI VTT so I guess that enough, right? Maybe it is better to reduce speed to 1800MHz with 8-8-8-20 timings instead..?

2GHz DRAM may require VTT as high as 1.65V.
05-25-2009, 11:51 AM
Bootsy

Here are my Kinston HyperX @ DDR3-2100. vtt is set at 1.42 32m stable and memtest stable.

http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/671...itheverest.jpg
05-25-2009, 12:33 PM
Vega

Very nice...whats the key to get them over 1900MHz then....?
I use more voltage than you but no succes any way!) :)
Any other settings I forgot maybe.

What is your settings for MCH Strap and QPI Freq. selection?
05-25-2009, 02:50 PM
Bootsy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vega

Very nice...whats the key to get them over 1900MHz then....?
I use more voltage than you but no succes any way!) :)
Any other settings I forgot maybe.

What is your settings for MCH Strap and QPI Freq. selection?

MCH strap is 2:10 QP freq I left at auto. This board handles memory really well. I can run the same speeds on my Rampage II but need 1.55 VTT. Have you tried lower volts? I can run DDR3 2000 @ 1.35 VTT with 1.60 on the ram.

I have 2 kits of these and the both do well over ddr-2000. I am try to get 12gb stable @ ddr3 2100:)

Will they run with the 1866 XMP profile?
05-25-2009, 03:44 PM
anzial

I feel like D0s require less VTT, indeed they are less stable with high VTT.. On the other hand, they don't like the uncore more than 2:1 or 2:1+1 uncore/ram ratio
05-25-2009, 07:01 PM
cstkl1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bootsy

MCH strap is 2:10 QP freq I left at auto. This board handles memory really well. I can run the same speeds on my Rampage II but need 1.55 VTT. Have you tried lower volts? I can run DDR3 2000 @ 1.35 VTT with 1.60 on the ram.

I have 2 kits of these and the both do well over ddr-2000. I am try to get 12gb stable @ ddr3 2100:)

Will they run with the 1866 XMP profile?

hmm if ure kits is running 2k C8 at 1.6
then 2100 C8 is at 1.7v
and for 12gb ure going to need around 1.75-1.8v for 2100

again nobody with 4.4ghz 2100mhz prime95 large fft custom 5.4gb or blend custom 5.4gb 2 hours stable screenshot??
05-25-2009, 08:47 PM
LardArse

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

Uncore stuff that him, I, and a few others are talking about has nothing to do with cooling. My cooling is perfectly fine but I get the same problem. 3oh6 also runs only sub-zero with the same problems.

Maybe it varies with cpu, 3540 normal aircooling only ~ 4.2G Uncore 23x matched with 2:10 Rams meaning Uncore x2 + 3,
cpu and uncore synched...

http://g.imagehost.org/0687/unc1.jpg

3540 normal aircooling only ~ 4.2G Uncore 23x matched with 2:8 Rams meaning Uncore x2 + 7,
cpu and uncore synched...

http://g.imagehost.org/0123/unc2.jpg

Under ln2 some clockin of uncores:

Rams @ 2:12 Uncore @ 4.9G, 27x -> x2 + 3

http://g.imagehost.org/0852/5659.jpg
05-25-2009, 09:00 PM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by LardArse

Maybe it varies with cpu, 3540 normal aircooling only ~ 4.2G Uncore 23x matched with 2:10 Rams meaning Uncore x2 + 3,
cpu and uncore synched...

3540 normal aircooling only ~ 4.2G Uncore 23x matched with 2:8 Rams meaning Uncore x2 + 7,
cpu and uncore synched...

Under ln2 some clockin of uncores:

Rams @ 2:12 Uncore @ 4.9G, 27x -> x2 + 3

How about this theory...

Could it be that when we were thinking the Xeon chips had locked multipliers for Uncore and QPI that they were in fact exactly the same or very similar to the i7 920 D0 parts and when work was done to enable the Xeon multipliers to function correctly it actually fixed them where as the desktop version of D0 920 chips stayed broken.

Thoughts? Could you repeat your series of tests with a regular retail D0 920? There was one other person on XS reporting working Xeons yet everyone with a D0 920 is coming with the same story...
05-25-2009, 09:15 PM
LardArse

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

How about this theory...

