Thanks, I'll give this a try when I get home.Quote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
Printable View
Thanks, I'll give this a try when I get home.Quote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
i still didn't manage to get a stable linx test..
it drops on the 14, 17 and 18th test...
http://i645.photobucket.com/albums/u...ka_189/oc1.png
this is my bios template..(1102)
is there anything that i've overlooked here..?Code:Target CPU Frequency 4000MHz
Target DRAM Frequency 1604MHz
LN2 Mode: Disabled***
QPI Loadline Calibration: Disabled***
Sync Mode [Enabled]
AI Overclock Tuner [Manual]
OC From CPU level Up [Auto]
2D Performance Booster [Disabled]
CPU Ratio Setting [25.0]
CPU Turbo Power Limit [Disabled]
>CPU Configuration----------------------------
CPU Ratio Setting [25.0]
C1E Support [Disabled]
Hardware Prefetcher [Disabled]
Adjacent Cache Line Prefetcher [Disabled]
MPS and ACPI MADT ordering [Modern]
Intel(R) Virtualization Tech [Disabled]
CPU TM Function [Disabled]
Execute Disable Bit [Disabled]
Intel(R) HT Technology [Disabled]
Active Processor Cores [All]
A20M [Disabled]
Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) Tech [Disabled]
Performance/Watt select [Power]
Intel(R) C-STATE Tech [Disabled]
C State package limit setting [Auto]
C1 Auto Demotion [Enabled]
C3 Auto Demotion [Enabled]
----------------------------------------------
BCLK Frequency [160]
PCIE Frequency [100]
DRAM Frequency [1604]
UCLK Frequency [3528]
QPI Link Data Rate [7057]
Memory Configuration Protect [Disabled]
>DRAM Timing Control--------------------------
CAS# Latency 6 [8]
RAS# to CAS# Delay 7 [8]
RAS# PRE Time 6 [8]
RAS# ACT Time 18 [24]
RAS# to RAS# Delay 4 [auto]
REF Cycle Time 72 [88]
WRITE Recovery Time 10 [auto]
READ to PRE Time 6 [auto]
FOUR ACT WIN Time 24 [Auto]
Back-To-BackCAS# Delay 0 [Auto]
Timing Mode 1N [1N]
Round Trip Latency on CHA 59 [auto]
Round Trip Latency on CHB 61 [auto]
Round Trip Latency on CHC 62 [auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(DD) 8 [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(DR) 8 [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(SR) 18 [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DD) 7 [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DR) 7 [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(SR) 7 [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DD) 7 [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DR) 6 [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(SR) 4 [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DD) 7 [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DR) 7 [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(SR) 4 [Auto]
----------------------------------------------
CPU Differential Amplitude [Auto]
CPU Clock Skew [Auto]
IOH Clock Skew [Auto]
------------ Extreme Engine Digi+ ------------
Digi+ PWR Mode [T-Balanced]
PWR Volt. Control [Auto]
Load-Line Calibration [auto]
CPU Voltege OCP [Enabled]
CPU PWM Frequency [Auto]
Extreme OV [Disabled]
Extreme OC [Auto]
CPU Voltage 1.343 [1.31250]
CPU PLL Voltage 1.349 [auto]
QPI/DRAM Core Voltage 1.429 [1.43125]
DRAM Bus Voltage 1.654 [1.65625]
>DRAM REF Voltages----------------------------
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHA [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHA [Auto]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHB [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHB [Auto]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHC [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHC [Auto]
----------------------------------------------
IOH Voltage 1.111 [Auto]
IOH PCIE Voltage 1.508 [Auto]
ICH Voltage 1.111 [Auto]
ICH PCIE Voltage [Auto]
*QPI Voltage OCP [auto]
*IOH Voltage OCP [auto]
*DRAM Voltage OCP [auto]
*QPI PWM Frequency [Auto]
*IOH PWM Frequency [Auto]
*DRAM PWM Frequency [Auto]
---------- Spread Spectrum Control -----------
CPU Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
DRAM Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
***on-board jumper dependant
That looks good, I wouldn't worry about it dropping fractions of a gflop here and there, could be background process related as is not IMO demonstrative of an issue.
you can see on my cpu-tweak, the uncore clock turns to be 10xxxmhz when it is actually 35xxmhz..!!..Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK
is that a bug issue..?
