Nehalem Overclocking @ XS

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-04-2008, 02:14 AM
Charles Wirth

http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/10.JPG

Wprime.

Not sure what happened when I changed ram and uclk/uncore was too low. I will redo at 5ghz and correct bandwidth.
11-04-2008, 02:55 AM
pxhx

Quote:

Originally Posted by FUGGER

http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/10.JPG

Wprime.

Not sure what happened when I changed ram and uclk/uncore was too low. I will redo at 5ghz and correct bandwidth.

Thank you! :up:
11-04-2008, 07:37 AM
s e t h

2 Attachment(s)

here's my wprime and single card 06 for comparisons.
for some wierd reason i had two gpu-z's open...i think that was habit from fighting vista and dual 4870X2's :D
11-04-2008, 08:09 AM
Pt1t

Quote:

Originally Posted by s e t h

here's my wprime and single card 06 for comparisons.
for some wierd reason i had two gpu-z's open...i think that was habit from fighting vista and dual 4870X2's :D

Hello s e t h !

Any comparaison with my wprime @ 4.2ghz with retail i7 965xe

I dont know if it s caused by wprime version but your time will be beter @ +4.6ghz.

http://www.pt1t.eu/public/X58/R2E/Wprime-32M-4200.PNG
11-04-2008, 08:13 AM
Fitseries3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pt1t

yes off course you can run @ 22X in idle or sometimes with pi 1M but when you launch multithread aplication the multiplier goes down to 20X.

so basically the 21x and 22x are pointless? i mean, whats the deal. will i be dissapointed if i get a 920? im hoping to get 4.5ghz and i have good cooling.
11-04-2008, 08:18 AM
Ghigo

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pt1t

Hello s e t h !

Any comparaison with my wprime @ 4.2ghz with retail i7 965xe

I dont know if it s caused by wprime version but your time will be beter @ +4.6ghz.

http://www.pt1t.eu/public/X58/R2E/Wprime-32M-4200.PNG

Hmm need so much volts for a 4.2 for a retail 965 ?
11-04-2008, 08:20 AM
s e t h

funny...my cpu-z's say 'single channel'...but i'm in xp and you're in vista
11-04-2008, 08:28 AM
Gautam

It's vista...better for wprime. Both of you could do with some memory optimization though, lol. :sofa:
11-04-2008, 08:46 AM
Pt1t

Quote:

Originally Posted by s e t h

funny...my cpu-z's say 'single channel'...but i'm in xp and you're in vista

no :) it s xp too !
11-04-2008, 09:25 AM
Pt1t

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

It's vista...better for wprime. Both of you could do with some memory optimization though, lol. :sofa:

off course :) but it was my first boot on this board.
11-04-2008, 09:46 AM
s e t h

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

It's vista...better for wprime. Both of you could do with some memory optimization though, lol. :sofa:

hahaha...very funny :ROTF:
true though...i just got tthe board running and then it was straight under ln2 :D

'06 efficiency seems better with i7 than with qx9650 going by the bot...even unoptomised.
11-04-2008, 01:52 PM
S1mon-

What kind of voltage can be used with these new chips for 24/7?
11-04-2008, 02:09 PM
Ket

Yawn, just numbers. Lets see something that has some backbone to it like Crysis benchmarks, WinRAR, etc.
11-04-2008, 03:50 PM
BenchZowner

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ket

Yawn, just numbers. Lets see something that has some backbone to it like Crysis benchmarks, WinRAR, etc.

You are in the Xtreme Overclocking section.
Do you really expect to see anything but 3D Marks, SuperPi, and wPrime ?
11-05-2008, 01:01 AM
Brandybuck

woww:shocked:

I need Corei7:)
11-06-2008, 02:10 PM
Rickpatbrown

AMD could beat that any day!

I'm a little upset that the lower end ones won't overclock.

