13.906
Abit IP35 Pro
E6600 @ 8x450
2x1 crucial tracers pc8000
http://www.johnshim.com/forums/bleed....2.55volts.jpg
Printable View
13.906
Abit IP35 Pro
E6600 @ 8x450
2x1 crucial tracers pc8000
http://www.johnshim.com/forums/bleed....2.55volts.jpg
Too bad I noticed this thread a day too late. I just replaced my P5W with some crappy DDR3 board :/
I could run 4 3 3 4 with tweaked subtimings with the P5W. Can't remember what time I got, but it was 13.8xx something.
I was testing tweaks on my Win XP and got some interesting results :)
It is still not like my friend staxm result but...
I was burned my abit QuadGT :(
setup:
Core2 Duo E6850 ES@3600MHz, TT BT cooling
ASUS P5B-Plus Vista Edition
Kingston HyperX PC8500 2x512MB (D9GKX)
...
1M time=13.968s
This is my try...
Config:
- DFI 965-S (400*9, 2:3)
- Intel E6600
- Crucial ballistix tracer pc667 c3
- xp sp2 lite with some tweaks
http://www.atris.it/Forum/photoplog/..._2-3_cas_4.jpg
Unfortunately, i made this shot above (before the other), but i could't open cpuz... it's too hot now in Italy, and the ram doesn't like it... :) I will try for a better results
http://www.atris.it/Forum/photoplog/...cas_4_cpuz.jpg
I finally got back from real life! The Scores Have been Updated guys!! Some of these are insane!!! I also have a new time of 13.891s:
13.891s (my windows install is getting old now! Maybe I'll borrow the drive from the HP downstairs that I just redid, 80MBs memory in use at idle!)
do i entitle to join the fun?
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a2...bestresult.jpg
No, it's called @3.6ghz for a reason.
Strike again with Allendale :).
It's not my 1M Windows (actually it's 16/32M etc) so I think it can be atleast 50ms better, if I will find time do to this (install another P35 Windows) I will post again ;).
Asus P5K-Dlx
E6400 450x8 = 3600MHz @ 1,45V
2:3 675MHz 5-5-4-4-4 :eek: @ 2,55V {end of V @ BIOS :p:} Crucial Ballistix 8000 :) - P35 is making miracles with that RAM ;)
15.219s
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/7...he15219zp8.png
edit:
The Windows is still that non-1M-optimized 2003 (1M on XP is much better in my case) but the chipset is i965 this time - I love that chipset to be honest ;).
4:5 with modded 1333 strap (and from what I see that "modded 1333" is with 4:5 faster than genuine 1066 4:5 :eek:) and a little better - P35 is slower with 4:5 about 1% than i965 4:5 so P35 3:5 5-5-4-4-4 seems slower than i965 4:5 4-4-4-4 :).
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/5...5203i96wp4.jpg
Very small improvement....
Config:
- DFI 965-S (400*9, 2:3)
- Intel E6600
- Crucial ballistix tracer pc667 c3
- xp sp2 lite with some tweaks
http://www.atris.it/Forum/photoplog/..._cas_4_rid.JPG
;)
Nice OMG :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKS
When i have the possibility to reinstall Windows, i try to come below 15,4seconds. I dont have D9 ram, so i can only bench @ low ramspeed.
Now it's better:
http://www.atris.it/Forum/photoplog/..._2-3_cas_4.JPG
;)
Thx :), i965 with 4:5 really rocks :D {or 2:3 with P35, but as You can see i965 is still equal or even better ;)}.Quote:
Originally Posted by ownage
Sub15,4 450x8 1:1 could be difficult - I tried to re-achieve my previous 14,437 @ 450 1:1 today and I wasn't able to :p: (another installation of Windows, maybe I changed something important :shrug:). Anyway, good luck! :)
Finally, I can say that this score "doesn't suck" :p: as mentioned in first post of that topic ;).
Yes, that Ballistix I have for some tests is really good - 700 Dual Channel benchable @ 2,55V for example :) {on P35}.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Learn
Congrats my friend :toast:
WTFQuote:
Originally Posted by Learn
how the heck did you pull that time off :shocked:
3608 :p:
It makes a large difference...I did this originally but never wanted to post it because I believe that 3.6GHz=3600MHz and no higher. But that's just me.
koda's time is the most efficient so far in this thread, barring none, and that no one can argue with.
