Well that aint no answer biatch :p: :banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Printable View
Well that aint no answer biatch :p: :banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
OK...then maybe you can answer my question....;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
What it comes down to is that you THINK the 4mb cpu's have a huge advantage since you see the majority of outrageous clocks and low pi scores coming from them when, in fact, the cache plays MUCH lesser of a role in a 32m run vs. a 1m run. The difference - percentage wise - between the 4mb cpu's and 2mb cpu's is HUUUUUUGE :p: in a 1m run but it's a whole 'nother story when you compare 32m's......
2M
http://img67.imageshack.us/img67/512...m15703scz1.png
4M
http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/3...m03968slo9.png
Not exactly the same clocks, but as can be seen the difference is very small. May be sub-13mins is possible with both CPUs and 2Gb of RAM instead of my good ol 1Gb kit.
i don't test 1M much to be honest (this is a 32M challenge thread :p:)Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
but in my testing on B1 steppings there was as much as 40 seconds difference between 2M vs 4MB
looks like Before's benches look more like half that on B2 steppings....
Thank you my friend :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by before
So who's gonna be the first to admit they were wrong? lol........
LOL let's see clock for clock differenceQuote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
and i think 20-40 seconds is massive lol.....it isn't to you?!?
Here are the good screenies to compare... same clocks, same timings; same tweaking
2M
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/4...m06954sks5.png
4M
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/5...m02546sln2.png
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/4125/crazyboydw7.png
And 32m's is what I was originally talking about.....40 seconds is a HUUUUUGE difference :confused: ? On a 15 minute 32m run, that's less than a 5% difference.....Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Wow....that's pretty damn close :clap: (Actually even closer than I thought possible)....LOL @ the Super Tulip Gardena SPD :DQuote:
Originally Posted by before
OMG :eek: how the hell did you do that
i'm gonna pretend this didn't happen :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
ok :banana::banana::banana::banana: it i'm going to do the test now E6600ES B1 vs E6300ES B1 at 400MHz FSB.........same settings
Quote:
Originally Posted by before
looks like mine yours and evas definition of huge differs considerably lolQuote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
i'm gonna have to take it back what i said about the Polish overclocker cheating as Before clearly demonstrated it is possible(well sort of....with the right RAM clocks) hehe.............it's crazy wow
ES's don't really give a very good indication in terms of final performance numbers, even more so with the B1's. You'll get a better picture with a B2 ES, but ultimately it's the retail chips that count ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
looks like i was badly wrong........i must have been comparing 1333 strap on E6300 due to high FSB benching i did with it and 1066 strap on E6600 as most of my SuperPI benching was at 3.6Ghz
anyways here is the full story with screenshots to go
FIRST UP E6600ES B1 BIOS SHOTS AND 32M SuperPI RUN:
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/4549/dsc03807td9.jpg
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/673/dsc03805bu1.jpg
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/2276/dsc03806lu4.jpg
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/7...rpi28ghir4.jpg
NEXT UP E6300ES B1 BIOS SHOTS AND 32M SuperPI RUN:
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/9388/dsc03808fy5.jpg
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/9224/dsc03810aj4.jpg
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/7397/dsc03809as0.jpg
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/5...rpi28ghcl6.jpg
BASICALLY 3 seconds difference........that's it :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
Nice testing buddy! :)
thanks for pointing this out........it was pretty ignorant of me not to repeat my testing after some time you know what i mean :) :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by before
wow I'm surprised too but then i never touched a 2MB cache chip lol
but still if you're going for world ranked pi times 4MB cache is the key as every second counts :)
@dinos22: :toast:
@eva2000: of course you're right... BTW a well tweaked 2M run @Spi32M easily beats an 'average' 4M run.
Thanks for clearing that up before :clap:
and thanks dinos for the bios shots with your benchies, removes all doubt now really :clap: :toast: :banana:
Gave sub 14 another shot:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6.../32Msub143.jpg
What am i doing wrong?? :confused:
This thread is on fire!! I love it.
@nicke...yah I stole your girl
@zeus...from my testing ram mhz as a huge effect on time in 32m regardless of main or adv timings. Also booting at a tighter strap helps.
@before...How you like the commando compared to the p5b bro?? I am thinking of getting one.
No your little dirty :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana: stay away from her! I will kill twitch for telling you who she was!! Damn that guy!
Your buddy didnt tell me, I figured it out on my own ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by NiCKE^
Yeah sure, and the earth is flat? :stick: :toast: :banana: :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
I'm serious bro...ask him. She's in alot of the modded car magazines, and guess what?? She's mine now :DQuote:
Originally Posted by NiCKE^
Hah she will always belong to me! But the worst part is that most users will think "Oh look at him he took the girl k|ngp|n's avatar" and not the other way around.
Yeah I know she started to pose in a car magazine IIRC.
But one thing is for sure SHE IS MINE! MOAHAHAHA :D