Good work on the clocks. It's impressive technology in the hands of an able person.
11-06-2008, 03:00 PM
revogamer

1 Attachment(s)

i940 fun :up:

im only on the extreme stock cooler hahahahah, TRUE results early next week..

the intel board aint bad btw.
11-06-2008, 03:19 PM
xVeinx

Um, huh? Beat what? And, yes they do overclock.
11-06-2008, 04:53 PM
PeterPeterson1

1 Attachment(s)

I can't understand those 2 different values. Could someone help me here? or is everything messured by detection programs like CPUz not trustworthy until a new certified version comes?
11-06-2008, 05:58 PM
flesheatinvirus

Excellent results here.:D
11-07-2008, 06:40 AM
TheKarmakazi

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rickpatbrown

AMD could beat that any day!

I'm a little upset that the lower end ones won't overclock.

Good work on the clocks. It's impressive technology in the hands of an able person.

Not to start a flamewar, but aMD couldnt beat that in their wildest dreams...

The lower end ones DO overclock... lots of 940's hit 4-4.2Ghz on air.
11-07-2008, 07:54 AM
Leeghoofd

Quote:

Originally Posted by PeterPeterson1

I can't understand those 2 different values. Could someone help me here? or is everything messured by detection programs like CPUz not trustworthy until a new certified version comes?

Everest doesn't seem to detect the 33 multi set and takes default 24X...

Stop me Bill from buying it , I need your support badly !!!!!!
11-07-2008, 08:00 AM
BenchZowner

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leeghoofd

Stop me Bill from buying it , I need your support badly !!!!!!

Resist you must :p:
May the 32nm force be with you :p:
11-08-2008, 02:55 AM
FlanK3r

hm..more than 1.5V is to much i think, for 45nm Intel (or LN2?)
11-09-2008, 02:20 PM
Charles Wirth

Lapped and polished, gained about 100Mhz

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1226267087
11-09-2008, 02:36 PM
T_Flight

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rickpatbrown

AMD could beat that any day!

I'm a little upset that the lower end ones won't overclock.

Good work on the clocks. It's impressive technology in the hands of an able person.

:rofl: You're kidding right? Please do some more reading...alot more reading.

AMD doesn't even have a paper tiger that come close to that, nor will they for the foreseeable future.

Not only are these things gonna take the desktop market over, Intel's server Team is well poised to take over the server market again too with this technology.

I've never in my life seen a CPU that was capable of doing everything extremely well like this one does.

920's and 940's clock very well. I think you need to take a look at the 920 clocked to 4.3Ghz on the EVGA board down one forum. That is on air, and it's also 24/7 stable.

AMD has nothing that will come close to that. I've seen the paper tigers on the Internet and those are neither here nor there. When they can post some screenshots then they might make me a believer, but making wild claims on paper does not make it reality.
11-09-2008, 03:37 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by FUGGER

Lapped and polished, gained about 100Mhz

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1226267087

100MHz is a pretty big deal

was it concave or convex
looks like these CPUs must really get hot too in full load

what are your max 3D CPU MHz clocks for '06 from your best chip
11-09-2008, 03:39 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_Flight

920's and 940's clock very well. I think you need to take a look at the 920 clocked to 4.3Ghz on the EVGA board down one forum. That is on air, and it's also 24/7 stable.

i think jakup showed a short 4.2GHz prime

i seriously DOUBT that retail chips will be able to get stability past 4GHz that easily unless evga board is doing something special plus they get extremely hot when fully loaded
11-09-2008, 07:30 PM
t_russell

Very nice results my man. But I too would like to see some more real world stuff off of these.
11-09-2008, 09:49 PM
SuperFly03

You know... this just makes me feel inadequate.

Great job. Sickness keeps raining down from Intel.

I almost feel bad for AMD... then I realize they did it to themselves.
11-10-2008, 12:16 AM
Astennu

sorry double post.
11-10-2008, 12:18 AM
Astennu

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperFly03

You know... this just makes me feel inadequate.

Great job. Sickness keeps raining down from Intel.

I almost feel bad for AMD... then I realize they did it to themselves.

