Ruggero has right.Quote:
Originally Posted by ruggero
what is the secret?
conroe's s-pi result,not change with minimal os tweak.Max few cent.
In this run,the result is 0,2-0,3s lower of your precedent result...
Please illuminate me...
Printable View
Ruggero has right.Quote:
Originally Posted by ruggero
what is the secret?
conroe's s-pi result,not change with minimal os tweak.Max few cent.
In this run,the result is 0,2-0,3s lower of your precedent result...
Please illuminate me...
w00t =O
OPB is a great tweaker, there could be sub memory timings that were set in BIOS or some other Windows tweaks. OPB is one the best on this board and consistently puts up great results, there is no reason he should be questioned here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattstrike3
Or u are a fanboy? Maybe all is possible man... i can put 50lt of ln2 in my pot and smoke during a fake superPI... so all is possible!
I don't want to tell u that OPB is a faker man!!
But i want to know where he have found the genius of the lamp!
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattstrike3
what's that! c'mon man, we're not jelous at all!! u nut? Everytime someone make a new WR I'm the first one to make my gratz cause I know how hard it is to bench and to make good scoors, I don't wanna even imagine how hard has it to be to make a WR!!!
we just want an explanation on what he said abt the impossibility to go under 9.1s ... and two days after he maid 8.906s... I think it is insane! I mean we all know abt the usual tricks to make in windows and we all know that the memories don't count as much as in the other platform...
anyway, great time man!
Marco
in Windows,memory timings areQuote:
Originally Posted by filmbot
identical .
at first...you are crazy....we aren't jealousy...of this wr....in name of s.o.t...and (i think) for italian overclockers team in general (i see...that you nominate only this). We try....only for us....and not for win a goblet of the world. at second....."he wasted 25l on single 1m session....."....example...the sot last day for 9.093 used 40liters.....2 dewar...(20l). ByeQuote:
Originally Posted by mattstrike3
I'm not of team japan pr italy, but:Quote:
Originally Posted by mattstrike3
- OPB said some days ago that near impossible to reach 8s on spi1mb with the this frequency... and after some days with the same TIMINGS, the same MULTIPLER, a LOWER FREQUENCY he reach 8s :rolleyes:
- optimizations i think that he had to do it in the first screen of 9,1xx, infact he says that was impossible at this frequency reach 8,9xx second. moreover cpulloverclock said that they aren't significative optimization for conroe and it's true.
the conclusion to you... :stick:
Congrats master, well done great work for one man :toast: :toast: :toast:
He just benched 150MHz more and he decrease frequency for the screen.
That's all
It's the same story that his %µ%µ%*ing time at 28GB...
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmax_oc
:slap:
why u should have to decrease the freq?
:stick:
sorry man but this can't stand!
the only thing I can guess is on the used/avaible mem ... but thats all...
Marco
You are a fanboy.Quote:
Originally Posted by mattstrike3
In this 3d we talk of the opb result,not soccer..
Please think before write
Of course impressive run, man.. butQuote:
Originally Posted by mattstrike3
Looks like he knows the O.S better than Bill himself..
*sitting down and looking for further explanations*
ahahahahahahah zidane ahahhahahaha you're fantastic...ahahhahaQuote:
Originally Posted by mattstrike3
:bows: Congrats
The truth is elsewhere :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by Langley
Memories .... http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/28GP/28GP.htm
Optimization is a very rare gift and I think that OPB is blessed by the gods :toast:
ruggero, and ludus, that's why sometimes I love to see people doubt but well, you guys seems missed some points I mentioned earlier.
Did you check some tweaks I mention with very obvious showing on tht calculation? That's all alright, if you have any question I am more than happy to share the tweaks with you, I never ever refused to share .
With wrong tweaks or bad settings, I bet you even can crack it up to 5.8g, and you never closed to 9.1 second.
I tried 8m yesterday with 5.4g but just 0.37 seconds short compare with Omega san's 8m. I also tried without any tune up for running 8m@ 5.4g what do you expect the result? It's about 2 minutes and 12 seconds. Think about that.;)
First of all, very impressive as always (as I said just a couple of times ;) )
Second, why doubt the masters results?! Hasnt he proved enough yet ?
