Pifast Benchmark

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

05-30-2005, 08:19 AM
Garrett

2922Mhz Pifast (1122mhz OC lol) :D
Going under 40s won't be possible yet, I'd need some real cold water for that I think :P :woot:
http://img143.echo.cx/img143/3448/4061pifast4ov.th.png
*clickable*
05-31-2005, 09:53 PM
chefnr1

heres mine with very tight memsetting, and water on cpu and gpu :p:
http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfold...d0/pifast3.jpg
06-03-2005, 06:35 AM
Garrett

Finally, below 40 seconds woohoo oh yeah :D :thumbsup: :woot:
http://img85.echo.cx/img85/591/pifast39885ra.th.png
06-03-2005, 07:02 AM
Mauri Antero

Quote:

Originally Posted by chefnr1

heres mine with very tight memsetting, and water on cpu and gpu :p:

with those clocks and timings cannot be 30.39 close 40s is right time
06-08-2005, 08:50 AM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mauri Antero

with those clocks and timings cannot be 30.39 close 40s is right time

and why do you say that i have a faster results with machII that i can show you...
http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfold...d1/pifast8.jpg

why are you doubht on it i get this results every time i run pifast.
my timings : 1.5-2-2-3-7 read premable 4.5
06-08-2005, 12:00 PM
[XC] moddolicous

Wait, isnt the record for PIFAST something like 32's or so by Memsema?
06-08-2005, 12:04 PM
ZMarre

Indeed ChefNr1, your result doesn't fit in the picture :D

My guess: you didn't use the .bat file, but just the .exe and entered your own numbers ;)
06-08-2005, 12:52 PM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZMarre

Indeed ChefNr1, your result doesn't fit in the picture :D

My guess: you didn't use the .bat file, but just the .exe and entered your own numbers ;)

are you cidding me ofcourse i use the bat file , and i dont entered any mumbers at all why you say that, i'll get this results and thats it, why would i cheat on this im just glad it goes that fast, well you sure can ruin a fine score i post. stupid to think that. why type my own numbers? i dont wanna be a cheater i'll get around this score every time i run THE BAT FILE :rolleyes:
and i can use a DVcam and film before and during the test uncut, my son will come in next week and he can film the test an then i'll post it so you can see it, is that good enough for you :p:
06-08-2005, 01:21 PM
[XC] moddolicous

Quote:

Originally Posted by chefnr1

are you cidding me ofcourse i use the bat file , and i dont entered any mumbers at all why you say that, i'll get this results and thats it, why would i cheat on this im just glad it goes that fast, well you sure can ruin a fine score i post. stupid to think that. why type my own numbers? i dont wanna be a cheater i'll get around this score every time i run THE BAT FILE :rolleyes:

It is suspicous (not saying u cheated) but I think the WR is something like 32 or 31. I know for a fact it isnt in the 20's though.
06-08-2005, 01:25 PM
Colin

From Sept 2004 but shows that something is out of whack.
06-08-2005, 01:26 PM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by moddolicous

It is suspicous (not saying u cheated) but I think the WR is something like 32 or 31. I know for a fact it isnt in the 20's though.

read what i edited in my post before this..and it's for sure i'll get this time in pifast using the BAT FILE

Colin thats about 9 months ago!!!!
06-08-2005, 06:11 PM
Colin

True it is but the guys on top are still faster than you are, that's why it still applies.
06-08-2005, 10:17 PM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colin

True it is but the guys on top are still faster than you are, that's why it still applies.

I'm using the latest pifast, running the bat.file... Then how come 33.96 from september 2004 is faster than 28.73? By the way did you check my timings, tight enough for you? or do i detect a spot of jealousy in all of this , it's in black and white 28.73 :fact:
06-08-2005, 10:35 PM
nutcase

1 Attachment(s)

first, All the records were set using Hexus Pifast..

The two runs (ignore scores, were done on my everyday machine) were done like this:

Top one is using Hexus Pifast which uses pifast41.exe

Bottom one is TheLab Pifast which uses Pifast43.exe

Notice over 15 seconds difference between them and they were ran on the same Machine..
06-08-2005, 11:06 PM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag6br

first, All the records were set using Hexus Pifast..