Could it be that when we were thinking the Xeon chips had locked multipliers for Uncore and QPI that they were in fact exactly the same or very similar to the i7 920 D0 parts and when work was done to enable the Xeon multipliers to function correctly it actually fixed them where as the desktop version of D0 920 chips stayed broken.

Thoughts? Could you repeat your series of tests with a regular retail D0 920? There was one other person on XS reporting working Xeons yet everyone with a D0 920 is coming with the same story...

I'll do so when I have it back right now the retail 920 D0 is in a demo rig for someone else's booth.
05-25-2009, 09:21 PM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by LardArse

I'll do so when I have it back right now the retail 920 D0 is in a demo rig for someone else's booth.

Sounds good. I really want to see what happens in your test results.
05-25-2009, 10:08 PM
tekjunkie

I have the Xeons(W3540,W3520) and a 920 D0. Maybe I could be of some help here.
05-25-2009, 10:13 PM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by tekjunkie

I have the Xeons(W3540,W3520) and a 920 D0. Maybe I could be of some help here.

Knock yourself out :p: Run the tests with each of the chips and see what results you get. The test is to be able to clock Uncore past 2x + 1 or 2x + 2 of DRAM speed on the Classified board. For example, if the DRAM is clocked to 1600MHz, see if you can get Uncore of 3600MHz or higher, or if DRAM is at 2000MHz if you can get Uncore 4400MHz or higher.
05-26-2009, 12:24 AM
bluehaze

Quote:

Originally Posted by cstkl1

again nobody with 4.4ghz 2100mhz prime95 large fft custom 5.4gb or blend custom 5.4gb 2 hours stable screenshot??

Would love to see this, My ram is stable at 2100, my processor also stable at 4.4 but combine the 2 and as soon as I start Prime the computer powers off. No errors or anything it just powers down and theres no Windows error when loading back up either.
05-26-2009, 03:39 AM
Vega

I have a strange thing with my board and wonder if is normal or not?

I can easily multi clock my 965 from stock 133bclk...past 4.2GHz with out any problem with multi x32 but when i try higher bclk as 190 it wont boot at all with mult x16.
I did a test....cleared cmos and set every voltage to auto exept Vcore and Vdimm and my max bclk was ~180...is this normal, maybe a bios thing??
I know my 965 handle 210+ bclk on R2E.

Thanks in advance.
05-26-2009, 04:19 AM
LardArse

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vega

I have a strange thing with my board and wonder if is normal or not?

I can easily multi clock my 965 from stock 133bclk...past 4.2GHz with out any problem with multi x32 but when i try higher bclk as 190 it wont boot at all with mult x16.
I did a test....cleared cmos and set every voltage to auto exept Vcore and Vdimm and my max bclk was ~180...is this normal, maybe a bios thing??
I know my 965 handle 210+ bclk on R2E.

Thanks in advance.

there are 3 things you need to set,
VTT ~ +200mv
DRAM ~ 1.65v
QPI Link Speed @ 4.8GT/S
05-26-2009, 07:49 AM
FragMagnet

Here's what I got with my air cooled W3520 on the 760. The vtt was stock at this speed until I upped the uncore. I found stability at 17x with +.05mv, and 18x with +.1mv I was using IBT 2x 10 passes to test the settings out before launching into prime95 blend, it hiccupped on the 2nd IBT, so I upped the vcor 1 notch and the vtt +.025mv just to be sure. 19x wouldn't boot at this setting using 2:8 on the mem.
Remember e-leet seems to show .09v higher than set and measured with a DMM, the rest are very accurate

http://i706.photobucket.com/albums/w...0324hrsmon.jpg
05-26-2009, 08:50 AM
Waxking1

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

Hey wax. Thanks for clearing that up. I found it very strange that Uncore would be down-clocking on its own. Anyway, now that we cleared up that issue we can get back to the now pretty clear Uncore problem. You are now another confirmation that Uncore with a D0 will only go 2x + 1 and no more in reference to DRAM speed.

What is going on here?

