I have a larger vDrop and vDroop on my Q814 (low vid) compared to my Q817 (high vid). So it has to be somewhat processor related. The difference was from almost no drops at all to 0.06-0.07v combined.
Printable View
I have a larger vDrop and vDroop on my Q814 (low vid) compared to my Q817 (high vid). So it has to be somewhat processor related. The difference was from almost no drops at all to 0.06-0.07v combined.
Quote:
Originally Posted by H4wk
1.4 pretty safe and 1.45 max (going by intel)
janolle .. eye had both 817&814 both drooped the same on my mobo .04 v (under load)
the drop was the same also (from bios to windows)
needless to say sold the 817 ;)
here is my 24/7 im sure i could do alot better with some better ram!
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z...Guage/4000.jpg
Updated
FPO#:Q807A185
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/7...al90vk3.th.png
;)
I got a question guys. So I overclocked up to 3.8ghz. I actually lowered my voltage compared to what it came at stock. I ran OCCT for an hour, and no errors at all. I was told running OCCT for an hour, was as good as running Prime95 for 24. I have a picture of everything. Could somsone let me know if this is fine, and if with these temps it would be safe to push it more? Under max load using OCCT the temp went up as high as 67c With Vdroop my voltage goes down to 1.272
http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x46/Trax416/test.jpg
Don't believe everything you read in a forum! I'd much rather be 24 hours Prime small FFTs stable as compared to 1 hour OCCT stable. The important thing is to be stable for whatever you use your computer for. A game crashing isn't as important as a nuclear power plant going down because the guy in the control room was going for a big OC. :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewL1950
Your max temperature in RealTemp only shows 51C. That's the important number. If RealTemp maxed out at 67C then I wouldn't go any higher. If OCCT is showing you 67C then ignore it. At 51C you still have some more head room to give 'er some more voltage and some more MHz without burning down the house. :up:
Thanks for the info. That Realtemp was opened just after OCCT finished. I had another RealTemp running, which maxed out at 67C. So I will not push it any farther until I pick up a True 120. I am using the baby version of Noctua's flagship HSF, so I have a lot of room to work lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
I just wanted to make sure I OC'd it right. I see a lot of people talking about increasing NOrth Bridge temps, etc.., and I don't really understand that.
Anyway what does absolute max mean? Does it mean CPU can operate under this conditions if not going over max allowed temperatures?
And what's the max safe CPU VTT (CPU FSB) for 24/7 overclock?
Is it better to run memory Linked or Unlinked?If I run Unlinked at max clocks I get better memory bandwidth in Everest but in real life does CPU take advantage of that?
Anyone have any idea why, at idle, and at max load, my cores are 10C apart? Core1 being on the high end, Core 0 being on the low end?
today i got my Q807 E8500 For Rma and i got a new one Q806
it dose a bil lower Mhz from the old one but he can do more fsb stable :p stil 540Mhz wall on my board
after two hours of testing and priming i got this for 24/7
i sill lowering the Vcore to see how stable he can be
and some strange thing : if the core 0 has gtl lower than 73% he is not stable even @ 3017Mhz :/
when i find at what Vcore is stable for 500x8 i will post some ss
The Actual Vcore is 1.34 just as the sidebar measured with a multimeter, abit IP35 Pro has a huge Vdroop and i am just to boring to just it :D
http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/5...0001fz8.th.jpg
Mostly because these sensors are less than perfect. They were designed to accurately trigger thermal throttling at about 95C and thermal shut down at about 125C and I've yet to hear of one processor that couldn't do this job adequately. Each CPU is individually calibrated by Intel for that reason.Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewL1950
Some of these sensors just aren't great at reporting low temperatures. You can read the RealTemp docs and try the calibration procedure. Your temps should look a little better but they won't be perfect.
For those that missed it, Intel plans to release the full specifications for the 45nm temperature sensors at next weeks IDF. This should make it far easier for all programmers, including myself, to better interpret the data coming from these sensors. I don't think there's anything they can say that is going to make these sensors perfect but maybe there is some additional temp info hiding in these chips that no one knows about.
http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/showpost.aspx?i=478
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/IDF...ture,6154.html
It's wise to not push past 67C. A True will be your new best friend!
Here's the latest beta of RealTemp with a more modern look:
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...alTempBeta.zip
I'm waiting for the E8400 & E8500 with E0 steppings, they may address the Wolfdale temp sensor issue, the other thing I'm noticing with my E8400 (C0)
is my Vcore is creeping upwards, I need more Vcore today to reach the same overclock than when it was new 6 months ago.
and thanks for the latest RealTemp !
i thing with the new stepping they fixed the degrade too :/
i'am trying mine Q801 ( E8500 ) with 1.55 @ 4.3Ghz he is ok for now :p
but i'am sure in one week i will need more than 1.6 for those Ghz
I'm not sure that a stepping change can fix it. It shouldn't degrade that quickly. Keep testing and let us know. This is very important information. Every Wolfdale seems to have an initial burn in period were it takes less volts to hit higher speeds for the first week. Then, you have to increase the volts. It seems to be a one time thing.Quote:
i thing with the new stepping they fixed the degrade too :/
i'am trying mine Q801 ( E8500 ) with 1.55 @ 4.3Ghz he is ok for now :p
but i'am sure in one week i will need more than 1.6 for those Ghz
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Is anyone getting E0 steppings for the E8400/8500?