The two runs (ignore scores, were done on my everyday machine) were done like this:

Top one is using Hexus Pifast which uses pifast41.exe

Bottom one is TheLab Pifast which uses Pifast43.exe

Notice over 15 seconds difference between them and they were ran on the same Machine..

so you mean that i have to use an older version to get an acceptable score on pifast? thats look insane to me!!! then all must run with the newer version to get correct scores, since it seems a little bit pointless releasing a new version that shows inreliable results... But still, your post's the one making most sense here, "all other posts seems to be just doubt about me faking the results :slapass: "

EDIT: here it's run in same speed with pifast41
http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfold...fast-38-53.jpg
10 sec difference hmmmm
06-09-2005, 02:35 AM
Mauri Antero

Quote:

Originally Posted by chefnr1

10 sec difference hmmmm

Now you got the right pifast.
06-09-2005, 03:25 AM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mauri Antero

Now you got the right pifast.

ok! but why are they released a newer version that nobody use :confused: the newer is much nicer to run :p:
06-09-2005, 03:26 AM
ZMarre

Quote:

Originally Posted by chefnr1

ok! but why are they released a newer version that nobody use :confused: the newr is much nicer to run :p:

It's simply another version. Hexus <> Pcenter

It uses another algorithm IIRC, wich is little slower.
06-09-2005, 03:48 AM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZMarre

It's simply another version. Hexus <> Pcenter

It uses another algorithm IIRC, wich is little slower.

aha ok well then i have to clock more to get a quicker score :)
06-09-2005, 04:38 AM
Garrett

chefnr1 that's some nice BH-5 you got there... 279 is pretty good... mine maxes out @ 270, that's with 3.7v
06-09-2005, 04:50 AM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garrett

chefnr1 that's some nice BH-5 you got there... 279 is pretty good... mine maxes out @ 270, that's with 3.7v

279 is not the max i can run them in 286 is the fastest with them i've tested but in that speed super-pi and pifast dont wanna play :) this 3d01 is run with 283 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8578684 well it should show 38k and 3114mhz = 283x11 1,1
06-11-2005, 01:14 PM
Maxtor

http://www.no-ip.freehosting123.com/...rschriftTZ.jpg

Max stable oc = 2850 :) With a good powersupply can i break the 42.xx, this 3.3 V line is verry low :mad:

0516GPCW Batch 860
06-11-2005, 02:13 PM
ZMarre

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxtor

With a good powersupply can i break the 42.xx, this 3.3 V line is verry low :mad:

3.3V is mainly used for RAM. Your ram is allready quite high now, so I doubt if you'll get a lot higher with better PSU... :toast:
06-13-2005, 12:51 PM
<Wouter>

hey people, I've got a 205sec :banana: :banana: pifast on my duron 700@9x110 ~pc100@147mhz :P before i tweaked my mem i ran 246sec :slapass:. I hope 160-180sec is possible when i oc my cpu a bit more xtreme.
07-07-2005, 01:36 PM
cpulloverclock

on wc with a venice now

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...ique/39.86.gif
07-07-2005, 02:23 PM
Garrett

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

on wc with a venice now

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...ique/39.86.gif

Noooo..... :(

I hate you so much right now... just kidding awesome job there :)

Here's why I 'hate' you ;)
http://img85.echo.cx/img85/591/pifast39885ra.th.png
07-09-2005, 01:13 PM
cpulloverclock

not lucky :D
at 2976MHz I get 39.71
07-15-2005, 02:35 PM
Tom Holck

3 Attachment(s)

new one

32.99 sek

at 3854 Mhz but the ramspeed is bad. Memkontroller no god at -120 c :(
07-15-2005, 02:39 PM
Garrett

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

32.99 sek

at 3854 Mhz but the ramspeed is bad. Memkontroller no god at -120 c :(

Nice work Tom... now throw some BH5/OCZ VX/Mushkin Redline at it... like 270 or so ;)
07-15-2005, 03:04 PM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garrett

Nice work Tom... now throw some BH5/OCZ VX/Mushkin Redline at it... like 270 or so ;)

It is Mushkin Redline, they can go 280+ fastest timings on air, but the cold bug hold the Memkontroller back in the CPU.... :(
07-16-2005, 12:20 AM
Jack

Tom, does the memory controller give the same problems with 2x 256mb ram?
07-16-2005, 08:38 AM
Garrett

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

It is Mushkin Redline, they can go 280+ fastest timings on air, but the cold bug hold the Memkontroller back in the CPU.... :(

That's a real shame... maybe 2x256 helps like Jack suggests...