I don't think its cleared up in as 2x plus 1. I still booted at 2x plus 3 with my Mushkin @ 1600, I just was looking at QPI Link in Eleet. The problem with the Corsair not booting a higher uncore than 2x plus 1 is most likely voltage.
05-26-2009, 08:52 AM
jasonelmore

nice thread. See if you can get as organized as my Rampage II Extreme Thread ;)
05-26-2009, 09:49 AM
Vega

Quote:

Originally Posted by LardArse

there are 3 things you need to set,
VTT ~ +200mv
DRAM ~ 1.65v
QPI Link Speed @ 4.8GT/S

I tryed but it did not work....no boot at 190x16. :(
I used mem. mult x8 so the memorys cant stop it.

Any other ideas?
05-26-2009, 10:15 AM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by jasonelmore

nice thread. See if you can get as organized as my Rampage II Extreme Thread ;)

I doubt it will get as nice as that thread. That's a very impressive thread :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by FragMagnet

Here's what I got with my air cooled W3520 on the 760. The vtt was stock at this speed until I upped the uncore. I found stability at 17x with +.05mv, and 18x with +.1mv I was using IBT 2x 10 passes to test the settings out before launching into prime95 blend, it hiccupped on the 2nd IBT, so I upped the vcor 1 notch and the vtt +.025mv just to be sure. 19x wouldn't boot at this setting using 2:8 on the mem.
Remember e-leet seems to show .09v higher than set and measured with a DMM, the rest are very accurate

This is a Xeon and they do seem to work fine. Nobody with a Xeon reported this kind of behavior yet, not that I registered anyway. Also, your DRAM is running below stock settings (just over 1200MHz vs. rated 1600MHz) so I am not sure if that has any impact on anything.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waxking1

I don't think its cleared up in as 2x plus 1. I still booted at 2x plus 3 with my Mushkin @ 1600, I just was looking at QPI Link in Eleet. The problem with the Corsair not booting a higher uncore than 2x plus 1 is most likely voltage.

Both of you guys seems to be alluding to voltages. I can assure you that they are not a problem. I have tried all voltage combinations with no success. Raising VTT or DRAM voltages makes no difference. Unlike with your chips my D0 does not even POST if Uncore is more than 2x + 1 in reference to DRAM speed. It stays stuck looping F3/68 codes on the ECP. However, like I said before clocking the DRAM higher allows me to clock the Uncore higher as well, as long as I stay within 2x + 1.
05-26-2009, 03:26 PM
tekjunkie

Test results as promised with trying uncore more than 2x memory.My W3540 did not have any problems doing memory 2:8 and uncore memoryx2+5=21 and this was hyperPi32Mx8 stable

http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/642...emory28.th.jpg

I will now mount my 920 D0 and post back. The good thing is that my 920 required almost the same amount of volts as my W3540 to hit the same speed as it is from the "golden" batch 3845B027.
05-26-2009, 03:54 PM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by tekjunkie

Test results as promised with trying uncore more than 2x memory.My W3540 did not have any problems doing memory 2:8 and uncore memoryx2+5=21 and this was hyperPi32Mx8 stable

http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/642...emory28.th.jpg

I will now mount my 920 D0 and post back. The good thing is that my 920 required almost the same amount of volts as my W3540 to hit the same speed as it is from the "golden" batch 3845B027.

Thanks for doing the tests. The Xeon is doing what I expected, but let's see the 920... ;)
05-26-2009, 05:43 PM
tekjunkie

Quick hyperPi 1Mx8 test with the 920 and uncore running x21 memory @2:8

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/404...emory28.th.jpg
05-26-2009, 06:41 PM
FragMagnet

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

This is a Xeon and they do seem to work fine. Nobody with a Xeon reported this kind of behavior yet, not that I registered anyway. Also, your DRAM is running below stock settings (just over 1200MHz vs. rated 1600MHz) so I am not sure if that has any impact on anything.

Hey threadjacker ! this is a Classified thread, and I'm posting ! :ROTF:

Yes in terms of your topic, uncore should have been 2x6 or 2x6+1, but it's 2x6 +6, so that confirms the Xeons are not included in this issue.
05-27-2009, 07:24 AM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by tekjunkie

Quick hyperPi 1Mx8 test with the 920 and uncore running x21 memory @2:8

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/404...emory28.th.jpg

Thanks man! Not looking promising for my chip. Which DRAM are you running? You gave me a few ideas to try still so I hope something comes out of it :p:

Quote:

Originally Posted by FragMagnet

Hey threadjacker ! this is a Classified thread, and I'm posting ! :ROTF:

Yes in terms of your topic, uncore should have been 2x6 or 2x6+1, but it's 2x6 +6, so that confirms the Xeons are not included in this issue.

