Its me or when something " not too bad " is wrote about AMD, the article is from Slobodan, and when it is "really bad " for AMD, the article is from Fuad ?
Well anyway, we should know all in 3 days,
:D
http://i.imgur.com/Xumz6.jpg
:rofl:
No idea if we can trust this .
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/646/bf3af.jpg
GTX580 vs 7970 : 1920x1080 FXAA / MSAA - 5760x1080 FXAA /MSAA ( 4xMSAA? )
I hate marketeers. They're even too stupid to compile correct graphs.
double post...
And its far to easy with basic photoshop skill to change the value on left ...
looks a bit fishy, but I like the Eyefinity results. :p:
Oh, nice. I'm curious about the reduced shimmering on AF. It could be a nice little improvement on image quality. Eager to see the results of this :)
They look FAR more professional and polished, that's for sure. And from what I looked at, far more realistic.
AMD PowerSlide Technology
maximum watermark performance when you need it!
lol
Seriously hate those benchmark charts where the competing product always has a 1.0 ratio while the newer product obviously has a higher performance bar, better wait for more better benchmark charts.
100% agree with you
Interessant steady video feature .... For local memory ( aka system virtual memory ), well we will need to wait some games who use it.
People tend to buy what is "better" which is often based upon things they come into contact with so there such make sense same as the way its suppose to play slogans.
few games needs more horsepower at 1920x1080 unless we talk the amount of AA and such.
I look forward more at 5040x1050 my gaming resolution.
To measure a new card is kinda though, do we use dx9 or dx10 or dx10.1 or dx11 only?
Games also are mostly consol based design, even BF3 which if you ask me is one game that shows dx11 to a extent.
good to have some news to talk about tho ;)
My HD4850 is struggling with Morrowind at 720p, and my friends HD6850 isn't enough for 1080p, we don't even have the highest settings. So I definitely see a need for the horsepower of an unlocked 7950 in my rig now. :)
Driver problem. A card that can run Crysis decently at 720p wont struggle with an ancient game unless something is very wrong...
Don't really see the point of mention how inaccurate any given graph is from whatever company when they are releasing a new product. It's always like this, and thats basically how marketing works. We on this forum should just sit tight and wait for proper results. ;)
I will find it very interesting to see how much the 6950 will drop after the launch of the 79xx series.
It's a difference between Morrowind and Morrowind. ;)
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/415/morrowind1v.jpg
http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/9441/morrowind12.jpg
http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/1766/morrowind10.jpg
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/7632/morrowind14.jpg
I run Morrowind Overhaul 2.0. :)
Makes Skyrim look like the ten year old game. ;)
GPU-Z v0.5.7
Quote:
Added support for AMD Radeon HD 7970, HD 7350
Fixed "APIC counter broken" message on AMD Fusion Graphics
Fixed PCIe 3.0 showing up as 2.0
Fixed fillrate calculation on Fermi architecture
Fixed ROP count on GT 420, GT 520, HD 5450, HD 6450
Fixed random values showing as default clocks on some NVIDIA cards
Fixed random value showing as shader clock on NVIDIA cards without shader clock
Added / corrected release dates for HD 3650, FirePro V4800 and V3800
Added process size, die size, transistor count for Radeon E6760
Added transistor count for FirePro V4900
Improved detection for HD 5570, HD 6450A, HD 6470M