Opb, u would have better perfs at 426*13 4:5 or 396*14 4:5 (for 5550MHz)
at 403*14 4:5 for 5650MHz
All with 4-4-4-4 timings
Yep but he proved he faked too :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by kaze
I believe is 8.903, it's a WR, no problem for that, but the frequency for this time
no proof for me is needed... just look at the score ;)
Big Big crats to OPB :) Well done m8
In order to show his incredible skill in tweaking :DQuote:
Originally Posted by principino1984
I read all from page 5.
I don't care who doubt me, you guys have the right to doubt but the way you guys act just seriously say to us you never think or basically you don't believe. If I don't wanna share, and just like some one you, what you wanna do to me? or if this result is from you guys, how can you prove? nothing, merely only a pic or screeny without showing any task bar onthe windows or even more weird to gray out any secret you do NOT wanna share.
I hate those stupid dumb ass always point fingers to the one they don't like.
if I said this and got banned again, go ahead.
XS has become even worse because of you guys who come to here and think here is the playground without anyone can be superior to you.
Enough!
Mod can close this thread or delete this, I don't care if anyone think OPB is no class overclocker.
OPB, no stress man, you are the best now ;)
ya, forgot to say, if I wanna cheat or something, I won't show you those information(about how fast I post ont the 5566 or whatever ) and then stupid enought to decreas some freq then post next day say wow, I got this and I am the man...that is the damn most stupid without wisdom way to cheat.
Oh ya, I also remember that Cpulloverclock did the same thing when Coolaler had 9.00 1m WR...and apologized
he is way more better than those just shout here and do nothing.
oh forgot to say as well, mattstrike3, you don't have to waste time to explain that to them,
and for this moment, I change my mind, I won't even share in public how I put the effort to sort out all the tune up and
re-organize all the information Coolaler-san discuss with me the day before I did the bench. Cuz basically they are not
worth to let me do so. oh, I only share how I did that @ coolaler.com Hope they can easily understand that traditional
chinese so they can understand, but I doubt they are capable of learning that language that fast.;)
here you go, learn some Chinese before go there and check it. Good luck
http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...9&postcount=45
http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...2&postcount=49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
ok man,but when you have try this tweak?is new?It's the same of cooaler?
can we know this tweak?for kill 0,2 with a lower frequency and the same settings it would be a very important tweak.
The checksum can be validated too. Do you expect OPB to give away all his secret optimizations? He worked very hard to get this 1M time. If it was Team Japan, no one would question them, nor would anyone ask about their secrets. Why is OPB treated differently? Would you divulge all your secrets if someone asked you to? Do you think calling him a cheater (with no proof) will make him divulge his secrets in order to defend himself? No one should have to do that. Remember, overclocking is a competition...you can't expect to be handed everything.
One last thing, congrats OPB.
Awesome :toast:
Truly impressive :thumbsup:
@ coolaler... when are you gonna get benching again... still @ 9.000 SuperPi 1M? :)
even if i agree in part with my italian friends i must do my grats to you OPB;)
this is a very impressive results, and you have an impressive tweak too:slapass:
waiting for 8m and 32m now:clap:
i wasn't gonna post, but this stuck out at me.... there's a lot more to memory timings than what CPU-Z shows. a LOT. get your "facts" straight before accusing someone who is constantly redefining extreme to be lying to us. if you're so sure that it is fake, why don't you prove it, huh? :slapass:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ludus
no respect to those who don't give any :slap:
Yes, Master Yoda. :bows:Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
Incredible OPB.
Whats the Highest benchable with @ 3D?
But really.. 11/10.. fantastic stuff.
INSANE opb, you predicted your WR and you have it :). Any chance you give the 3d benches a chance ?
To ALL conspiracy-and-cheats-believers: Lay down and have some rest ... if you think benchmarking is all about cheating, you should better stop and go fishing.
HOLLY MOTHER OF GOD!!! You took the WR in a big way. Congrats on that OPB.
Oh, ...
