since when are capacitors small tan blocks with solder points at each end????.... the C doesn't specify the item lolQuote:
Originally Posted by largon
every resistor I have ever penciled for a mod looks like the one behind the gpu of these cards
Printable View
since when are capacitors small tan blocks with solder points at each end????.... the C doesn't specify the item lolQuote:
Originally Posted by largon
every resistor I have ever penciled for a mod looks like the one behind the gpu of these cards
*facepalm*Quote:
Originally Posted by SNiiPE_DoGG
O RLY?
Are you sure you have actually been pencilling resistors?Quote:
every resistor I have ever penciled for a mod looks like the one behind the gpu of these cards
:ROTF:
The only way to avoid disappointment would be to close oneself in a hut in the Arctic until April 6th...everything else is speculation.
Perkam
Capacitor:Quote:
Originally Posted by largon
http://www.germes-online.com/direct/..._Capacitor.jpg
Resistors:
http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/3...tbeforetn6.jpg
Is there something I'm missing here? if so then please explain to me dont mock me :shakes:
Google for "surface mount ceramic capacitor".
Among the nigh-random images you'll spot these.
you could have said that in your first post instead of making an ass of yourself... any reasonable person can see where the confusion is --- they look the sameQuote:
Originally Posted by largon
/me graps popcorn and keeps enjoying the circus show.
nm :)
who cares about the difference between resistors and capacitors, lets just make more rumors about this awesome new, non-re-badged ATI card.
We actually don't know that yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
Has anyone seen this thread yet? Shows some preliminary results which are taken with a grain of salt.
I hope those numbers aren't true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle
A 4870 1GB with a Core i7 965 scores 16.3k in 06 X_X
Perkam
I honestly don't believe they are. Here are my 4870 results using a E8400 @ 3.60GhzQuote:
Originally Posted by perkam
In all honesty, using a 920 should have yielded a higher result, 3D06 is CPU Bound.
3DMark06 is heavy CPU-limited in this case because it's not a 965 but a 920@stock
Stock i7 920 and...
- HD4870 @ 820/1000: 14400 (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=818978)
- HD4890 @ 850/1000: 16000 (http://www.ocheaven.com/news_view.asp?gid=6754)
Considering 3DMark06 is actually a CPU benchmark the increase is CRAAAZY.
:clap::clap: thanks for the research sir. This is gonna be a monster card - voltmods should take it well over 1ghz coreQuote:
Originally Posted by largon
That gpu score of 9801 in vantage is pretty darn good. For reference, a stock 4870 1gb at hardware canucks scores a 8724 so thats 12.3% increase which seems about right.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...review-10.html
Mr.BSEL,
HD4890 also has a 13% higher core freq.
And HWC's benches are with a 3.85GHz Yorkfield.
This review is using a C2Q @ 3.85Ghz.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.BSEL
I'm pretty sure the i7@2.66 is slower.
By the way:
This is so going to be my sig!Quote:
Originally Posted by Shintai (about the RV790 being just an overclocked RV770)
Lol, certain someone still has tough luck with statements related to ATi.
It's incredibly hard to verify speeds based on 3dMark06 across the systems
That said, its GPU score in that puts it very close to a GTX 285, and slightly above the GTX 280
Which could mean that nVidia wont release a GTX275 but give the GTX285 a pricedrop. Several sources have said that the GTX275 release depends on RV790 performance.Quote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
http://i44.tinypic.com/15s7xhh.jpg
HD 4870 1GB + Cat 9.3 (same system) = 10 360 3dmarks ... (7 percent lower score)
i dont know anything, have only screen ...Quote:
Originally Posted by LordEC911