Printable View
1 is my vote. or method 3. you take the highest clock from each member and have the 2 top members of each team and have a live vid cam stream of them cleaning off all the insulation and conformal etc off the boards and check with a blacklight to make sure all the residue is off. then they have to send their board back to rma replacements. the guy that gets his replacement board back from the rma 1st wins the contest.Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
knock knock...who's there?
New HWBOT Rev? What? I'm out of the loop.
The biggest change was the replacement of the Pro-OC League by the Pro OC Cup. There is also a poll to bring back the Pro OC League.
Happy Pi Day! :up:
Happy Easter! :)
added a few points to the team today:
http://hwbot.org/submission/2371182_...calculate=true
Nice work, Dave! :up:
You nailed it Dave, nice wr!
That is one heck of a sys you have, well done! :clap:
Thanks guys, trying to get the 1024m record but I'm using win7-64 Ultimate and I see the top 2 guys using Vista Ultimate and win2K8 server
Asked around last night and those are better????? Any info??
Dave use Server 2k8 non R2 it is a stripped version of Vista. You will probably have to go to the System Properties then to the Advanced Tab and then Performance and then Advanced tab and make sure it is set to adjust for best performance of applications and not background
Yup, Thanks..Downloading it now.,.:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Planet
Not a lot for this but a little anyway:
http://hwbot.org/submission/2371421_...calculate=true
One way or the other I'll get the wPrime 1024M record by next week or you'll hear stories about this old guy pulling out what little hair he has left! :D
^ On a roll Dave, great job!
I'm trying!:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by l0ud_sil3nc3
Nice UCBench score! :)
I noticed you were running 36x100MHz on your older scores, and now you're running 34x106MHz. Is ~ 3600MHz the limit of the chips?
Chips themselves are limited to a 34 multi on all cores, 36 on 4 cores, 38 on 1-2 cores.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don_Dan
On the older scores I was limited to 100BCLK..This board has settings to 106BCLK
The screen shots could vary due to EIST( speed step) at the time they were taken.
Wait till late next week..I have a new bios coming..
FX-8120 planned for this week, thanks for Daveburt716 for sending it :)
Early batch (release), runs hot, goes fast with not so much voltage...seems like a good candidate for LN2, I have an itch for 8 GHz and faster DDR3 speed...
Also 565 BE, wPrime 32M/1024M 3 core global points.
Got some more points for the team today with my 955, also missed 1st place 32M by 1 second :(
I broke top 400 for Xtreme OC league...
I see, I didn't know that the multi was different for the number of cores.Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Your 955 scores are among the fastest scores ever made on AMD:Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
1M:
http://imageshack.us/a/img507/8716/b...top10amd1m.jpg
32M:
http://imageshack.us/a/img194/6825/b...top5amd32m.jpg
Great scores and nice benching! :up:
Thanks Daniel :)
Determined to find a 7+ GHz 965...they are about $90 a piece for me brand new, I'll have to buy a few.
After many hours of benching and a few hours of sleep these are my scores from the Awardfabrik Team Session last weekend. You can find pics and more scores in SoF's thread, I'll post my screenshots over there as well. I'll just post the HWBot links here:
E8600:
CPU-Z #94
1M #181
32M #44
PiFast #83
UCBench #1
WPrime 32M #118
WPrime 1024M #80
The UCBench score is not only a category record but also ranked 7th compared to all dual cores at HWBot.
http://imageshack.us/a/img842/1549/b...cbench1404.jpg
E6600:
CPU-Z #41
1M #44 <- Team Cup
32M #11
PiFast #23
UCBench #1
WPrime 32M #101
WPrime 1024M #74
E8200:
CPU-Z #41
1M #45
32M #17
PiFast #40
UCBench #1
WPrime 32M #54
WPrime 1024M #40
Benching after such a long hiatus was great fun, thanks a lot to the Awardfabrik crew for inviting me! :toast:
Not only did I gain a lot of team points, I improved my rank as well:
http://imageshack.us/a/img706/7701/r...before1404.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img843/8567/r...after14042.jpg
444 places gained. Not bad. :D
http://imageshack.us/a/img198/2825/r...ationalaft.jpg
^flucking beast Dan, was just looking at your sig and thinking wow somebodies been benching:D
Nice benching Dan! Good to see you back at it.:)
Just thought I should share my UCBench scores since all of them are #1 in their respective category:
http://imageshack.us/a/img819/8002/e...nch6252mhz.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img842/4381/e...nch4918mhz.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img208/4500/e...nch4721mhz.jpg
The E8600 was doing okay, though I'm about 100 - 150 MHz off from what the pre-owner did. Not sure if the board or I am to blame here, probably me since the board has done higher FSB speeds with the E8400. -.-
The E6600 was much better than expected, I already knew it was a good chip and I had promised the pre-owner to try for 5 GHz under LN2, in the end I could do 1M at 5 GHz and validate at 5.1 GHz.
I bought the E8200 on ebay recently, without much pretesting I quickly checked the max FSB and it did ~600 MHz on air, but on LN2 it turned out to be a rather bad chip, I could only validated 8 x 615 MHz once and all the benchmarks had to be run much lower. CB at -105?C and CBB at -95?C didn't make it any better... :(
And a pic of my setup:
http://imageshack.us/a/img5/8620/set...ioninlange.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by l0ud_sil3nc3
Thanks guys! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by MTP04
David, I saw you put the FX-55 under LN2, did you run any other benchmarks?
21 submissions worth 208.9 points, dang!