Haha :p: thanks for posting the results earlier. I knew that Xeon chips are fine. I think some 920s just have crap IMC unless there is a few boards out there with problems. Looks like the A832 lot has some problems, at least mine. Not too impressed with this. I would not be surprised if this chip had problems with high speed DRAM as well. Maybe I should sell it, get a Xeon instead. Either way, a number of people reported a problem clocking Uncore higher, but also some clearly reported not having problems. I'd be inclined to say its the chip's IMC that has a problem rather than the board or the board's BIOS.
05-27-2009, 09:31 AM
dejanh

So I finally managed to pin down the Uncore clocking problem to the setting which is causing me to not be able to clock past 2x + 1 in reference to DRAM. If the memory multiplier is left on Auto the Uncore cannot be clocked past 2x + 1 and POST fails with looping F3/68 codes even if Auto multiplier results in correctly rated DRAM speed within specifications. However, setting manual multiplier to say 2:8 and then clocking Uncore independently works fine. I managed to quickly clock Uncore to 2x + 4 in reference to 1600MHz DRAM (4GHz Uncore). I am certain this is the problem because I can now reproduce it at will just by flipping back to Auto DRAM multiplier instead of manually setting one. :up:
05-27-2009, 10:30 AM
raptor1

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

I doubt it will get as nice as that thread. That's a very impressive thread :D

in time it will be close - rome was not built in a day

i only get time the odd evening when i get home early from work and at the weekends to update the first few pages

this is my first thread and any help i can get to have it a particular way would be appreciated

if ye have suggestions on how to do this please make them

Thanks
Raptor1
05-27-2009, 10:38 AM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by raptor1

in time it will be close - rome was not built in a day

i only get time the odd evening when i get home early from work and at the weekends to update the first few pages

this is my first thread and any help i can get to have it a particular way would be appreciated

if ye have suggestions on how to do this please make them

Thanks
Raptor1

Hehe, no worries dude, I'm just glad this thread exists :)

One thing to do is to get the links on the front page organized nicely like this..

UnOfficial EVGA X58 Classified Owners Thread

The syntax is like this (* is inserted to stop the tag from working)

[U*RL="h*ttp://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=3812840#post3812840"]UnOfficial EVGA X58 Classified Owners Thread[/UR*L]

Also, we need to get all versions of the BIOS for the Classified linked off the main page and add a small snippet on the top introducing the mission and vision of the thread :D

Here are the links for the BIOS...

ftp://ftp.evga.com/bios/E759S21H.bin
ftp://ftp.evga.com/bios/E759S21M.bin
ftp://ftp.evga.com/bios/E759S21N.bin
ftp://ftp.evga.com/bios/E759S21S.bin
05-27-2009, 10:48 AM
tekjunkie

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

So I finally managed to pin down the Uncore clocking problem to the setting which is causing me to not be able to clock past 2x + 1 in reference to DRAM. If the memory multiplier is left on Auto the Uncore cannot be clocked past 2x + 1 and POST fails with looping F3/68 codes even if Auto multiplier results in correctly rated DRAM speed within specifications. However, setting manual multiplier to say 2:8 and then clocking Uncore independently works fine. I managed to quickly clock Uncore to 2x + 4 in reference to 1600MHz DRAM (4GHz Uncore). I am certain this is the problem because I can now reproduce it at will just by flipping back to Auto DRAM multiplier instead of manually setting one. :up:

Glad that you figured it out. So can I put my Xeon back on my classified or do you want me to run more tests? I am asking this because of the reason that the I cannot seem to get my 920 stable when I clock uncore independently of the RAM. It is semi stable allright, but HyperPi 32mx8 always gives me IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL BSOD or some other BSOD related to IMC/Memory and memory is fine as I can run memtest. So inshort, yes the 920 D0 does seem to have a weaker IMC, atleast when compared to the xeons.
05-27-2009, 10:51 AM
raptor1

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

One thing to do is to get the links on the front page organized nicely like this..