Awesome cpu speed anyway :thumbsup:
07-17-2005, 01:32 PM
cpulloverclock

on WC

FX-25 cuz I have the 310p bios :D
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...ique/37.81.gif
07-21-2005, 03:08 AM
k|ngp|n

http://pic8.picturetrail.com/VOL256/.../105281298.jpg

This is on p4gd1. With p4c800, score will get lower I am sure of it, close to full second. Never thought 30.** for hexus pifast could go down so soon.....
07-21-2005, 05:45 AM
Jack

That dothan is working really nice under LN2 :toast:
07-21-2005, 10:54 AM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by k|ngp|n

http://pic8.picturetrail.com/VOL256/.../105281298.jpg

This is on p4gd1. With p4c800, score will get lower I am sure of it, close to full second. Never thought 30.** for hexus pifast could go down so soon.....

nice k|ngp|n, the Fx57 can't do that. The ramspeed is not mutch better than Fx trotteling speed :rolleyes:
I might try that dothan on my cascade
07-21-2005, 11:46 AM
Majistic

from MMOUSE,31.80s at 3750mhz is doable Tom !

http://jason57.iwarp.com/fx57/pifastwramd.JPG
07-21-2005, 11:50 AM
k|ngp|n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Majistic

from MMOUSE,31.80s at 3750mhz is doable Tom !

http://jason57.iwarp.com/fx57/pifastwramd.JPG

The OC' kid is back...other than japs with the old sledgehammers, that is best pifast on fx I have seen to date..tighter than nails on the ram too.... gfj man :toast:
07-21-2005, 01:50 PM
harleybro

:worship: :slobber: :slobber: Wow looks like AMD is bk in the game awesome work! :toast: :toast:
07-22-2005, 02:15 PM
cpulloverclock

Pifast 10M a 3171MHz

AMD WR with a non extreme cooling?
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...ique/37.28.gif
07-26-2005, 02:46 AM
SynGroW

Celeron ''Northwood'' 2.4GHz @ 3651MHz

http://www.hardwaredome.nl/images/sy...ifast/7328.JPG
Validation

Intel Celeron 2400 @ 3651MHz
Epox EP-4GEMI rev 0.1
Corsair TWINX512-3200LLPT v1.1 (BH-5) @ DDR406 3.1v
Prometeia Mach I r134a

There's more left in the CPU, but the motherboard is too crappy to bench it higher. (I actually ran Pifast @ 3740MHz w/o error but the system crashed when I tried to start CPU-Z)
07-26-2005, 12:50 PM
cpulloverclock

always on wc

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...ique/37.00.gif
07-27-2005, 12:45 PM
cpulloverclock

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...ique/36.91.gif
07-28-2005, 06:24 AM
fredyama

WR by New Beetle

By New Beetle

29.27s

M/B：ASUS P4P800-SE #2 Mod + CT-479 / 55MM339*** / BIOS：1009se.004
M/B Bed：「V-TEC ARC Bed Rev.3.3」
CPU：Pentium M 780 / 7506B***
CPU Cooling：「V-TEC ARC Pot Rev.12.0XE」＋LN2
Chipset Cooling：「Tara-chan First Version」+ DICE
Memory：SanMax SMD-51225 B-V PC3200 512MB x2 /DDR400 / CL2.0-2-2-5-4-A-A-A
VGA：ATI XPERT 98 PCI 8MB
HDD：IBM-DTLA-307030 /U-DMA 5 (ATA100)
Power Supply：OCZ PowerStream 520W
Vcore：1.85V（Actual）/ Vddr：3.43V（Actual）/ Vio：3.65V（Actual）
OS：Windows Server 2003

http://premium1.uploadit.org/fredyam...New-Beetle.gif
07-28-2005, 06:53 AM
SynGroW

Wow, under 30s :slobber:

Congrats :toast:
07-28-2005, 11:25 AM
cpulloverclock

congrats NewBeetle

awesome score possible only with a dothan 780
07-28-2005, 11:43 AM
sai

I dunno, these Dothans are kinda lame. That's like SuperPi competing againsr SuperPi SSE2 patched..I mean how you gonna beat that with an AMD. It's just impossible, so where's the fun :rolleyes:
07-30-2005, 02:54 PM
harleybro