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gautamb/3607_13828.PNG
Here there is a system DDR3 powered.
Asus P5k3
E6420 air cooling
DDR3 SuperTalent 1600 7-7-7 Micron Z9
Win2K3
http://www.atris.it/Forum/photoplog/..._best_last.JPG
thx ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by before
Some basic tweak, wich everybody know now :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
See posts #1 #72 #74 #92 ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
no :rofl:
There is someone (i know) with a much better efficient ;) and a italian dude also
Hm excuse me Learn I haven't been keeping up with this thread. :) But koda still is .001 faster than you. :hehe:
I know the Italian time you're talking about....I completely do not understand it.
I would like to know too :eek: there is a long road it seems :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
oh sweet oogly moogly.. i'd like to see this uber sweet italian's score! :D
but Learn, nice clocks and speed!
it's very good to see early samples of DDR3 doing so well.. then again I guess it was like early DDR2 with Micron fatbodies...
By C.h.r.i.s-Quote:
Originally Posted by shimmishim
http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/9135/137813600ev3.png
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...0&postcount=33
Completely incomprehensible. Even 13.828 is very difficult at 3603. This 781 is a good 3 ticks ahead of any other time in this thread.
That time really doesn't make sense, I gotta wonder if he's hiding the memory info for a reason, and also what the available system cache was during that run (what makes copy waza faster). The RAM timings are tight, but not tighter than any one elses, and not enough to make a difference, so that can't be it.
The available real memory is likely part of the key. (See his first 1M result in that post where he shows it)
haha. he makes it sound so easy. Only 2.95V :)Quote:
Originally Posted by krompirusa
Did you actually look at anyone else's timings lol? The ram timings are actually tighter than most here - he's at 4-4-3-4, the TRFC is 21 as opposed to 30 - 45+ and write to precharge & tWTR are both 9, and TRRD is 1.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stapler
I think that sub timings are not enough tighter to explain that difference. Here there are some very good tweaks and a very good SO optimization.Quote:
Originally Posted by Timbosan
If I have a look only to their screenshot (400 FSB, 3603 MHz, DDR2-600 4-4-3-4) I must say this is impossible, but for sure there are something that we do not see with screenshot that make this to be possible.
With my old P5B dlx i found a tweak by changing at every reboot the maxmem dimension in a special order (somewhere i have a big paper about it),with this method the first run (only the first run) of the 1M was faster about 30ms,but this tweak doesn't work with my old asus commando (13.812s@3608mhz) and with my new P5K dlx :shrug: .
That's all .:shakes:
Strange...though 13.812 is still very very good. (Though is more or less equal in difficulty to 13.843 at 3600)
IMHO though C.h.r.i.s...a few hints here and there are nice but you don't need to share all your Pi secrets. :p: Goodness knows I never do. ;)
The problem is that from now going ahead when someone will find some new tweaks peoples may not believe and we all knows why...:(Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
This is not a good thing :(
Anyway with the P5K 515x7 5/6 cas5 i'm very slow :p: ;)
EDIT=Sorry for my bad english :(
We all know that Pi under Linux is really faster than under Windows.Quote:
Originally Posted by C.h.r.i.s
This fact show us that the hardware is not really the main problem to go faster.
I think that all the tweaks are not yet found ... so C.h.r.i.s, maybe you found something really new to improve your time.
true...and that's the main problem...if a guy comes up...discover a tweak and has a time that no one has...the questioning begins and the accusations fly around, and happens he thinks like Gautam (Does not like to share his tweaks) --> example, then escalates to cheater, guy get bitter and gone or not etc...:(...Quote:
Originally Posted by koda
let's put an example...can 11:50ms be achievable in 32m pi at 8x500 with P965 chipset ...could it be done? it's difficult to imagine it but does not mean it's not possible ... remember mascaras friend running 4-4-4-9 , maybe a unknown tweak...Gautam saw that post too by mascaras...
-->http://img122.imageshack.us/img122/4774/400032meh9.png
everybody has a different approach to tweaking...;)
Hey, I'm always willing to help anyone dedicated...but to be honest, I've never let everything I do out of the bag and I don't think any serious bencher out there has.