Need a helping hand? My salary can be watching you break records and polish RAM sticks :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
Thank you :toast:
Translate English :toast:
http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...9&postcount=45
Congratulations article civalize look great ~ ~ mad for a long time ... finally succeeded crashed into the realm of p ... Little did she expect that she would P5WDH break ... is a terrible ... this will not be the mastermind of a lazy oh ... every day ... haha he was Fansi Yesterday, I even told him I maxmem discuss the problem anymore.I was never really in Unadvisable apply maxmem is to be set up like 104 or 512 ... 600 ... 256 is not expected.104 is the right time, but the memory is there in the 2x512.to double the original to be the best way to deal with the proper and stable than 104mb.
http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...2&postcount=49
Congratulations less frenzy, the first eight seconds when the male vein lower than roro 19mhz, pi has a fast 0.2 seconds.fsb os and it is very important not know Vcore number, and C is his u is the same?Unfortunately, some feel that C is his shoulders.If the measurements above the 5.8 GHz band should be 1.73v 5526 pi 8.5 seconds on the strength of this proportion could not be considered;Before I go 5566mhz also try using 14x400 5600mhz.na run 1,200 2:3.4-4-3 ... the pi 1m 1m 9.125s 5566mhz worse there than in 1 :1 position, the higher the frequency, the greater the burden mch and ram, the relatively higher Vcore increases,cpu load greater, although the frequency of super elevated,But, it will reduce the efficiency of C. .. This is the great debate yesterday and today .. So I put vcore dropped 1.75v.vmch use 1.9v, 2.55v vdimm use all reasonable limits,coupled with the transfer of the regulation has, naturally fast. omega 8m run on the very fact of God.I like it there is no way to break the 16m, I have to go to 8m.The result is 0.372 lose the next bar .. like ..
Hey dudes, do you really think that XIP like OPB or coolaler need to cheat for getting WR? Two days ago i saw an excellent overclock of s.O.t, and saw OPB benching hard. Now I see that OPB got a WR and the first 8.XXX 1m result, and all italian people begin to doubt of a master of overclocking.
Dudes do you really think that OPB need cheating to get it? I dont wanna generalice but IMHO all italians were hoping a italian spi1 wr, and now they see that a taiwanese oc master got it before... just complaining? I dont know... only know that just suck.
Id never doubt of a dude like opb, coolaler, or all PRTeamJapan, beacause they have too high reputation to loose it only for cheating...
Coolaler? He is more like OC teacher in Taiwan Now, He gave me his best OC concept when I was noob.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett
He will continue to bench and get the awesome results as usual.:)
Hey Kevin.... be careful, Godfather is coming back... :)
Please go on with your superb ocs and benches and don't pay attention to ridiculous people... the steak was to big for their stomach
Some of the translation is totally wrong, some is correct...
you got about 70%
you can ask if shamino wanna read that;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
:toast: well done OPB :toast:
Great result OPB.
How much work this took shows that 8 seconds would be extremely hard. I think we might be stuck in 9's until 45 nm.
OPB he is the king of de spi and OC
The one who doubts OPB's word is for envy....
That I am a fan of OPB:banana:
regards
I was too busy to read this thread last night. Anyways, I am here now. Gratz Kevin! :clap: and can you please go get some sleep now? I beg you bro.... get some sleep. Don't make me call your gf and ask her force you to. :p:.
Just take it easy for today.
Jason is right! You deserve some booze and massage :D , my TREAT! :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
it is a simple translation by google ;)
it isn't has me to contact other people to check what you say on the forum of coolaler, each one must have its idea
I doesn't question the results of the benchs but of the frequencies which made to obtain them :cool:
That make since more 1 Years that you have make screens with scores/Fréquency incredible and that nobody can make…
You have surely a OS and tweaks out of the commun run for carried out performances also enormous but accumulated all this, some start has to have some doubt on the level of these tweaks magic ....
But for me to make a benchs and then to lower the frequency (Setfsb, clock gen….) to make believe very good tweaks has is very easy A to make and it is what seems most logical with the questions that I am posed since more than 1 year… :cool:
And this makes him a xtreme oc tweaker, he is OPB :)Quote:
Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
if OC was only frequency probably anyone with ln2 = xtreme legend or something like this...:rolleyes:
Nice to conclude that OPB is untouchable :D
Too many fans... They don't understand something : the score is real but the bench frequency is around 150MHz higher.