Here's jason's latest: :slobber:
http://jason57.iwarp.com/3231.JPG
07-30-2005, 03:06 PM
cpulloverclock

nice
07-31-2005, 06:04 AM
k|ngp|n

Quote:

Originally Posted by PRTeamJapan

By New Beetle

29.27s

M/B：ASUS P4P800-SE #2 Mod + CT-479 / 55MM339*** / BIOS：1009se.004
M/B Bed：「V-TEC ARC Bed Rev.3.3」
CPU：Pentium M 780 / 7506B***
CPU Cooling：「V-TEC ARC Pot Rev.12.0XE」＋LN2
Chipset Cooling：「Tara-chan First Version」+ DICE
Memory：SanMax SMD-51225 B-V PC3200 512MB x2 /DDR400 / CL2.0-2-2-5-4-A-A-A
VGA：ATI XPERT 98 PCI 8MB
HDD：IBM-DTLA-307030 /U-DMA 5 (ATA100)
Power Supply：OCZ PowerStream 520W
Vcore：1.85V（Actual）/ Vddr：3.43V（Actual）/ Vio：3.65V（Actual）
OS：Windows Server 2003

http://premium1.uploadit.org/fredyam...New-Beetle.gif

Incredible scores by NB.
I want to run some pifast on the p4p/p4c now :slobber:
07-31-2005, 08:59 AM
Comp-Freak

1 Attachment(s)

Here I come with my sad score ;) My p4 won't get any higher, maybe soon with phasechange cooling.

- P4 northwood 3,0
- Gigabyte ga-8ik1100 rev 2
- zalman cnps7000 Cu
- 2x Corsair XMS3200C2PT rev 4.2, 256MB, 1:1, 2-3-3-6
08-10-2005, 11:09 PM
SynGroW

Celeron ''Northwood'' 2.4GHz @ 3815MHz

http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/9012/59539rp.jpg

Intel Celeron 2400 @ 3815MHz
Asus P4P800SE
Corsair TWINX512-3200LLPT v1.1 (BH-5) @ DDR398 2.9v
Custom PhCh - Single Stage (Epsilon's Promkiller)

No validation link because the system rebooted when I tried to save that file :mad:
08-13-2005, 09:49 PM
Pedro Rocha

Here is my FX-57, cooled by an MachII ..DFI mem volt jumper still at 3.2v so only 257mhz on the Redlines :)

http://pedrorocha.planetaclix.pt/PIFast_3372_3602.jpg

Anyaway not a bad start ;)
11-27-2005, 03:58 PM
GoriLLakoS

Here is mine at 3520mhz....memory at 3.70V with maximizer ona a dfi sli

http://www.thelab.gr/attachment.php?s=&postid=315976
11-28-2005, 03:14 AM
M.Beier

Uhm, missed this thread..

33.19 sec, reached at netbyte using LN2 on a FX55 clawhammer :)

Aint home, so cant post pictures, but quite some time ago.
06-10-2006, 12:18 PM
fredyama

M780 28.83s WR by New Beetle

By New Beetle

Return match of Pifast with his M780.
Many thanks to Hipro5 for your mods;)

Time: 28.83s
Clock: 4098.2MHz(FSB256.1MHz x 16)
M/B：ASUS P4P800-SE #2 mod + CT-479 mod / 55MM339*** / BIOS：P4P8SE1011.ROM
M/B Bed：「V-TEC ARC Bed Rev.3.3」
CPU：Pentium M 780 / 7506B***
CPU Cooling：「KuriPro２」+ LN2
Memory：SanMax PC3200 512MB x2 + DICE / CL2.0-2-2-5-4-A-A-A
Vcore：1.85V（Actual）/ Vddr：3.40V / Vcca：2.40V / Vio：3.65V
VGA：ATI XPERT 98 PCI 8MB
HDD：IBM-DTLA-307030 /U-DMA 5 (ATA100)
PowerSuplly：Zippy-460WS #2 （3.3Vmod）

http://premium1.uploadit.org/fredyam...New-Beetle.png
08-10-2006, 10:04 PM
zakelwe

k|ngP|n on 18.5s

http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL256.../176350862.jpg

Regards

Andy
09-15-2006, 05:01 AM
Boble76

FX57 with DI, one-timer pifast. 32.88s

http://koti.mbnet.fi/boble76/Tietoko...ast_32.88s.jpg
10-02-2006, 12:00 PM
sierra_bound