UnOfficial EVGA X58 Classified Owners Thread

The syntax is like this (* is inserted to stop the tag from working)

[U*RL="h*ttp://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=3812840#post3812840"]UnOfficial EVGA X58 Classified Owners Thread[/UR*L]

can you explain this to me - maybe i'm not reading it properly
05-27-2009, 11:02 AM
raptor1

Another Review I Found For The EVGA Classified Motherboard

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/mai...lassified.html
05-27-2009, 12:43 PM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by tekjunkie

Glad that you figured it out. So can I put my Xeon back on my classified or do you want me to run more tests? I am asking this because of the reason that the I cannot seem to get my 920 stable when I clock uncore independently of the RAM. It is semi stable allright, but HyperPi 32mx8 always gives me IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL BSOD or some other BSOD related to IMC/Memory and memory is fine as I can run memtest. So inshort, yes the 920 D0 does seem to have a weaker IMC, atleast when compared to the xeons.

IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL BSOD has been Vcore related for me with the D0. With a C0 it was VTT/DRAM voltage related or plain DRAM related (e.g., faulty ICs). Try bumping up your Vcore. I am testing 4GHz Uncore atm using DRAM at 1600MHz. I will let you know what happens. I agree though that the i7 920 D0 does seem to have weaker IMC than the Xeon parts. Try what I suggested and let me know what happens...

I'm currently at +200mV VTT and 1.6V DRAM for 4GHz Uncore. Everything else is on Auto except for Vcore which is at 1.26250V Without Vdroop and I also dropped the IOH PLL and CPU PLL voltages to 1.50000V. BCLK at 201MHz (200.5MHz effective), 21x multiplier (20x + turbo), 2:8 DRAM multiplier, 7-7-7-16-59-1T basic timings, using DRAM Ratio for MCH Strap.

Edit: Got the same IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL BSOD around 25th iteration, bumped the Vcore to 1.27500V and passed 50 runs of LinX. Now running x64 LinX test as well with all memory selected but I'm quite certain I will be problem free.

Edit 2: x64 Linx running just fine with all memory. Noticed a funny thing though in CPU-Z and E-LEET. My DRAM is being reported as 8GB even though I have 6GB installed in triple channel configuratin. I wonder if it is because I have a Dominator 2000MHz SPD flashed to the on-board chip?

Edit 3: Everest screen at new stable DRAM config using 4GHz Uncore...next is finding a stable Uncore combination to go with my 4.4GHz 24/7 OC. Not gonna be too much higher than current Uncore (gonna go for 20x210MHz or 4200MHz Uncore). I wonder how some of the people posting Everest screenshots are getting latencies in the 35ns range though? My timings are already pretty good I think. Are these suicide runs on DRAM with latencies below those that are stable?

http://img.techpowerup.org/090527/4000MHz_uncore_01.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by raptor1

can you explain this to me - maybe i'm not reading it properly

I butchered the tags by inserting * in order to prevent the tag from rendering. Just a sample of how you would code up a link tag so that you can have a title as the link instead of a full URL followed by a descriptive name. Makes sense?
05-27-2009, 10:15 PM
pphx459

Got a chance to play w/ the system tonight, all is lookin good :up:

http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l1..._pc/4300i7.png

Anyone else liking the ELEET tuning utility as much as I do?
05-28-2009, 04:38 AM
gmod

Any of you guys running your Class. with 12gigs ram..In other words all the dims filled up...Does this reduce your OC any.
05-28-2009, 05:19 AM
gatecrasherlok

I'd guess just like any platform filling up the dimm slots is gonna reduce the overclock but that assumption from me comes from reading a few forum posts by others and I have never tried it first hand. I'm only an avid overclocker, more of a gamer.
05-28-2009, 05:33 AM
Splave

Quote:

Originally Posted by gmod

Any of you guys running your Class. with 12gigs ram..In other words all the dims filled up...Does this reduce your OC any.