AMD never had a chance. Intel always had the name. + Intel is 8-10x bigger if you look at fabs and development teams. And they have way more money.

So i'm not surprised they make technology like this. I think they could do a lot better if they would really do there best and use more money to do it.

But we need AMD. If AMD is gone Intel will have free play. And we will only gain 200 Mhz per year. And need to do 2-3 Years with 32nm tech instead of 1.

So i really hope AMD can keep some pressure on the market. If they had not done that with K8 we would still have those Crappy P4's with netburst tech.
11-10-2008, 09:36 AM
HDCHOPPER

Quote:

Originally Posted by FUGGER

Lapped and polished, gained about 100Mhz

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1226267087

sweet ! thats gotta be a recoard itself :D
11-10-2008, 09:56 AM
WaterFlex

Killer chip!
11-11-2008, 07:35 AM
plokko

Can you overvolt the memory without overvolt the cpu with this mobo(possible only if integrate a "memory voltage controller" like dfi who let you overvolt memory without burn the cpu)?

The ud5 is cool,less extreme than the "extreme" version but with a lot of cool features and a great price!

P.S.:Great score fugger!:up:
11-11-2008, 07:38 PM
Rickpatbrown

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_Flight

:rofl: You're kidding right? Please do some more reading...alot more reading.

AMD doesn't even have a paper tiger that come close to that, nor will they for the foreseeable future.

Not only are these things gonna take the desktop market over, Intel's server Team is well poised to take over the server market again too with this technology.

I've never in my life seen a CPU that was capable of doing everything extremely well like this one does.

920's and 940's clock very well. I think you need to take a look at the 920 clocked to 4.3Ghz on the EVGA board down one forum. That is on air, and it's also 24/7 stable.

AMD has nothing that will come close to that. I've seen the paper tigers on the Internet and those are neither here nor there. When they can post some screenshots then they might make me a believer, but making wild claims on paper does not make it reality.

:( Of course I was kidding. Look at my signature.

Overclocking is pretty much the only reason I really got into this hobby of building computers. I can't see myself buying 500 dollar chips to overclock it. I wish AMD hadn't executed so poorly. We should be seeing the launch of the next generation AMD chip right next to this one. Instead, we have Core2 owning the next closest offering by AMD. i7 is showing up to %25 more efficiency than C2. Poor AMD . . . Poor consumer . . . Rich Intel.
11-12-2008, 09:55 AM
Dr.Paneas

Has anynone test the Turbo Mode ?

I saw (from TomsHardware screenshot) that even locked models (such as Core i7 920 / 940 ) do unclock automatically and they raise up the multiplier and they low down the bclock. Is this possible ?

Check this http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...e-i7,2063.html to see what I mean.
11-14-2008, 05:45 AM
plokko

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr.Paneas

Has anynone test the Turbo Mode ?

I saw (from TomsHardware screenshot) that even locked models (such as Core i7 920 / 940 ) do unclock automatically and they raise up the multiplier and they low down the bclock. Is this possible ?

Check this http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...e-i7,2063.html to see what I mean.

even tomshardware say that the block can be disabled even in the 920/940 processors,see the last article on processors:up:!

P.S.:plz if you can answer my last post plz do!
11-14-2008, 12:04 PM
slash777

3400mhz @ 1.120V ( air, Intel boxed cooler )

http://www.abload.de/thumb/3400kkgj.jpg
11-14-2008, 01:11 PM
Rickpatbrown

Quote:

Originally Posted by plokko

even tomshardware say that the block can be disabled even in the 920/940 processors,see the last article on processors:up:!

P.S.:plz if you can answer my last post plz do!

Thanks for the clarification !
That's good news
:up:
11-14-2008, 01:34 PM
T_Flight

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rickpatbrown

:( Of course I was kidding. Look at my signature.