X6800 + Vapochill LS

http://img422.imageshack.us/img422/27/pifast2053ci7.jpg
10-02-2006, 12:12 PM
Garrett

I have 36.61... see my sig... pretty pathetic NOW huh? :p:
11-30-2006, 03:52 AM
demiurg

24.45 - E6700 @ 3980MHz (398*10) 1.6V
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=558614
01-11-2007, 04:42 AM
jvargaszabo

Hi, i'm new, but i'm doing a research project about cpu temps when calculating pi. If anybody could post some times temps n cooling methods they used to achieve them, i'd appreciate it. Any information helps.

thx
01-27-2007, 07:09 AM
flclisgreat

i feel dumb for asking this but how many number's are we supposed to calculate?
how many is normal?
01-28-2007, 02:14 PM
Viss

E6600 and P5B dlx:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6.../pif460020.jpg
02-23-2007, 11:41 PM
sysfailur

Quote:

Originally Posted by flclisgreat

i feel dumb for asking this but how many number's are we supposed to calculate?
how many is normal?

hexus.pifast.net download the package, run the bat, not the exe

Also.... (air)

http://www.maximumoc.com/img/hardware/E6600/1667x9.jpg
04-12-2007, 09:37 AM
sparkY1000

Sorry to sound like a complete newb but how do you run this benchmark? It gaves me so many options and im just not sure which ones I want? sysfailur says something about running a bat file but there wasnt one in the download just an exe and a txt
01-14-2008, 11:10 AM
PMM

I Stopped maintaining Pifast because of all the cheating as it is cheatable, I did have a word with the program maker but he was un-interested in sorting a fix.

However its as simple as... downloading .... http://pifast.hexus.net/hexus_pifast.zip

and then run the file hexus_pifast.bat
01-16-2008, 12:29 PM
spaglia

I don't think QuickPi is cheatable. How are the cheats done?
01-17-2008, 10:16 AM
PMM

1 Attachment(s)

A person would have to go to extra lengths to effect QuickPi but I have just confirmed it can be messed with... see pic below

A liitle time and effort and easily made less noticable.
01-17-2008, 07:58 PM
spaglia

Quote:

Originally Posted by PMM

A person would have to go to extra lengths to effect QuickPi but I have just confirmed it can be messed with... see pic below

A liitle time and effort and easily made less noticable.

I see, of course -- changing the system clock skews the times. I was thinking more along the lines of tampering with the output. Ah well, where there is a will, there usually is a way...
01-18-2008, 10:39 AM
spaglia

Quote:

Originally Posted by PMM

A person would have to go to extra lengths to effect QuickPi but I have just confirmed it can be messed with... see pic below

A liitle time and effort and easily made less noticable.

I think I can fix this, anyone interested?
01-20-2008, 05:48 AM
PMM

After running this again on my home machine a few times I like it :) esp as its multicore friendly it kind of brings in a new type of tinkering to get max speed the run above I did at work.

I think if you can certainly put into place....
1) An anti cheat
2) A Validation at the end to confirm the calculation is all is OK
3) Suggest an autorun batch file to say kick off a 10M run as a fixed benchmark standard.

I think you have a winner :nod:
01-20-2008, 07:16 AM
spaglia

Quote:

Originally Posted by PMM

After running this again on my home machine a few times I like it :) esp as its multicore friendly it kind of brings in a new type of tinkering to get max speed the run above I did at work.

I think if you can certainly put into place....
1) An anti cheat
2) A Validation at the end to confirm the calculation is all is OK
3) Suggest an autorun batch file to say kick off a 10M run as a fixed benchmark standard.

I think you have a winner :nod:

Version 4.5 is is available here:

http://home.istar.ca/~lyster/pi.html

Let me know if you can easily cheat it. The app can compute a checksum over all the digits and you can verify the correctness that way (by comparing it to a known good checksum). Use the -check option. Other options are the -bin and -stats options. By submitting the resulting binary file, it can then be independently varified.
01-22-2008, 11:18 AM
PMM

Passed my test but I admit I'm not clued up in the ways of tripping progs up.

I have PM'd Kunnak here in the view if he is willing to put his superior know how to give it a thumbs up.

Excellent work by the way http://www.brittech.co.uk/thumbsup.gif

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:40 AM.

XtremeSystems