I myself have done 11:51.4xx at 400x10 2:3 4-4-4 so the same time at 500x8 does not seem too far-fetched to me...
lol..it was an example...;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
try 500x8...:p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
I never could get that kind of FSB working. :lol:
500x8 at 4-4-4-9 would be much slower than with the same tweaks at 2:3 4-4-4-x, I'd say 3-5s or so from my experience, but I don't doubt mascaras time at all. It seems to me like we ought to be less judgemental when looking at other people's times. Not very many are going to give up their secrets after you start a witch hunt.
Played for an hour with this, damned if I can figure it out :up:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3..._1M_13.859.png
damn it i could have hit #4 for the 2mb category but I didn't take proper screenshot when I did it. Too late now. maybe I'll try again next week with p35, but my memory seems to have degradated, even though I never fed it more than 2.12v in all the time I've owned it and had 2 60mm's blowing on top
Nice one GHZ, that ram aint to shabby.
I thought the same thing,but i was not able to repeat that tweak again :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by koda
hm my OS seems to be too slow...were to get this xplite?
mfg
ah i almost forgot:
http://img475.imageshack.us/img475/2...t333qb5.th.jpg
mfg²
Hmm... 2,75Vdimm and 450 2:3 @ i965 (with P35 2:3 it was not that good although it requires only 2,55V [unmodded P5K-Dlx])
450x8 [boot @ 400] 2:3 with Allendale (I really want to test it with Conroe and I think I will shortly ;)) - the comparision between 2:3 400x9 4-4-4-4; 450x8 4:5 4-4-4-4 and 450 2:3 5-5-5-5 is interesting IMHO (and I will probably do this on Conroe)
And a little tweak for those who think that "1066 strap" is an ideal performance deal (of course it requires a strong NB, in my case it was @ 1,95V, I didn't tried lower ;)) - [with PMem] FED1403F and "22" instead of "23" in upper left corner is slightly faster :). It is some tweak for X6800 xtreme benching I think ;) (for the rest CPUs it will be probably impossible due to high FSB).
Edit: I must test it properly (and I will, probably today) because on my daily OS this is unmeasurable - I will post later if it makes a difference or not (with 4:5 surely it does IIRC but with 1:1 and 2:3 I'm not sure ATM).
15.157s - I had some 15.156 (and no screenshot - too small update :p:) with 5-5-4-4 instead of 5-5-5-5 but I'm looking for lower time :).
http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/4...36002mbkw1.jpg
Some comparision, still with Allendales unfortunately but this is optimistic also because with Allendales even with 1M there are some differences in score visible with different memory settings ;).
With jumson's E4400: [it could be his score if author is going to update the rating]
E4400 @ 400x9=3600MHz, RAM 2:3 = 600 4-4-4-4 [known as golden memory settings I think ;)] => 15.171s
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/9...5171em7.th.jpg
My improvement:
E6400 @ 450x8=3600MHz [boot @ 400], RAM OCZ Reaper 9200 2:3 = 675 5-4-4-4 @ 2,9V :eek: => 15.125s
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9...5125dq2.th.jpg
That score is I think the best I can do until I will find some nice DDR3 :).
I hope I will be able to test 450x8 2:3 5-4-4-4 with Conroe shorlty but I'm not sure about it.
Nice results JMKS:up:
Jmax made an very impressive run yesterday :
http://www.jmax-hardware.com/ftpjmax...GP/15.094s.JPG
Very good run indeed :). I can tie it with 451x8 = 3608MHz probably.
Unfortunately for that kind of FSB [510+, not 450 of course] my E6400 requires subzero [and that E4400 will not reach it even with LN2 probably although we will fight for ~5GHz with it soon ;) - 4,71GHz under DI so far].
Nice to see someone still fighting with "slow" Allendales :).
DFI P35-T2R , 2:3 , 1200@CL 4 4 4 4
http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/1...90spi1mjc5.gif
Scores have been updated.
and a new update :)
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1...75spi1mkn8.gif
p5k dlx
e6600 l631b022
crucial pc8500
win2k03
http://www.pctuner.info/up/results/_...135637_rec.jpg
Best I could do. Cas 5 with 4/5 divider does well.
think i'm gonna get the 1st place!