Overclocking is pretty much the only reason I really got into this hobby of building computers. I can't see myself buying 500 dollar chips to overclock it. I wish AMD hadn't executed so poorly. We should be seeing the launch of the next generation AMD chip right next to this one. Instead, we have Core2 owning the next closest offering by AMD. i7 is showing up to %25 more efficiency than C2. Poor AMD . . . Poor consumer . . . Rich Intel.

I'm not seeing it. I'm actually seeing cheaper prices on the stuff I've bought so far. The i7965 I bought was 500 dollars cheaper than the QX9650. I am buying a RIIE today that is cheaper than a Rampage I lists for. Ram is slightly higher but is to be expected and will come down alot.

From where I am sitting as a consumer I'm getting more for less, and that's very unusual when it comes to cutting edge stuff. Intel will always be rich, and as long as they don;t get out of hand with prices, they deserve to be. They are making great stuff. They really are.

AMD is just not there yet, but they're working on it, and they will be again. I really hope they turn it around. We all want them there. They've been down before and have came out with great performers and they will again. I sincerely hope that nothing bad happens to AMD. It was looking very bleak for their future there for awhile, and I was worried, but now things are looking much brighter. Everybody need to get through this world recession and US recession too. They'll both pull through. :)
11-15-2008, 05:25 AM
T_M

Charles, do you suffer with cold boot bugs and is your also at -60C?
Ive tested a number of CPU's on a number of gigabyte boards and all are -60C....
11-15-2008, 01:32 PM
VictorWang

wow.......that's really a gem chip.
we are still fighting for 4.9Ghz.
so many chips can't go over 1.5v
and coldbug at about -80c
lower the temp or more volts helps nth :(

congratz on the great results !
11-15-2008, 02:29 PM
Charles Wirth

No cold boot issues at all, I found out with the vapo head it was putting too much pressure on the caps and would prevent it from booting sub zero. Once I figured that out I never saw a boot problem again. I think you are putting too much pressure on the caps and that is preventing it from booting too.

Thanks, lapping the chip definitely helped.
11-15-2008, 10:22 PM
T_M

I'm running 1.7V with no problems and definately see clock gains from doing so.
Lapping helped under subzero?
11-15-2008, 11:03 PM
AndreYang

cold boot and cold bug depend on cpu. my chip can do -125 no problem.
11-16-2008, 04:57 AM
T_M

Then every 965 I have tested just unluckily had cold boot at exactly the same temperature.
Ive tested 6.....
11-16-2008, 05:01 AM
dinos22

sounds like your boards
11-16-2008, 05:14 AM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndreYang

cold boot and cold bug depend on cpu. my chip can do -125 no problem.

Andre i'm sure you tested a few 965EEs, so many were capable of such cold temps and how many didn't make the grade ? :)
11-16-2008, 05:20 AM
AndreYang

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

Andre i'm sure you tested a few 965EEs, so many were capable of such cold temps and how many didn't make the grade ? :)

you will find a good temp chip when you try 30+ pcs chips.:D

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

sounds like your boards

NO......

My chip done -125 on EX58-Extreme, too. 6 chips is nothing. Try 60 pcs.
11-16-2008, 05:22 AM
T_M

Im not saying there arent gem chips out there mate, but 0 out of 6 suggests a poor strike rate
11-16-2008, 05:26 AM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_M

Im not saying there arent gem chips out there mate, but 0 out of 6 suggests a poor strike rate

you are not wrong Tim :down:
11-16-2008, 05:28 AM
AndreYang

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_M

Im not saying there arent gem chips out there mate, but 0 out of 6 suggests a poor strike rate

0 of 6 is normal........

Retail and ES are the same. The same batch has -60 and -120 chips. Maybe your chips already tested by someone before you got.
11-16-2008, 05:30 AM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndreYang

you will find a good temp chip when you try 30+ pcs chips.:D

NO......

My chip done -125 on EX58-Extreme, too. 6 chips is nothing. Try 60 pcs.

