Dudes! He just posted 8sn SP 1M and you're still talking about AMD vs. Intel?!?!
Dudes! He just posted 8sn SP 1M and you're still talking about AMD vs. Intel?!?!
It's roughtly 25s total for each of the 4 instacnes of Super PI 1M, he was taken screenshots at 3 distinct time indexes.Quote:
Originally Posted by SamHughe
:D :D :D hehehehQuote:
Originally Posted by alpha0ne
Looks like the CPU-Load History graph would suggest otherwise.Quote:
Originally Posted by coldpower27
i was wondering about this, do you add them up or something to get the results to compare to a single core, or how does that work?Quote:
Originally Posted by coldpower27
OC 2.7g@cinebench2003
fast than 2.4g 2sec
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/13.gif
mickeymouse has one but i think he had like one 7900GT at the time or something or atleast thats the only score i remember seeing from him wiht that, he was running at 3ghz and got like 7k something on 3dm06 with the single GTQuote:
Originally Posted by XFxGeforced
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloody_Sorcerer
Oh.... I really doubt it.
I think I just pooped a little.
spi@quadcores
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/14.gif
change cores to single
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/15.gif
spi@singlecore
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/16.gif
singlecore is no better and make slower
:eek2: ljwkefhklwehfkljef....i just shat myself....
...twice
very nice indeed...
i||uSi0n^
oc 2.8g@cinebench2003
broke 17s
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/17.gif
this is sweet. I just wish I knew how much it was blowing everything out of the water..... I'm not a benchmarker in the past. or currently. but maybe the future.
I think that beats my XP Barton 2800+ @ 1.3 GHz :mad: someone touched the compy without permission..
Very nice:toast:
Kentsfiled:banana: :banana:
holy god....
Respirator time:D
oc 2.9g@cinebench2003
16.4S
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/18.gif
oc 3.0g@cinebench2003
16.0S
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/19.gif
Just for reference,Quote:
Originally Posted by coolaler
The Quad Core PowerMac G5 2.5Ghz scored 1102
You've just gone mad.
This is the point were fast gets another meaning, Intel....
I think I'd want one of these :)
Could we please see a Rosetta bench with this monster?
-k0nsl
dual dualcore to be exact. Anyone got the benches hanging around for some comparrison?Quote:
Originally Posted by cMw
As amazing as that cpu is, i think i might just go with E6600 this year and prolly E6800 or X6900 next year. I still prefer higher clock dual core since OC ability should be better, less heat. Hate to be a stickler, but the super pi 1M score wasnt that good, and it will prolly be $999. In that case, i think i am going for a X6900 4Ghz (or more) air 24/7 :) Well if its not $999 then count me in.
That's just brutal cinebench results!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ethernal
Quote:
Originally Posted by ethernal
I would think that software needs to be (re-)written to take full advantage of four cores and beyond.Quote:
Originally Posted by accord99
Brutal, really brutal. You could play 2 games at the same time, and run Rosetta twice, and don't feel it :p
wow it sure performs well in the right application
and whats AMD doing ?
Using DDR2 and nothing else.
No performance increase at all.
They must be having some serious meetings around the board room table.
How about jumping forward 18 months right now ...!?!
I just woke up, asking myself why so many people where in the intel section.
well here's the anwser.
Results a skyrocketing again. And it's just the begining!
Good luck there. Awesome to see this
Nice results coolaler. Do we know the prices for this monster?
whoa kentfield is already here? Dont think Hector Ruiz can say "cpu power doesnt matter" about this one.
A multimedia monster.
Thanks for showing us.
Man, that is simply great. What I will like to know is that what kind of cooling was used.
Amaizing chip
Run 3D06 :eek: You might be the first to break 4K CPU score, I don't think it has ever been done :woot:
again hate to be a stickler:
E66 1.54v 4G daul 1M PASS! 1.5V 3.9G dual 32M PASS on AIR
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=103918
but then again, with better stepping im sure the kentsfield will OC well
rosetta, gaming, breaking WRs, encoding videos at the sametime! :)
AMAZING RESULTS AS ALWAYS !!!
btw - will this cpu be supported by Bad Axe rev 304 ?
can someone tell ?