It clearly says in the Intel documentation that if you go beyond the Absolute Maximum core voltage which is 1.45 volts for 45nm, that your "reliability will be severely degraded."
Even in the gray area of 1.40 to 1.45 volts where many people here operate their 45nm processors 24/7, Intel still states that, "neither functionality nor long-term reliability can be expected.
If you want to push 1.55 volts or whatever through a 45nm CPU that's fine but if a month or 6 months from now you find that your processor has degraded, you shouldn't be too surprised by that. The only surprising thing would be if your processor didn't degrade. I don't think the new E0 stepping is going to significantly change the laws of physics that limit these CPUs.
2.6 Voltage and Current Specification
2.6.1 Absolute Maximum and Minimum Ratings
At conditions exceeding absolute maximum and minimum ratings, neither functionality nor long-term reliability can be expected. Moreover, if a device is subjected to these conditions for any length of time then, when returned to conditions within the functional operating condition limits, it will either not function, or its reliability will be severely degraded.
http://download.intel.com/design/pro...hts/318732.pdf
What they don't say in the documentation is the time frame they are talking about. It is my understanding that these chips are made to run for 10 - 20 years, maybe longer. For me, I just want a year or two. I'm curious just how fast they degrade. I know that this is a very complicated matter and that no two chips will be the same. Also, there is no formula that says 1.5v at 65degrees will kill a chip in x amount of days. I would like some ballpark figures though. We should start seeing some effects of high voltages within the next few months if this is actually the case. These chips have been out since November of 2007. We're going on ten months. I know some guys had to be running these at 1.5+volts this entire time. I just hope that they tested them properly.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that I don't believe them. I just wish I knew the specifics. I guess that I would need a Ph.D for that.
I like
3.0.5 Package Insertion Specifications
The processor can be inserted into and removed from a LGA775 socket 15 times.
16 times, it will explode.
Thanks for the link. That's good stuff.
How does this work in terms of chips with different vid values? For instance my old e8400 had a vid of 1.25. If i ran it at 1.4, I was overvolting it by 0.15. My new e8400 has a vid of 1.15 so if i ran it at 1.4 i would be overvolting by 0.25. Do these intel reccomendations count for all 45nm chips regardless of default vid?Quote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
my E8500 Q750A194
http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/f...9507-6-5-1.png
Mumid: My opinion would be that VID doesn't really matter. CPU VID tells a motherboard how much voltage a processor needs to run reliably at default MHz as well as how much voltage is needed to run reliably when C1E / SpeedStep are enabled. It doesn't really change the fact that these are all 45nm chips and the Intel Minimum and Maximum ratings apply to all 45nm CPUs.
I don't think there will ever be enough scientifically collected information to come up with a reliable model to predict the life span and how much these processors will degrade vs time. If you can't afford to run out tomorrow and buy a new one then I'd play it safe and wouldn't go over 1.40 volts. For most people, a tank of gas and a low end processor is about the same price these days so if a processor gets fried, it's no big deal. :D
Rickpatbrown: I think the documentation is very clear about time.
"...if a device is subjected to these conditions for any length of time..."
Obviously Intel needs to be a little conservative to keep the RMA numbers down but if you plan to keep your CPU for a couple of years then going by the Intel docs isn't such a bad idea.
i got a new e8500 q816a (which seems to be a good batch - for e8400). i get very high temps, even at default. its a decent overclocker, ie 4275 @ 1.32v bios, but the idle temps are around 55c. i checked my contact, and even swapped out my hs, but still same. if i was priming for 15 minutes or so @ 72c, the heatpipes on my xig should be hot to the touch? because they are not. i have had 3x 45nm chips like this now (not in a row), a q9450 and an e8600 and this. could they be making really bad contact with the ihs? this is with 3 out of around 10 cpus. vid as reported by realtemp 2.70 is 1.2250v.
Really high idle temperatures are usually a sign of sticking sensors. A good air cooler can dissipate a lot of heat quickly so it might not feel as hot as you think it should. Bad core to IHS contact is a possibility but if this was a problem I don't think it would be a good overclocker.
:rofl: οκ 4600Mhz with 1.8 now :p he is the worst chip i ever got and then he just died when he was priming on 4600Mhz so i show that the degrade cames on even lower voltages less than 1.4V and it is not for the first week only but for the whole life of the chip :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Rickpatbrown
Got my hands on these babies today :)
http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/5...0674ir5.th.jpg
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/2...0676pj5.th.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gligy
nice to see mate...waiting results.