60 pcs.. that's like AUD$132,000-168,000 bucks! :eek:
11-16-2008, 05:38 AM
AndreYang

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

60 pcs.. that's like AUD$132,000-168,000 bucks! :eek:

so what? that's cheaper than QX9770. lol
11-16-2008, 05:42 AM
dinos22

lol talk about this being a wallet sport

it's getting there pretty quick isnt it :p:
11-16-2008, 05:53 AM
George_o/c

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

lol talk about this being a wallet sport

it's getting there pretty quick isnt it :p:

Unfortunately :(
11-16-2008, 06:08 AM
AndreYang

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

lol talk about this being a wallet sport

it's getting there pretty quick isnt it :p:

no..RMA bad chips everyday.:ROTF:
11-16-2008, 06:41 AM
BenchZowner

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndreYang

no..RMA bad chips everyday.:ROTF:

Yeah, lol.
Until the shop gets suspicious and refuse to RMA your stuff any more :D
11-16-2008, 07:00 AM
Harshal

No good cards for 3D... which makes me 2D guy for sometime now :p:
ASUS P6T-Dlx numbers.... as EX58-UD5P was acting shady with me and made me waste 15 liter LN2.:mad:
http://www.imgx.org/files/26395_esqt...Prime1024M.jpg
3rd with 32M and 1024M on HWBOT and its was first day of playing with 965EE so no GFX is allowed. Planning to push it high 2moro.
Thanks to A-Data, ASUS and Intel for the hardware :up:
11-16-2008, 07:57 AM
R.MnTnA

Just wondering has anybody done an overclock with 1:1 ratio yet? What's the best you can get?
11-16-2008, 08:30 AM
zlojack

Quote:

Originally Posted by R.MnTnA

Just wondering has anybody done an overclock with 1:1 ratio yet? What's the best you can get?

I don't think it's going to work like that.

1:1 ratio would put the RAM at a ridiculously low speed.
11-16-2008, 01:49 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndreYang

no..RMA bad chips everyday.:ROTF:

Quote:

Originally Posted by BenchZowner

Yeah, lol.
Until the shop gets suspicious and refuse to RMA your stuff any more :D

ROFL what if you ARE the shop ;) :D :rofl:
11-16-2008, 02:30 PM
BenchZowner

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

ROFL what if you ARE the shop ;) :D :rofl:

Good idea! ROFL :D

A customer comes in and says: "Sir, I'd like to RMA this E8600, it's a bad clocker, no matter what I do it won't get past 6GHz :p:"
11-16-2008, 03:28 PM
[XC] gomeler

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndreYang

0 of 6 is normal........

Retail and ES are the same. The same batch has -60 and -120 chips. Maybe your chips already tested by someone before you got.

Christ.. *jealous*
11-16-2008, 03:39 PM
George_o/c

Quote:

Originally Posted by BenchZowner

Good idea! ROFL :D

A customer comes in and says: "Sir, I'd like to RMA this E8600, it's a bad clocker, no matter what I do it won't get past 6GHz :p:"

Yeah, but imagine if the seller goes like: "Yeah, tell me about it ... I have tested all the E8600s I got here - which by the way are like 40, one by one on LN2, and none of them was able to pull of an AM3 @ 6.4GHz ... You think is my REX, or what ?"

:D
11-16-2008, 04:30 PM
mstp2009

Anyone found a way to change the QPI Multiplier on the P6T?

I'm working w/ a lower-end Gainstown and the QPI bus is limiting the OC.
11-16-2008, 05:41 PM
T_M

Harshal, i got the exact same score in 32M last night on EX58-UD5 at just a slightly higher clock (4669MHz).
Interesting to see that efficiency is the same between the two competitors in wPrime at least.
11-16-2008, 05:49 PM
Movieman

I got lucky then. I got one chip and it did 4226 on air..
Now if someone can tell me how to get to 4500+ on air or water I'm listening!:D
11-16-2008, 06:08 PM
T_M

4226 on air is not uncommon, even my bad chip is doing that :)
The big difference with these chips is under cold
11-16-2008, 06:12 PM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_M

4226 on air is not uncommon, even my bad chip is doing that :)
The big difference with these chips is under cold

Ahh, thats news to me. I've just seen one higher than that on air so far..Pedro's..
But I'm not a bencher so what do I know..;)
11-16-2008, 06:27 PM
T_M

At what volts did you achieve that clock btw?
11-16-2008, 06:28 PM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_M

At what volts did you achieve that clock btw?