18? 12 months from now AMD sells a genuine quad core K8L with shared L3 cache and major IPC improvements, while Intel hasn't released this 2x2 mockup quad CPU... what's wrong with this?Quote:
Originally Posted by graham_h
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...9&postcount=87Quote:
Originally Posted by HiJon89
coolaler got a '06 score of 3519 at stock
this is some brutal stuff. All there is to it is to write applications that can use quad cores. This cpu shure does show allot of strenght in benchmarks coded fop multy cores.
Quad cores reveald so soon. Nice colaler;)
Still right now for the future 2 years i would go with conroe for gaming, this is a legacy chip in my mind it fits the server market more then for average consumer. All thou it all might change in future if Nvidia codes each core to work for one of the Gpu cores. It could be all about drivers. 2xsli GX2 anyone:toast: ?
You have same performance @ 3 GHz than 3.2 GHz ... Everest says 2.89 GHz in all case.
Why ?
What a twit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pjotr
Because your "genuine" QC exists on paper right now and might have its ass on a plate to this "mockup".
People are being too quick to dismiss AMD. But they forget we don't get any Eng. samples tested (without NDA) from them untill a few weeks before the final product is launched. It's a very different case from Intel, Kentsfield is about 10-12 months away still, you could compare this to someone testing K8L under socket M2 already.
Appart from that, congrats on the tests Coolaler and thanks for those ridiculous scores. Me want one.
Wrong place for such an argument ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Pjotr
January 2007, this sucker or an even probaly an even better edition will hit the streets, while AMD still havnt got anything better then their current AM2 CPU class... - Later AMD will launch their "I got too much money to spend on a computer" edition with possibility of multiple CPU's..
AMD's history untill they pull off some 65nm quadcore CPUs with anti-hyperthreading..
Was there a limit of 4 cpus/cores atm?Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
very nice results. im not keen on the 2 seperate dies, but 4 cores is still fun.
any word on when an intel quad core will be coming out that will have one die for all 4 cores?
This cpu :slobber:
4 core :eek:
Very nice score and stuff Coolaler :)
:woot:
pr0n!
What to do if you meet someone of AMD:
http://www.zve-opleidingen.nl/images/rean-pic.gif
Didn't think we'd be getting results so soon; nice work.
How about getting some screenshots of load and idle for each core and all cores with "Core Temp" running?
It got to be interesting to see some temps readings.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMa
Thanx for sharing, that will save many lives :p:
I hope there will be mainstream Kentsfields during H1 2007, lets hope Intel decide to go 1333FSB with them on or shortly after launch so there can be 1066FSB Quads for the rest of us. Sub $500 Quads! (..and who is dreaming now? :rolleyes: )
Nah, you just plug your ears while they dream on about how bandwidth starved Intels are, and not being real quad-core.Quote:
Originally Posted by SMa
some different..
http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c1...2/DSC03415.jpg
Dear cookie, what do you mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by hicookie
Im a bit slow, its early mornin' here ;) (12:44 AM)
Kentsfield is 2 Conroes so the heat output should be twice as high theoretically. That doesnt prevent it from OC'ing 33% on stock volts so I would like to see what temps really are, or does temperature meannothing to this beast?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
Sweet Jebus man :toast:
*bow* ^^
Thanks for showing.
The new cray super computer will have 24K of AMD Quad Procs think 24K with Kentsfield :slobber:
Did you run 32M?
:woot:
Will it be "Core 2 Quadro" ? :confused:
That his Kentsfield looks different ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
yup, i got chip 3monthes ago,looks a bit different;)Quote:
Originally Posted by C3
Based on their stellar track record getting FUBARed is the rule , not the exception.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitriman
Don't you think some are to quick to give credit to AMD ?
Remove IHS coolaler and show us 4 naked egg's :D
Um there are 2 small eggs... :slap:Quote:
Originally Posted by MaSell
http://www.ixbt.com/news/digimage/bc...tsf_live/1.jpg
What PSU do I need 4 that CPU, in Europe energy is realy expensive :lsfight:
Probably not more then the PSU you need with a P4 660Quote:
Originally Posted by Alante
It has been done with dual and quad Opterons a few times ( ;) ) but I think you are right if you meant it has not been done with an Intel yet. But it feels like it is done within a week or so...Quote:
Originally Posted by HiJon89
Impressing CPU I must say! And it does not seem impossible to clock it quite(?)alot higher...