I believe that 12gb of ram will put more stress on the IMC on the cpu regardless of the motherboard you use which could hurt clocks
05-28-2009, 07:08 AM
dejanh

Raptor1, your BIOS links are pointing to *.exe files instead of *.bin. Just an FYI.
05-28-2009, 07:09 AM
raptor1

Bios Section Has Been updated on the first post

if any one has bios ver s21j and s21e please pm them to me so i can add them

Thanks
Raptor1
05-28-2009, 07:12 AM
LardArse

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

Edit 2: x64 Linx running just fine with all memory. Noticed a funny thing though in CPU-Z and E-LEET. My DRAM is being reported as 8GB even though I have 6GB installed in triple channel configuratin. I wonder if it is because I have a Dominator 2000MHz SPD flashed to the on-board chip?

yes its the backup SPD ROM, Free Ram... NOT :D
05-28-2009, 07:16 AM
raptor1

Quote:

Originally Posted by dejanh

Raptor1, your BIOS links are pointing to *.exe files instead of *.bin. Just an FYI.

fixed
05-28-2009, 07:55 AM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by LardArse

yes its the backup SPD ROM, Free Ram... NOT :D

Free DRAM, I wish! :p:
05-28-2009, 02:38 PM
Viss

Crazy board, testing me 3540's IMC. 3x2GB ~1000mhz @ 7-8-7-20-1T with 1,30 vtt :D

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...-20-1TVTT1.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...Memtest250.jpg
05-28-2009, 09:14 PM
OBR

http://i42.tinypic.com/33or50o.png

Yeah, my Ci7 920 is LinX stable on AIR at 4200 MHz without TURBO ... but Vcore is pretty high ... 1,5V ... :mad:

Only one problem i have - cannot break 210 MHz BCLK ... i tryed everything but no succes ...
05-29-2009, 03:53 AM
G-UNIT91

@OP: my 3d

http://i4memory.com/f55/evga-x58-cla...-thread-17928/
05-29-2009, 06:25 AM
Longbow

how long are the included sata cables? tnx
05-29-2009, 07:22 AM
roller11

FragMagnet, or anyone with a Classified 760....
Could somebody test S3 sleep mode performance? My 760 is taking twice as long to resume as it should, so I need to know if the 760 has particularly bad resume time, or I've got a bad board. How many seconds from from power button to cursor can move around on the screen?
05-29-2009, 08:02 AM
j.almonte

Quote:

Originally Posted by Longbow

how long are the included sata cables? tnx

I think they are 18" or 24" can remember right now.
05-29-2009, 08:46 AM
ctsoccer13

I just put my rig together last night. I was excited about the dual 8-pin connectors associated with the Classified. However, when I plugged one of my extra PCI-e power cables into the 2nd 8-pin slot, I couldn't get the PC to boot. No fans spinning, no nothing...

Any ideas?
05-29-2009, 08:58 AM
Splave

woot, finally get mine back from RMA today. Only took 3 weeks but w/e just glad to get it back
05-29-2009, 09:14 AM
Bootsy

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctsoccer13

I just put my rig together last night. I was excited about the dual 8-pin connectors associated with the Classified. However, when I plugged one of my extra PCI-e power cables into the 2nd 8-pin slot, I couldn't get the PC to boot. No fans spinning, no nothing...

Any ideas?

AFAIK the 8 pin power connectors are different than your PCI-e cables. My PSU has two 8 pin power cables and 3 8pin PCI-e cables. I don't think that's going to work.
05-29-2009, 09:20 AM
Sil2

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctsoccer13

I just put my rig together last night. I was excited about the dual 8-pin connectors associated with the Classified. However, when I plugged one of my extra PCI-e power cables into the 2nd 8-pin slot, I couldn't get the PC to boot. No fans spinning, no nothing...

Any ideas?

uhh yeah.....

well you need the other CPU 8pin which may be labelled EPS 12v+ or something similar.

PCI-E one will just not work.
05-29-2009, 09:22 AM
ctsoccer13

That's what I assumed and just decided to live with only one 8 pin connection. I just thought it might work because they share the same voltage rail layouts.
05-29-2009, 09:33 AM
dejanh

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctsoccer13

That's what I assumed and just decided to live with only one 8 pin connection. I just thought it might work because they share the same voltage rail layouts.