If you mean me, 1.4825v on the cpu, 1.62v on the memory.
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=441673
11-16-2008, 06:33 PM
T_M

Ewww, smackover board :P
Was it benchable at that speed or just a screenshot?
11-16-2008, 06:43 PM
Movieman

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_M

Ewww, smackover board :P
Was it benchable at that speed or just a screenshot?

ran SP1M at that speed
11-16-2008, 07:33 PM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndreYang

If I want to sell brand new chips, I just need to send to Intel for replacement.:ROTF:

I'm waiting to hear that they are building a warehouse next door to you to cut down on shipping costs!:rofl:
11-16-2008, 07:35 PM
AndreYang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Movieman

I'm waiting to hear that they are building a warehouse next door to you to cut down on shipping costs!:rofl:

I forgot to say Intel send you DHL return label.:ROTF:
11-16-2008, 07:35 PM
boblemagnifique

Andre : I have kill my 965XE ES , you think Intel replace me because I so unsatisfied it doesn't hot ? :D
11-16-2008, 07:42 PM
npk

Andre you shouldn´t say those things out loud ;)
11-16-2008, 07:49 PM
AndreYang

Quote:

Originally Posted by boblemagnifique

Andre : I have kill my 965XE ES , you think Intel replace me because I so unsatisfied it doesn't hot ? :D

oh..yeah...change IHS to retail IHS and RMA it.:D
11-16-2008, 09:57 PM
boblemagnifique

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndreYang

oh..yeah...change IHS to retail IHS and RMA it.:D

Good Idea :ROTF:
11-16-2008, 10:22 PM
ol'norton

Quote:

Originally Posted by Movieman

I got lucky then. I got one chip and it did 4226 on air..
Now if someone can tell me how to get to 4500+ on air or water I'm listening!:D

I can show you how to get 4400 on stock Intel cooler.
Probably didn't need that sort of VTT, but I just wanted to see what it would do.

http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/3913/9390qm3.jpg
11-16-2008, 10:51 PM
T_M

Nice vdimm ;)
11-17-2008, 12:08 AM
dinos22

nice OC as well
11-17-2008, 12:16 AM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by ol'norton

I can show you how to get 4400 on stock Intel cooler.

Yes, but thats the Gigabyte board, I'm on the Intel..
11-17-2008, 12:16 AM
T_M

Now run 1024M wPrime or PCMark05 please :)
11-17-2008, 01:11 AM
George_o/c

Has anyone reported yet, improvements in PCMark05 ?
11-17-2008, 01:51 AM
T_M

Note sure if you can say its improvement, but here's my result from last night with only an Intel SSD (no iRams etc):

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=792285
11-17-2008, 01:52 AM
Sampsa

Quote:

Originally Posted by George_o/c

Has anyone reported yet, improvements in PCMark05 ?

Here is mine with 965 @ 4,4 GHz and Intel X25-M 80 GB SSD:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=791569
11-17-2008, 01:58 AM
Harshal

Congrats on that number Tim :up:
Will give it a try now that I have a decent GPU!
11-17-2008, 02:17 AM
s e r e n i t y

Nice work T_M!
11-17-2008, 02:57 AM
George_o/c

Thank you guys (Tim and Sampsa) for the replies :)
18167 is pretty much the same score, that somebody can get with an E8xxx @ ~4.5 - 4.7GHz and 2xIRams in Raid=0 ;) Now, when it comes to a Yorkie, things aren't so encouraging ... With about 3.8GHz, 2xRaptors in Raid=0 and some proper tweaking, they can outrun a nelly @ 4.6GHz ...
So, not so sure that there is an improvement, depends on the tweaking of course ... We will see :)
11-17-2008, 03:46 AM
ol'norton