CELLSHOCK DDR3 1800
ASUS BLITZ EXTREME
http://web.tiscali.it/microcool/csddr3/primo.jpg
very nice kamel! but i think ddr3 scores shouldn't be allowed!!! j/k :)
just curious.... what hard drive are you using?
Seagate SATA II 250gb
I think the only constraint is cpu max frequency at 3609 MHz, the rest is not specified.Quote:
Originally Posted by shimmishim
great runQuote:
Originally Posted by Kamel
if that CPU can handle 600FSB you could hit 13.7xx easy :D
i wonder with 128MB maxmem and/or lower trrd would do any better
i'm loving these ddr3 benches
Allendale striking back ;).
E6400 [under DI, wall on air ~510] 514.7x7 = 3602.8MHz, OCZ 9200 Reaper VDimm 3.2V => 4:5 4-4-4-4, modded strap [10, 24, 03, 04, 09 for those who know what it means ;)], all with Commando
RAM was really nicely scaling with V and it survived many hours with VDimm ~3V.
If sticks are still alive? hmm... half-dead unfortunately, one of them is not booting if VDimm < ~2,8V, although it was already in that state during this bench.
15.031s and it is probably not maxed out :)
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/3...ish4sg8.th.jpg
Great time. Next time sub 15s :DQuote:
Originally Posted by JMKS
Very impressive time ! I love your timings ;)
36GP 1M C2D 2Mo
15.094s| Jmax_oc | E6300 | Blitz Formula | Crucial Ballistix PC8500 @ 642mhz @ 5-5-4-1
http://www.jmax-hardware.com/ftpjmax...GP/15.094s.JPG
36GP 1M C2D 4Mo
13.875s| Jmax_oc | E6850 | Blitz Formula | Crucial Ballistix PC8500 @ 643mhz @ 5-5-4-5
http://www.jmax-hardware.com/ftpjmax...GP/13.875s.JPG
14.187 G.Skill F2-8000PHU2-2GBHZ
http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/8262/spi1sh9.jpg
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/5352/bios011im8.jpg
13.836 at 3608 400.9 5/8 641Mhz 5-5-5-4-7 PL 5 25 -10 -10 -8
Basic tweaks ,dirty instal, trying to figure out how Eram works , japanse is not exactly my language :D
After clean instal some Gautam ass whooping ;)
screenshot?Quote:
Originally Posted by BeardyMan
basic tweaks?? bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: basic tweaks.....you've got something good going on there :D
sharing is caring :D:D:D:D
e6850 @3600
mushkin xp6400
basic tweaks , only 14.188
http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/7697/spi14188br8.jpg
for me those are basic tweaks, the known stuff :DQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
my final result wil be screened :up:
I'll tell you what's BS, xx.836 is not a possible Pi time. :rolleyes: Don't try and mess with us.
you reckonQuote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
maybe it was a bugged run like that other guy
but looking at his timings i am a little surprised at the time :confused:
Seeing what this guy has posted in the past I really don't put anything past him:down:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
reallyQuote:
Originally Posted by Stapler
is he being an idiot?
i would ban him if he's here to :banana::banana::banana::banana: with us
He's been banned a couple times before.
My time is faster than the one he claimed. It's just that 836 is not a possible suffix. Nothing between 843 and 828. No, this ain't quite a bannable offense lol. But he does need to stop screwin with us.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
I have reinstalled windows and was able to push my time even lower, made screens coming from 13.922 -13.859 - 13.828.
Tomorow i should get a custom version of 2003 wich should be a little faster for superpi as well and perhaps a better time.:)
M/B：ASUS P5B-Deluxe 1.03G P965C1 rev., Vcore, Vdroop, Vdimm, Vmch mods
CPU：Intel Core2 E6700 L633A550
CPU cooling：Watercooling Alphacool
Memory：Wintec PC2-8000 C5 1024MBx2
VGA：Jaton 8600GS
HDD：Western Digital 80GB
Power Supply：Antec TP 550W
Vcore：1.360V(Bios)
Vdimm：2.62V(Actual)
FSB Termination Voltage：1.45V
NB Voltage：1.71V(Actual)
OS：Windows Server 2003
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/3...m13875slh0.png
Notice CPU-Z bug... reports 512MB instead of 2048MB and can't shows specifications of the memory kit.
