TJ Max for Sandy is 98C.
TJ Max for Ivy is reported as 105C.
Printable View
TJ Max for Sandy is 98C.
TJ Max for Ivy is reported as 105C.
IB runs much hotter than SB. It's been reported everywhere. Even here. ;)
"Ivy Bridge exhibits much higher temperatures during full load due to its 22nm process, which will probably only get better though cooling optimizations and better contact between the HIS and the CPU Die."
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...s+Overclocking
what is latest version?
It would be nice to have a Min/Max CPU temp when hover on systray like the GPU Min/Max, will we see it in the next update, tnx? :toast:
Hi Uncle :wave:
I would like to ask do you have anything documenting RTCore.dll. I am writing a plugin for LCD Smartie to get CPU core temps, and I would love to use your library if that is ok with you.
Thanks
Hi
If I remember correctly Real Temp gave an approximation of watts usage on Sandy Bridge ?
Can we has this for Ivy ?
Thankies
Intel came up with a great idea so monitoring software could easily read power consumption data directly from the CPU. This data is used internally by Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge CPUs to control the amount of Turbo Boost. Unfortunately, this data is based on the VID voltage and not the actual core voltage. If you go into the bios and change the CPU core voltage manually, this estimated power consumption number will not be accurate. I will try to add this data back to RealTemp in the near future for Ivy Bridge CPUs.
RTCore.dll was designed to work with RivaTuner. When RivaTuner was replaced by MSI Afterburner, I stopped working on the RTCore.dll plugin. Reading the core temperature of a Core i CPU is trivial. You would be better off just writing your own code but you can try and use the RTCore.dll however you like.
What if you take the power consumption, divide it with CPU VID, and multiply it by vCore? Wouldn't it give approximate real power?
[thinking out loud]If you read first one, then before you read second one everything drops, you could get abnormal result, very high power consumption.[/thinking out loud]
If you were doing some Prime95 or similar testing where the VID and actual voltage were fairly consistent, you probably could come up with some sort of correction factor.
Power consumption in a CPU is proportional to voltage squared. If VID voltage was 1.20 volts and actual voltage was 10% higher at 1.32 volts then the correction factor would be:
1.10 x 1.10 = 1.21
In that case, actual power consumption would be about 21% higher than what RealTemp is showing.
Does any software show actual power consumption based on actual voltage? Any monitoring software that uses the Intel method and the Intel recommended power consumption register is not accurate.
Okay thanks for your efforts, excellent program :-)
Hi Unclewebb, does RT support Rainmeter? If not, may I request it? :worship:
unclewebb, so what about mac os X version? ;)
Uncle Webb, maybe you can make a version that supports an 8core chip on your free time. Thanks...
Apologies if am asking too much.
Hi maxxx, I am pretty sure I did make an 8 core version of RealTemp once upon a time but the guy I wrote it for said it was too big and ugly so I scrapped it. Unfortunately I don't have enough time or hardware for an 8 core update now.
Lately I have been working on a special edition of RealTemp for my friends over at Tech|Inferno which is just about done.
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/2225/realtempti.png
It includes the return of VID and VID based power consumption monitoring for Intel's 3rd Generation Core i CPUs.
I also added a column to report the CPU Package temperature but in my testing, that just looks like the maximum of the 4 cores so that is not too useful.
There is also a new C-State reporting window. I like using C3/C6 to save some power but most enthusiasts at XS turn that junk off when overclocking.
WaterFlex: I don't know of any easy way to read CPU registers in OS X. In Windows I am using the WinRing0 library but I don't know of anything equivalent for Mac. I also don't own a Mac or any sort of development tools so you're out of luck unless you are running Boot Camp.
hey why i have such big difference between cores?
Maybe you don't install your CPU Cooler well or maybe you don't put the TIM ok ?
difference is around 5-7?c from coolest cpu 0 to warmest cpu 3....using i5 2500k/asrock z68 e4g3 etc.
The difference is ok. :)
RealTemp seems to have a problem starting on Windows 8. Will run and work fine when you click on it, but will not start with Windows 8. Tried putting shortcut in start-up folder, reg entry in current user run and even task scheduler with elevated privileges, it just wont run at start-up. Even tried another PC with Windows 8, same thing. Any ideas Uncle Webb? Thanks.
edit: OK got it to start with task scheduler. It only worked when I selected the "run when user is logged on" option, it wont work if "run whether user is logged on or not" .
Seems 8 is a bit more difficult to work with start up programs:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1...n-requirements
if you run it before a user logs on, then you won't be able to see the system tray icon or open the window when you log on. this is part of how win7 works so i assume win8 is the same.
Starting RealTemp with Windows 7.
http://forum.notebookreview.com/hard...ml#post6865107
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...essors/page146 Post #3645
I think that works in Windows 8 but I haven't done any recent testing.
Maybe this weekend I will get around to finishing off RealTemp T|I.
http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/2...empaisuite.png
Unclewebb: may we know the difference from the regular version of RealTemp? TIA....Quote:
Maybe this weekend I will get around to finishing off RealTemp T|I.
Here's the README file for the new T|I version.
http://www.mediafire.com/?ouo9lzeuu9r0tkq
The program should be ready for download within the next day. I will post a link when it is up.
I am just beta testing a few minor features and updates, mostly for the newer Sandy and Ivy Bridge CPUs.