Coolaler reached 9 sec on 5526mhz, this result was reached on 5549mhz.Quote:
Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
The record has fallen, get used to it.
you think that i don't know the impartance of alpha timings? in the screen there are also Memtest with all alpha timings :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzimark
i write what i think and i think with my head... that's all.
how do you think that i can prove the contrary?
i know only that the time for the frequency is strange, ok the optimizations, but i know also that gained 0.3seconds at this frequency is very hard, morever not VS a neewbie, but under serious team overclockers with very good so. maybe OPB and coolaler have a new super tweacking metods.
sorry OPB, i don't have nothing against you and sorry for the flame in this topic. :)
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by jmax_oc
if you can totally manipulate the question I list below, I can say, you even can do better than I did here. Just like Omega-san's 8m is untouchable even I use 5450 and still 0.3s short and he only used 5369mhz I think maybe you need to doubt that as well.;)
************************************************** **
Since Alex from the Italy Shark Team PM me, I think I can post here
about the hint I gave him:
but I use question ask you instead of Answer
Have you try to compare the windows 2000 achitecture with xp and 2003 original by checking the each file
allocation size you set? or you just use default?
What and how you set or deal with your paging file for virtual memory usage ? is there any difference before
and after you doing the well-know copy-waza tweak? How far you understand the copy-waza tweak?
How good that you understand exactly what type of service you need to keep and abandon when you bench super pi?
Have you really observe the reaction after you change the frequency from either setfsb or clock-gen and
immediately running super pi and got what type of error message? and what kinda error message you get?
Not exactly run or not convergent in sqr? and what is that ?
have you tried stop the calculation in the middle of running and NOT cleaning the cache(run a 16k then re-do
it) and run it over..? and what result will be? faster or slower?
have you think about just using keyboard instead of mouse to operate that calculation ?
under 9 :rolleyes:
go s.o.t. :banana: next step under 8 sec and 6 ghz :toast: :banana: :woot:
Opb, u'll can try my requests there are some pages? :)
To the haters- if you think XS is filled with people with their heads in the sand, you're sorely mistaken. I for one noticed right off the bat the discrepancy between the 9.156s time and the 8.906s time. I'm sure many others that offered congrats did as well.
Did we run in here yelling that OPB faked something? No, and not because we're not paying attention, but because its a question of respect. Cheated results have been posted here before, but there's a right and wrong way to bring them to light.
Making accusations this sharp a) is unfounded and b) demonstrates a lack of class.
Anyone that's benched seriously before knows that stuff rarely goes as planned the first time around. Especially on a medium as difficult to deal with as LN2. Takes trial and error and a lot of experimenting before driving everything home, so its only natural that the second or third attempt comes out significant faster than the first one.
To OPB- thanks for that blip of information. I was scratching my head over the 256 meg Maxmem for hours last night. :p: I'll have to give that a shot along with some lower vcore next time. ;)
nice go opb , i know its treu .
i have seen this tweak to here , this is pure hw/software tweak .
but if some one doubt this like with troman/willes he had the skills to tweak nv all out with not getting any one to believ him .
soon i will show u some off the tweaks damage !
i know that troman/willes reads the forum and he will be back with me ass his voice ;) .
big congrats to u OPB , have a same chip here week that is ;)
This was ran on 12 multi, s.O.T. on 13. In case you don't know anything about overclocking or just missed it, that makes a difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by qballe
You 're more than welcome to catch me anytime for discussion.:)
My full respect.
OPB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
idd GHZ and amd64 tweaked os is not so good for a new intel ;) .Quote:
Originally Posted by G H Z
u need to start from the groud up again !
Amazing WR and tweaking OPB....huge gratz :toast:
:banana::banana::banana::banana:ing amazing, nice 1M :clap:
:D
http://www.wegotcards.com/cards/say/...s/congrats.GIF
lol..this--->http://smile.turpo.net/mopedb.gif
let me recall when I got my first rig ever,
bought all the hardware ride with me back home
and no idea how to put them together.:p:
Congrats OPB for an awesome result :toast:
Congrats man.
it reminds me of myself to,it just hard in the beginning :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
but now you know a little bite more about computers :D
congrats to WR :clap:
In my opinion:
SIMPLY CLAMOROUS!!
