I've been noticing lots of peeps bumping threads lately...TMK, thats a big no-no around these parts.
Printable View
I've been noticing lots of peeps bumping threads lately...TMK, thats a big no-no around these parts.
skinnee, why is bumping threads an issue (if someone is constantly bumping the same thread every second thats a problem but if a thread that people are interested in falls away whats the point with bringing it back to attention (though admitidly it would be better if it was brought back with new information but ...))
Wasn't directing at everyone, just some of the recent ones I have seen the questions were answered but the threads were bumped repeatedly after with nothing more than a "bump" post.
Sorry guys, thought this thread was comedy so I wanted to keep it going. I'll lay off the bumps, I promise... :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealRedRaider
Now that's funny.......
...and possible true...:rolleyes:
Hiw very constructive.Quote:
Originally Posted by hotdun
OOooo Interesting, if those Q6600 #'s are correct I may have to pick this up when it comes out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Repliquant67
Finally, some internal shots.
That article is claiming a .75ēC improvement over an EK Supreme and 1.25ēC over Fuzion V2 at 1.5GPM for both.
Thanks for the pics Rosco! You rocks§§
(I've just rehost them to save bandwidth ;) )
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/3473/gtz1sqq6.jpg
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/9499/gtz2szg0.jpg
http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/6595/gtz5swx2.jpg
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/5710/gtz3de6.png
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/4192/gtz4kn0.jpg
we have a new king...:worship:
i would like to see some more testing though..
pics are soo small! but atleast we know what it looks like now
http://www.cooling-masters.com/image...00808/gtz1.jpg
http://www.cooling-masters.com/image...00808/gtz2.jpg
yeah... like i said i would like to see some more testing... :)
i prefer supreme looks wise but if these results are accurate i just cant deny!
Look promising but let's wait for some cold hard numbers ;)
i think there should be a seal between the jet plate and the top
from the drawings it looks like the plate is just seated in plate as well
nothing to keep it from moving. none the less i think the base looks awesome
just curious to why they would make a base a semi pin array and use
a vertical/horizontal jet. i guess the impact surface area would be more even
also dont understand why they would put the channels on the side,
looks like it blocks flow, i guess more turbulence is good. none the less looks
like a pretty awesome design
Just in case you don't read French, Rosco states in his preview that it will be as restrictve as a Storm :/
ouch :hitself: thats not good to hear :\Quote:
Originally Posted by aster
Gabe...a GTZ would be a great way to break in my test bench! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by disruptfam
Those numbers are SWIFTECH numbers, not independently tested... however I have no reason no doubt their numbers.Quote:
Originally Posted by disruptfam
No, Gabe performed that test. Actually Stephen did but, same difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by RealRedRaider
So what?Quote:
Originally Posted by aster
Missed the restriction thing (I can read french but some weird words use threw me off) but like Scott said, so what ? In the Storm days, people is buying them and just adjust the pumping power and loops around that.
ohh, if these numbers are correct I'll change my Fuzion.
The pressure drop looks similar to the ones for a Fuzion V2 with a 6.5mm nozzle, so our current pumps should work OK.
It is not that different from the EK Supreme.
Some restriction isn't a bad thing, it'll make the people with the RD30 happy to put their pumps to use again :D Heck even the 18W DDC should do fine, it handled the storm OK.