Venice, Stepping and Oc Database

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-05-2005, 11:02 PM
TEDY

overcrash...holly glory!!!!!...watercolling without HS ?

2900 at only 1.5v wow...that's 1.55v in bios :)....only 32°c ? wow....tried S&M at 100& ? :=)
06-05-2005, 11:54 PM
babyelf

lol load temps lower than my idle by 6 lol..

maybe i should take it off as well when i get my venice :D
06-06-2005, 12:11 AM
Seriola

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aoeplus

0516 CPBW is very bad ,is it max????? :soap:

I'd be quite pleased with that Aeoplus! I paid for a 3800+ CPBW and run at your speed! You bought a 3000! + CPBW appears to be a sub 3ghz, but well see about that when my gskill LA arrives :woot: good job
06-06-2005, 01:18 AM
overcrash86

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEDY

overcrash...holly glory!!!!!...watercolling without HS ?

2900 at only 1.5v wow...that's 1.55v in bios :)....only 32°c ? wow....tried S&M at 100& ? :=)

yes Watercool without IHS and 1.55v selected into BIOS, i've tested 2950 1.52v isn't stable more than 1H ,now testing 1.552v (cpu-z)
06-06-2005, 02:42 AM
187(V)URD@

I wanna take the ihs off with my wc cooling but i am bit scared that i crush the core. :|
06-06-2005, 02:45 AM
Dani

What a *ell is wrong with my 3200+ 0517BPDW :confused: :confused:

http://koti.mbnet.fi/dani69/DFI%20nF...re%201h25m.gif
06-06-2005, 03:43 AM
perry_78

Batch number is in high 700s :(

So far 240*10 at default. Probably the worst 0517 there is :(
06-06-2005, 03:45 AM
overcrash86

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juliette

Batch number is in high 700s :(

So far 240*10 at default. Probably the worst 0517 there is :(

cooling box :confused:
06-06-2005, 03:55 AM
perry_78

My 3200+:

ADA3200DAA4BP
LBBLE 0517GPPW
Z644446E50709

240*10 at default vcore and no more.

Will try water later, this stock isn't doing me much good. Just found out my winchester is suffering from the concave syndrome, hope that will beat my venice once i get it lapped :mad:
06-06-2005, 04:25 AM
Jupiler

First test with my new 3000+ Venice.
Bought it last week in a local store (it was the only 3000+ I could find in 3 stores) but had to wait for my DFI to return from RMA.

LBBLE 0517BPEW
Zxxxxxxx0589

I had some initial problems with the cpu running stable, using the 510-1 bios on my SLI-D.
Flashed back to 310P bios and seems running fine now.
Had to change some memory timings (2*512MB Corsair PC3500) though, but still searching and tweaking.

Anyway,
Managed to run SuperPi 1M at 2900Mhz, 1.61-1.63V with watercooling.
Right now, it's running Prime at 2700Mhz, 1.47V. Not bad for a start, I'd say.

http://users.skynet.be/MetalHead/300...ce/2900Mhz.jpg

http://users.skynet.be/MetalHead/300.../2700Prime.jpg
06-06-2005, 04:27 AM
exscape

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juliette

Batch number is in high 700s :(

So far 240*10 at default. Probably the worst 0517 there is :(

My batch number is 892. :slapass:
06-06-2005, 04:36 AM
perry_78

But yours does 2600mhz. Mine won't :( Can't seem to get over 2400mhz stable, even eat 1,6V
06-06-2005, 04:40 AM
perry_78

Bah! I've had enough, this is one terrible CPU.

It's being RMA'd and has been agreed to by the company I bought it at :)
06-06-2005, 06:29 AM
Mr.President

has anybody an 0519???
and whats better?
an high or low batchnummber?
06-06-2005, 07:18 AM
187(V)URD@

i guess low batchnumbers.
06-06-2005, 09:03 AM
TEDY

holly :banana::banana::banana::banana:

CPU BURN-IN and running S&M really helped.....

At 2800 I started with 1.5v, now i'm at 1.485v.....will try 1.475 tomorrow.....that's settings in bios :>
06-06-2005, 09:04 AM
Mr.President

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEDY

CPU BURN V1.01 ok ? ok i'm running it now

311*9 at 1.5v as i know it's prime rock stable....so i'll let it burn for next 9 hours when i go to sleep....

So i try tomorrow same settings with a little less vcore ???

But what if it reboots ?

Where to get S&M ?

what cooling do you use?
i will get a 0517 dpmw too :D

2808 @ 1,5v seems very good :slobber:
06-06-2005, 09:35 AM
Dani

Hmm, maybe I will use CPU Burn-In and S&M
Hope I can get my BPDW 3.1GHz stable at 1.5V :woot:

Im stuckt at 3056MHz 1.5V StressPrime2004 stable :slapass:
06-06-2005, 09:43 AM
Jupiler

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.President

has anybody an 0519???
and whats better?
an high or low batchnummber?

Mine is 0589.

I know a guy who has 2 3200+. One has a batch number 5xx, the other 9xx.
The second one (9xx) clocks better than the 5xx one. Pure luck?
06-06-2005, 09:46 AM
ReelMonza

lower batch number is just plain BS
06-06-2005, 10:22 AM
perry_78

Perhaps. From my own experience a lower batch number was always better - I'm giving my own venice another un, I hope it's only a ram issue.
06-06-2005, 10:50 AM
TEDY

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.President

what cooling do you use?
i will get a 0517 dpmw too :D

2808 @ 1,5v seems very good :slobber:

A sucky Zalman 7000B-AlCu
06-06-2005, 11:48 AM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReelMonza

lower batch number is just plain BS

Hey, you've wasted two thread spots with this and haven't yet explained your reasoning. I made a statement and then offered an explanation of why I had come to my conclusion. You basically are just saying it to say it. Please, let us know why you think the way you do.....
06-06-2005, 12:53 PM
ReelMonza

Can you show me some OFFICIAL AMD info regarding these numbers ?

I had a 0019 and a 0243 JIUHB XPMW, the 0243 OC a LOT better than the "lower batch" one.

Lots of people already shown that lower batch numbers doesn't always translate into higher OC's, so if I were you I would stop telling ppl to get "lower batch" ones cause they OC better...

EDIT: 0243 could do 2.55GHz @ 1.9v and 0019 would do the same @ 2.1v
06-06-2005, 01:00 PM
Nubius

I've got an LBBLE 0518APFW 3200+.......however I won't be able to use it until DFI releases their nf3 socket939 AGP board, or if they don't do that, then I'll have to sell my current GT to go PCI-E

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page