I've got nothing new to say... but you cant stop me doing it anyway...
GRATS! AWESOME!
there are plenty of timings that memset can't adjust. ever tried messing with things like tIS? (defined by jedec as "Address and Command Input Setup Time Before Clock ") :toast: :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ludus
It seems there's a new spot here:
http://img54.imageshack.us/img54/594/breilmu8.jpg
I can't believe all the people making accusations.
OPB is a respected member and a guy like him cheating is not even possible.
Everyone knows the power of superpi tweaks and OPB has been here for years teaching us all how to do it right.
If you think OPB is a cheater, you are a noob, and you haven't been here long enough to know the community.
Like I said, OPB has more respect on these forums then most, and insulting him like that is uncalled for and unfounded. There are much better ways to get OPB to share his tweaks, as he has never tried to hide them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
LOL, and now you are Top DOG.....
:bows: :bows: :bows: :bows:
Cheating ?
True overclocker is not cheater, instead is a addict.
Addict to achieve more WR and challenge more impossibility.
OPB, way to go!!
It's always good to witness such legendary achivements.
Congra.
SC
wow, just crazy. Mad props dude!
Hmm who will believe a single benchmark result of team italy from now on? In Spain we say "Don't trust those who doesn't trust"Believe me when I say the first memory module I plug took me around 2 minutes, trying to be 150% sure it plugged perfectly parallel to the motherboard, trembling in fear of breaking it :D:D:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
You can compare coolaler results vs OPB I think they both used same tweaks and results speak for them self?s
coolaler
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/WR...26_9000S_1.gif
OPB
http://www.ocxtreme.org/onepagebook/...906spi1mwr.jpg
OPB with higher frequency, Fsb , better memory he can easly break 9 seconds and if he is a faker how he can get his result validated and coolaler result validated to and why the hell he waited so long to post these result he could even break all AMD super pi records that will give him better credit
SO now you make him a hell of a programmer that can easily breaks super pi code easily
________
medical marijuana patients
5526 and memory 425 vs 5549 and memory 462, same timmings
HOW COULD BE FAKE? ;)
OPB ftw this time :D
sorry guys....if you are italian...american.....spanish..ecc..ecc..don't worry, bench is a moment of godiment (only or with a member) If you don't think that this results is true (...or caused by a hardware selected)....is a relative problem....I have my heart...perfect...I ask a question to OPB. If you are...in a good way....why don't post your totally configuration?...I don't ask you a optimization...but only the type of bios....:stick:
Overclock is an art...not a sport...
So team Italy are making all that noise to know all the configuration and what Bios OPB used come on you can do better than thisQuote:
Originally Posted by Ghost
You can ask politely without any false accusation
________
easy vape
Very nice OPB, I think it was inevitable that it was going to be broken soon :D.
Bios won't show you anything to improve any super pi performance.
here are 2 pictures, figure it out why there are 20 seconds different.
how and why? you could be aware of now by the theme on and off along with different maxmem setting. well even same memory timings, bios, and all the voltage settings. what do you wanna say? OPB cheat again? ;)
Go figure it out.
http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/4...s43032mtj8.jpg
http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5...3032mtpcd7.jpg
there are lots of things which can easily shave off 20 seconds and more :)
OPB i've been testing 600MB maxmem along with some lower values and an odd thing happens with 32M runs............all runs aside from 32M run fine............32M just won't finish....it doesn't error but just slows down to buggery
i found that ~250MB maxmem to do best 1M and 8M times consistently....i guess different mix of hardware will give different results
Well done OPB :toast: :toast: Great achievement you are tops mate
who said men cant multitask lol :banana: :banana:
I must add guys that I have noticed differences in my humble benches at same frequencies and memory timmings... by even oc with bios and then setting with clock gen as compared to just setting in bios,board could be setting different timmings for all the unseen timings, so that is just one way besides tweaks you can get different results
Also stability /temps / seat/and luck all work different every bench and lets face it that was not one run ;)
I wanna say the former is lacking LargeSystemCache. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
About coolaler vs. s.o.t., I have a gut feeling that perhaps the Bad Axe is a bit faster than the P5W DH when the 1066 strap is used.
dinos, yes but try 256mb you might gain more;) and 8m I am not sure yet, I will give 384 a shot.
well Gautam buddy, I am not done yet. Let me show them this, if they really want some, why not?;) but they gotta pay some effort to fill this up, they should feel good, I did not leave the session manager /subsystem parameters empty. some of this settings are exactly what I got before the bench.