Yeah looks like it, with mine it doesn't detect the core multi/freq properly. I just use CPU-Z
Can somebody direct me to a good overview of oc'ing i7's and/our this board in particular. It's ben quite a while since I oc'd last build ran stable for a long time and didn't have half the features of this board.
Need a refresher.
Running an 970 six core now.
A almost 4400 posts digging through here for relevant info is a pain.
Sent from my X10a using Tapatalk
Not sure Ive seen one. Try and not use lowest uncore speed is the one thing I picked up for gulfies. Other than that specifically what kind of info are you after?
I keep hearing this as well, but when I increase my uncore mult x1 from lowest, I have stability issues... I think there can be a lot of variation as to what's good and what's not for individual cpus. Just like CPU PLL on R3E, different values work better for different cpus.Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK
I think the important thing to know is these things *can* help, but you won't know if it will help *you* specifically unless you try it.
If I were you I'd just look through the thread in reverse order, and find a BIOS template someone posted that is ~ the speed you want, and work from there.
i7-970 @ Watercooling
4813 Mhz @ 1,501v. @ Prime95 26.4 :cool:
http://www.abload.de/thumb/4813mhz15...7uncorn7v9.jpg
5187 Mhz @ SuperPI 1M :D
http://www.abload.de/thumb/superpi1m5187mhzq7xg.jpg
this is a new version of bios?Quote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
I'll take an order of that with a side order of ram tweaks.Quote:
Originally Posted by mahaudi
Honestly I'd like a good noob guide to start off with. I have no idea what I've forgotten.
Sent from my X10a using Tapatalk
This isn't a noob forum so you're not going to get any noob guides dude.Quote:
Originally Posted by MagisD
New Bios 1207
1. Improved DRAM compatibility
2. Fixed S3 resume fail when USB 3.0 controller was disabled
3. Fix incorrect CPU temperature may display in BIOS setup menu when the temperature is under 0 degree
4. Support GPU tweakit function
ftp://ftp.asus.com.tw/pub/asus/mb/LG...-ASUS-1207.zip
days behind.Quote:
Originally Posted by mahaudi
is that safe to run on a regular day basis(24/7), especially on the high the cpu/vtt at 1.43125v..Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahaudi
03/04/2011
1.43125v BIOS is going to give you around 0.1v less by Raju's measurements. My 1st board was closer from the MLCC's at the back of the CPU socket (with VTT LLC enabled I would set 1.29v and get 1.28v) but you'd have to measure to know for sure on your board. I haven't measured my new one.Quote:
Originally Posted by kaka_89
Anything under intel spec is safe.
!!!!! well i may have found a cure of my frustration. out of all the bios out there, 1207 finally seems to be showing promise.
i've been endlessly trying to be apart of the 4.5 club and it seems i might have gotten it finally with 1207. every time i tried with other bios it would get to about 4.4 and then it refused to go any further. i could push it to 4.5 while in windows, but i couldn't get it to post at startup afterwords.
UPDATE: something i find to be annoying... 1207 seems to have issues on startup or cold starts. it takes several shut downs to finally get it to start booting...
Same here ! >_<Quote:
Originally Posted by skuldarin
No problems here with 1207, but I went for 0003. Those 0xxx were always better for my HW combo then 1xxx since 9124 crossroad.
the 0003 requires less tensions, etc. ... than the 1207?Quote:
Originally Posted by donmarkoni
Tensions to the hardware, or to my brain trying to tweak it? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by tistou77
Anyway, I don't know, cause I didn't test 1207 much, just booted one evening on standard settings and flashed 0003 tomorrow, no tweaking or testing.
So far positive results with 1207 for me. Exact 1005 settings were stable.
Now testing at 21x205. I want the extra 100mhz! ;)
More bclk needs so much more IOH! 200 I only need 1.2 IOH, 205 I need 1.272.
Edit:
I tested CPU PLL 1.2 and it seems better than 1.55v!
Well my ram kit worked perfectly first try with 1207. Xmp profile. Couldn't do more then 1333 stable before.
Now to work off that for oc.
Sent from my X10a using Tapatalk