Plug in your 8-pin and 4-pin cables for 8+4. That will give you a bit more power if you want but not quite as good as 8+8. 8+4 configuration is officially supported and I use it from day one basically.
05-29-2009, 10:34 AM
OBR

http://i41.tinypic.com/23t2lid.png

4,7G on AIR and stable for most benchmarks ... :)
05-29-2009, 10:40 AM
ctsoccer13

I've heard there was teaming support for the gigabit LAN adapters, but I can't tell because I'm running Windows 7....

For those of you testing out Windows 7 out there, any luck finding teaming drivers that are compatible?
05-29-2009, 11:41 PM
kpablo

Quote:

Originally Posted by roller11

FragMagnet, or anyone with a Classified 760....
Could somebody test S3 sleep mode performance? My 760 is taking twice as long to resume as it should, so I need to know if the 760 has particularly bad resume time, or I've got a bad board. How many seconds from from power button to cursor can move around on the screen?

S3 Sleep Mode works OK to me... took me 10 seconds to wake up and get in the OS (Win Vista). With 21x191 OC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctsoccer13

I've heard there was teaming support for the gigabit LAN adapters, but I can't tell because I'm running Windows 7....

For those of you testing out Windows 7 out there, any luck finding teaming drivers that are compatible?

According to EVGA Techs it work with the lastest Realtek Vista drivers.
05-30-2009, 01:28 AM
bob(nz)

Quote:

Originally Posted by loc.o

Crazy board, testing me 3540's IMC. 3x2GB ~1000mhz @ 7-8-7-20-1T with 1,30 vtt :D

Hi m8 - can you tell me what bios you are using? I have a 3540 but only have access to the 2:8 and 2:10 ratios - looking at your screenshots you obviously have more :)
05-30-2009, 06:23 AM
Splave

can someone post their over 222 bclk settings? tryed just about everything, pcie up to 101-114, qpi comp and cpu imp set to less, mem x6 or x8 etc an hard locks 223 bclk. even tryed 0-500 clock skew and tons of different voltage combinations. This chip has done 5ghz ht on my last classified so Im missing something simple.
05-30-2009, 08:17 AM
PRJ

Where does one OC a 24/7 setup best on this board, from Bios or from E-LEET?

I' have always used Bios, but lots seem to like this E-LEET program.

PRJ
05-30-2009, 08:19 AM
ctsoccer13

Quote:

Originally Posted by kpablo

According to EVGA Techs it work with the lastest Realtek Vista drivers.

Anyone tried it to confirm this? I really don't feel like fighting a BSOD today...
05-30-2009, 08:49 AM
Viss

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob(nz)

Hi m8 - can you tell me what bios you are using? I have a 3540 but only have access to the 2:8 and 2:10 ratios - looking at your screenshots you obviously have more :)

If you have 759 board this one buddy:

http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.asp?m=100644472
05-30-2009, 10:38 AM
Ace-a-Rue

760 Version

21x @ 210 bclk..Prime 95 all 8 cores (2hours); cpu temps averaging 75-82c; vcore @ 1.37-1.38v; memory @ 840 Mhz, 8-8-8-24 w/1T.

http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...4.4_2hours.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i did a PCMARK 2005 run (9800 GTX) with 'HT on' (1ST PIC BELOW) and it scored less than with 'HT off' (2ND PIC BELOW)...it appears that 'HT', at the moment, is not as useful in most everyday usages..with it off, your CPU will produce less heat.

HT ON
http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...markhton-7.jpg

HT OFF
http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...arkhtoff-7.jpg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

finally found a bench to show HT capabilities.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WPRIME WEBSITE

wPrime uses a recursive call of Newton's method for estimating functions, with f(x)=x2-k, where k is the number we're sqrting, until Sgn(f(x)/f'(x)) does not equal that of the previous iteration, starting with an estimation of k/2. It then uses an iterative calling of the estimation method a set amount of times to increase the accuracy of the results. It then confirms that n(k)2=k to ensure the calculation was correct. It repeats this for all numbers from 1 to the requested maximum.