One of my modules don't want to boot anymore... :( Have to wait a while and give it a try again.
do you think that one of those RAM modules is looking like it's gonna die
i have a similar thing going on with one of my kits
first one module would not boot at stock voltage and now both
Xavier stick it in a freezer for 5 minutes and boot up after taking it out
it will boot :D
what no more .836 :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by BeardyMan
Lol dinos :DQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
*i have reinstalled windows :D *
Wich was a stripped down Windows Xp with sp 2 :)
edit*
Trying some new settings right from the box around 0.1 faster then previous settings.
http://users.telenet.be/kuan/13938.JPG
http://users.telenet.be/kuan/13937.JPG
who said what about 0.043-0.028, lol learn your lesson
Emm, Beardy man, you seem VERY confused! And btw 13.937 is not .1 faster...it's .1s slower.
Scores Have been updated and I've changed the way they're listed to make it easier for me...Hope it's not too much worse??
Really impressed by Your big push JMKS! Much more interesting than the 4mb cat. so far.
BTW, No problems with DDR3 results....it's all welcome!
Indeed that was confusing i meant 14.000secs 400fsb ddr2 641 fsb vs 450/676 ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigchrome
Well, I think I'm at the back of this pack, but I've got a Q6600 so what do you expect!
http://img451.imageshack.us/img451/755/q6600qj6.jpg
you can't make that excuse when eva2000 who has a quadcore scores a 13.906s :DQuote:
Originally Posted by djbon2112
you can do better... you just don't know it yet ;)
my new personal best
13.859s 7x515
http://www.johnshim.com/forums/bleed...1M.13.859s.jpg
my turn :D
7x514FSB 1:1 divider 4-4-4-5 = 3598.9Mhz x 13.890 = 49988.72 1M efficiency
1M
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Com...1_13s890ms.png
Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
Nice with 4GB setup;)
New results from Team Serbia.
http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/5649/13859pq2.jpg
http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/9...026copyik3.png
With my new Asus P5K-E :)
http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/4...84336gpaw0.jpg
Here's a quick run with P5K Vanilla and 2x1GB 10th Anniversary sticks:
Attachment 64845
Very good run :up:
Good improvement (my previous time was 13.828).
Setup:
Asus P5k3
E6420 air cooling
DDR3 SuperTalent 1600 7-7-7 Micron Z9
Win2K3
http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/3...1m13812mc5.jpg
http://img187.imagevenue.com/loc539/..._122_539lo.jpg
15.578s with my E6400 :)
http://shrani.si/files/eastkoastl13ab2.jpg
A contribution of Moonman & myself, the duo known as EastKoast of OC-Lab2 :D
http://shrani.si/f/2y/Yb/1f9C4N5Q/lowclock13875.jpg
Win XP+SP2: Eram+MaxMem
Low FSB:rolleyes:
13.875
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/...360913.875.jpg
My Quad @ 8x450 (can't run it @4x514 nor my mems run @4-4-4-x with that clock...:mad:)
anyhow -->13.906s
http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/2...spiddw7.th.jpg
Mine:
Un-Tweak....
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/3...5515yh0.th.jpg
No tweaks because I was playing with the memory :D!
niceQuote:
Originally Posted by koda
13.843s
looks like i'm gonna have to try a little harder ;) :D
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/8...3mhz755rk1.png
i'am so behind :D
You can do better than that, sub 13.9. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
Here's a slow one compared to all else'. Compare: http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/8...eat3600kx7.png
Look at my timings/subtimings. To keep it simple, no LSC, no maxmem, no CDT, no CW, no Memtest, no other tweak. What you see is what you get. I used SetFSB from low clocks though because BIOS failed to OC and closest I got to 3600 is that.
Don't include my that result on the list please. It 'aint for submission and neither am I into Pi. I just wanted to share the knowledge with this guy or any other thats interested as they can get faster. Don't be daft and say "you can't" just because you don't know it or can't do it yourself. That's what the narrow minded flat earthers believed for thousands of years because of this attitude. It blinds expansion of knowledge and facts. :)
Ok, here is what I've got until now. The result is pulled out preety much only from RAM clocks and timings, no serious tweaks yet :cool:
13.875s - E6600@3598Mhz, 2x1024MB Crucial Ballistix@1200 4-4-4-4, DFI Infinity P965-S