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_M

Now run 1024M wPrime or PCMark05 please :)

I don't have PCMark 05 installed yet, here's Vantage.

http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/1...3423fo8.th.jpg

1024M wPrime just isn't going to happen at that speed with the stock cooler :horse: Well not before winter at any rate. :D
This was the best I could do. I got 40% through @ 4380MHz :p:

http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/3...3082hs0.th.jpg

But I did get through 1meg @ 4500+ Stock Air :woot:

http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/2878/9156qk0.th.jpg

Oh, and Nice PCMark score Tim :)
11-17-2008, 03:54 AM
dinos22

really :banana::banana::banana::banana: CPU man
let me know if you want to sell it :ROTF:
j/k
11-17-2008, 07:14 AM
Rol-Co

Quote:

Originally Posted by ol'norton

I don't have PCMark 05 installed yet, here's Vantage.

http://img511.imageshack.us/my.php?image=v13423fo8.jpg

1024M wPrime just isn't going to happen at that speed with the stock cooler :horse: Well not before winter at any rate. :D
This was the best I could do. I got 40% through @ 4380MHz :p:

http://img511.imageshack.us/my.php?i...p233082hs0.jpg

But I did get through 1meg @ 4500+ Stock Air :woot:

=http://img511.imageshack.us/my.php?image=9156qk0.jpg

Oh, and Nice PCMark score Tim :)

Don't know what happend here but the score for the clocks are waaaaaaay to low m8
Last two screens running with a true getting 70-80 degrees load so don't think boxed cooler can do this @ 4400 8 cores load. ;)

air thermalright ultra extreme with proper fan :)

4533 1m
http://www.rol-co.nl/xs/4533-8.891.jpg

4200 vantage
http://www.rol-co.nl/xs/4200-vantage-oc.jpg

4200 wprime 32 and 1024
http://www.rol-co.nl/xs/wprime-4200all-1.39v.jpg
11-17-2008, 10:40 AM
PytonOrm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sampsa

Here is mine with 965 @ 4,4 GHz and Intel X25-M 80 GB SSD:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=791569

On Ln2 in hwbot :rolleyes:? hmm not air
11-17-2008, 12:02 PM
ol'norton

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rol-Co

Don't know what happend here but the score for the clocks are waaaaaaay to low m8

I was really just trying to get through the test @ that speed & have done no tweaking.

:( I don't know what happened there either, at first I put it down to not having triple channel memory, but I see you only have 2GB.
It must have just got too hot. Although the 1meg score is poor too, so :shrug:
I always get the warped one. :mad:
11-17-2008, 01:15 PM
Rol-Co

no offence but its not only the 1m who is slow, cpu score vantage is lower and wprime the same.
1 thing is you're running without Ht so basicly you are using only 4 cores, put them all on and you will see the difference. ;)

at my prospective its not possible to run multicore benchmarks at 4400 with a boxed cooler normal temp, they simply can't transport the heat.

try the same with 8 enabled .we'll see.
11-17-2008, 05:15 PM
T_M

Yeah HT enabled should reduce your clocks ;)
11-17-2008, 11:49 PM
ol'norton

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rol-Co

no offence but its not only the 1m who is slow, cpu score vantage is lower and wprime the same.
1 thing is you're running without Ht so basicly you are using only 4 cores, put them all on and you will see the difference. ;)

at my prospective its not possible to run multicore benchmarks at 4400 with a boxed cooler normal temp, they simply can't transport the heat.

try the same with 8 enabled .we'll see.

Thanks mate, :up:
I enabled Hiperthreading & took 1.5 seconds off my 32M WPrime.
Unfortuately I could only get 80% through 1024M because of the extra heat.
I'll get a bracket for my waterblock before I do any more benching.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:21 PM.

XtremeSystems