Threading

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our aim was to make a perfectly threaded benchmark, such that it would consistantly use 100% of the CPU while in use. This is achieved by using CPUz to detect the CPU count and use exactly that many processing threads to avoid any performance losses due to multiple threads running on any single physical thread. Each thread is designed to do 1/n of the work, where n is the number of threads. For example, if you're calculating 16 roots on 4 CPU's, each CPU will calculate 4 roots. Some might argue that this style of threading is unrealistic in real-time performance, but in fact is quite indicative of performance in several real world tasks such as F@H which allows you to run several instances of the work at any one time.

HT OFF:
http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...primehtoff.jpg

HT ON:
http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...wprimehton.jpg

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUPER PI RESULTS FOR 32M
http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...per-pi-32m.jpg

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i was able to get a better time completion for Wprime bench.

i installed my G.Skill Falcon 128 gb SSD drive and then, i installed XP 64 bit (1st partition) and Vista 64 bit Ultimate on the 2nd partition...booted into vista and i ran the wprime 2.0 version.

it might be vista 64 (no service pack) in combination with the SSD drive.

http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...sd_vista64.jpg

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

an hour to demonstrate how GOOD this board is with 12 gig's of corsair ddr3-2000 memory in win xp 64 bit.

http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...t_1hr_12gb.png

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the zalman looked pretty installed but it was a lack-luster performer compared to the TRUE 120...i put the TRUE 120 back in to do the above one hour prime 95.

http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...2gb_memory.jpg

BIOS SCREENSHOTS THAT MATTER:

http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...evga_bios1.jpg

http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...evga_bios2.jpg

http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...evga_bios3.jpg

http://home.comcast.net/~captain-is-...evga_bios4.jpg

NOTE: voltages are a guide...it does not mean that it will work on your board with different memory and cpu...it is meant as a guide to assist in reaching your overclocking goals.
05-30-2009, 10:51 AM
Viss

Strong chip :up:
05-30-2009, 12:44 PM
Splave

any ideas on 222 bclk, im dying here
05-30-2009, 01:37 PM
Viss

Boot 218~220 and use Eleet to go up. PCI-E at 110 or so for starters, i used these volts for:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...920/156687.jpg
05-30-2009, 03:31 PM
bob(nz)

Quote:

Originally Posted by loc.o

If you have 759 board this one buddy:

thanks - will load up and see how we go :up:
05-30-2009, 04:24 PM
roller11

Quote:

Originally Posted by kpablo

S3 Sleep Mode works OK to me... took me 10 seconds to wake up and get in the OS (Win Vista). With 21x191 OC.

Thanks for responding to my post.
Your ten seconds is from power button to desktop appears, but that's only half way to full resume. full resume = cursor moves on desktop and green circle on top of cursor disappears. At that time, double click launches apps, open files etc.

power button to desktop appears = x
desktop apppears to cursor moves = y
cursor moves to green spinning circle disappears = z
x + y + z = full resume
I've tested 9 different x58 mobos, E760 being my tenth. On all nine, x+y+z = 5-9 seconds. The 10 seconds you refer to is 5 seconds on all these other boards. I just tested a E759 and it's has the same bad performance as the E760. Best result is 13 seconds ten of that being desktop appears. typically 15 seconds, sometimes a full 18 seconds. This is absolutely inexcusable given that ASUS, Biostar, gigabyte, MSI, DFI, Foxconn effortlessly achieve 5-9 seconds. At some point, you may as well just do a full warm reboot since S3 SM is almost as slow.
05-30-2009, 05:40 PM
bluehaze

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobbylite

any ideas on 222 bclk, im dying here

PCI 104 should be good up to 230, the board won't boot over 221 bclk in my experience only way to clock higher is boot first into Windows @ 221 and then use Eleet to OC.
05-30-2009, 06:46 PM
02wrxgt30r

well guys hopefully I can become an official owner very soon I am about to pull the trigger on a Classified for my build was going to go with the RIIE but this board looks and sounds amazing :D
05-30-2009, 08:46 PM
Splave

Quote:

Originally Posted by loc.o

Boot 218~220 and use Eleet to go up. PCI-E at 110 or so for starters, i used these volts for:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...920/156687.jpg

thanks man tryed those settings, got to 224 and it froze. Tryed pci-e at 104 as well and froze again. So strange, same mem and everything as before but just cant get it crackin. Phase comes out tomorrow so will see if I can get it back. Any other ideas?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:06 AM.

XtremeSystems