Provide a link, becuase I'm pretty sure that is plain BS.Quote:
Originally Posted by blossa
You are claiming there is a dual opteron system that can get 4000+ CPU score in 3dMark06? You sure you aren't confusing it with overall score? Or did the winky smily mean you were kidding?
Anyways this thread is about Kentsfield and the thread crapping needs to stop.
Thank you so much for all your work so far, Coolaler. I think alot of people would be interested to know about temps (is it 95W TDP and cooler from the picture?), as well as seeing some of the media and encoding benchmarks at overclocked speeds.
In particular I'm curious to see your tpMPEG encode of that file you have at 2.9-3.0GHz so I can compare it to your data from the 2.9-30GHZ Conroe encodes that you did.
Cheers!
Not mine but anyway:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=279171
Edit: If interested, this is my posted CPU-score (can only have one result published):
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=325828
Wow, I didn't expect to see Quad core so soon.
This is getting ugly, kenstfield is Intel just twisting the knife they stabbed in AMD's heart with conroe.
Yea Quad Core's are nice when you want to do some rendering or/and encoding, for gaming and most other apps it won't be much of a gain at least for near future.
Coolaler - you have the BEST contacts dude, I cant keep up!
Looking good for 07 :)
funny u mention that, i think the guys over at epic have something planned for 2007 that makes use of the four coresQuote:
Originally Posted by Karak
:)
Coolaler you always seem to be the one to show us all the great new stuff coming out so keep it coming!
I cant wait to see some 3D action with this thing.
Was there any BIOS update needed?
wow great stuff coolaler, thanks for this info
http://img468.imageshack.us/img468/5382/omg8wq.jpg
That's what I call the Coolaler effect :D
Hicookie got a conroe XE 2.93Ghz :
http://www.overclocking-masters.com/...ute-,t3153.htm
awesome results only at default frequancy :slobber:
DDRII1040 2gb@Quadcore Platform
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/24.gif
what a cinebench 9.5
12s :banana:
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/20.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by markodude
Second best, I guess :DQuote:
Originally Posted by hicookie
Thanks for the results :slobber: :slobber:
And any temp readings?
CPU Temp@3.0G(Vcore=1.42v)
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...ENSFIELD/7.JPG
CPU Temp@2.4g(Vcore=1.42v)
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...ENSFIELD/8.JPG
48 Degree Celsius on a Heatsink with the fan off that is impressive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldpower27
if thats the tuniq tower, the fan isnt off... its in the middle.
where is the "we got cookies" pic?:banana:
4spi real time
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/25.gif
compare with 1spi real time
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/26.gif
it's really impressive :toast:
Nice nice nice,
I will wait for the die shrink and a true Quad core version, which probably should come maybe 4Q 2007? maybe? does anyone know?
Will it work with my Conroe Motherboard? :P soo many questions, so many much idle time between now and 2007 :toast:
Oooh. That nice Powerful.
oh my, :CTF:
thats really impressive of intel.
I cant wait to see the real quad core.
great work coolaler :toast:
4spi32m real time @2.4g
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/10.JPG
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/11.JPG
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/12.JPG
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/13.JPG
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/14.JPG
6s range @4spi among
Compare with 1spi32m real time
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/15.JPG
must be the ULTIMATE folding machine!!! :rolleyes:
lol....never thought I'll see you here..... LandShark@roadfly :DQuote:
Originally Posted by M3 CSL
something doesn't look right in the Coolaler's #195 ^^
Compare the taskmgr time (length of high graph) with the times posted for SPi32.....she don't fit.
t
are you even serious? what are you trying to say?Quote:
Originally Posted by taemun
done;)Quote:
Originally Posted by taemun
fast than 4spi 6minutes
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/16.JPG
Core 2 Quadro is my guess.Quote:
Originally Posted by cpuz
What TDP Kensfield have ? :confused:
do me a favour and name it Core Quad-o.............this would be comedy gold.....hey there's no reason not to have a bit of a sense of humour with these :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :DQuote:
Originally Posted by cpuz