************************************************** ******
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Drivers32]
"aux"="xxxxxx.dll"
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\FileSystem]
"ConfigFileAllocSize"=dword:00000xxx
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curre ntVersion\Explorer]
"DesktopProcess"=dword:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\PriorityControl]
"Win32PrioritySeparation"=dword:
"IRQ8Priority"=dword:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\Update]
"UpdateMode"=dword:
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\desktop\windowmetrics]
"MinAnimate"=" "
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\Session Manager\Memory Management]
sometimese clearpagefileatshutdown, but depends
"DisablePagingExecutive"=dword:
"IoPageLockLimit"=dword:
"LargeSystemCache"=dword:
"SecondLevelDataCache"=dword:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\Session Manager\Executive]
"AdditionalCriticalWorkerThreads"=dword:
"AdditionalDelayedWorkerThreads"=dword:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\FileSystem]
"NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate"=dword:
"NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation"=dword:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\AeDebug]
"Auto"=" "
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curre ntVersion\Policies\Explorer]
"NoActiveDesktop"=dword:
"ClassicShell"=dword:
"NoActiveDesktopChanges"=hex:
"NoCustomizeWebView"=hex:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\Session Manager\SubSystems]
"Windows"=hex(2):25,00,53,00,79,00,73,00,74,00,65, 00,6d,00,52,00,6f,00,6f,00,\
74,00,25,00,5c,00,73,00,79,00,73,00,74,00,65,00,6d ,00,33,00,32,00,5c,00,63,\
00,73,00,72,00,73,00,73,00,2e,00,65,00,78,00,65,00 ,20,00,4f,00,62,00,6a,00,\
65,00,63,00,74,00,44,00,69,00,72,00,65,00,63,00,74 ,00,6f,00,72,00,79,00,3d,\
00,5c,00,57,00,69,00,6e,00,64,00,6f,00,77,00,73,00 ,20,00,53,00,68,00,61,00,\
72,00,65,00,64,00,53,00,65,00,63,00,74,00,69,00,6f ,00,6e,00,3d,00,31,00,30,\
00,32,00,34,00,2c,00,36,00,31,00,34,00,34,00,2c,00 ,35,00,31,00,32,00,20,00,\
57,00,69,00,6e,00,64,00,6f,00,77,00,73,00,3d,00,4f ,00,6e,00,20,00,53,00,75,\
00,62,00,53,00,79,00,73,00,74,00,65,00,6d,00,54,00 ,79,00,70,00,65,00,3d,00,\
57,00,69,00,6e,00,64,00,6f,00,77,00,73,00,20,00,53 ,00,65,00,72,00,76,00,65,\
00,72,00,44,00,6c,00,6c,00,3d,00,62,00,61,00,73,00 ,65,00,73,00,72,00,76,00,\
2c,00,31,00,20,00,53,00,65,00,72,00,76,00,65,00,72 ,00,44,00,6c,00,6c,00,3d,\
00,77,00,69,00,6e,00,73,00,72,00,76,00,3a,00,55,00 ,73,00,65,00,72,00,53,00,\
65,00,72,00,76,00,65,00,72,00,44,00,6c,00,6c,00,49 ,00,6e,00,69,00,74,00,69,\
00,61,00,6c,00,69,00,7a,00,61,00,74,00,69,00,6f,00 ,6e,00,2c,00,33,00,20,00,\
53,00,65,00,72,00,76,00,65,00,72,00,44,00,6c,00,6c ,00,3d,00,77,00,69,00,6e,\
00,73,00,72,00,76,00,3a,00,43,00,6f,00,6e,00,53,00 ,65,00,72,00,76,00,65,00,\
72,00,44,00,6c,00,6c,00,49,00,6e,00,69,00,74,00,69 ,00,61,00,6c,00,69,00,7a,\
00,61,00,74,00,69,00,6f,00,6e,00,2c,00,32,00,20,00 ,50,00,72,00,6f,00,66,00,\
69,00,6c,00,65,00,43,00,6f,00,6e,00,74,00,72,00,6f ,00,6c,00,3d,00,4f,00,66,\
00,66,00,20,00,4d,00,61,00,78,00,52,00,65,00,71,00 ,75,00,65,00,73,00,74,00,\
54,00,68,00,72,00,65,00,61,00,64,00,73,00,3d,00,31 ,00,36,00,00,00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\AeDebug]
"Auto"=" "
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curre ntVersion\Policies\System]
"SynchronousMachineGroupPolicy"=dword:
"SynchronousUserGroupPolicy"=dword:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\lanmanserver\parameters]
"AutoShareWks"=dword:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\W32Time\TimeProviders\NtpClient]
"SpecialPollInterval"=dword:
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop]
"AutoEndTasks"=" "
"NoResolveTrack"=dword:
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curre ntVersion\Explorer]
"DesktopProcess"=dword:
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curre ntVersion\Policies\Explorer]
"NoRecentDocsHistory"=dword:
are those registry edits or what?
