Victor, plz do us a favor and post all the results in the first post. its pain to press F5 every 5min to read some irrelevant info, tnks
Printable View
Victor, plz do us a favor and post all the results in the first post. its pain to press F5 every 5min to read some irrelevant info, tnks
Something is going wrong with bios.Quote:
Originally Posted by nCrusader
merom 2G - 5775
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1920378
yonah 2G - 4411
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1918673
Quote:
Originally Posted by kl0012
2x256mb might be doing some harm here - along with onboard graphics ( taking even more ram away) - not sure
I believe that there is an old wise man saying: "dont bite the hand that feeds you." These guys owe nothing to you. Im pretty sure if I got a conroe in the mail before public availability Id be excited enough to tell my buddies on a forum after changing my underwear. Then I would tell them how long I thought it would take to get it working. Then I would be frustrated that it wasnt working. Then it would be made worse by lots of d-bags joining the forum only to :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana: at me for letting my forum know that I got a conroe before I had it working.Quote:
Originally Posted by jebo_4jc
Basically, anyone that joins a forum just to complain to the people on the forum should probably sit down in a nice comfortable chair, and have a nice warm cup of shut the :banana::banana::banana::banana: up.
Cool it guys - let's all stay on the topic - no need to rehash it over and over. It's about Conroe here
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeguava
find the problem at last
the Network Card or it's driver may have some problem.
after installed , cpu always under 25%~35% load...
now , more test coming, see my blog:
it's more easy for me to upload pictures, haha
http://vic.expreview.com/read.php?1
Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
Thanks again for the time and trouble!
I think we are overloading your Host Victor :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
Whole world wants to see...hehehehe
Keep up the great work :D
Only DDR2@533.. :(
Tried with some 512MB sticks?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyderOCZ
:p: that's ok.
welcome all of you.
I'll post PCmark05/3Dmark03/SienceMark2/Cinebench9.5 soon
bios need some fix.Quote:
Originally Posted by R101
cannot support my Micron DDR2 1000 1G*2 and add-on PCIE-VGA Card
Thanks soooo much for that :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
VictorWang
Thank you and good luck :toast:
BTW onboard gfx sux anyway :(
Don't know if it's the RAM size thats not supported or the timings?Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
oh my god.........
you guys are crazy.
to many connection on my blog, even myself cannot enter :(
Bo-Blog Database System Tips: Can not connect to MySQL server
Time: 2006-4-5 4:58pm
Script:
Error: Too many connections
Errno.: 1040
:(
Glad that it worked for you. Usualy its some driver that screwsup and overloads your sys. GJ on finding that it was network card. Great scores in Sisoft. Post thoe pics here:toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
Thank you for the results..
23minute superpi32m, that's pwnage, especially since it's only 2x256ram and cpu usage, lol, simply amazing
:( :( :(Quote:
Bo-Blog Database System Tips: Can not connect to MySQL server
Time: 2006-4-5 5:12pm
Script:
Error: Too many connections
Errno.: 1040
Quote:
Originally Posted by StyM
now it's okay.
fixed the connection limit :p:
woow... thanks a lot.. great 32M results...
It's funny how people kept posting that 32M times would be hindered because once the CPU had to go to Memory, the performance would be reduced greatly. Seems to me 23min wouldn’t be the time of a "hindered computer".
Again, Thank you Victor for dedicating your money and time to inform the rest of us.
Fugger and FCG, Same goes to you. Thank you for what you're both doing. Some may not appreciate it but other certainly do. I’m positive that not many of us would be able to dish out hundreds for a new motherboard or whatever just so they can do some tests for US. So good job and thanks again.
Yum! The 32m score was what I was waiting for and it did not dissapoint. Although the way it ran the 1M I would have guessed the 32M would have been a bit faster. Thanks Victor!
Victor , please test the latency of the caches.Use latency.exe from CPU-Z.
Thanks for your work.