awesome 1m time opb. :banana:
congratz :) :clap:
opb what happened with cpt insano :eek:
Quote:
In honor of Conway Stevens, from now on,
OPB's official Bench WILL BE all in the name of Cpt. Insano.
RIP my dear bro.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
he passed away, like 3 weeks ago i think i read about it on ocxtreme
ys and if u look good u see that thy are not all te samê like a A64set ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by wtkprol
Quote:
Originally Posted by blind_ripper
Thanks for the point out.
here is another hint to figure out.
have you been really aware of how much system memory usage you have when you bench super pi?
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/555...emusagenq9.jpg
Im finding all these hints valuable OPB, cheers mate and congrats
LOL Kev never gets a break here, its always someone pointing the finger at him and saying hes a cheater, to all those who claim he cheats, either have some proof or STFU..
Hes a world class competitor, who goes all out on these benchies, just to have a buncha cry babies here trying to bash him..
Good job Kev.
Wow nice OPB. :clap:
Nevermind the haters.
They will always doubt. :fact:
Since something is a strange thing, it comments. Since Pai-1M and OS are software, the same time does not always come out. It may accelerate, if some software is operated. It is called WAZA to make this acceleration always act. Even if it makes it tuning of OS as for MAXMEM, it accelerates similarly. WAZA etc. is not using my record. If it uses, it may be becoming 0.1-0.2 seconds quick. I think that I am splendid WR because OPB-san has reported whichever it makes it. It is because OPB-san believes that it is splendid Overclocker. OPB-san please carry out WR achievement also of except for 1M at this tune. Or [ that purport of a letter is amusing since he is poor at English ]. It bears.
thanks very much Kaz-n -san,
you have been contiunously encourging me since the day I got the WR of X6800 highest freq.
I got much inspiration from Kyosen, Omega, hideo and fredyama-san, I have never doubt because I understand thatis not just a simple theory you can put the pot on CPU and fill it up with full of LN2.
they are all just giving him compliments really :D the man is a machineQuote:
Originally Posted by [cTx]Philosophy
sorry to hear about Cpt.Insano :(
yes. you are really awesome !!! no doubt!!
just leave them into there own tower, They always doubt. !!
Spi 88k and 88832k??Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
How is it possible?
Sigh, that's why VictorWang is XIP;), I used to ask him this question.
why NOT? You never seen this before doesn't mean it can't be.:)
That merely means when running copy-waza to almost end, the whole system memory usage will be decreased to the smallest amount; however, it will jum up back little bit especially when the moment you are ready to close the explorer.exe.
hummm I look at that http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread.php?t=137945Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
A thread should be made about COPY WAZA...
childish ruggero ... in fact you just wanna know the OPB's optimization secret ?
even you know his optimization method
i think you can't do this all yours life
廢物
Opb, I did what you put in your thread from Coolaler and I havent always that
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/555...emusagenq9.jpg
it's in a reg?
:clap:
How was the Record before C2D arrived?:D
iLL
Only the essential services are running. The Windows Shell (explorer.exe) was finalized. Make a copy of SUPERPI folder to a RAMDRIVE and change its priority. Anything more?